Alan Dix Lancaster University www.hcibook.com/alan/papers/Tamodia2002 TAMODIA 2002 managing the ecology of interaction • rationale • phenomena of rich interaction • new paradigms TAMODIA 2002 overview TAMODIA 2002 the problem • task models – formal description • situatedness – unique contexts • ethnography – rich ecologies bringing them together? everything formal tasks TAMODIA 2002 option 1 – reject formalism everything formal tasks TAMODIA 2002 option 2 – enforce formalism everything formal tasks TAMODIA 2002 option 3 – expand and accept TAMODIA 2002 HCI – dialogue with the computer ubicomp – no computer/artefact divide wearable/cyborg – no computer/user divide TAMODIA 2002 dialogue with the environment phenomena TAMODIA 2002 TAMODIA 2002 phenomena • • • • • collaboration information triggers artefacts placeholders • situatedness • intentional cycle + continuity & duration • already in several notations – e.g. CTT • add artefacts too ? TAMODIA 2002 collaboration pre-planned cognitive model goal action situated action environment action TAMODIA 2002 information TAMODIA 2002 control • open loop control – no feedback – fragile control system environment actions TAMODIA 2002 control • open loop control – no feedback – fragile • closed loop control – uses feedback – robust feedback control system environment actions TAMODIA 2002 adding information 0. pour tea how many cups? 1. boil kettle Plan 0: 1 then 2 when kettle boils 3 then 4 2. get out cups 3. make pot of tea 4. pour tea TAMODIA 2002 triggers process – what happens and order get post from pigeon hole bring post to desk open post TAMODIA 2002 triggers process – what happens and order triggers – when and why first thing in the morning get post from pigeon hole holding post bring post to desk at coffee time open post • ethnographic studies • as shared representation • as focus of activity • act as triggers, information sources, etc. TAMODIA 2002 artefacts • knowing where you are in a process – like a program counter • coding: – memory – explicit (e.g. to do list) – in artefacts TAMODIA 2002 placeholders TAMODIA 2002 where are you? 1. controller choose new flight level 2. controller tell pilot new flight level 3. pilot confirm new flight level 4. pilot ascend to new level 5. new flight level achieved TAMODIA 2002 step 1. choose new flight level 1. controller choose new flight level 2. controller tell pilot new flight level 3. pilot confirm new flight level 4. pilot ascend to new level 5. new flight level achieved TAMODIA 2002 step 3. flight level confirmed 1. controller choose new flight level 2. controller tell pilot new flight level 3. pilot confirm new flight level 4. pilot ascend to new level 5. new flight level achieved TAMODIA 2002 step 5. new flight level acheived 1. controller choose new flight level 2. controller tell pilot new flight level 3. pilot confirm new flight level 4. pilot ascend to new level 5. new flight level achieved • system models – event centric • status–event analysis – continuous time (status) and discrete (events) – many generic issues and phenomena • task models: – in the annotations and descriptions – concurrency – true or interleaved? TAMODIA 2002 continuity & duration TAMODIA 2002 intentional cycle triggers artefacts memory actions information and placeholders artefacts paradigms TAMODIA 2002 • socio-organisational Church–Turing hypothesis • embodied computation • embodied interaction • incidental interaction TAMODIA 2002 paradigms TAMODIA 2002 the socio-organisational Church-Turing hypothesis TAMODIA 2002 TAMODIA 2002 TAMODIA 2002 TAMODIA 2002 • the THEOREM – Church’s lambda calculus and Turing machines are ‘equivalent’ • the POSTULATE – all computation is ‘equivalent’ TAMODIA 2002 the Church-Turing thesis • are politcial, social, economic ... but are also ... • information processing entities so ... TAMODIA 2002 organisations similarities to computers and cognition • computational power • computational structure TAMODIA 2002 the socio-organisational ChurchTuring hypothesis • computer: program and data • organisation: process and information plus … • computer data: LTM, STM, program counter • organisation: ???? files, papers … placeholders TAMODIA 2002 the organisation as a computer TAMODIA 2002 parallels process data placeholder computer cog sci organisation program procedural memory processes data LTM files program counter STM, activation location of artefacts stimuli triggers initiative interrupts, events TAMODIA 2002 parallels process data placeholder computer cog sci organisation program procedural memory processes data LTM files program counter STM, activation location of artefacts stimuli triggers ??? people initiative interrupts, events interpretation ??? TAMODIA 2002 embodied computation the world is full of computation cognitive social economic this helps us understand the world TAMODIA 2002 ubiquity of compuation computation happens in the world memory networks processors this helps us understand computation TAMODIA 2002 physicality of compuation • computation is incremental • interaction not Magnus Magnusson • pointers take space • where log space comes from • space means time • o(N) memory takes 3√N time • representation not information • importance of interpretation TAMODIA 2002 embodied computation some examples TAMODIA 2002 embodied interaction • Paul Dourish’s term • focus on: – tangible computing – social computing • users create meaning • designers give them the means • where does task analysis fit in? TAMODIA 2002 embodied interaction TAMODIA 2002 incidental interaction • traditional interaction – purposeful – user as controller – system as slave • incidental interaction – user acts for one purpose – system observes and acts TAMODIA 2002 incidental interaction • traditional interaction – purposeful – user as controller, system as slave • incidental interaction – system observes and acts, not user’s purpose • examples: – car lights – auto-flush toilet – intelligent homes TAMODIA 2002 incidental interaction • model main purposeful activity – use to design sensors • model activity to be aided/enhanced – use to design actuators TAMODIA 2002 ? task analysis winding up TAMODIA 2002 • ecologically valid task modelling – incorporate rich phenomena – but also understand limits • role? – normative or normal? – definitive process or descriptive grammar – main task or subsidiary task TAMODIA 2002 final thoughts …
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz