Coimbra, 30th September 2011
TOK Meeting III
Domenico Cotroneo
University of Naples Federico II
[email protected]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Agenda
•
•
•
•
•
Deliverable to be finalized and upcoming deliverables
Mid-Term Review;
Questionnaire;
Report and Form C;
Date for next actions.
[1]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Upcoming Deliverables
WP LEADER
WP 3
QUANTITATIVE
EVALUATION OF
ROBUSTNESS
AND DEPENDABILITY
FCTUC Prof.
Henrique
Madeira
TASK
T3.1
Quantitative evaluation at
component level
Task Leader: Prof. Marco
Vieira
T3.2
Quantitative evaluation at
system level
Task Leader: Prof. Marco
Vieira
FAULT
DIAGNOSIS AND
DYNAMIC
RECONFIGURATI
ON
PARTNER
Oct 2011
D3.2: Quantitative methods and
procedures for assessment of OTS-based
software systems
Feb 2012
Nov 2011
T4.1
Detection and location
mechanisms for diagnosing
software faults
Task Leader: Dr. Christian
Esposito
D4.1: State-of-the-art on fault diagnosis
mechanism (report)
Fault treatment and dynamic
reconfiguration techniques
Task Leader: Dr. Catello di
Martino
D4.2: Progress report on on-line
diagnosis and reconfiguration techniques
T4.2
MONTH
CINI/UoN
CSW
T3.3
CINI/UoN
Prof.
Domenico
Cotroneo
FUTURE DELIVERABLES
D3.1: Quantitative methods for
assessment of OTS software components
Quantitative evaluation at
system interconnection level
Task Leader: Prof. Henrique
Madeira
WP 4
TECHNIQUES
FOR ON-LINE
DELIVERABLES
FCTUC
CSW
Mar 2012
[2]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Upcoming Deliverables
WP LEADER
TASK
T3.1
WP 3
QUANTITATIVE
FCTUC Prof.
Henrique
Madeira
Quantitative evaluation at
component level
Task Leader: Prof. Marco
Vieira
DELIVERABLES
D3.1: Quantitative methods for
assessment of OTS software components
MONTH
Oct 2011
Quantitative evaluation at
system level
Task Leader: Prof. Marco
Vieira
Scope: Description of all theD3.2:
quantitative
Quantitative methods and
procedures for assessment of OTS-based
Feb 2012
Quantitative evaluation
at
softwarea
systems
evaluation methods,
providing
suitable
solution
system interconnection level
T3.3
Task Leader: Prof. Henrique
to be used for estimating
the dependability level
Madeira
Detection andas
locationwell as of the entire
ofWP single
OTS items,
4
mechanisms for diagnosing
D4.1: State-of-the-art on fault diagnosis
T
T4.1
software faults
Nov 2011
mechanism (report)
CINI/UoN
software
systems.
Task Leader: Dr. Christian
Prof.
EVALUATION OF
ROBUSTNESS
AND DEPENDABILITY
ECHNIQUES
FOR ON LINE
FAULT
DIAGNOSIS AND
DYNAMIC
RECONFIGURATI
ON
T3.2
Esposito
Domenico
Cotroneo
Fault treatment and dynamic
reconfiguration techniques
Task Leader: Dr. Catello di
Martino
D2.3: Guidelines to support software
D4.2: Progress report on on-line
diagnosis and reconfiguration techniques
Person in charge: prof. Marco Vieira
FUTURE DELIVERABLES
T4.2
PARTNER
CINI/UoN
CSW
FCTUC
CSW
Mar 2012
[3]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Upcoming Deliverables
WP LEADER
TASK
T3.1
WP 3
QUANTITATIVE
FCTUC Prof.
Henrique
Madeira
Quantitative evaluation at
component level
Task Leader: Prof. Marco
Vieira
DELIVERABLES
D3.1: Quantitative methods for
assessment of OTS software components
MONTH
Oct 2011
Quantitative evaluation at
system level
Task Leader: Prof. Marco
Vieira
Scope: Description of all theD3.2:
quantitative
Quantitative methods and
procedures for assessment of OTS-based
Feb 2012
Quantitative evaluation
at
softwarea
systems
evaluation methods,
providing
suitable
solution
system interconnection level
T3.3
Task Leader: Prof. Henrique
to be used for estimating
the dependability level
Madeira
Detection andas
locationwell as of the entire
ofWP single
OTS items,
4
mechanisms for diagnosing
D4.1: State-of-the-art on fault diagnosis
T
T4.1
software faults
Nov 2011
mechanism (report)
CINI/UoN
software
systems.
Task Leader: Dr. Christian
Prof.
EVALUATION OF
ROBUSTNESS
AND DEPENDABILITY
ECHNIQUES
FOR ON LINE
FAULT
DIAGNOSIS AND
DYNAMIC
RECONFIGURATI
ON
T3.2
Esposito
Domenico
Cotroneo
Fault treatment and dynamic
reconfiguration techniques
Task Leader: Dr. Catello di
Martino
D2.3: Guidelines to support software
D4.2: Progress report on on-line
diagnosis and reconfiguration techniques
Person in charge: prof. Marco Vieira
T4.2
Unknown
status?!?
FUTURE DELIVERABLES
PARTNER
CINI/UoN
CSW
FCTUC
CSW
Mar 2012
[4]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Upcoming Deliverables
Scope: Overview of the state of the art on
Quantitative evaluation at
component level
D3.1: Quantitative methods for
software faults
the
T3.1 diagnosis, and description of Oct
2011
Task Leader: Prof. Marco
assessment of OTS software components
Vieira
WP 3
proposed
detection
and location mechanisms, as
Q
Quantitative evaluation at
FCTUC Prof.
system level
well
as
the architecture
of the proposed diagnosis
Henrique
T3.2
R
Task Leader: Prof. Marco
Madeira
D3.2: Quantitative methods and
D
Vieira
procedures for assessment of OTS-based
Feb 2012
engine.
Quantitative evaluation at
software systems
WP LEADER
TASK
DELIVERABLES
MONTH
UANTITATIVE
EVALUATION OF
OBUSTNESS
AND EPEND
ABILITY
T3.3
PARTNER
CINI/UoN
CSW
system interconnection level
Task Leader: Prof. Henrique
Madeira
Person in charge:
dr. Christian Esposito
Detection and location
WP 4
TECHNIQUES
FOR ON-LINE
FAULT
DIAGNOSIS AND
DYNAMIC
RECONFIGURATI
ON
T4.1
CINI/UoN
Prof.
Domenico
Cotroneo
FUTURE DELIVERABLES
T4.2
mechanisms for diagnosing
software faults
Task Leader: Dr. Christian
Esposito
Fault treatment and dynamic
reconfiguration techniques
Task Leader: Dr. Catello di
Martino
D4.1: State-of-the-art on fault diagnosis
mechanism (report)
Nov 2011
FCTUC
CSW
D4.2: Progress report on on-line
diagnosis and reconfiguration techniques
Mar 2012
[5]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Upcoming Deliverables
Scope: Overview of the state of the art on
Quantitative evaluation at
component level
D3.1: Quantitative methods for
software faults
the
T3.1 diagnosis, and description of Oct
2011
Task Leader: Prof. Marco
assessment of OTS software components
Vieira
WP 3
proposed
detection
and location mechanisms, as
Q
Quantitative evaluation at
FCTUC Prof.
system level
well
as
the architecture
of the proposed diagnosis
Henrique
T3.2
R
Task Leader: Prof. Marco
Madeira
D3.2: Quantitative methods and
D
Vieira
procedures for assessment of OTS-based
Feb 2012
engine.
Quantitative evaluation at
software systems
WP LEADER
TASK
DELIVERABLES
MONTH
UANTITATIVE
EVALUATION OF
OBUSTNESS
AND EPEND
ABILITY
T3.3
PARTNER
CINI/UoN
CSW
system interconnection level
Task Leader: Prof. Henrique
Madeira
Person in charge:
dr. Christian Esposito
Detection and location
WP 4
TECHNIQUES
FOR ON-LINE
T4.1
mechanisms for diagnosing
software faults
Task Leader: Dr. Christian
Esposito
D4.1: State-of-the-art on fault diagnosis
mechanism (report)
Nov 2011
At the moment, the first draft of the deliverable
Fault treatment and dynamic
has been exchanged
the
participants.
reconfigurationamong
techniques
D4.2:
Progress
report on on-line
T4.2
Mar 2012
FAULT
DIAGNOSIS AND
DYNAMIC
RECONFIGURATI
ON
CINI/UoN
Prof.
Domenico
Cotroneo
Task Leader: Dr. Catello di
Martino
FCTUC
CSW
diagnosis and reconfiguration techniques
We are waiting a contribution from SESM about
F
UTURE DELIVERABLES
Diagnosis
Background and Related.
[6]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Future Deliverables
WP LEADER
WP 3
QUANTITATIVE
EVALUATION OF
ROBUSTNESS
AND DEPENDABILITY
FCTUC Prof.
Henrique
Madeira
TASK
T3.1
Quantitative evaluation at
component level
Task Leader: Prof. Marco
Vieira
T3.2
Quantitative evaluation at
system level
Task Leader: Prof. Marco
Vieira
FAULT
DIAGNOSIS AND
DYNAMIC
RECONFIGURATI
ON
PARTNER
Oct 2011
D3.2: Quantitative methods and
procedures for assessment of OTS-based
software systems
Feb 2012
Nov 2011
T4.1
Detection and location
mechanisms for diagnosing
software faults
Task Leader: Dr. Christian
Esposito
D4.1: State-of-the-art on fault diagnosis
mechanism (report)
Fault treatment and dynamic
reconfiguration techniques
Task Leader: Dr. Catello di
Martino
D4.2: Progress report on on-line
diagnosis and reconfiguration techniques
T4.2
MONTH
CINI/UoN
CSW
T3.3
CINI/UoN
Prof.
Domenico
Cotroneo
FUTURE DELIVERABLES
D3.1: Quantitative methods for
assessment of OTS software components
Quantitative evaluation at
system interconnection level
Task Leader: Prof. Henrique
Madeira
WP 4
TECHNIQUES
FOR ON-LINE
DELIVERABLES
FCTUC
CSW
Mar 2012
[7]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Mid-Term Review: Guidelines
WHERE:
Naples – at CINI, Via Cinthia, Complesso Universitario di
Monte S.Angelo
WHEN:
20th December 2011, 10.00 - 17.00
19th December 2011, 10.00 - 17.00 <<-- Preparation meeting of
CSTEP participants at CINI.
WHY:
To build a constructive dialogue between the network
participants and the Research Executive Agency project
officer and to receive feedbacks from/to the consortium
the Research Executive Agency (REA)
and
[8]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Mid-Term Review: what to do and when?
MID TERM REVIEW REPORT aka Progress Report (Coordinator) by 20th
November 2011.
This report must make explicit reference to the overall progress of the project
and to deliverables update including recruitment and international
conferences/events.
QUESTIONNAIRES (Fellows) by 15th November 2011.
MEETING with the EC Officer on 20th December 2011.
[9]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda
1. Introduction (10 minutes) by the REA Representative and the
Coordinator
2. Coordinator’s Report (60 minutes) on the Network and the MTR
Report covering the following aspects:
a) Scientific
b) Transfer of Knowledge & Networking
c) Management
d) Impact
[10]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda
Introduction
(10 minutes)
the REA Representative
and
The1.scientific,
technological
orbysocial-economic
reasons
forthecarrying out
Coordinator
the research
in the field covered by the research; the researcher
objectives of the network; scientific highlight of the work so far.
2. Coordinator’s Report (60 minutes) on the Network and the MTR
Report covering the following aspects:
a) Scientific
b) Transfer of Knowledge & Networking
c) Management
d) Impact
Each
research
unit,
i.e.,scientist
CINI, SESM,
CSW
and their
FCTUC,
has to
provide
3. Tour
de Table:
Each
should
present
research
Team
and a
coupletheir
of slides
to the
Coordinator
by 10th November on scientific highlights
role within
the
network
of the carried out work.
[11]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda
1. Introduction (10 minutes) by the REA Representative and the
Secondment
implementation vsGantt chart plan; recruitment – new
Coordinator
knowledge acquisition; network wide events and events open to external
2. Coordinator’s
(60institution.
minutes) on the Network and the MTR
participants,
benefitsReport
for each
Report covering the following aspects:
a) Scientific
b) Transfer of Knowledge & Networking
c) Management
d) Impact
Each
research
unit,
i.e.,scientist
CINI, SESM,
CSW
and their
FCTUC,
has to
provide
3. Tour
de Table:
Each
should
present
research
Team
and a
couple
of slides
Coordinator by 10th November on the benefits
their role
withinto
thethe
network
achieved during the first two years of CSTEP.
[12]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda
1. Introduction (10 minutes) by the REA Representative and the
Coordinator
Recruitment Report; Financial aspects; any proposed re-orientation of the
2. Coordinator’s Report (60 minutes) on the Network and the MTR
networks’
activities; dissemination, and IPR (Intellectual Property Rights).
Report covering the following aspects:
a) Scientific
b) Transfer of Knowledge & Networking
c) Management
d) Impact
CSW
should
provide
slides
on the
on-going
activity
the
3.
Tour
de Table:
Each
scientist
should
presentrecruitment
their research
Teamto
and
Coordinator
by 10th
November,
their role within
the
network while other participants should provide
slides on any re-orientation on the project’s activities.
[13]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda
1. Introduction (10 minutes) by the REA Representative and the
Coordinator
2. Coordinator’s Report (60 minutes) on the Network and the MTR
LastingReport
collaborations,
Complementary
covering the following
aspects: skills acquisition; and Career
development.
a) Scientific
b) Transfer of Knowledge & Networking
c) Management
d) Impact
3. Tour de Table: Each scientist should present their research Team and
Nowithin
contributions
from research units are required.
their role
the network
[14]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda
1. Introduction (10 minutes) by the REA Representative and the
Coordinator
2. Coordinator’s Report (60 minutes) on the Network and the MTR
Report covering the following aspects:
a) Scientific
b) Transfer of Knowledge & Networking
c) Management
d) Impact
3. Tour de Table: Each scientist should present their research Team and
their role within the network
[15]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda
1. Introduction (10 minutes) by the REA Representative and the
Coordinator
2. Coordinator’s Report (60 minutes) on the Network and the MTR
Report covering the following aspects:
Leadersa)ofScientific
each research unit, i.e., CINI, SESM, CSW and FCTUC, have
b) Transfer
of Knowledge
Networking
to prepare
slides on
their team,&activities
carried out, obtained results, and
c) Management
future work.
Deadline: 20th December 2011.
d) Impact
3. Tour de Table: Each scientist should present their research Team
and their role within the network
[16]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda
4. Selected Individual Reports (10-15 minutes per fellows)
The Fellows should present themselves, their background, their experience in
the IAPP network. This presentation should go beyond the scientific project and
should include their expectations on the possible impact of the action on their
future career.
[17]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda
4. Selected Individual Reports (10-15 minutes per fellows)
The Fellows should present themselves, their background, their
experience in the IAPP network. This presentation should go beyond the
scientific project and should include their expectations on the possible
impact of the action on their future career.
Each research unit, i.e., CINI, SESM, CSW and FCTUC, has to select a
number of researchers for such individual reports. Selected researchers
have to provide presentations on their conducted activities within the
context of CSTEP, implemented secondments, and considerations on the
acquired skills and impact on their career development. Deadline: 20th
December 2011.
[18]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Mid-Term Review: The Meeting Agenda
4. Selected Individual Reports (10-15 minutes per fellows)
The Fellows should present themselves, their background, their experience in
the IAPP network. This presentation should go beyond the scientific project and
should include their expectations on the possible impact of the action on their
future career.
5. Meeting Between the Fellows and the REA Representative (3060minutes)
This meeting is intended to allow the Fellows to discuss with the REA
Representative about their experience within the IAPP network.
6. Open discussion
[19]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Questionnaire
QUESTIONNAIRES (Fellows) by the 15th November 2011
Fellows currently employed by the Network should complete a mid term
assessment questionnaire. This questionnaire is designed to give the Research
Agency feedback on training activities of the network.
Fellows will receive at the beginning of November an e-mail with the reminder
and the instruction to submit the questionnaire.
[20]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Reports and Form C
Progress Report and Form C (Coordinator) by the 15th November 2011
This report covers period from M1
to month of Mid-Term review. No
financial reports are required for
this period.
[21]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Reports and Form C
Progress Report and Form C (Coordinator) by the 15th November 2011
This report covers period from M1 to M24.
The Financial Statements as well as
Summary Financial Report are required for
this period.
[22]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Reports and Form C
The progress report has to be filled through SESAM and will be made by the
Coordinator based on the current ToK Plan, performed activities and organized
meeting. Deadline - 20th November 2011.
The coordinator will write a first draft of the periodic report, and make it circulate so
to collect any remarks and contributions on that. Deadline within 31th January
2012.
Form C has to be filled through SESAM by each participant and submitted within
31th January 2012. No CFS is required for the first two years of the project.
[23]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Progress Report
The Progress Report contains short overview of the deliverables implemented
during the reporting project. The report comprises the following sections:
1. Overall progress of the project – free text section.
2. Contract deliverables update – separate tables for:
a. Recruitment and Secondment – 1 line per contractor. Tables will calculate
automatically the difference between planned and implemented
deliverables (researcher-months)
b. International conferences / events – 1 line per event
The report must be submitted via SESAM, printed out, signed by the
coordinator and sent to the Commission to the address mentioned in the
article 8.1 of the grant agreement.
[24]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Periodic Report
The report should comprises:
1. Cover page
2. Declaration by the project coordinator
3. Publishable summary (which will be automatically published on the Cordis)
4. Overview of the work progress towards the objectives of the project, including
achievements and attainment of any milestones, deliverables and
dissemination activities identified in Annex I
5. Project management with justification on incurred costs
6. List of submitted certificates
By the coordinator: Summary Financial Report consolidating the claimed
Community contribution of all the beneficiaries in an aggregated form, based on
the information provided in Forms C by each beneficiary. This form will be
generated automatically as soon as all the beneficiaries will submit Forms C.
[25]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Form C
By the scientist-in-charge: (each beneficiary including the coordinator)
A Financial Statement (Form C) from each beneficiary. Financial statements
should be accompanied by certificates (Form D), when appropriate (i.e., for SESM
and CSW at the end of the project).
[26]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Form C
By the scientist-in-charge: (each beneficiary including the coordinator)
A Financial Statement (Form C) from each beneficiary. Financial statements
should
by certificates
D), when
SESM
Such be
infoaccompanied
must be compliant
with(Form
the ToK
Planappropriate
stated in (i.e.,
the for
Progress
and
CSWand
at the
endbe
of taken
the project).
Report
can
from the Budget Simulator xls file available on
the project web site.
[27]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Form C
[28]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Form C
No
No
No
No
[29]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Dates for next actions
October 2011:
Deliverable 3.1 finalized;
10th November:
Contributions to the Progress Report and MTR
Presentations;
15th November:
Strict deadline for submitting the questionnaire
20th November:
Progress Report;
November 2011:
Deliverable 4.1 finalized;
19th December:
Preparatory meeting for the MTR;
20th December:
Meeting with the Officer;
31th January :
Periodic Report and Form C from each participant
submitted;
February & March 2011: Deliverable 3.2 and 4.2 finalized.
[30]
COIMBRA, 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011
Thank you
for your attention