EDO PSSF - AC PROJECT STATUS SAFARI into Credit Industry 15 February 2017 Presenter Riaan de Swardt Deputy Chairperson: EDO PSSF EDO PSSF AC PROJECT STATUS - CONFIDENTIAL 1 Background • SARB require the banks and EDO Users to establish an authenticated collections (AC) payment stream in the early debit order environment. • This AC payment stream and implementation, as a minimum, should: – Grant the existing EDO PSSF Members / EDO markets / participants an equal opportunity to migrate to and allow for participation in the AC payment stream; – Meet the requirements of the affected EDO markets consisting of both users and payers; – Ensure that risk is minimized during implementation and the Transition Periods; and – Ensure financial stability in the NPS. EDO PSSF AC PROJECT STATUS - CONFIDENTIAL 2 Revised AC implementation plan AC Project Team tabled a revised implementation approach at the SARB composed of the following elements June 16 to 31 Oct ‘16 Reset phase 1 2 1 Phased implementation approach with 5 distinct phases 2 1 Jul ‘17 – end Jan‘18 01 Nov’16 – end Jun ‘17 3 Technical delivery phase Relatively “light” simplification of AC to benefit from practical improvements Technical update based on revised re-authentication rules and technical gap analysis 4 Pilot Phase 7 months 7 months Testing reality factored in timeline 01 Feb ‘19 – 30 Oct ‘19 01 Feb’18 – 31 Jan ‘19 5 Ramp-up phase 9 months 12 months Low volume operational pilot phase to stabilise systems and monitor uptake Migration Phase Gradual uptake of users and volumes with NAEDO fall-back AC + EFT Can shorten Possible simpler migration approach AEDO/ NAEDO origination (mandates) Fall-back to NAEDO and AEDO which will run concurrent to AC for a period to mitigate mandate origination and collection risks AEDO and NAEDO Collection AEDO/NAEDO collection with disqualifiers Current dispute processes for NAEDO Disqualified criteria for disputes No new AEDO & NAEDO AC capability 3 4 5 Additional real time non face-to-face solution Gates with key success criteria to ensure delivery in each phase Intervention to find additional measures to curb existing debit order abuse • Additional Real Time Non Face to Face Authenticated Solution 1 0 Project Gate 0 criteria Compliance Gate 1 criteria • Follows a separate development and testing reality than other assets (TT1, TT2, TT3) Must be sufficiently tested and piloted to be ready for ramp-up 2 Project Gate 2 criteria 4 3 Compliance Gate 3 criteria Compliance Gate 4 criteria 1. Concerted effort by banks to identify and prosecute rogue users from now until pilot commences 3 31 May 2016 Authenticated Collections SteerCo - Revised Implementation Approach Current status • Risk mitigation - Controlled implementation • Interbank specifications – Technical specification vs. 16 being tested in UAT • User specifications • EDO PSSF member requirements – Data or information requirements – Pilot • Industry pilot scheduled from 1 July 2017 • User participation – User could be approached to participate – Dependent on User readiness – Contact Service Provider / Member Association or PSSF to validate legitimacy of request/s • Communication workgroup – Toolkit – Single message to the community EDO PSSF AC PROJECT STATUS - CONFIDENTIAL 4 Way forward Nov ’16 – Jun ‘17 Development updates and Testing • Pilot group: UAT • User development • Internal testing Jul ’17 – Jan ‘18 Feb ’18 – Jan ‘19 Pilot • Pilot group implement • Low volumes to stabilise systems and monitor uptake • User testing Ramp up • All Users implement • Users all live Feb ’19 – Oct ‘19 Migration • Migrate existing EDO business to AC EDO PSSF AC PROJECT STATUS - CONFIDENTIAL 5 More information Contact your Service Provider Contact your Member Association Contact your sponsor bank Alternatively:Johnny Pienaar EDO PSSF Data Custodian 082 496 4601 [email protected] Angelene van der Walt Independent Project Manager 072 829 4253 [email protected] EDO PSSF AC PROJECT STATUS - CONFIDENTIAL 6 Thank you! EDO PSSF AC PROJECT STATUS - CONFIDENTIAL 7
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz