LEARNING PROGRAMME EVALUATION
Created by:
Approved on:
Amended:
Amended:
C. Janish
Approved by:
Amended by:
Amended by:
Next review date:
Date:
January 2009
Signed:
Signed:
Signed:
January 2010
2
Compiled:
March 2009
Revision date:
August 2010
Version:
1.2
LEARNING PROGRAMME APPROVAL APPLICATION
EVALUATION BY THE BANKSETA
PROVIDER DETAILS
Provider Name
Trading As
Provider Type
Primary ETQA
Accreditation Number
Period of accreditation
Accreditation Status
PROGRAMME DETAILS
Programme Name
Number of credits
Level
Registered Qualifications /
Unit Standards
Programme Type
Delivery Methodology
Mode of Learning
1.
UNIT STANDARD ALIGNMENT
Criteria
Evidence
Adequate
Needs
Feedback
Improvement
Specific outcomes evident
Assessment criteria
Range statement
Essential embedded
knowledge
Critical Cross Fields
evident
Skills programme or Qualification Name
SAQA ID
Unit standard title
SAQA ID
Level
Credits
4
Compiled:
March 2009
Revision Date:
August 2010
Version:
1.2
2.
HUMAN RESOURCES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Criteria
Evidence
Adequate
Needs
Improve
ment
Feedback
Evidence
Adequate
Needs
Improve
ment
Feedback
Facilitators
Insert extra lines
Assessors
Insert extra lines
Moderators
Insert extra lines
Assessors and moderators are
registered with BANKSETA
3.
INFRASTRUCTURE
Criteria
Infrastructure for providing
training and assessment
Adequate equipment provided
in the workplace or off-site.
5
Compiled:
March 2009
Revision Date:
August 2010
Version:
1.2
4.
DELIVERY OF THE LEARNING PROGRAMME
Criteria
Evidence
Adequate
Needs
Improve
ment
Feedback
Evidence
Adequate
Needs
Improve
ment
Feedback
Programme Design and Delivery
framework is evident
Facilitators Guide
Learner Guide / Workbook
Are formative activities evident in
the Learner workbook
5.
ASSESSMENT
Criteria
Relationship between the unit
standards and assessment
instruments is evident i.e. a matrix
The assessment scope, approach
and method is clearly evident
(formative / summative, workplace
/ formal theory based, portfolio /
assessor focused)
Evidence covers a range of
knowledge, process and product
requirements
A clear process of assessment is
evident
6
Compiled:
March 2009
Revision Date:
August 2010
Version:
1.2
Policy and procedure for learner
appeals
6.
MODERATION
Criteria
Evidence
Adequ
ate
Needs
Improve
ment
Feedback
Is internal moderation conducted?
Are feedback mechanisms in place
and are they utilized to enhance the
assessment process
7.
LEARNER SUPPORT
Criteria
Evidence
Adequat
e
Needs
Improve
ment
Version:
1.2
Feedback
Learner roles and responsibilities
clearly outlined
Learner orientation and guidance
outlines a clear learning map and
path
Learner rights and process of
appeal is evident
Coach, mentor and facilitator
roles and responsibilities clearly
outlined
A clear roll out / implementation
plan is evident for the overall
programme (only applicable to full
7
Compiled:
March 2009
Revision Date:
August 2010
Criteria
Evidence
Adequat
e
Needs
Improve
ment
Feedback
qualifications and learnerships)
8.
RPL PROCESS
Criteria
Evidence
Adequat
e
Needs
Improvement
Feedback
Policy and procedure for RPL
RPL evidence requirements is
indicated
9.
PROGRAMME EVALUATION SUMMARY
Programme evaluation summary
10.
Weighting
1
Unit standard alignment
15
2
Human resources
15
3
Infrastructure
10
4
Delivery of Learning programme
10
5
Assessment process
20
6
Moderation
10
7
Learner Support
10
8
RPL
10
Meet
Criteria
Development
Area
ACTIONS/EVIDENCE REQUIRED
8
Compiled:
March 2009
Revision Date:
August 2010
Version:
1.2
Action
Accountable Date
1.
2.
3.
11.
PROGRAMME STATUS
Yes
Evaluation status
No
Programme approved
Programme not approved due to outstanding information
12.
RECOMMENDATION
ETQA SPECIALIST
13.
DATE
FINAL APPROVAL
ETQA MANAGER
DATE
9
Compiled:
March 2009
Revision Date:
August 2010
Version:
1.2