Taking Calculated Risk in Peel`s Water Transmission

Taking Calculated Risk in Peel’s
Water Transmission System using
ArcGIS Model Builder
Presented by: Imran Motala M.Eng., P.Eng., PMP
Ron Galos B.E.S., GIS-AS
October 14, 2015
Organization Overview
Regional Municipality of Peel
-
2nd Largest municipality in Ontario
-
1.4 million residents
-
Comprised of the Cities of Brampton and Mississauga, and the
Town of Caledon
-
~780 km of water transmission pipes
GHD Inc.
-
Engineering Consulting
-
Mississauga, Ontario
-
Employees: ~1400 (Canada) ~8500 (Global)
-
Esri users since 2006
Project Team
Region of Peel
-
Operations and Maintenance
-
Program Planning
-
Capital Works
-
Information Management Systems
GHD – Industry Specialists
-
Risk Assessment (Canada)
-
Water Operations (Canada)
-
Hydraulic Modeling (USA)
-
GIS Services (Canada)
Project Objectives
1.
Characterize risk associated with transmission and sub
transmission water mains
2.
Develop risk management plans for high risk/critical assets
3.
Develop a long-term capital plan to reduce overall risk
4.
Develop a risk tool to repeat and update risk assessments
Project Description
•
GIS based critical pipe analysis
•
Define water pipe criticality
•
Collaboratively establish a risk framework during workshops
•
Develop a geo-processing model
•
Evaluate and summarize results
•
Support informed decision-making for prioritization
•
Proactive approach to preventative maintenance
System Environment
•
Standard system hardware architecture
•
GIS Modeling – Esri ArcGIS ModelBuilder
•
Hydraulic Modeling – Innovyze InfoWater
•
Data Source – Region of Peel
-
Spatial
-
Tabular
-
Institutional Knowledge
Defining Critical Pipes
•
Asset Characterization
-
Simplify 4500 watermain pipes into homogeneous segments
-
Group codes assigned based on water pressure zone, pipe diameter,
material, age, and proximity to physical and environmental constraints
-
Semi-automated using ModelBuilder and then results refined during
workshops
4500
segments
1700
segments
Defining Critical Pipes
•
Threat Characterization
-
Developed a list of 16 threat events which may result in failure of the
watermains
-
Utilized the Region’s corporate likelihood matrix to evaluate each
threat’s possibility of occurrence
Defining Critical Pipes
•
Consequence Analysis
-
Assess the impact of watermain segment failures socially, financially,
and environmentally (10 impacts)
-
Measured on a 1 (negligible) to 5 (catastrophic) scale
Defining Critical Pipes
•
Vulnerability Analysis
-
Assess the extent to which watermains segments can withstand each
potential threat event
-
Vulnerability Scale: 0%, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%
Defining Critical Pipes
•
Risk Analysis
-
Risk = Likelihood * Vulnerability * Resilience * Consequence
-
Likelihood
•
-
Vulnerability
•
-
-
Potential threats to the system
Potential weaknesses
Resilience
•
Ability to withstand failure
•
Resilience = Likelihood * Vulnerability * Severity * Duration
Consequence
•
Potential impact of failure
Geo-processing Model
•
Comprised of 42 individual models
•
2 Categories of models
- Data Preparation
-
•
Create new fields
•
Extract subsets from data
•
Assign Values
Data Calculation
Geo-processing Model
•
Data Preparation
Geo-processing Model
•
Likelihood
Geo-processing Model
•
Vulnerability
Geo-processing Model
•
Resilience
Geo-processing Model
•
Consequence
Geo-processing Model
•
Risk Score Calculation
Model Output
Results
•
Top 10 Highest Risk Scores
Results
Results
Benefits
•
Model decision processes with ModelBuilder
•
Run complex spatial and attribute queries with GIS tools
•
Perform calculations in GIS environment
•
Repeatable decision processes of 16 threats for 1500 pipe
segments
•
Update process as needed
•
Connect service level objectives to strategy
•
Optimization of preventative maintenance
•
Support decision-making processes
•
Increased productivity
Lessons Learned
•
•
What would we do differently?
-
Streamline models for better organization and efficiency
-
Address information and data gaps to improve quality of
assessment results
Positive recommendations for others
-
Build multi-disciplinary teams
-
Maximize the analytical capability of GIS
-
Respond to business needs with innovative solutions
Future Plans
•
•
What is the next step to your project?
-
Completion of processing latest (2015) dataset
-
Utilize what we have learned from this project to enhance and
streamline current wastewater critical pipe analysis project
How do you think your organization will leverage this
achievement
-
Region of Peel - Develop mitigation strategies for the critical pipe
segments
-
GHD – Utilize the critical pipe analysis process to assist other
clients
© 2015 Esri Canada Limited. All rights reserved. Trademarks
provided under license from Environmental Systems
Research Institute, Inc. Other product and company names
mentioned herein may be trademarks or registered
trademarks of their respective owners. Errors and omissions
excepted.