Capital Programmes
HSE Dashboard - Period 01/14-15
Incidents Reported
There were 176 Incidents reported in Period 1, this is a combined figure from the various Safety
Reporting Systems in use across CPD. Of these Incidents, 109 were Near Misses and included in
the other 69 incidents there was 1 Major Injury and 14 Minor Injuries. The Major Injury and 2 of the
Minor Injuries resulted in Lost Time Incidents all of these LTIs were reportable under RIDDOR.
Hours Worked
In Period 1, a total of 1,152,463 hours were reported by the CPD Project Teams and Suppliers,
slightly down on the average per period in 2013/14 which was 1.166m hours.
Incident Frequency Rate (IFR)
The Blue line on the chart shows the rate for CPD and its supply chain. The red line extracts the
rate for the LU Project Teams and includes incidents allocated to LU and those where no
contractor has been assigned. The IFR excludes Near Misses and therefore reflects the rate of
Incidents causing Injury Damage or Loss. The overall rate for CPD continues to rise increasing to
4.93 Incidents causing Injury, Damage or Loss per 100,000 hours worked. Much of the increase
in this rate can be attributed to a rise in the IFR for the Permanent Way programme
Incident Close out Rate
After 3 periods where the percentage of those incidents closed out within 14 days as a percentage
of all incidents closed in the period rose, this measure fell in Period 1 to under 50 per cent. The
percentage that were closed more that 4 week (28+ days) after the incident occurred increased to
27 per cent. It should be noted that this measure only measures incidents closed in the period
and does not measure the length of time uncompleted incidents have been open.
Minor/Major Injury Rate
The Minor Injury Rate for CPD continues the downwards trend seen in 2013/14 and now stands at
1.62 Minor Injuries per 100,00 hours worked. The Programme with the clearest trend continues to
be the Stations & Crossrail programme which continues its steady downwards path and is now
less than 50 percent above the overall rate at 2.39. Although the increase is not as pronounced as
the fall in that for Stations and Cross Rail, the rate for the SUP has now increased in 5 of the last
7 periods.
There was 1 Major Injury in Period 1 on SUP however as the was also one in the same period last
year there is no sharp change in the rate as has been observed in other periods. The upwards
trend in the Major Injury rate in the second half of 2013/14 was due to generally fewer hours
worked in these periods compared to the second half of 2012/13.
Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR)
In addition to the Major Injury that occurred on SUP which resulted in a Lost Time Injury there
were 2 LTIs in the Permanent Way Area. Despite these LTIs the rates for all of the Programmes
calculated and that for CPD overall remain stable in Period 1 with the overall CPD rate remaining
at 0.31 LTIs per 100,000 hours worked. The only programmes that are under the 0.20 target for
this rate are JNP Projects, PCCU and BCV Upgrades
RIDDOR Rate (AFR)
There was a small increase in the AFR for CPD increasing to 0.16 RIDDOR reportable Injuries per
100,000 hours worked. As highlighted above both of the LTIs that occurred in the Permanent Way
Programme were also RIDDOR reportable as the Injured Persons were unable to carry out their
normal duties for more than 7 days and the AFR for the Permanent Way Programme increased
again in Period 1 and at 0.30 is almost twice the overall rate for CPD.
Incident Causes
'Not following procedures/rules' (21.6 per cent) remains the most common cause of Incidents,
followed by 'Poor Asset Condition' (17.6 per cent) and 'Lack of Hazard Identification' (17.4 per
cent). Please note that this currently does not include causes for JNP Project Incidents which are
classified using a different set of incident causes
Environmental Incidents
Following the above trend number of Environmental Incidents in Period 13 (8), there were only 3
Incidents in Period 1 which helped the Environmental Incident Rate to fall slightly to 0.33 per
100,000 hours worked. The Pie Chart of the categorisation of Environmental Incidents over the
past 3 months shows that ‘Oil Leak / spill’ continues to be the most common cause of
Environmental Incident (36 per cent) however over the past 3 periods 'Asset related Noise
Nuisance' (22 per cent) was more of an issue than ‘Works Noise Nuisance’ (14 per cent).
Planned General Inspections (PGI) and HS&E Tours
In a continuation of the trend seen in previous periods, there were a significant more PGIs
completed than planned (164 planned, 217 completed) with 39 of the extra PGIs being carried out
by the Stations Upgrades Programme team. There was better agreement between planned and
completed Safety Tours with 63 planned and 62 completed.
Total Incidents, Near Misses and
Injuries
In
Incidents closed in Period - Days to complete
Incident Frequency Rate
(Per 100,000 Hours Worked)
250
100%
90%
6.0
80%
5.0
200
70%
60%
4.0
150
3.0
100
29-90
40%
15-28
1-14
30%
2.0
20%
50
1.0
0
Minor Injuries
P6
P7
P8
Major Injuries
0.0
P9 P10 P11 P12 P13 P1
No Injury
CPD Total
Near Misses
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
0%
P8
P9
P10 P11 P12 P13
P1
3.71 3.78 3.93 4.02 4.20 4.32 4.43 4.43 4.53 4.68 4.76 4.80 4.93
CPD (LU Incidents) 1.47 1.44 1.53 1.56 1.66 1.69 1.59 1.54 1.50 1.50 1.52 1.49 1.46
0.25
Major Injury Rate
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
(Per 100,000 Hours Worked)
4
(Per 100,000 Hours Worked)
P2
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
P9 P10 P11 P12 P13 P1
CPD
1.85 1.80 1.78 1.73 1.78 1.76 1.77 1.72 1.76 1.73 1.68 1.65 1.62
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
P9 P10 P11 P12 P13 P1
CPD
0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
P9 P10 P11 P12 P13 P1
CPD
0.37 0.40 0.42 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.42 0.40 0.40 0.38 0.34 0.31 0.31
0.4
(Per 100,000 Hours Worked)
P5
RIDDOR Injury Rate (AFR)
P4
10%
(Per 100,000 Hours Worked)
P3
Note: Near Misses
not included
Lost Time Injury Rate
(LTIFR)
P2
Minor Injury Rate
50%
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
P9 P10 P11 P12 P13 P1
CPD
0.16 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16
SUP
1.03 0.93 0.87 0.82 0.75 0.67 0.76 0.75 0.76 0.83 0.85 0.85 0.96
SUP
0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13
SUP
0.10 0.10 0.10 0.17 0.21 0.18 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.25
SUP
0.07 0.07 0.10 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.21
Stations
3.62 3.49 3.53 3.34 3.41 3.27 3.23 3.03 3.07 2.95 2.80 2.58 2.39
Stations
0.10 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06
Stations
0.76 0.85 0.92 0.89 0.86 0.78 0.73 0.62 0.62 0.56 0.47 0.34 0.33
Stations
0.29 0.32 0.31 0.28 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.13 0.12
Permanent Way
2.20 2.14 2.05 2.15 2.16 2.21 2.07 2.07 2.17 2.08 1.99 2.06 2.07
Permanent Way
0.08 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.17 0.19 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14
Permanent Way
0.62 0.62 0.60 0.63 0.59 0.63 0.64 0.65 0.63 0.59 0.58 0.59 0.58
Permanent Way
0.33 0.33 0.32 0.37 0.31 0.33 0.35 0.31 0.30 0.26 0.26 0.28 0.30
Power/Comms/Cooling 0.54 0.47 0.31 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.31 0.24 0.32 0.32 0.40 0.57 0.50
Power/Comms/Cooling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
Power/Comms/Cooling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
Power/Comms/Cooling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
BCV Upgrades
0.33 0.38 0.00 0.46 0.50 0.54 1.13 1.71 1.78 1.79 1.82 1.82 1.85
BCV Upgrades
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
BCV Upgrades
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
BCV Upgrades
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
JNP Projects
0.98 1.16 1.21 1.07 1.14 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12
JNP Projects
0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00
JNP Projects
0.18 0.24 0.24 0.18 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.12 0.18 0.18
JNP Projects
0.06 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.12 0.12
Incident Causes Last 13 Periods
Poor Asset
Condition
17.4%
Lack of hazard
identification
17.6%
No or Wrong
Method
Statement
4.6%
Environmental Incident Rate (per 100,000 Hours
Worked)
0.50
0.45
Poor
Housekeeping
8.9%
Poor control of
tooling
9.2%
PGIs
and HS&E Tours
300
250
Vibration
7%
Number of
PGIs
Other
9.5%
0.35
0.25
Competence
1.3%
Inappropriate
manual
handling
2.3%
Not following
procedures /
rules
21.6%
0.20
Works Noise
Nuisance
14%
Other
7%
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12 P13 P1
Series1 0.46 0.46 0.43 0.41 0.36 0.36 0.33 0.31 0.31 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.33
200
150
100
0.40
0.30
Lack of
Operational
Discipline
7.0%
CPD Environmental Incidents
(rolling 3 Periods)
Oil leak / spill
36%
Asset related
Noise
Nuisance
22%
50
Breach /
potential
breach of
discharge
consent
7%
Leak / spill other than oil
7%
PGI's Planned
PGI's Complete
Number of
Tours
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
Tours Planned
Tours Complete
P9
189
246
P10
91
119
P11
152
251
P12
198
232
P13
179
217
P1
164
217
P9
84
88
P10
55
53
P11
77
116
P12
98
102
P13
70
67
P1
63
62
Printed: 12/05/2014
System Safety Metrics
SUP Assurance submissions success rate
2
52
2
4
67
63
1
23
58
21
2
4
20
36
6% 3%
5%
2% 3%
0%
0
16
2
21
11% 10%
1
0%
0
25
21
10%
SUP Late assurance submissions
b
0
5%
Number of Submissions Received
Percentage of Submissions
1
0
10
0% 0%
Total Submissions Approved in Period
Total submissions not approved 'first time' following safety related comment(s)
70
60
50
Dependencies
40
S8 Total
S8 Open
30
10
0
P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12P13 P1
No. Submissions < 1 day review
No. Submitted 1 - 5 day review
No. Submitted 6 - 10 days
Surveillance Contravention Categorisation
Incorrect Revision of Prints
2
8
1
2
Period
4
3
2
0
1
P1
1
P13
3
P12
3
P9
1
3
P10
4
6
P8
P3
3
6
P5
4
3
P4
5
96
8
P7
1
2
Untidiness of Wiring Installation
P11
10
7
Restrictions for Operation
Total S-stock restrictions
S8 (excluding depots)
S7 total
Depots
Total S Stock Neasden Depot
Neasden Depot (S8)
Neasden Depot (S7)
Hammersmith Depot (S7)
Lillie Bridge Depot (S7)
Upminster Depot (S7)
Ealing Common Depot (S7)
Northfields Depot (S7)
Ruislip (S7/S8)
31
1
31
7
7
6
4
2
8
4
6
1
Closed
2
P6
10
37
Lack of House Keeping
2
2
0
Total Surveillance Contraventions
Status Tracker
4
15
P2
Open
Recovery/Removal of
Redundant Equipment, Wiring &
Labelling
Incorrect Installation of Wiring &
Equipment
Open Snags (safety relevant)
Safety Related Total
Safety Related Open
128
53
System Safety Measures
The Graphs on this page relate to
System Safety Measures. Currently
these measure relate mainly to the
Sub-Surface Upgrade Programme
with Operational Restrictions Graphs
for the Northern and Jubilee Line
Programmes.
The Graphs relate to;
The number of Assurance
Submissions that failed to be
approved first time due to Safety
related comments;
Late Assurance Submissions which
are defined as those submissions
received immediately prior to the
deployment date (measured in the
date groupings as shown) and
Graphs relating to Surveillance on
legacy signalling, contraventions
picked up and those closed per period
and their categorisation.
Operational Restrictions and Severity
No Labelling of Wires, Cables &
Equipment
Northern Line Operational Restriction and Severity
50
Jubilee Line Operational Restriction and Severity
45
30
40
25
35
20
Intolerable
15
Tolerable (mitigation)
Tolerable (review)
10
Tolerable
5
Intolerable
30
Tolerable
(mitigation)
Tolerable (review)
25
20
Tolerable
15
10
0
1.1 15/02/13
(NMA1)
1.2 NMA 2 Go
NMA 3
NMA3 Go 5.0 NMA5 5.1 NMA5
17/04/13
live
Trial Ops live (3.1)
Go Live
27/3/14
(3.08.10
(v2.0+2) (v2.0&3.0)
for NMA1)
1.17
1.18
1.2
1.21
2
2.02
2.04
2.07
2.08
2.09
3.00 - 22/6
3.01 - 26/6
3.02 - 4/7
3.02 - 18/7
3.03 - 9/8
3.04 - 19/8
3.05 - 20/9
3.06 - 12/10
3.06 - 16/11
3.07 - 17/11
3.08 - 28/11
3.10 - 4/3
3.11 - 23/4
3.12 - 22/5
3.13 - Aug
3.13 - Jan
3.14 - March
3.15-Sept
3.16-Jan 2014
3.17 May 2014
5
0
1.00 31/01/13
(Pre
NMA1)
Number of ORs
No. of Contraventions
2
Period 1
787
3
20
% of submissions not approved first time following safety related comment(s)
20
SUP Operational
Restrictions
OR version & Date
Printed: 19/05/2014