PSI National Dialogue on Medical Sharps

PSI National Dialogue on
Medical Sharps
Boston, MA
May 21-22, 2008
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
What is the
Product Stewardship Institute?





Non-profit, based in Boston, founded in 2000
Membership
 44 State members
 51 Local agency members
 20 Adjunct Council members
Board of Directors: 7 states, 4 local agencies
Multi-stakeholder product stewardship network
Adjunct Council: business, environmental/organizational
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
2
PSI Full and Affiliate State Members
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
3
Why was the Product Stewardship
Institute Created?





Unified voice: State and Local Governments
Fiscal relief for government on waste issues
Objective data for decision-making
Forum for collaboration with industry
Nationally coordinated systems/harmonized
regulations
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
4
PSI Projects
 Medical Sharps
 Telephone books
 Pharmaceuticals
 Gas Cylinders
 Fluorescent lamps
 Tires
 Mercury Thermostats
 Beverage containers
 Paint
 Packaging
 Electronics
 Batteries
 Radioactive Devices
 Motor oil
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
5
What is Product Stewardship?
“Product Stewardship" is a principle that
directs all those involved in the life cycle of a
product to take shared responsibility for
reducing the health and environmental
impacts that result from the production, use,
and end-of-life management of the product.
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
6
PSI Role in Dialogue
 Research
 Facilitate/mediate dialogue meetings
 Implement projects & initiatives
 Evaluate projects
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
7
PSI’s “Agenda”
• Promote product stewardship solutions
• Reduce product impacts
• Forge partnerships that share responsibility
– Product management
– Sustainable financing
• Get results – not just discussion
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
8
Meeting Objectives
• General agreement on:
– Stakeholder roles/process
– Issue statement
– Dialogue goals
• Confirm road map
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
9
Meeting Objectives
•
•
•
•
Learn from presentations and research
Explore priority issues and strategies
Establish work groups on 2 priority strategies
Determine next steps
– Meeting date/location
– Stakeholder assessment
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
10
Priority Issues and Strategies
#1 – Source reduction
#2 – Collection, transportation, and disposal
infrastructure
#3 – Regulation and enforcement
#4 – Sustainable financing
#5 – Education, outreach, and risk
communication
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
11
Stakeholder Roles
•
•
•
•
•
•
Authorized to represent company, agency, or organization.
Attend 4 meetings (or via phone).
Active participation between meetings.
Jointly develop agreement.
Ensure your interests/others’ interests are met.
Participation in dialogue does not preclude legislative
activity.
• Negotiate in good faith.
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
12
Consensus
• All participants can live with decision and no
one will actively block or undermine decision.
• The greater the stakeholder agreement, the
greater the likelihood that the agreement will
be sustainable.
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
13
Consensus
• Consensus is preferable for broad initiatives:
– Technical standards
– Policies
– Legislation
• Consensus is NOT needed for pilot projects or
individual initiatives.
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
14
Road Map
MEETING 4
AGREEMENTS
• Finalize agreements
•2 Workgroups
•Develop
findings
•Draft work plans
MEETING 1
START
• Develop
Implementation Plan
•Refine draft
agreements
MEETING 3
• Present Workgroup findings/plans
• Discuss additional strategies
• Start to develop draft agreements
MEETING 2
•Refine Workgroups
•Develop Findings
•Draft work plans
•Present Workgroup
findings/plans
• Full financing discussion
•Discuss additional strategies
May 2008
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
August 2008
November 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
Workgroup
Activity
Dialogue
Meeting
February 2009
15
Possible Dialogue Outcomes
• Pilot projects with measurable results
• Demonstration project to test comprehensive
program
• Model state policies (e.g., procurement)
• National standards/requirements
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
16
Possible Dialogue Outcomes
• Business innovations/profitability studies
(e.g., reverse logistics potential)
• Model state or federal legislation
• Model state or national education campaign
• National sustainable financing system for the
management of medical sharps
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
17
Possible Mechanisms
for Agreements
• Letter of agreement between those
involved in pilot project
• Memorandum of agreement between
stakeholders stating intent to perform
certain activities
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
18
What do we want to avoid?
• Multiple state solutions
• Unilateral state or federal regulation
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
19
Potential Stakeholder Contributions
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Manufacturers (sharps and pharmaceuticals)
Pharmacy benefit managers/third party payers
Insurers
Retail pharmacies
Government agencies
Public health/other associations
Waste management companies
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
20
Potential Contributions:
Sharps Manufacturers
 Develop/promote sale of products with safety
features
 Increase public awareness about importance
of safe disposal and collection locations
 Produce/sell approved sharps disposal
containers for sale with sharps products
 Manage and finance safe collection of
medical sharps
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
21
Potential Contributions:
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
 Develop/promote sale of products with safety
features
 Increase public awareness about importance
of safe disposal and collection locations
 Require self-injected products to be
accompanied by approved sharps disposal
container
 Manage and finance safe collection of
medical sharps PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
22
Potential Contributions: Pharmacy
Benefits Managers/Third Party Payers
 Require self-injected products to be
accompanied by approved sharps disposal
container
 Increase awareness of importance of safe
sharps disposal and collection opportunities
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
23
Potential Contributions: Insurers
 Reimburse costs of sharps disposal
containers and collection/disposal of sharps.
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
24
Potential Contributions:
Retail/Mail Order Pharmacies
 Increase public awareness about importance
of safe disposal and collection locations
 Collect used sharps on site or via mail-back
 Provide coupon as incentive to return used
medical sharps for disposal
 Promote sale of products with safety features
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
25
Potential Contributions: Government
 Oversee manufacturer collection programs
 Increase public awareness about importance
of safe disposal and collection locations
 Regulation/enforcement to level playing field
and maintain fairness
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
26
Potential Contributions:
Government, cont.
 Require that sale of self-injected products
includes safe sharps disposal
 Provide existing facilities for safe consumer
collection convenience
 Explore tax credits or other opportunities to
encourage private sector participation in sharps
disposal programs
 Explore public financing options
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
27
Potential Contributions:
Waste Management Companies
 Increase awareness of importance of safe
sharps disposal and collection opportunities
 Provide safe transport and treatment for
sharps disposal
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
28
Process for Developing Action Plan
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Draft Problem Statement and Goals
Issues/Strategies
Interviews/input from over 35 stakeholders
Input incorporated into Action Plan
Draft Action Plan/comments
Input on 2nd Draft Action Plan – due 2 weeks
NOT PSI’s Issue Statement and Goals
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
29
Issue Statement
• Sharps are used for self-injection and blood
glucose testing by people with diabetes,
patients administering their own medications,
and injection drug users.
• Sharps used in the “community” typically end
up in MSW, recycling, or wastewater
• If not properly disposed of, sharps can pose a
hazard to sanitation workers, others
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
30
Issue Statement
• Sharps may also be left in public places
• Sharps may damage or disable equipment
• Problem is expected to increase as number of
people with diabetes rises and “biologic”
drugs expand markets
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
31
Dialogue Goal
The primary goal of the project is to
maximize the safe and environmentally
sound collection and disposal of waste
sharps by developing a nationally
coordinated system that is financially
sustainable.
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
32
Dialogue Focus
This project will focus on sharps generated
outside the traditional health care setting,
including households, hotels, casinos,
restaurants, airports, and other public
venues.
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
33
Purpose of Presentations
 Educate attendees on basics
 Outline current boundaries of knowledge
 Illustrate product stewardship
 Show potential for collaboration
 Portray possibilities
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
34
Issue/Strategy Discussions
 Background technical information
 Clarify issues and strategies
 Additional strategies
 Prioritize strategies
 Workgroups at end of 2nd day - top 2 strategies
© Product Stewardship Institute, Inc.
May 2008
PSI Medical Sharps Dialogue Meeting
35