December 12 * NG32A-02 • Climate models -- the most sophisticated models of natural phenomena. • Still, the range of uncertainty in responses to CO2 doubling is not decreasing. • Can this be a matter of intrinsic sensitivity to model parameters and parameterizations, similar to but distinct from sensitivity to initial data? • Dynamical systems theory has, so far, interpreted model robustness in terms of structural stability; it turns out that this property is not generic. • We explore the structurally unstable behavior of a toy model of ENSO variability, the interplay between forcing and internal variability, as well as spontaneous changes in mean and extremes. Battisti & Hirst (1989) dT / dt T (t ) T , 0, 0 Suarez & Schopf (1988), Battisti & Hirst (1989) dT / dt T (t ) T T 3 Tziperman et al., (1994) dT / dt tanh T (t 1 ) tanh T (t 2 ) cos(2 t ) Realistic atmosphere-ocean coupling (Munnich et al., 1991) Seasonal forcing d h(t ) tanh h(t ) b cos(2 t ) dt Thermocline depth deviations from the annual mean in the eastern Pacific Strength of the atmosphere-ocean coupling Wind-forced ocean waves (E’ward Kelvin, W’ward Rossby) Seasonal-cycle forcing Delay due to finite wave velocity b 1, 100, 0.42 “High-h” season with period of about 4 yr; notice the random heights of high seasons Rough equivalent of El Niño in this toy model (little upwelling near coast) b 1, 10, 0.45 Interdecadal variability: Spontaneous change of (1) long-term annual mean, and (2) Higher/lower positive and lower/higher negative extremes N.B. Intrinsic, rather than forced! dh(t ) tanh h(t ) b cos(2 t ), t 0 dt h(t ) (t ), t [ ,0) (1) (2) Theorem The IVP (1-2) has a unique solution on [0, ) for any set ( , b, , ). This solution depends continuously on initial data (t ), delay , and the rhs of (1) (in an appropriate norm). Corollary A discontinuity in solution profile indicates existence of an unstable solution that separates attractor basins of two stable ones. Trajectory maximum (after transient): 0.5 Smooth map Monotonic in b Periodic in Trajectory maximum (after transient): 1 Smooth map No longer monotonic in b, for large No longer periodic in for large Trajectory maximum (after transient): 2 Neutral curve f (b, 0 appears, above which instabilities set in. Above this curve, the maxima are no longer monotonic in b or periodic in and the map “crinkles” (i.e., it becomes “rough”) Trajectory maximum (after transient): 11 The neutral curve moves to higher seasonal forcing b and lower delays . The neutral curve that separates rough from smooth behavior becomes itself crinkled (rough, fractal?). M. Ghil & I. Zaliapin, UCLA Working Meeting, August 21, 2007 This region expanded Instability point Maxima Minima Shape of forcing Time b = 1, = 10, = 0.5 100 initial (constant) data 4 distinct solutions (b = 1.4, = 0.57 = 11) Stable solutions (after transient) Initial data Solution profile (b = 1.0, = 0.57) (b = 1.6, = 1.6) (b = 2.0, = 1.0) (b = 3, = 0.3) (b = 1.4, = 0.57) (b = 1.4, = 0.57 = 11) 1. A simple differential-delay equation (DDE) with a single delay reproduces the realistic scenarios documented in other ENSO models, such as nonlinear PDEs and GCMs, as well as in observations. 2. The model illustrates well the role of the distinct parameters: seasonal forcing b, ocean-atmosphere coupling , and oceanic wave delay . 3. Spontaneous transitions in mean temperature, as well as in extreme annual values occur, for purely periodic, seasonal forcing. 4. A sharp neutral curve in the (b–) plane separates smooth behavior of the period map from “rough” behavior. 5. The model’s dynamics is governed by multiple (un)stable solutions; location of stable solutions in parameter space is intermittent. 6. The local extrema are locked to a particular season in the annual cycle. 7. We expect such behavior in much more detailed and realistic models, where it is harder to describe its causes as completely.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz