Top Mass from Cross Sections Solene Chevalier-Thery LPTHE, CEA-IRFU/SPP D0 collaboration Work in collaboration with : - U.Bassler (SPP CEA Saclay) - M.Cacciari (LPTHE Paris) - F.Deliot (SPP CEA Saclay) - U.Heintz (Boston University) 1 March 11th , 2008 S. Chevalier-Thery, Moriond QCD – Top Mass from Cross Sections Why extracting top mass from cross sections ? Direct measurement already exists and is more precise. However : which mass do we really extract from Pythia : LO, NLO, which renormalization scheme…? Alternative : extract mass from NLO+NLL cross section measurement this gives a mass in a well-defined renormalization scheme 2 March 11th , 2008 S. Chevalier-Thery, Moriond QCD – Top Mass from Cross Sections First approach Lepton+jet channel Both experimental and theoretical cross sections depend on top mass : their intersection gives the top mass. Both cross sections have uncertainties : the intersection of the uncertainty bands gives the uncertainty on the top mass. Extracted top mass (D0 note 5459) : Lepton+jet channel mtop 166.165..13 (stat syst )46..97 (theory)GeV Dilepton channel Dilepton channel mtop 174.198..84 (stat syst )46..20 (theory)GeV In agreement with the central value from direct measurement : mtop = 172.6 ± 1.4 GeV. (see U.Heintz talk) 3 March 11th , 2008 S. Chevalier-Thery, Moriond QCD – Top Mass from Cross Sections Second approach : use of probabilities The theoretical and experimental cross sections suffer from uncertainties. If you know the shape of these uncertainties, you can combine them according to probability rules to obtain the probability of having a given top mass. Theoretical dependencies According to the factorization theorem, the total cross section of t-tbar pair production at the Tevatron is : tot ( pp tt , S ) dxi dx j fi , p ( xi , F ) f j , p ( x j , F ) i, j PDF Experimental dependencies The experimental cross section is measured as : ( pp tt ) ˆ i , j (ij tt ; sˆ xi x j S , F , R , mtop ) Partonic cross section Theoretical t-tbar cross section depends on : the PDFs the factorization scale μ , the F renormalization scale μR March 11th , 2008 N observed N background Atot Ldt Evaluated by MC Slight dependance with top mass Experimental t-tbar cross section depends on : systematics statistics S. Chevalier-Thery, Moriond QCD – Top Mass from Cross Sections 4 Combining uncertainties Experimental gaussian : centered on experimental curve p.d.f. f(mt) = We want to determine the probability density function (p.d.f) for the top mass f(mt). So we have to know the different p.d.f.s for all the sources of uncertainties : fexp(σ|mt) cross section Experimental uncertainty : taken gaussian fexp(σ|mt) p.d.f. PDFs : taken gaussian and calculated from CTEQ or MRST sets fth,PDF(σ|mt) renormalization and factorization scales fth,μ(σ|mt) p.d.f. fth,μ(σ|mt) ) p.d.f. σ_min σ σ_max 100% Gaussian probability due to the PDFs uncertainty ( fth,PDF(σ|mt) Theoretical uncertainties : x x p.d.f. σ_min 1 cross section σ σ_max 90% 2 σ σ_max σ_min 60% 3 30% 10% cross section March 11th , 2008 δσ1 10% δσ1 δσ2δσ2 cross section δσ1 δσ1 δσ2δσ2 Different step function for the probability due to the scale uncertainty cross section 5 S. Chevalier-Thery, Moriond QCD – Top Mass from Cross Sections Results Uncertainty +/- 7 GeV Uncertainty +/- 10 GeV Different choices for theoretical uncertainty have limited impact on mass extraction (+/- 1 GeV for the central value and the error). 6 March 11th , 2008 S. Chevalier-Thery, Moriond QCD – Top Mass from Cross Sections Conclusions We can extract a value for top quark mass, in good agreement with the direct measurement but with greater uncertainty. The uncertainties could be reduced using : New data sets (more precise) New PDFs sets with smaller uncertainties Better higher order calculation (NNLO?) This extraction depends on the choice for the shape of the p.d.f. due to the scales uncertainties. Work in progress. 7 March 11th , 2008 S. Chevalier-Thery, Moriond QCD – Top Mass from Cross Sections
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz