Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanisława Staszica
Wydział Geologii, Geofizyki i Ochrony Środowiska
Al. Mickiewicza 30
30-059 Kraków
ASSESSMENT OF THE MASTER OF SCIENCE DIPLOMA THESIS
NAME AND SURNAME OF THE GRADUATE: .....................................................................
Student register’s No.: ............................................................
DISCIPLINE AND SPECIALIZATION:…………………………………………………….................................
GRADUATING UNIT:…………..............................................................................................................................
TITLE OF THE DIPLOMA THESIS (in Polish):
…............................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................
TITLE OF THE DIPLOMA THESIS (in English):
…………………………………….............................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................
SUPERVISOR:.............................................................................................................................
REVIEWER:…….........................................................................................................................
Number of: pages........., figures ........., tables ............, references …......
Appendices (type and numbers):…………………………………
Marking of the Master of Science Diploma Thesis
SUPERVISOR: ..................................... REVIEWER: ......................................
Final numerical and verbal grade : …………............................................
(average of the supervisor’s and reviewer’s grades)
Scale of grading (according to the Rules of Studies at the AGH-UST, article 27):
1) 3,00 - 3,20 satisfactory (3.0),
2) 3,21 - 3,70 satisfactory plus (3,5),
3) 3,71 - 4,20 good (4.0),
4) 4,21 - 4,70 good plus (4.5),
5) 4,71 – 5,00 very good (5.0).
…………………………………………………….
Chair’s of the Exam Committee signature
Krakow, …month and year…
1
ABSTRACT (up to eight sentences)
Key words (up to six words)
Location of the M.Sc. project training
.......................................................................................................................................................
Program of the M.Sc. project training:
1. ...........................................................................................................................................
2. ...........................................................................................................................................
3. ...........................................................................................................................................
4. ...........................................................................................................................................
5. ...........................................................................................................................................
6. ...........................................................................................................................................
7. ...........................................................................................................................................
2
DECLARATION OF THE AUTHOR
Being aware of the criminal responsibility for a false statement, I declare hereby that
the diploma thesis presented here has been prepared personally by myself, not using other
sources than those listed in its text.
I also declare that this diploma thesis has not been earlier a subject of the procedures
leading to obtaining a professional degree in another higher school, and that its written
version is identical with the electronic version enclosed. Additionally, I am taking note of
obtaining a mandatory written permit from my supervisor if the whole diploma thesis or its
part would be published.
……………………..
………………………………………
Date
Author’s signature
Graduating unit
(Head’s stamp and signature)
3
MASTER OF SCIENCE DIPLOMA THESIS ASSESSMENT
MARKING FORM
COMPONENT OF THE DIPLOMA THESIS
Supervisor’s
mark
Reviewer’s
mark
I. THE CONTENT ASPECT [ 0–80 points ]
1. Compatibility of the thesis content with its title
[ 0 – 6 points ]
2. References (correctness and completeness of their preparing,
correctness of their citing)
[ 0 – 6 points ]
3. Skills in laying out the research problem and the ways leading to its
solving (research self-reliance and initiative, proper description of the
basic materials and respective previous investigations)
[ 0 – 16 points ]
4. Methodology of investigations (selection of proper research methods
and skills of their use)
[ 0 – 16 points ]
5. Discussion of the results and concluding (sound reasoning, proper and
critical analysis of the results, their scientific and practical significance,
evaluation of the results that can be considered author’s intellectual
rights)
[ 0 – 30 points ]
6. Marks granted if the thesis adapted to editorial requirements is to be
published: as a paper (full version [6 points], selected results [4
points]), or as a short note (selected elements only [2 point]), or not
whatsoever [0 points]
[ 0-6 points ]
Total of the content aspect
(total of marks in the lines 1 to 6)
II. THE EDITORIAL ASPECT [ 0 – 20 points ]
1. Correct language usage (syntax, grammar and spelling), proper
proofreading
[ 0 – 10 points ]
2. Completeness and correctness of the figures, tables and appendices
[ 0 – 6 points ]
3. Esthetic look of the written version
[ 0 – 4 points ]
Total of the editorial aspect
(total of marks in the lines 1 to 3)
GRADE OF THE THESIS BY POINTS
NUMERICAL GRADE OF THE THESIS
Supervisor’s signature................................................................date ........................................
Reviewer’s signature..............................................................date …...................................
Scale of grading (according to the Rules of Studies at the AGH-UST, article 13, item 1)
Number of points Numerical and verbal grade
91 –100.......... ..........5.0 (very good)
81 – 90......................4.5 (good plus)
71 – 80......................4.0 (good)
61 – 70......................3.5 (satisfactory plus)
50 – 60......................3.0 (satisfactory)
<50...........................2.0 (unsatisfactory)
4
DESCRIPTIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE DIPLOMA THESIS
(obligatory only in the case of the lowest, i.e. unsatisfactory [2.0], grade)
(justification of a possible proposal to honor the diploma thesis)
REVIEWER
....................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................
Reviewer’s signature
SUPERVISOR
...................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
Supervisor’s signature
5