HOW TO CREATE A GREEN SOCIETY – CASE
OF KAMPALA CAPITAL CITY
Edison Masereka
Manager, Business Development and Research
Kampala Capital City Authority
Strategic Context
• National Development Program
II (2015/16 – 2019/20)
• KCCA Strategic Plan 2014/15 –
2018/19
• To transform Kampala into a
Vibrant, Attractive and
Sustainable City
• Kampala Climate Change Action
Plan
Kampala
Climate
Change
Action Plan
Energy & Climate
Profile
With the support from
Please refer to the downloadable version on KCCA website www.kcca.go.ug/?jsp=climate_change_strategy
K ampala
C limate
C hange
A ction Plan
Please refer to the downlable version on KCCA website www.kcca.go.ug/?jsp=climate_change_strategy
Approaches
Creating enabling environments
•Policy • Regulations • Incentives
•Community Development Programmes
Communication, participation and support
Promotion of best practice
•Information and knowledge sharing
•Awareness raising management • Dialogues
•Supporting and encouraging actions by stakeholders and community-led initiatives
Leading by example
•Management of our assets, buildings, fleet, facilities
•Climate friendly approaches to service provision
•Role model and exemplary actions
•Demonstration of best practices and eco standards
Innovation and technology
Partnerships
•Public-private • Government agencies • Community
•Development partners • Academic and other
institutions
•Pilot initiatives using appropriate and alternative technologies
•Research and development
•Smart Services
Action Plan
Prioritizing the Action Plan
Prioritizing the Action Plan
Example: Energy, NMT & Public Buildings
Smart Moving Kampala Project
Eco-stoves in
public markets
Biogas recovery at
Kasanga
school
Solar street
lighting
Public buildings
renovation & dev
renewable energy
Example: Improved Cook stoves in Schools
Example: Organic Urban Agriculture
Example: Transport, Greening & waste management
Reducing Urban Heat
Island
Dev carbon sinks
Waste
Management
Improving pedestrian
mobility
Public Transport
Example: ECO Pavilion at KCF
Example: ECO Pavilion at KCF
Example: Internal Policies
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Criteria for Project Selection and Prioritization
Project provides health, safety, or social benefits or will reduce health, safety, or social risks
Project directly benefits disadvantaged segments of the population
Project contributes to environmental protection goals and objectives
Project increases or maintains infrastructure reliability or integrity, service provision, or efficiencies
Project has a positive impact on revenues, the recurrent budget, or economic development
Project is identified as a priority in planning initiatives or as a legal or regulatory requirement
Project is likely to succeed; risks are being considered and mitigated
Climate Smart and Resilience Criteria
Project exhibits strategic planning for carbon through change in scale/density
Project exhibits strategic planning for carbon through selection of low carbon energy source
Project exhibits strategic planning for carbon through utilization of energy saving technologies
Project exhibits strategic planning through minimized capital costs
Project exhibits strategic planning through minimized lifecycle costs
Project exhibits strategic planning through minimized replacement costs
Project minimizes vulnerabilities as exhibited in climate informed cost.
Example: Internal Policies
Busega Primary School
1
Criteria
Scale
Units
Conventional
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
1
100%
13,078
1
100%
13,078
1
100%
13,078
Grid (20%); Diesel
(70%); Biogas (8%);
Solar (2%)
Grid (20%); LPG
(32%); Biogas (8%);
Solar (40%)
Solar (92%) Biogas
(8%)
100%
0.21
46%
0.10
7%
0.02
Proportion of Conventional
Percent of Conventional
m2 of conditioned space
Total energy by source
Energy Source
Percent CO2e per MWh of conventional
tCO2e per MWh
Energy Saving
Technologies
Carbon Pollution
Capital Cost
Life-cycle Cost
LED; Passive
LED; Passive
LED; Passive
Ventiliation; Natural Ventiliation; Natural
Ventilation
Daylighting
Daylighting
Technology
Percent Energy Use of Conventional
Annual Carbon (tCO2e)
Percent of annual CO 2e of conventional
Decadal Carbon (tCO2e)
Life-cycle Carbon (tCO2e)
Percent of conventional
Cost in millions
Percent of conventional
Period in years
Annual Operating Cost (millions)
Major Maintenance & Rehab
Cost in millions
$
$
$
$
100%
22
100%
223
1,781
100%
10,425
100%
80
80
7,084
23,909
$
$
$
$
96%
10
44%
99
791
103%
10,725
105%
80
92
7,084
25,129
$
$
$
$
96%
2
7%
16
129
107%
11,153
97%
80
53
7,909
23,302
Towards Implementing the CC Action Plan
Thank You