UMKC ATHLETICS PRESENTATION
December 2, 2011
Points of Discussion
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Athletics History - Timeline
Forward.Together
Why Be in Division I
Case Studies
Divisional Comparison
Divisional Peers
Division I – National Competitiveness
Division I – Conference Competitiveness
Division I – Facility Success
Division I – Improved Scheduling with New Peer Group
Division I – UMKC Staffing
Division I – External Revenue Growth
Budget – Total Athletic Budget
Budget – Sports Operating Budget
Sources of Revenue – Student Fees, Institutional Support, External Support
UMKC Institutional Comparison
2
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Athletic History - Timeline
•
•
•
Intercollegiate athletics has been at UMKC for 57 years.
Program is entering its 24th year as a Division I program and 17th year in the Summit
League.
Four NCAA Tournament appearances in programs first 20 years, five in the past five
years.
1954
1969
Athletics
formed at
UMKC
1985
1987
1994
1st NCAA
team
invitation –
men’s tennis
(also 2000)
DI pursuit
presented by
KC Mayor
First year of
Division I
Athletics
joins NAIA
2001
1999
Joined the
Summit League
2005
2007
Men’s
basketball
11-game win
streak
Soccer
receives
NCAA
Tournament
invite (also
2003)
Tim Hall
hired as AD
4
Forward.Together
The Forward.Together strategic initiative was developed in 2007 by director of athletics Tim
Hall, to enhance and improve UMKC athletics in alignment with the institutional Mission and
Vision.
Key metrics of the Forward.Together plan included :
•
Academics –Reinforce focus for strong academics amongst our student athletes. (Place
Student Success at the Center.)
•
Competitiveness – Improve competitiveness within the Summit League and nationally
(Director’s Cup). Set goal of finishing in top-third of Summit League Commissioner’s Cup.
(Place Student Success at the Center, active engagement with its city and region).
•
Budget – Increase overall athletic budget support, which falls $2 million below the
conference average. Included in this goal will be to improve efficiencies and increase
external revenue support. (Strengthen resource base and financial capacity).
•
Attendance – UMKC will increase attendance in both men and women’s basketball.
(Strengthen resource base and financial capacity; active engagement with its city and
region).
•
Staffing – Improve administrative and coaching staffing levels, which fall in the bottomthird of the Summit League. (Place Student Success at the Center, Embrace Diversity).
•
Facilities – UMKC athletics facilities lag behind the Summit League. Follow-through on
initiatives to provide a world-class experience for our student-athletes and to be
competitive at the Division I level (Active engagement with its city and region).
5
DIVISION I
Why Division I
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Alignment with institutional peers - 19 of Urban 21 are Division I
programs.
“Alignment through competition” (i.e. KU, Mizzou, Kansas State)
Align highest level of intercollegiate athletic participation with
institutional goal of excellence in all endeavors.
National exposure and branding at Division I, that is not available in the
other intercollegiate athletic divisions.
Athletic Revenue Opportunities – NCAA, corporate sales, fundraising,
tickets, licensing.
Local Economic Impact
Local and national media – radio and television.
Opportunities to engage students, alumni and community.
Athletics as institutional “front porch.” Utilizing athletics as cornerstone
of institutional marketing and branding to expand recruiting base.
Enrollment impact – The Flutie Effect – study indicated impact that
athletic success with football and men’s basketball can have on
applications and enrollment.
2005 study the Empirical Effects of Division II Intercollegiate Athletics
indicated that athletic success did not translate into increased alumni
giving.
Value of Degree – (UConn FBS feasibility study indicated that students felt their
degree had “more value” if Uconn had FBS football, survey results replicated as part of
SIUE transition).
7
Division I – Case Studies
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Butler (consecutive Final Four appearances)
41% increase in applications.
20% increase in annual giving.
$640 million in television publicity value per Final Four “run” (Borshoff & Meltwater)
George Mason (Final Four)
20% increase in freshmen applications.
Increase from $19.6 to $23.2 million in new gifts and pledge payments.
25% increase in athletics donations; 45% increase in unrestricted gifts.
Gonzaga (sustained MBB success)
Enrollment has increased from 4,500 to 7,000
Freshman applications average 4,000 per year compared with 2,000 in 1999.
Georgia State (announced and started FB)
In the past three years, total enrollment has grown from 25,967 to 30,861.
SIUE (transition to Division I)
Undergraduate applications increased 44%.
Freshman ACT score increased 21.7 to 22.5.
Undergraduate enrollment increased 5%, graduate enrollment increased 13%.
Economic impact – visiting teams spent $1 million in marketplace.
8
Economics of NCAA I-AAA Institutions
Generated Revenues
Allocated Revenues
•
•
Ranged from $1.2 to $23 million
•
Median of $8.3 million
•
Allocated Revenue Sources Include:
Ranged from $311,000 to $16.8
million
•
Median of $2.0 million
•
Revenue Sources Include:
– Ticket Sales
– NCAA and Conference Distribution
– Contributions from alumni and
others
– Other
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
–
–
–
–
Student activity fees
Direct government support
Direct institutional support
Indirect institutional Support
Guarantees and options
Third party support
Concessions
Broadcast rights
Royalties / advertising / sponsorship
Sports camps
Endowment / investment income
Source: 2011 NCAA Convention Dashboard Presentation
9
DIVISIONAL COMPARISON
Divisional Comparison - Matrix
Measurement Category
Current Member Schools
Championships Offered
Minimum Number of Sports
Division I
331
26
NAIA
270
23
NCAA Division II
312
25
14
6 (Adopted in 2011)
10
18% Public - 82% Private
52% Public - 48% Private
NCAA Division III
447
28
Minimums based upon
enrollment. 10-12 sports
required.
20% Public - 80% Private
% Public-% Private
Graduation Rate* (General Student Body)
62
Mid-South Conference - 38%
47%
64%
Graduation Rate* (Student Athletes)
64
Not Available
55%
64%
Freshman Student Athlete Academic
Requirements - Initial Eligibility Test
Score Requirements
Freshman Student Athlete Academic
Requirements - Initial Eligibility - GPA
Requirement
Average Sports Sponsored
Athletic Financial Athletic Aid Offered
Athletic Financial Aid Requirements
The bottom end of the GPA
Scale requires a 2.0 GPA with at
least a 1010 SAT. The high end
of the GPA Scale requires at
least a 3.55 GPA with 400 SAT.
18 - ACT; 860 - SAT (Critical
Reading and Madth)
A minimum combined score on
the SAT verbal/critical reasoning Admitted to the institution under
and math sections of 820 or a
the same standards as four-year
minimum
degree-seeking students
sum score of 68 on the ACT.
An overall high school grade
Admitted to the institution under
point average of 2.0 or higher on 2.0 Minimum of 14 Core Courses the same standards as four-year
a 4.0 scale
degree-seeking students
7 Men - 7 Women
6 Men - 6.2 Women
6.8 Men - 7.7 Women
8.1 Men - 8.9 Women
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
a) 50% of maximum allowable
grants in each sport**
OR b) Minimum aggregate
expenditure of $1,148,451 (with
at least $574,225 in women's
sports) in 2008-2009 (excluding
football and men's and
women's basketball). Grant
value may not be less than 38
full grants (with at least 19 for
women)*** OR
c) Equivalent of 25 full grants in
men's sports and 25 full grants
in women's sports (exclusive of
grants in football and men's and
women's basketball)****
No financial aid minimums.
Maximums allowed by sport.
Financial aid minimums required
as part of membership.
Minimums are based upon three
possible scenarios.
N/A
*Graduation Rates as reported on NCAA.org for 2002-03 Cohort using Federal Graduation Rates.
11
Divisional Comparison – Athletic Aid
Maximum Allowable Financial Aid By Sport
Men's Sports
Basketball
Cross Country/Track and Field
Golf
Soccer
Tennis
Total Men
Women's Sports
Basketball
Cross Country/Track and Field
Golf
Soccer
Softball
Tennis
Volleyball
Total Women
Total All Sports
*Division I
13.0
12.6
4.5
9.9
4.5
44.5
**Division I
15.0
18.0
6.0
14.0
12.0
8.0
12.0
85.0
129.5
Division II
10.0
12.6
3.6
9.0
4.5
39.7
Division II
10.0
12.6
5.4
9.9
7.2
6.0
8.0
59.1
98.8
NAIA
UMKC
11.0 (Div I), 6.0 (Div II)
13.00
12.0
8.63
5.0
3.99
12.0
9.09
5.0
4.39
45.0
39.10
NAIA
2011-12
11.0 (Div I), 6.0 (Div II) HC/Equivalenc
15.00
12.0
12.54
5.0
3.85
12.0
10.02
10.0
9.58
5.0
8.00
8.0
12.00
63.0
70.99
108.0
110.09
*Men's Basketball is a head count sport.
*Women's Tennis, Basketball, and Volleyball are head count sports.
Maximum athletic aid allowed per division varies significantly between
Division I and Division II and NAIA. Division III allows for no athletic
financial aid.
12
Divisional Comparison – Athletic Expenses
Total Athletic Expenses
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
UMKC
•
NAIA Public
DIII W/Out
Fball
DIII Public
DII W/Out
Fball
DII Public
DI W/Out
Fball
Average athletic budget at the various divisions:
• I-AAA - $11 million
• DII (no FB) - $3.1 million
• DIII (no FB) - $1.3 million
• NAIA - $2.3 million
13
Divisional Comparison – Athletic Participation
Total Athletic Participation
400
350
300
152
133
250
200
141
163
126
Women
114
91
Men
150
204
100
50
123
136
144
193
125
161
0
UMKC
•
NAIA Public DIII W/Out DIII Public DII W/Out DII Public DI W/Out
Fball
Fball
Fball
Student Athlete Participation levels:
• I-AAA – 324
• DII (no FB) – 238
• DIII (no FB) – 260
• NAIA - 225
As part of its divisional change New Orleans has lost 70% of its student athletes.
14
Divisional Comparison – Undergrad Students
Total Full-Time Undergraduate Students
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
4,328
5,000
4,000
3,628
3,000
1,554
2,584
0
UMKC
•
•
Men
2,216
2,000
1,000
Women
3,098
2,836
951
680
NAIA
Public
2,357
1,142
1,564
2,489
3,418
DIII W/Out DIII Public DII W/Out DII Public DI W/Out
Fball
Fball
Fball
Full-time undergraduate enrollment by division:
•
I-AAA – 7,746
•
DII (no FB) – 3,780
•
DIII (no FB) – 2,695
•
NAIA – 1,631
UMKC is 40% above the average of all divisions.
15
Divisional Comparison - Enrollment
Institutional Analysis
30,000
25,000
20,000
17,973
15,000
Enrollment Fall 2010 Undergrad
10,000
Enrollment Fall 2010 Grad
9,850
9,586
5,000
4,579
5,409
2,200
0
UMKC
Summit League
Average (DI - 11
members)
1,054
1,302
1,969
4,473
6,652
836
Great Lakes Valley
St. Louis
American Midwest Urban 21 Average
Conference Average
Intercollegiate
Conference Average
(DII - 17 members) Athletic Conference (NAIA - 9 members)
Average (DIII - 9
members)
•
UMKC is 29% higher than SL’s total enrollment average and ranked 2nd out of their 11
members
•
UMKC 171% higher than GLVC’s total enrollment average
•
UMKC 367% higher than SLIAC’s total enrollment average
•
UMKC 187% higher than AMC’s total enrollment average
•
UMKC is 38% lower than Urban 21’s total enrollment average and ranked 19th out of
their 21 members
16
Divisional Comparison – Carnegie Classification
Carnegie Classification Research Universities (high research activity)
12
11
10
8
6
# of Institutions
4
4
2
1
1
0
0
0
UMKC
Summit League Average Great Lakes Valley St. Louis Intercollegiate
(DI - 11 members) Conference Average (DII Athletic Conference
- 17 members)
Average (DIII - 9
members)
American Midwest
Conference Average
(NAIA - 9 members)
Urban 21 Average
•
Summit League has 4-of-11 of their institutions with UMKC’s High Research
Carnegie Classification
•
GLVC has 1-of-17 institutions with a High Research Carnegie Classification, 8
are Master’s Colleges & Universities.
•
SLIAC and AMC do not have any institutions with a High Research Carnegie
Classification – 4 of SLIAC and AMC are Baccalaureate Colleges.
•
Urban 21 has 11-of-21 institutions with a High Research Carnegie Classification
17
UMKC ATHLETIC IMPACT
NCAA Certification
UMKC Athletics completed NCAA Certification in 2009, which is required by
the NCAA every 10 years. Mandates prescribed by the NCAA for UMKC to
achieve full certification included:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Institutional Commitment - continue aggressive practice of hiring minority
staff and recruitment of minority student athletes with a focus on tennis,
golf, softball and volleyball
Graduation/Retention - continued development and monitoring of
programs that assist with student athlete retention and graduation.
Athletic Scholarships – increase men’s athletic scholarships, as well as
scholarships for WBB and VB.
Participation – increase participation for women’s programs to improve
proportionality.
Equipment/Supplies – improve expense budget for the women’s programs
to be in alignment with the men’s programs.
Schedules/Practice – equitable schedule for men’s and women’s programs.
Travel – improve women’s team travel budget.
Salaries – address salary differentials in the women’s programs
Staffing – add women’s assistant coaches and replace part-time coaches
with full-time positions.
Locker Rooms – add locker room space.
Sports Medicine – increase the number of full-time athletic trainers.
19
Brand – Peer Alignment
As noted in the Why Division I slide “Alignment through Competition” is
one of the benefits of Division I competition. The men’s and women’s
programs have made a concerted effort to improve scheduling. A
sampling of men’s and women’s opponents in the past few years include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
University of Kansas
Kansas State University
University of Missouri
University of Cincinnati
University of Nebraska
University of Florida
University of Arizona
University of Arkansas
University of Maryland
University of Memphis
Iowa State University
Oklahoma State University
20
Athletic Spending On-Campus
$825,000
$124,138
Scholarships
$644,633
$2,788,062
Campus Housing
Meal Plans
Support Services
•
•
Athletics spends approximately $4.3 million back on-campus, in form of
fees, room/board, tuition paid directly by athletics or by the student
athletes.
Athletics spends $825,000 in support and auxiliary services annually, such
as custodial, facility maintenance, security.
21
Athletic Improvements - Staffing
HC
Men's
Basketball
Golf
Soccer
Tennis
Women's
Basketball
Golf
Soccer
Softball
Tennis
Volleyball
Combined
XC/Track & Field
Total Staff
•
•
UMKC Coaching Staff (FTE)
2006-07
Asst
DOO
GA
HC
2011-12
Asst
DOO
GA
1
0.5
1
0.5
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
1
1
1
0.5
3
0
1
0.5
1
0
0
0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0
1
0.5
1
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
0
0.5
1
1
1
1
0.5
1
3
0
1
1
0.5
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0
0
1.5
0.5
0.5
1
8
3
11
0
0
0
1.5
1
10
3
14
0
2
1
6
UMKC Administrative Staffing
2006-07
Position
FT
GA
Administration
Director of Athletics
1
0
Administrative Ass't
1
0
External Operations
Development
1
0
Sports Information
1
0.5
Marketing & Promotions
1
0
Corporate Sales
0
0
Ticket Operations/Sales
0
0
Internal Operations
Business & Finance
1
0
Compliance
1
0
Academics/Student Services 2
0
Facilities/Operations
1
0.5
Sports Medicine
2
1
Strength and Conditioning
1
0.5
Equipment
0
0
Total Staffing
13
2.5
FT
2011-12
GA
1
2
0
2
2
1
0
0
0.5
2
2
2
1
4
2
1
22
0
0.5
0.5
0
0
0
0.5
0.5
0
0.5
0.5
0
3.5
UMKC has increased coaching and admin staffing as part of NCAA
Certification mandates and to be in alignment with Summit League
members.
In 2007 benchmarking study, athletics had ranked in the bottom-third of
administrative staffing in Summit League.
22
Athletic Improvements - Scholarships
Financial Aid By Sport
Men's Sports
NCAA Max
Basketball*
Cross Country/Track and Field
Golf
Soccer
Tennis
Total Men
13.0
12.6
4.5
9.9
4.5
44.5
Women's Sports
NCAA Max
Basketball*
Cross Country/Track and Field
Golf
Soccer
Softball
Tennis*
Volleyball*
Total Women
Total All Sports
15.0
18.0
6.0
14.0
12.0
8.0
12.0
85.0
129.5
2006-07
HC/Equivalency
13.00
7.82
4.50
9.80
2.85
37.97
2006-07
HC/Equivalency
15.00
7.50
3.73
NA
8.37
5.00
11.00
50.60
88.57
2011-12
HC/Equivalency
13.00
8.63
3.99
9.09
4.39
39.10
2011-12
HC/Equivalency
15.00
12.54
3.85
10.02
9.58
8.00
12.00
70.99
110.09
*Men's Basketball is a head count sport.
*Women's Tennis, Basketball, and Volleyball are head count sports.
•
•
UMKC has increased scholarships by 21.52 scholarships since 2006-07
Athletics is 19.41 scholarships below the NCAA maximum for sports it offers
23
Athletic Improvements – Men’s Operating Budgets
Institution
Oral Roberts
Southern Utah
Western Illinois
Valpo
UMKC
IUPUI
Centenary
Oakland
IUPFW
North Dakota State
South Dakota State
Average
Variance
UMKC Rank
•
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Summit League Sports Operating Budget Comparison
Men's Basketball
Men's Soccer
Men's Golf
2006-07
2009-10
2006-07
2009-10
2006-07
2009-10
237,700 $
374,463 $
60,350 $
59,149 $
37,500 $
32,870
190,975 $
195,718
$
22,800 $
53,849
467,157 $
288,629 $
49,577 $
54,889 $
33,666 $
44,528
366,783
$
67,151
267,480 $
321,501 $
65,340 $
97,417 $
26,548 $
59,233
165,538 $
445,573 $
57,550 $
91,569 $
25,786 $
56,386
194,838 $
166,667 $
69,700 $
66,702 $
22,959 $
26,977
220,700 $
442,874 $
63,800 $
92,066 $
18,000 $
35,252
$
215,056
$
66,702
$
33,731
$
277,739
$
51,286
$
361,267
$
70,118
263,896 $
308,949 $
61,924 $
75,499 $
26,751 $
46,423
1%
4%
6%
29%
-1%
28%
3
5
3
1
3
2
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
XC/Track & Field (M/W)
2006-07
2009-10
148,400 $
135,825
148,292 $
163,993
106,237 $
120,390
102,502
83,920 $
225,163
28,751 $
59,082
20,938 $
16,694
12,000 $
209,933
$
68,143
$
367,610
$
221,284
81,380 $
158,812
3%
42%
5
2
UMKC has increased operating budgets for all men’s programs with
three programs in the top-third of the Summit League.
24
Athletic Improvements – Women’s Operating Budgets
Institution
Oral Roberts
Southern Utah
Western Illinois
Valpo
UMKC
IUPUI
Centenary
Oakland
IUPFW
North Dakota State
South Dakota State
Average
Variance
UMKC Rank
Institution
Oral Roberts
Southern Utah
Western Illinois
Valpo
UMKC
IUPUI
Centenary
Oakland
IUPFW
North Dakota State
South Dakota State
Average
Variance
UMKC Rank
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Summit League Sports Operating Budget Comparison
Women's Basketball
Softball
Volleyball
2006-07
2009-10
2006-07
2009-10
2006-07
2009-10
225,400 $
224,093
$
99,800 $
106,923
146,260 $
156,996 $
57,860 $
133,288
98852
257,532 $
223,265 $
88,897 $
105,835 $
66,707 $
75,633
234,459
$
61,695
$
76,538
184,633 $
227,881 $
46,890 $
141,738 $
58,480 $
124,559
161,614 $
293,224 $
56,817 $
115,423 $
56,717 $
100,046
133,385 $
132,281 $
96,739 $
92,639 $
63,709 $
68,983
207,200 $
289,819 $
57,500 $
142,305 $
48,300 $
96,710
$
164,946
$
89,891
$
87,753
$
238,507
$
170,446
$
157,263
$
330,602
$
170,966
$
127,657
193,810 $
228,161 $
66,628 $
129,170 $
67,179 $
104,438
-5%
0%
-30%
10%
-13%
19%
5
5
7
4
5
3
Summit League Sports Operating Budget Comparison
Women's Golf
Tennis (M/W)
2006-07
2009-10
2006-07
2009-10
$
34,750 $
62,627 $
55,200 $
29,021
$
53,849 $
28,963 $
23,971
$
24,373 $
36,518 $
29,932 $
42,606
$
67,702
$
26,547 $
45,094 $
44,756 $
64,941
$
25,989 $
38,528 $
43,880 $
107,349
$
28,361 $
21,622 $
38,230 $
22,093
$
18,000 $
28,988 $
12,000 $
17,691
$
27,307
$
73,117
$
52,864
$
$
73,613
$
117,075
$
26,337 $
44,101 $
40,083 $
49,786
1%
2%
12%
30%
3
5
3
4
•
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Women's Soccer
2006-07
2009-10
64,350 $
59,300
54,645 $
83,217
44,451 $
58,972
81,139
$
61,411
55,162 $
143,680
81,563 $
62,778
68,300 $
90,824
$
77,347
$
137,040
$
140,300
64,230 $
91,487
-100%
-33%
8
UMKC has increased
operating budgets for all
women’s programs with two
programs in the top-third of
the Summit League.
25
Athletic Improvements – Facilities Improvements & Needs
UMKC Facility Needs - December 2011
Team
WBB
MBB
Coaching Staff
Satisfied
Satisfied
MSO 1 additional private office
for assistant coach
WSO 1 additional private office
for assistant coach
VOL
SOF
TRK
1 additional private office
for assistant coach
2 additional private
offices for assistant
coaches
Locker Rooms
Satisfied
Practice
Satisfied
Competition
Satisfied
Other
game floor renovation
Satisfied
Satisfied
Satisfied
game floor renovation
Satisfied
Satisfied
Satisfied
Satisfied
Satisfied
Satisfied
Satisfied
Satisfied
need dedicated facility
with open accessibility;
indoor facility also
needed
Satisfied
Satisfied
2 additional private
offices for assistant
coaches
Satisfied
TEN
MGO
WGO
need dedicated facility
with open accessibility;
indoor facility also
needed
game floor renovation
need dedicated facility
with
open accessibility
need dedicated facility
with
open accessibility
1 additional private office
for assistant coach
workspace for graduate
assistant
team uses multiple
practice sites
equipment kept by
students or coaches
need "home"
need "home"
indoor/outdoor facility
indoor/outdoor facility
(uses Woodside or
(uses Woodside or
Carriage Club for indoor) Carriage Club for indoor)
workspace for graduate
assistant
team uses multiple
practice sites
equipment kept by
students or coaches
need "home" facility
(uses Swinney for indoor)
need "home" facility
1 additional private office
for head coach
workspace for graduate
assistat
team uses multiple
practice sites
equipment kept by
students or coaches
need "home" facility
(uses Swinney for indoor)
need "home" facility
current practice
availability
difficult to establish
considering the public
demand for space
current practice
availability
difficult to establish
considering club
members' demand for
space
26
Athletic Improvements – Facilities Improvements
Stanley H. Durwood Soccer Stadium &
Recreational Field
The DSSRF is the premiere soccer facility
in The Summit League. The $9 million
dollar was completed in 2009. DSSRF
provides seating for 850 fans and a
separate addition hosts locker rooms for
men's and women's soccer, softball and
track & field, as well as offices for the
respective coaching staffs and concession
areas.
Swinney Recreation Center
$500,000 in repairs and upgrades
were made to Swinney Recreation in
conjunction with both the men’s and
women’s program moving back oncampus. The “Old Swinney” practice
gymnasium was renovated and new
spectator seating was purchased.
27
Athletic Improvements – Facility Benchmarking
Basketball Arena – SDSU Frost Arena
Softball Field – WIU McKee Softball
Stadium
Volleyball Venue – NDSU Bentson
Bunker
Indoor Track & Field – USD Dakota
Dome
28
Athletic Improvements – Student Athlete Success
FRESHMAN-COHORT GRADUATION RATES
All Students
Student Athletes
2004-5 Graduation Rate
46%
64%
Four-Class Average
45%
55%
Student-Athlete Graduation Success Rate
87%
•
SA graduation rate of 64% is higher than institutional average
of 46%.
•
UMKC’s student-athletes ended the 2010-11 academic year
with a cumulative GPA of 3.22.
•
15 out of 16 teams finished the year with a cumulative GPA
above 3.0.
•
136 student-athletes earned Summit League Academic AllLeague Honors for 2010-11.
•
53 student-athletes were named Summit League Distinguished
Scholars for 2010-11.
•
76 student athletes were named to the Summit League
Commissioner’s List of Academic Excellence
29
Athletic Improvements – Competitiveness
UMKC Year-by-Year Won-Loss Record
MEN'S
Basketball
Conference finish
Conference record
Overall record
Golf
Conference finish
Soccer
Conference finish
Conference record
Overall record
Tennis
Conference finish
Conference record
Overall record
Track & Field
Conference finish
2010-11
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
6
9-9
16-14
8
6-12
12-18
10
3-15
7-24
8
6-12
11-21
6
6-8
12-20
1*
2
2
2
2
1
4-1-01
10-5-03
4
2-2-02
7-10-02
3*
3-3
10-7-03
4
2-2-02
7-8-04
2
4-1-1
5-13-02
1*
6-0
16-7
1
6-0
17-7
2*
5-1
14-7
3
4-2
6-9
2
3-2
6-6
Indoor - 5th; Indoor - 4th; Indoor - 7th; Indoor - 6th;
Outdoor - 5th Outdoor 5th Outdoor - 6th Outdoor - 6th
Indoor - 4th;
Outdoor - 4th
Average Men's Finish
3.2
4.0
5.0
4.8
3.3
SL All-Sports Rank
3
4
7
7
7
NCAA Team Appear.
2
0
2
0
0
*NCAA Tournament Appearance
30
Athletic Improvements – Competitiveness
UMKC Year-by-Year Won-Loss Record
WOMEN'S
Basketball
Conference finish
Conference record
Overall record
Golf
Conference finish
Soccer
Conference finish
Conference record
Overall record
Softball
Conference finish
Conference record
Overall record
Tennis
Conference finish
Conference record
Overall record
Volleyball
Conference finish
Conference record
Overall record
Combined Sport
Track & Field
Conference finish
Average Women's Finish
2010-11
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
6
9-9
14-16
4^
12-6
16-16
6
7-11
12-18
9
3-15
11-20
6
6-8
10-20
5
3
2
8
4
10
0-7-2
1-14-1
10
1-8-0
1-17-1
1
18-5
37-17
5
12-10
22-26
6
10-14
20-34
8
6-15
11-27
7
1-15
4-46
2
5-3
13-13
3
6-2
10-13
4
4-4
5-13
6
3-5
3-12
9
0-8
0-15
8
6-12
9-21
5
10-8
15-16
6
5-11
12-20
8
2-14
5-27
7
4-8
7-23
2010-11
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
Indoor - 6th; Indoor - 7th; Indoor - 8th; Indoor - 7th;
Outdoor - 6th Outdoor - 6th Outdoor - 7th Outdoor - 7th
4.1
5.4
4.9
7.6
Indoor - 5th;
Outdoor - 4th
6.0
SL All-Sports Rank
7
7
8
10
7
NCAA/Post Team Appear.
0
1
0
0
0
Directors Cup Rank
234
286
200
281
289
Directors Cup Points
30.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
0.00
SL Commissioner's Cup
6
6
7
9
7
*NCAA Tournament Appearance; ^WNIT
31
ATHLETIC BUDGET
Total Athletic Budget – Summit League
Summit League Total Athletic Budget
$16,000,000
$14,000,000
$12,000,000
$10,000,000
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
$UMKC
IUPUI
IPFW
SDSU
NDSU
Oakland
USD
SUU
WIU
•
Summit League’s Total Athletic Budget Average is $9.6 million
•
UMKC is 21% above the Summit League Average, when $1.6 million overage is
figured into the budget.
•
UMKC ranks 3 out of the 9 schools in the Summit League
33
Total Athletic Budget – Urban 21
•
Urban 21’s total athletic budget average is $17 million.
•
UMKC is 35% below the Urban 21 average.
•
UMKC ranks 9 out of the 21 schools in the Urban 21.
34
Sports Operating Budget – Summit League
Summit League Sports Operating Budget
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$UMKC
IUPUI
IPFW
SDSU
NDSU
Oakland
USD
•
Summit League’s Sports Operating Budget Average is $1.7 million
•
UMKC is 23% below the Summit League Average
•
UMKC ranks 8th in the Summit League
SUU
WUI
35
SOURCES OF REVENUE
UMKC Athletic Budget– Sources of Funding
Sources of Athletic Revenue
Line Item
2006-07
2010-11
Institutional Support
$ 2,216,724 $
3,792,052
Student Fees
$
945,740 $
1,166,871
NCAA/Conference Revenue
$
194,066 $
242,471
Game Guarantee
$
173,500 $
183,000
Contributions
$
799,956 $
998,004
Ticket Sales
$
160,708 $
71,125
Corporate Sponsorship; Camps
$
145,093 $
33,456
Other
$
64,924 $
121,935
TOTAL $ 4,700,711 $
6,608,915
% Change
71%
23%
25%
5%
25%
-56%
-77%
88%
136%
*Institutional support does not include institutional waivers.
Revenue Summary
Line Item
2006-07
Institutional Revenue
$ 2,216,724 $
Student Athletic Fee Revenue
$
945,740 $
Athletic Generated Revenue
$ 1,279,257 $
•
•
2010-11
3,792,052
1,166,871
1,285,585
% Change
71%
23%
0%
Institutional support exclusive of waivers has increased 71% in the past four
years; Student fee revenue has incrementally increased over the same time
frame.
External revenue for NCAA/conference; game guarantees and donations has
increased. Ticket sales have decreased, but athletics saved $300,000 annually
with the move from Municipal to Swinney.
37
Student Athletic Fees – Summit League
Student Fees as a % of Total Athletic Revenue
45%
41%
40%
35%
30%
29%
30%
25%
19%
20%
13%
15%
10%
10%
8%
7%
5%
0%
0%
UMKC
IUPUI
IPFW
SDSU
NDSU
Oakland
USD
SUU
WUI
•
Summit League’s Student Fee Average % of total athletic revenue is 17% and
$1.7 million annually.
•
UMKC is 33% below the Summit League average with $1.1 million in student
support.
•
UMKC ranks 6th in the Summit League for student athletic fee support.
38
Student Athletic Fees – Urban 21
Student Fees as a % of Total Athletic Revenue
90%
79%
80%
77%
75%
70%
60%
50%
52%
49%
45%
47%
41%
45%
40%
30%
30%
19%
20%
14%
10%
14%
10%
0%
0%
•
Urban 21’s Student Fee Average % of total athletic revenue is 40%.
•
UMKC is 80% below the Urban 21 average of $5.6 million.
•
UMKC ranks 14 out of the 21 schools in the Urban 21.
39
Student Athletic Fees – Peers/Enrollment
Summit League and Urban 21 - Similar Enrollment
Institution
UMKC
UAB
Cleveland State
Florida A&M
NDSU
IPFW
Western Illinois University
SDSU
Average
Variance
Rank
Enrollment
13,881
17,543
17,024
13,089
14,407
14,192
13,600
12,816
14,569
-5%
5
Student Athletic
Fees
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,130,000 $
3,450,000 $
8,050,000 $
4,200,000 $
1,070,000 $
1,910,000 $
2,980,000 $
2,370,000 $
3,145,000
$
-64%
7
Revenue per
Student
81.41
196.66
472.86
320.88
74.27
134.58
219.12
184.93
210.59
-61%
7
% of Student
Fees
10.1%
14.2%
79.4%
45.1%
7.4%
29.1%
29.7%
19.5%
25.6%
-61%
7
•
Seven peer institutions compared with similar enrollment as UMKC
•
UMKC student athlete fee revenue is 64% below the average of $3.1 million
•
UMKC student fee percentage in comparison to overall athletic budget is 61% below the
average of 25.6%.
•
Average revenue per student is $210.59 annually, compared to $81.41 for UMKC.
40
Student Athletic Fees – Projections
Athletics Student Fee Revenue Projections
2010-11 Enrollment and Credit Hours
total # of credit
Semester
# of students
hours taken
Fall 10
13,881
162,322
Spring 11
13,318
157,229
2010-11 Acad Yr
319,550
Per Cr Hr
Breakdown
Max # cr hrs accessed
Credit Hrs Included
Student Fees
Student Fee Scenerios - 12 hour cap
$4.42
$6.00
$7.00
$10.00
$4.42 (current) Current + $1.58 Current + $2.58 Current + $5.58
(12 hrs max)
(12 hrs max)
(12 hrs max)
(12 hrs max)
263,998
263,998
263,998
263,998
$
1,166,871 $ 1,583,988 $
1,847,986 $
2,639,980
Breakdown
Max # cr hrs accessed
Credit Hrs Included
Student Fees
Student Fee Scenerios - NO cap
$4.42 (current) Current + $1.58 Current + $2.58 Current + $5.58
no max
no max
no max
no max
319,550
319,550
319,550
319,550
$
1,412,411 $ 1,917,300 $
2,236,850 $
3,195,500
Information received from IRAP Spring 2011 Comprehensive Enrollment Report
(NOTE: Excludes dual credit high school)
Two scenarios (12 hour cap and no cap with four student fee allocations
are presented for consideration.
41
Institutional Support – Summit League
Total Institutional Support as a % of Total Athletic Revenue
90%
78%
80%
70%
65%
59%
60%
49%
50%
43%
40%
46%
42%
36%
34%
IPFW
SDSU
30%
20%
10%
0%
UMKC
IUPUI
NDSU
Oakland
USD
SUU
WUI
•
Summit League’s Institutional Support Average % of Total Revenue is 50% and
$5 million.
•
UMKC is 29% above the Summit League Average.
•
UMKC ranks 2nd out of the 9 schools in the Summit League.
42
Institutional Support – Urban 21
Total Institutional Support as a % of Total Athletic Revenue
70%
65%
60%
50%
46%
43%
43%
38%
40%
33%
29%
30%
24%
20%
16%
9%
10%
4%
7%
3%
0%
0%
0%
•
Urban 21’s Institutional Support Average % of total athletic revenue is 24%
•
UMKC is 75% above the Urban 21 Average of $4.1 million.
•
UMKC ranks 4th in the Urban 21.
43
Institutional Support – Peers/Enrollment
Summit League and Urban 21 - Similar Enrollment
Institution
UMKC
UAB
Cleveland State
Florida A&M
NDSU
IPFW
Western Illinois University
SDSU
Average
Variance
Rank
Category
Enrollment
Urban 21
Urban 21
Urban 21
Urban 21
Summit
Summit
Summit
Summit
13,881
17,543
17,024
13,089
14,407
14,192
13,600
12,816
14,569
-5%
5
Institutional
Support
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
7,180,000.0
10,520,000.0
440,000.0
590,000.0
4,770,000.0
2,360,000.0
4,540,000.0
880,000.0
3,910,000
84%
2
% of
Institutional
Support
64.2%
43.3%
4.3%
6.3%
33.0%
35.9%
45.3%
7.2%
31.9%
101%
1
•
UMKC institutional support is 84% above the average of $3.9 million
•
UMKC institutional support percentage in comparison to overall athletic budget is
101% above the average of 31.9%.
44
External Support – Summit League
Total External Support as a % of Total Revenue
40%
35%
35%
30%
27%
25%
20%
20%
19%
17%
15%
15%
SUU
WUI
11%
10%
10%
15%
5%
0%
UMKC
IUPUI
IPFW
SDSU
NDSU
Oakland
USD
•
Summit League’s external support average percentage of total athletic revenue is
19%.
•
Average external revenue is $1.9 million in the SL with UMKC at $1.3 million.
•
UMKC ranks 4th out of the 9 schools in the Summit League
45
External Support – Urban 21
Total External Support as a % of Total Revenue
70%
62%
60%
54%
50%
45%
40%
35%
32%
34%
27%
30%
20%
19%
11%
10%
20%
18%
15%
10%
18%
13%
0%
•
Urban 21’s external support average percentage of total athletic revenue is 27%
and $6.2 million.
•
UMKC is 31% below the Urban 21 average
•
UMKC ranks 9 out of the 21 schools in the Urban 21
46
THANK YOU!