First PPR Roadmap meeting for the Middle-East
Doha, Qatar – 2-3 December 2015
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
Nadège Leboucq (OIE)
On behalf of the GF-TADs PPR Working Group
First PPR Roadmap meeting for the Middle East - Doha, Qatar – 2-3 December 2015
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
• A Companion Tool of the
Global Strategy for the
Control and Eradication of
PPR to monitor its proper
implementation and assess
progress
• (Can be used as a standalone
Tool)
2
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
• 3 components
 PPR control and eradication
 Strengthening VS
 Improving the prevention
and control of other major
diseases of small ruminants
PMAT
focus
• 3 levels of
intervention
 National
 Regional
 Global
3
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
• is based on the four different stages identified in
the PPR Global Strategy
The Stages correspond to a combination of decreasing
levels of epidemiological risk and increasing levels of
prevention and control
4
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
5
Stakeholder
involvement
Legal
framework
Prevention
and control
Surveillance
Diagnostic
• is based on the five technical elements identified
in the PPR Global Strategy (Component 1)
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
Each Stage is described by the following aspects:
Outcomes
Activities
7
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
• is based on the Enabling Environment concept,
whereby efficient VS are indispensable for the successful
and sustainable implementation of PPR (and other major
TADs) prevention and control activities
12
CCs
27
CCs
29
CCs
33
CCs
Therefore, VS capacity must be reinforced as
the country moves along the PPR Stages
(‘progressive institutionalisation of PPR
prevention and control’)
8
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
• Objective of the PMAT
 To qualify countries at the appropriate stage along the
step-wise approach for the control and eradication of PPR
[assessment
tool]
Where?
How?
 To monitor progress within a given Stage and provide an
indicative list of activities to implement in the year to
come (annual PPR Roadmap)
9
[monitoring
tool]
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
• ‘Organisation’ of the PMAT
Description part
Questionnaire part
‘Way forward’ part
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
• ‘Organisation’ of the PMAT (descriptive part)
 ‘Logical framework approach’
PMAT
GCES
Outcome X
Activity 1
Indicator 1
Target
Activity 2
Indicator 2.1
Target
Indicator 2.2
/
Activity n
11
Means of
verification
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
12
A5
 Train veterinary officers
from central and peripheral
level on value chain and
risk analysis
I5
 Number of Veterinarians
at
central,
regional
(Province,
Directorate,
district….) level involved in
value chain and risk
analysis trained
(target: 75% of the staff has
received training before 12
months after entering into
Stage 1, 100% before 2
years )
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
• ‘Organisation’ of the PMAT (questionnaire part)
GCES
Outcome X
Activity 1
Indicator 1
Activity 2
Indicator 2.1
Indicator 2.2
Activity n
Questions
13
Target
PMAT
Q2
 Value chains and risk analysis studies
have provided a good understanding of
hotspots and transmission pathways to an
extent that those can be specifically
targeted and mitigated (basis for
implementing a Risk based strategic plan to
move to stage 2) [A5 – I5; A6 – I6]
A5
x
Not applicable
Not achieved
Partially achieved
Fully achieved
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
Comments
A5 and A6 achieved (targets)
x
A5 not achieved (target) or
A6 not achieved (target) or
Neither A5 nor A6 achieved
 Train veterinary officers from central and I5
 Number of Veterinarians at central, regional
A6 level
 (VS)
Identifychain
risksandhotspots
and(Province,
I6  Number
of meetings
by the
peripheral
on value
risk
Directorate,
district….)organized
level involved
transmission pathways using the valuein valueVeterinary
to identify
involve
analysis
chain andServices
risk analysis
trainedand
(target:
chains and risk analysis principles
the value
chain.
Evidence
75% ofstakeholders
the staff hasalong
received
training
before
12
meetings
be 1,available
through
monthsof
after
enteringshould
into Stage
100% before
2
years ) minutes of the meetings (target: at least one
meeting per year at national level and if
possible one meeting during the first two
14
years at each regional level)Number of
hotspots identified (no specific targets)
Q7
 The VS compile and maintain data and
have the capability to carry out risk
analysis. The majority of risk management
measures are based on risk assessment [CC
II.3 level 3]
x
Not applicable
Not achieved
Partially achieved
Fully achieved
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
Comments
If level  3  Fully achieved
If level < 3  partially
achieved
- Addressing PVS results
confidentiality issue
- No PVS Assessment or
Assessment older than 3 years 
request for a PVS Assessment
mission
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
• ‘Organisation’ of the PMAT (‘Way forward ’ part)
GCES
Outcome X
Activity 1
Indicator 1
Target
Activity 2
Indicator 2.1
Indicator 2.2
Activity n
Questions
16
Roadmap
Table
PMAT
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
PPR Roadmap Table for Stage 1 Outcome 2
Please report in this Table the activities above that have been partially or Not achieved
at all
Activity
Timeframe
Responsible staff

Activity 1  Train veterinary officers from central and peripheral
level on value chain and risk analysis
September 2015
Mrs xxx
March 2016
Mr xxx
Activity 2  (VS) Identify risks hotspots and transmission pathways
using the value chains and risk analysis principles
Q2
 Value chains and risk analysis studies
have provided a good understanding of
hotspots and transmission pathways to an
extent that those can be specifically
targeted and mitigated (basis for
implementing a Risk based strategic plan to
move to stage 2) [A5 – I5; A6 – I6]
x
17
Not applicable
Not achieved
Partially
achieved
Fully achieved
Activity 3 -
Comments
Neither A5 nor A6 achieved
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
• Moving to the next Stage
‘Gateway’
Stage 2
to enter the ‘Gateway’
step-wise
approach
Stage 3
‘Gateway’
Stage 4
‘Gateway’
19
‘Gateway’  To fulfill:
- The requirement of
the preceding Stage
+ Requirements to enter
the next Stage (GCES)
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
• Moving to the next Stage
20
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
To move to the next stage, all ‘mandatory’ questions (Q1, Q2,
Q3) must be achieved; this is not the case in this example, the
country cannot move to Stage 2 (if external assessment, it can
be granted with a ‘provisional status 1 or 2’ until all
documents are provided and compliant)
21
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
• How to use the PMAT?
[monitoring
tool]
 To monitor progress within a given
Stage and provide an indicative list of
activities to implement in the year to
come (annual PPR Roadmap)
 ‘Self-assessment mode’
22
**** PPR Monitoring
and Assessment Tool
• How to use the PMAT?
[assessment
tool]
 To qualify countries at the appropriate
stage along the step-wise approach for
the control and eradication of PPR
 ‘External assessment mode’ (GFTADs Acceptance involving a Regional
Advisory Group)
23
**** Thank you
First PPR Roadmap meeting for the Middle East - Doha, Qatar – 2-3 December 2015