PURPOSES OF ANALYSIS

Village of Woodridge
2011 Pavement Analysis
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
PURPOSES OF ANALYSIS
• EVALUATE EXISTING CONDITION OF STREET AND
BIKE PATH PAVEMENTS
• RATE STREETS AND BIKE PATHS RELATIVE TO
EXISTING CONDITION
• DEVELOP ALTERNATE METHODS FOR PAVEMENT
PRESERVATION/REHABILITATION
• DEVELOP A MULTI YEAR PAVEMENT
PRESERVATION PROGRAM
• NEW IDOT REQUIREMENT FOR MUNICIPALITIES TO
HAVE A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
PAVEMENT EVALUATION
• 95± CENTERLINE MILES OF STREETS
• 12.3± MILES OF BIKE PATH
• PAVEMENT SURFACE EVALUATION AND RATING,
“PASER” METHODOLOGY USED
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
PASER RATING SCALE
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
MOST PREDOMINATE
DISTRESS TYPE
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
COMPARISON WITH 2003 SURVEY
Percentage of Street Area
Pavement Condition
2003
2011
Good or Better
65.5%
44.0%
Fair
34.0%
54.9%
Poor
0.5%
1.1%
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM
The objectives of a Pavement Preservation Program
are to:
1) to provide an acceptable level of service by
maintaining adequate smoothness and surface
friction;
2) preserve the structural life of the pavement; and
3) protect the investment the Village has made in
it’s street system.
The strategy is to attend to pavements while they are
still in good condition, before they deteriorate to a
condition that requires costly major rehabilitation or
reconstruction.
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
PAVEMENT DETERIORATION CURVE
(for the Midwest region with seasonal changes and freeze/thaw cycles)
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
IMPACT OF PRESERVATION
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
TREATMENT METHODS OF
PRESERVATION AND REHABILITATION
• Crack Filling Along Edges of Pavement
• Crack Sealing
• Rejuvenators
• Slurry Seals or Micro-Surfacing
• Cold or Hot In-Place Recycling
• Surface or Full Depth Patching
• Minor Resurfacing
• Full Depth Resurfacing
• Reconstruction
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
RECOMMENDED
TREATMENT METHODS
• Crack Filling Along Edges of Pavement - $0.25/SY
(In Current Program)
• Crack Sealing - $0.85/SY
(In Current Program)
• Pavement Patching and Crack Sealing - $3.05/SY
(In Current Program)
• Minor Resurfacing - $15.30/SY (In Current Program)
• Full Depth Resurfacing - $29.30/SY
(Add to Current Program vs. waiting to reconstruct)
• Reconstruction - $69.40 to $89.50/SY (As Required)
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
MULTI YEAR PROGRAM
Period 1 – 2012 through 2017
Period 2 – 2018 through 2023
Period 3 – 2024 through 2029
Period 4 – 2030 through 2035
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
RECOMMENDED SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS
(Maintain existing level of service)
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
ESTIMATED ANNUAL
FUNDS NEEDED
*
*Estimated annual cost is based on the recommended cycle of
roadway treatments from the study – unknown pavement, soil,
and drainage conditions may impact the actual numbers
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
CURRENT FUNDING
The Village currently receives approximately
$1.075 million annually from Motor Fuel Tax and
Local Gas Tax Revenue.
From that amount, approximately $800,000* is
budgeted annually for pavement preservation.
*Balance of approximately $275,000 goes toward – MFT testing services, traffic sign materials, traffic light
maintenance, street light poles/fixtures/bulbs/ballasts, salt, salt brine, calcium chloride, pavement markings,
and bicycle path maintenance.
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
RECOMMENDED ROADWAY TREATMENT CYCLE
•
Adds Full Depth Resurfacing as a
treatment to be used
•
Goal of maintaining the existing average
level of service for the streets at 6.8
•
Requires additional funding beyond
existing MFT revenues
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
CONTINUING CURRENT ROADWAY TREATMENT
CYCLE
•
Keeps current treatment cycle (with
additional patching to take place and
reduced levels of resurfacing)
•
Based on existing MFT revenue levels
•
No treatments where deteriorated to a
point of requiring full depth work
•
Necessitates a unit cost for eventual
reconstruction of the roadway reconstruction is not part of the current
program
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
BICYCLE PATH CONDITION RATING
• All of the bicycle paths were found to be in “Good”
or better condition (Rating of 6 – 9)
• Continue existing program of sealcoating
approximately every 5 years with the recommended
addition of crack sealing
• Add isolated patching as needed
• Annual Estimated Expenses range from $17,416
(2012) to $20,054 (2016)
QUESTIONS REGARDING
THE PAVEMENT ANALYSIS
STUDY AND PRESENTATION
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
WORKSHOP FEEDBACK
1) Are you generally satisfied with the current level of
service for the overall Village roadway system?
a) Examples of Street Conditions
- Paser rating examples of 5.0 to 7.0 with pictures
- Overall street system has ratings from 3.0 to 10
b) Same approximate year in service
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
Paser Rating 5.0
Dean Drive
Built–1968
Paser Rating 5.5
Stillwell Court
Built–1968
Paser Rating 6.0
Jackson Drive
Built–1968
Paser Rating 6.5
Wolfe Drive
Built–1968
Paser Rating 6.8
(average street in Woodridge)
63rd Street
Built–1965
Paser Rating 7.0
Langley Court
Built–1968
WORKSHOP FEEDBACK
2) What level of service do you desire in the future?
a) To maintain the average Paser rating of 6.8 need to increase
annual pavement expenditures by approximately $750,000
b) Can calculate additional expenditure needed to reach any
desired level of service
c) Can utilize the existing revenue and reduce treatments
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.
WORKSHOP FEEDBACK
3) Do you wish to explore alternatives of increasing
funding for road maintenance?
a) Transfer current non-pavement preservation expenses out
of the MFT fund (i.e. salt, traffic signals, etc.) to the general
fund?
b) Decrease general fund expenses and conduct transfers
into the MFT fund for pavement preservation?
c) Evaluate current $0.01 gas tax?
d) Evaluate current level of sales tax?
e) Evaluate classification of additional FAU routes?
f) Pay as You Go vs. Bonding?
g) Other alternatives?
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.