Health and Social Care Act 2012 Section 251 and Wales Information Governance Board Author: Jane Evans Information Governance Manager Date: March 2012 Version: 0b Purpose and Summary of Document: To inform the committee on the current position Public Health Wales is in regard to section 251 approval and potential future changes in this approval. Sponsoring Executive Director: Mark Dickinson, Executive Director of Planning and Performance. Who will present: Jane Evans Documents attached: Briefing paper on how Wales will take forward requirements of Health and Social Care Act 2012 – section 251 and Wales Information Governance Board. Date of Committee meeting: 20 March 2013 Committee/Groups that have received or considered this paper: N/A Please state of the paper is for: Discussion Decision Information 1 Purpose The divergence of NHS Wales from NHS England means that Wales must take ownership through Welsh Government to ensure that it has in place mechanisms to take forward legislative enactments and requirements. One of these is the necessity for Wales to have a recognised body to ensure that Information Governance is nationally regulated, that the legal requirements concerning Section 251 support of the Health & Social Care Act 2012 are met and that other issues such as the current consultation of the EU General Data Protection Regulation are correctly channelled. 2 Recommendation(s) The Committee have requested a regular update on the situation and are asked to note this update. 3 Committee Members are asked to: Note the concerns of Public Health Wales: Section 251 support has been a concern for a number of years NWIS is taking forward the establishment of a body which can cover the requirements of Section 251 support, and is engaging with Welsh Government, through the Minister for Health and Social Services, to ensure this body has the necessary regulatory powers. 4 Introduction Section 251 of the NHS Act 2006 (originally enacted under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2001), allows the common law duty of confidentiality to be set aside in specific circumstances where anonymised information is not sufficient and where patient consent is not practicable. For example a research study may require access to patient identifiable data to allow linkages between different datasets where the cohort is too large for consent. This would require time limited access to identifiable information where gaining consent from a large retrospective cohort would not be feasible and would require more identifiable data than would be necessary for linkage purposes. An application for Section 251 support requires explicit details about data flows and full justification about why each identifiable piece of information is required and how this allows the aims of the study to be met. Evidence that no other reasonable alternative, such as anonymisation or consent, exists will be assessed via the application form. Public Health Wales S251 briefing paper for IGC Any Section 251 approval will be subject to an annual review in order to assess that the applicant has met the conditions or report plans, and/or action towards meeting them. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that this is submitted on the anniversary of approval. 5 Public Health Wales’ Section 251 applications PHW has successfully applied for Section 251 support for: CARIS Bowel Screening Wales Breast Test Wales Cervical Screening Wales Cervical Screening Wales HPV Vaccination Evaluation Newborn Hearing Screening Wales WCISU are currently covered under a joint UK Association of Cancer Registries application but will need to apply for separate Section 251 support. 6 The problem is the divergence of NHS England and NHS Wales NHS Act 2006 sets out mechanisms and legal basis for Section 251 support for England & Wales. The Health & Social Care Act 2012 does not rescind this but also obscures Wales’ position in respect of the changes that England is undertaking concerning the mechanisms for obtaining Section 251 support. Currently England is working towards these changes (see Appendix). 6.1 Legal basis for processing non-consented person identifiable data There must be a legal basis for processing the above. Section 251 applications are subject to annual review and it is likely that there will be requirements to submit new applications i.e. for a new screening programme. The DoH recognises that in the long term Wales must take on the process for submission, approval and review of Section 251 applications, but that in order to set up regulations there will be a transition period of 18-24 months. Date: March 2013 Version: 1 Page: 3 of 6 Public Health Wales 6.2 S251 briefing paper for IGC ECC Applications – Research and management information There are two distinct areas which may require Section 251 support: 6.3 Research Management information i.e. screening programme evaluation, cancer registration Research Research often crosses boundaries. In most cases ethics approval is necessary. One body should approve for Section 251 support as it would be seen as too onerous for researchers to have to submit to a separate such body in Wales as well as one in England. The Appendix explains the process that Wales would be happy to adopt for Research based projects. 6.4 Management information such as national databases, screening programmes, cancer registry activity Wales has/is taking the following steps: 1. Set up equivalent of National Information Governance Board and Ethics & Confidentiality Committee (ECC) – Welsh Information Governance Board (WIGB) and Privacy Advisory Committee (PAC) will mirror initially the functionality of the English boards. WIGB/PAC have been in operation for about 12 months. Patrick Coyle and Dr Tony Calland sit on WIGB and ECC. 2. Brief the Minister for Health and Social Services on the need to ensure there is a legal basis – regulations A meeting between the Minister for Health and Social Services and Chair of WIGB had been set up for January 2013 but was cancelled due to weather conditions. A briefing paper has been submitted to the Minister and a meeting arranged for late March to discuss the issues raised. 3. Welsh Government Legal department must take on setting up the requirement above. This has been raised in the briefing paper. Welsh Government Legal department refuses to engage directly with NWIS. Therefore instruction must come through the Minister for Health and Social Services. WG Legal would be required to: Transfer Secretary of State powers to Welsh Ministers; Date: March 2013 Version: 1 Page: 4 of 6 Public Health Wales S251 briefing paper for IGC Enable those provisions in regulations; and Formerly establish WIGB and PAC within the regulations. 4. WIGB/PAC to work with DoH/ECC so that will be fit for purpose to take on responsibility and have due process to grant Section 251 support. The Head of Information Governance from NWIS is in dialogue with Department of Health. 5. ECC will expect WIGB/PAC to ensure that applicants have adequate security and confidentiality measures in place to safeguard the data. In England this is compliance with Information Governance Toolkit and a Confidentiality Policy. Wales is unwilling to adopt the Information Governance Toolkit but relies on Caldicott Guardians and Caldicott Principles into Practice (CPiP) annual audit which, like the Toolkit, is a self assessment with the score submitted to NWIS. Head of Information Governance for NWIS is currently comparing the Information Governance Toolkit and CPiP to identify gaps and/or differences so that these can be addressed and CPiP audit strengthened. It is likely that a Confidentiality Policy could also be adopted. 7 Next Steps Public Health Wales is awaiting an outcome from NWIS and will keep the Committee updated. Date: March 2013 Version: 1 Page: 5 of 6 Public Health Wales S251 briefing paper for IGC Appendix Communication re Section 251 function transfer November 21, 2012 As announced by the Department of Health on the 20 September 2012, all functions that advise on the use of confidential patient information without consent, according to regulations made under section 251 of the NHS Act 2006 will transfer from the National Information Governance Board (NIGB) to the Health Research Authority (HRA) on the 31 March 2013. Responsibility for approving applications will lie with the Health Research Authority from April 2013 for research applications; the Secretary of State for Health will retain the approval function for all other nonresearch applications. Please see the FAQs for details on this change. Progress has been good since the original announcement and the following key decisions have been made: The HRA has agreed to convene a Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) which will take on responsibility which lies currently with the Ethics and Confidentiality Committee (ECC); Six current members of the ECC will transfer to the CAG on the 31 March 2013 to support the establishing chair and ensure a strong level of continuity – these posts will be re-advertised towards the end of 2013 and appointed to by March 2014; Recruitment of a further ten CAG members will be completed by January 2013 (advert due to go out at the beginning of December); Current staff associated with the function will transfer on or before the 31 March 2013; The next key step is to appoint the ten CAG members. The HRA will make these appointments, working closely with colleagues from the NHS Commissioning Board Authority, Public Health England, the Information Commissioners Office and others from the Health and Social Care Sector. Work also continues on ensuring that the advisory and decision making functions are wholly transparent and fit for purpose. A range of meetings will be set up with key stakeholders before the end of the calendar year to discuss the developing design work. The engagement work will continue in the new year where it is planned to hold two wider stakeholder events. More information to follow. Date: March 2013 Version: 1 Page: 6 of 6
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz