The proposed plan of work of the « implementers consortium »: objectives, methods, expected outcomes, timelines, partners Waranya Teokul (Thailand) and Salif Samaké (Mali) Third expert consultation on positive synergies between health systems and GHIs WHO, 2-3 October 2008 Structure of presentation 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Objectives Methods Main activities Expected outcomes Timelines Partners 28-juil.-17 Implementers consortium 2 1. Objectives Mandate = provide scientific, strategic and technical advice to WHO and to the different consortia + development of recommendations Specific terms of reference: 28-juil.-17 Act as a critical clearing-house for the work of the academic and civil society consortia, to ensure the quality and relevance of their outputs to the overall aims of the Project Use the results of the evidence gathered by the academic and civil society consortia to help WHO draft guidelines, formulate policy and implement the subsequent recommendations Act as political mobilisers and advocates & be a ‘voice’ in different fora – major meetings, board meetings, etc. – to report on the “Positive Synergies” work Implementers consortium 3 2. Methods Videoconferences Regular meetings of experts subgroups + of the whole consortium Participation to other groups’ meetings Review of research protocols and evidence Inputs to and review of the draft guidelines Participation to national and international fora Support to the implementation of policy in countries 28-juil.-17 Implementers consortium 4 3. Main activities A. Input to the other 2 consortia (Academic/CSO): Look at the evidence produced by the other consortia Provide technical guidance and feed-back to the work of the other consortia To bring into consideration of the consortiums the challenges faced by countries (fragmented ongoing GHIs, etc.) (Dedicated members of the consortium): Participate in all the meetings of the Academic and civil society consortia and report back to the Implementers’ consortium (All members of the Consortium): Attend the regular stocktaking expert consultations Foster countries’ participation and leadership in the work of the other consortia 28-juil.-17 Implementers consortium 5 B. Technical Guidance: Participation in the Scientific Advisory Committee meetings Consolidated opinion on the quality and relevance of the evidence to the aims of the Project Participation in the meetings of the WHO writing committee that will develop guidance on positive synergies Organise (in collaboration with WHO) a ministerial meeting to endorse WHO guidance (prior to G8) Promote and guide the implementation of policy and recommendations in countries Collaborate in the early evaluation of the policy’s implementation 28-juil.-17 Implementers consortium 6 C. Advocacy: Bring Positive Synergies work on to the agenda of appropriate fora – including Member State meetings, board meetings, and other high-level fora Present the technical guidance that results from the Project in appropriate fora Act as advocates and political mobilisers for the “Positive Synergies” work, and obtain consensus on the recommended strategies for maximizing positive synergies between health systems and GHIs 28-juil.-17 Implementers consortium 7 4. Expected outcomes Research of the 2 other consortia is supervised Evidence is validated Guidelines on positive synergies are fed by practice and developed with inputs from recipient countries A ministerial meeting to endorse WHO guidance is organised A consensus on maximising positive synergies is advocated Positive synergies policy and recommendations are: promoted in countries and in appropriate fora implemented in countries Policy’s implementation is assessed 28-juil.-17 Implementers consortium 8 5. Timelines A. Input to the other two consortia Timeline Look at the evidence produced by the Oct 08 - June 09 other consortia technical guidance Participation in meetings of Academic Sept 08 - June 09 & CSO consortia and report back Regular stock-taking expert consultations Oct 08 - June 09 Foster countries’ participation & leadership in other consortia Oct 08 - June 09 28-juil.-17 Implementers consortium 9 B. Technical guidance Participation in the Scientific Advisory Committee meetings Consolidated opinion on the quality and relevance of the evidence Meetings of WHO writing committee guidance on positive synergies Timeline Oct 08 - June 09 Ministerial meeting to endorse WHO guidance, prior to G8 Late June 09 Implementation of policy and recommendations in countries Evaluation of policy’s implementation June 09- Dec 09 (and beyond) 2010 28-juil.-17 Implementers consortium Oct 08 - June 09 Mar 09 - Dec 09 10 C. Advocacy Timeline Bring Positive Synergies work on to the Oct 08 - Dec 09 agenda of appropriate fora, incl. Member State meetings, board meetings, and other high-level fora Present the technical guidance resulting June - Dec 09 from the project in appropriate fora Advocate and mobilise for the “Positive Oct 08 - Dec 09 Synergies” work, and obtain consensus on the recommended strategies for maximizing positive synergies 28-juil.-17 Implementers consortium 11 6. Partners Leadership = MoHs of Mali and Thailand Around 15 members = Coalition of implementers incl. representatives from GHIs, recipient governments, and NGOs Optimum diversification in terms of professional background, gender, geographical representation, international standing and affiliations 28-juil.-17 Implementers consortium 12 6. Partners Proposed composition of membership : From Africa, Asia, 3 from low income countries Latin America, Europe 3 from lower middle income countries North America 3 from GHIs : GF, GAVIs, PEPFAR 1 each from the Academic Consortium and the Civil Society Consortium, in order to facilitate close cooperation between the different consortia 3 from international NGOs or independent scholars or actively engage in health system 2 public figures such as politicians / celebrity/ journalists (for advocacy purpose) 28-juil.-17 Implementers consortium 13 Thanks for your attention 28-juil.-17 Implementers consortium 14
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz