Integrating Active, Flexible and
Responsive Tertiary Prosumers
into a Smart Distribution Grid
WP1 - INERTIA Framework Requirements,
Specifications and Architecture
D1.2 – User and Business Requirements Specifications
Resubmission
ENG
INERTIA 5th Plenary Meeting, Rotterdam
D1.2 Review Comments
D1.2 User and business scenarios
Rejected
Remark:
Does not meet the objectives set in DoW, page 9. The length of the document is excessive.
The business cases and use cases should have examples including quantitative evaluation in
order to estimate the profitability of the whole system.
Resubmission by next Review
05/02/2014
INERTIA 5th Plenary Meeting, Rotterdam
2
D1.2 Review Comments
Breaking Remarks:
•
The length of the document is excessive
•
Does not meet the objectives set in DoW, page 9.
–
… from pag.9 of the DoW
D1.2) User and Business Requirements Definitions: Report Public. The deliverable comprises a thorough study and
definition of the requirements related to INERTIA framework, addressing key end-user (aggregators, tertiary building
prosumers, DSOs) and other beneficiaries of INERTIA business chain. Detailed definition of the overall business
requirements, especially the one related to demand side management and response in distributed grids, fully
associated with INERTIA framework and towards underlying the overall design and implementation methodology.
•
The business cases and use cases should have examples including quantitative
evaluation in order to estimate the profitability of the whole system
05/02/2014
INERTIA 5th Plenary Meeting, Rotterdam
3
D1.2 Resubmission Strategy
The length of the document is excessive:
•
Creating two annexes to D1.2
–
–
•
State of Art Section
Questionnaires Results Section
Erasing the repetitions of the DoW
… from the review report
Reports […] should be much less verbose and concentrate on achievements
during the reporting period and avoid repetitions of the DoW.
05/02/2014
INERTIA 5th Plenary Meeting, Rotterdam
4
D1.2 Resubmission Strategy
The business cases and use cases should have examples including
quantitative evaluation in order to estimate the profitability of the whole
system
•
Adding to each Business Scenario and Use Case:
– Clear Purpose and Objective
– Quantitative evaluation index
o
o
o
o
o
o
05/02/2014
Critical Success Factor
Perspective
Description
Metric
Measure
Quantitative Index
…example:
Quantitative evaluation index
Critical success factor Comfort index
Perspective
Final-Occupant
The percentage of time that the final
Description
occupant doesn't act on the strategy
applied by the Facility Manager
Metric
Strategy acceptance
The percentage of acceptance of the
Measure
applied strategy to a single occupant
75%
Quantitative Index
INERTIA 5th Plenary Meeting, Rotterdam
5
D1.2 Resubmission Strategy
Does not meet the objectives set in DoW, page 9.
– … from pag.9 of the DoW
D1.2) User and Business Requirements Definitions: Report Public. The deliverable comprises a
thorough study and definition of the requirements related to INERTIA framework, addressing key
end-user (aggregators, tertiary building prosumers, DSOs) and other beneficiaries of INERTIA business
chain. Detailed definition of the overall business requirements, especially the one related to demand
side management and response in distributed grids, fully associated with INERTIA framework and
towards underlying the overall design and implementation methodology.
•
Reviewing the five business scenarios w.r.t the demand side management and response in
distributed grids
–
–
–
–
–
BSC-01 - Prosumer Flexibility Profiling & Optimization of Building Operations for Maximum Prosumer
Surplus (Benefits/ Satisfaction)
BSC-02 - Utilizing Prosumer Flexibility for Maximizing Prosumer and Aggregator Financial Benefits
(Shared Profit Maximization)
BSC-03 - Offering Reserve Capacity to the TSO
BSC-04 - Imbalance risk reduction for different parties
BSC-05 - Location Based Management Services
05/02/2014
INERTIA 5th Plenary Meeting, Rotterdam
6
T1.2 1st Year Effort
• Again comment coming from the Outcome letter for the 1st review
– Although the overall use of resources is acceptable and roughly in line with the
approved DoW, beneficiaries 9(PPC) and 10(EnelSi) have used significantly less
resources than planned - a possible indication of weak commitment that proved
to be true resubmitted by the next review.
Duration
T1.2
M1 - M12
Del.Num.
D1.2
ENG
Partner CERTH
Effort
Task Lead Partner(s)
Deliverable Title Lead Partner(s)
User and
Business
Requirements
Definitions
05/02/2014
ENG
Planned
Actual
ENG
TECNALIA CNet INDESIT ALMENDE
1
1,04
3
5,6
2
1,5
2
0,3
2
2,1
0,04
2,6
-0,5
-1,7
0,1
0
TUK
0
HYPERTECH
PPC
ENELSI
TOTAL
4
4,03
2
0,4
4
2
20
16,97
0,03
-1,6
-2
-3,03
Corresponding
Estimated
Delivery CERTH ENG TECNALIA CNet INDESIT ALMENDE TUK HYPERTECH PPC
Task(s)
indicative PM
T1.2
20
12
1
3
2
2
2
INERTIA 5th Plenary Meeting, Rotterdam
4
2
ENELSI
4
7
D1.2 Starting Point
•
Reduce the length of the D1.2 (ENG)
–
–
•
Adding the Quantitative Evaluation section
•
•
•
Creating two annex
Erasing the repetitions
Updated Business Scenario and Update Use Case templates (ENG)
Filling in the new templates (each BS/UC owner )
Reviewing the five business scenarios w.r.t the demand side management and
response in distributed grids
–
–
–
–
–
BSC-01 - Prosumer Flexibility Profiling & Optimization of Building Operations for Maximum Prosumer
Surplus (Benefits/ Satisfaction) (CERTH)
BSC-02 - Utilizing Prosumer Flexibility for Maximizing Prosumer and Aggregator Financial Benefits
(Shared Profit Maximization) (ETC_EL)
BSC-03 - Offering Reserve Capacity to the TSO (PPC )
BSC-04 - Imbalance risk reduction for different parties (HYPERTECH)
BSC-05 - Location Based Management Services (TECNALIA)
05/02/2014
INERTIA 5th Plenary Meeting, Rotterdam
8
D1.2 Use Cases
•
Adjusting the Use Cases related to the new Business scenario
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
UC-01 Monitoring of Local Hub’s Energy Data
UC-02 Automated real-time control planning of the facility infrastructure based on contextual
information
UC-03 Real-time control on building’s DERs based on scheduling information
UC-04 Monitoring of personalized energy data (Final Occupant)
UC-05 Setting User Preferences
UC-06 Automated Local Hub Operation
UC-07 Monitoring of energy data (Aggregator Hub installation)
UC-08 Selection of the optimal portfolio on a non- emergency grid operation
UC-09 Selection of the optimal portfolio on an emergency grid operation
UC-10 Aggregated Control of Local Hub portfolio
UC-11 Distribution System Congestion Management
UC-12 Location Based RES Integration
05/02/2014
INERTIA 5th Plenary Meeting, Rotterdam
9
D1.2 Planning
Main Activities
1.
Business Scenario and Use Case templates updated
1.
Business Scenarios reviewed (Mid-April)
2.
Use Cases adjusted (End-May)
3.
List of User and Business Requirements updated (End-June)
05/02/2014
(Early-March)
INERTIA 5th Plenary Meeting, Rotterdam
10
Discussion
Questions??
Thank You !!!
05/02/2014
INERTIA 5th Plenary Meeting, Rotterdam
11