IE 341 Human Factors Engineering

King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
IE-352
Section 1, CRN: 5022
Section 2, CRN: 32997
Second Semester 1432-33 H (Spring-2012) – 4(4,1,1)
MANUFACTURING PROCESSES - 2
Sunday, Apr 29, 2012 (08/06/1433H)
Homework 3 Answers
Name:
Ahmed M. El-Sherbeeny, PhD
Student Number:
4
Section:
Su-8:00 / Su-10:00
Answer ALL of the following questions [2 Points Each].
1. Let 𝑛 = 0.5 and 𝐢 = 90 in the Taylor equation for tool wear. What is
percent decrease in cutting speed is required to cause a (a) 2-fold
(i.e. 200%) and (b) 10-fold (i.e. 1000%) increase in tool life?
Solution:
Taylor Equation for tool life:
𝑽𝑻𝒏 = π‘ͺ
𝑛 = 0.5; 𝐢 = 90
β‡’ 𝑉𝑇 0.5 = 90 β‡’ 𝑉1 𝑇1 0.5 = 𝑉2 𝑇2 0.5
a) 𝑇2 = 𝑇1 + 200%𝑇1 = 3𝑇1
β‡’ 𝑉1 𝑇1 0.5 = 𝑉2 (3𝑇1 )0.5
β‡’ 𝑉1 = √3𝑉2
β‡’
𝑉2
β‡’
𝑉1 βˆ’π‘‰2
𝑉1
=
𝑉1
1
√3
= 0.577
= 1 βˆ’ 𝑉2 = 1 βˆ’ 0.577 = 0.423 β‡’ decrease in cutting speed = πŸ’πŸ. πŸ‘%
𝑉
1
Note, less than half speed reduction is required for tool life to triple
a) 𝑇3 = 𝑇1 + 1000%𝑇1 = 11𝑇1
β‡’ 𝑉1 𝑇1 0.5 = 𝑉3 (11𝑇1 )0.5
β‡’ 𝑉1 = √11𝑉3
β‡’
𝑉3
β‡’
𝑉1 βˆ’π‘‰3
𝑉1
=
𝑉1
El-Sherbeeny, PhD
1
√11
= 0.302
= 1 βˆ’ 𝑉3 = 1 βˆ’ 0.302 = 0.698 β‡’ decrease in cutting speed = πŸ”πŸ—. πŸ–%
𝑉
1
Apr 29, 2012
IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012
HW 3 Answers
Page - 1
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
2. In an orthogonal cutting operation, spindle speed is set to provide a
cutting speed of 1.8 m/s. The width and depth of cut are 2.6 mm and
0.30 mm, respectively. The tool rake angle is 8°. After the cut, the
deformed chip thickness is measured to be 0.49 mm. Determine (a)
shear plane angle, (b) shear strain, and (c) material removal rate.
Given:
π‘š
cutting speed: 𝑉 = 1.8
𝑠
width: 𝑀 = 2.6 π‘šπ‘š
thicknesses: 𝑑0 = 0.30 π‘šπ‘š, 𝑑𝑐 = 0.49 π‘šπ‘š
rake angle:  = 8°
Required:
a)  =?
b)  =?
c) 𝑅𝑀𝑅 =?
Solution:
a)  can be obtained from:
π‘Ÿ cos 
tan  =
1 βˆ’ π‘Ÿ sin 
π‘‘π‘œ 0.30 π‘šπ‘š
π‘Ÿ= =
= 0.612
𝑑𝑐 0.49 π‘šπ‘š
⇒ = tanβˆ’1 [
0.612 cos 8°
1βˆ’0.612 sin 8°
] = tanβˆ’1 0.663
⇒ = πŸ‘πŸ‘. πŸ“°
b)  can be obtained from:
 = cot  + tan( βˆ’ )
⇒ = cot 33.5° + tan(33.5° βˆ’ 8°)
⇒ = 𝟏. πŸ—πŸ–πŸ•
c) 𝑅𝑀𝑅 (material removal rate) is the volume of material removed (i.e.
cut) every second which can be obtained from:
𝑅𝑀𝑅 = π‘€π‘‘π‘œ 𝑉 = (2.6 π‘šπ‘š)(0.30 π‘šπ‘š)[(1.8 π‘šβ„π‘ )(1000 π‘šπ‘šβ„π‘š)]
⇒𝑹𝑴𝑹 = πŸπŸ’πŸŽπŸ’
El-Sherbeeny, PhD
Apr 29, 2012
IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012
π’Žπ’ŽπŸ‘
HW 3 Answers
𝒔
Page - 2
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
3. Assume that, in orthogonal cutting, the rake angle is 25° and the
coefficient of friction is 0.2. Use the cutting ratio equation to determine
the percentage increase in chip thickness when the friction is
doubled.
Given:
rake angle:  = 25°
coefficients of friction: µ1 = 0.2, µ2 = 2µ1 = 0.4
Required:
percentage increase in chip thickness
𝑑𝑐 βˆ’π‘‘π‘
𝑑𝑐
i.e. 2 1 = 2 βˆ’ 1 =?
𝑑 𝑐1
𝑑 𝑐1
Solution:
ο‚· cutting ratio equation:
π‘‘π‘œ
sin 
π‘Ÿ= =
𝑑𝑐 cos( βˆ’ )
Rearranging: ⇒𝑑𝑐 = π‘‘π‘œ
cos(ο¦βˆ’ο‘)
sin 
ο‚· Assuming rake angle () and depth of cut (π‘‘π‘œ ) are kept constantβ‡’
𝑑𝑐2
=
𝑑𝑐1
π‘‘π‘œ
π‘‘π‘œ
cos(2 βˆ’ )
sin 2
cos(1 βˆ’ )
sin 1
=
cos(2 βˆ’ ) sin 1
cos(1 βˆ’ ) sin 2
ο‚· We lack the values for the shear angles(1 and 2 ), so we use:

𝛽
2 2
Note how we use this equation since µ1 and µ2 < 0.5
 = 45° +
βˆ’
Also, note:
𝛽1 = tanβˆ’1 µ1 = tanβˆ’1 0.2 = 11.31°
𝛽2 = tanβˆ’1 µ2 = tanβˆ’1 0.4 = 21.80°
β‡’

𝛽1
25° 11.31°
= 45° +
βˆ’
= 51.85°
2 2
2
2
 𝛽2
25° 21.80°
2 = 45° + βˆ’ = 45° +
βˆ’
= 46.60°
2 2
2
2
1 = 45° +
El-Sherbeeny, PhD
βˆ’
Apr 29, 2012
IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012
HW 3 Answers
Page - 3
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
 Substituting in chip thickness formula we generated⇒
𝑑𝑐2 cos(46.60° βˆ’ 25°) sin 51.85°
=
= 1.13
𝑑𝑐1 cos(51.85° βˆ’ 25°) sin 46.60°
β‡’
increase in chip thickness=
El-Sherbeeny, PhD
Apr 29, 2012
𝑑 𝑐2
𝑑 𝑐1
βˆ’ 1 = 1.13 βˆ’ 1 = πŸπŸ‘%
IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012
HW 3 Answers
Page - 4
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
4. A turning operation is performed on stainless steel with hardness 200
HB (with specific energy of 2.8 J/mm3), cutting speed = 200 m/min,
feed = 0.25 mm/rev, and depth of cut = 7.5 mm. How much power will
the lathe draw in performing this operation if its mechanical efficiency
is 90%?
Given:
total specific energy: 𝑒𝑑 = 2.8
cutting speed: 𝑉 = 200
π‘šπ‘š
π‘š
𝐽
π‘šπ‘š3
π‘šπ‘–π‘›
feed: 𝑓 = 0.25
π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘£
depth of cut: 𝑑0 = 7.5 π‘šπ‘š
mechanical efficiency: πœ‚π‘šπ‘’π‘β„Ž = 90%
Required:
Total power drawn from source: π‘ƒπ‘œπ‘€π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘ π‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘π‘’ =?
Solution:
ο‚· cutting power is related to power from source through:
π‘ƒπ‘œπ‘€π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘ = π‘ƒπ‘œπ‘€π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘ π‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘π‘’ βˆ— πœ‚π‘šπ‘’π‘β„Ž
or
π‘ƒπ‘œπ‘€π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘
π‘ƒπ‘œπ‘€π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘ π‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘π‘’ =
πœ‚π‘šπ‘’π‘β„Ž
ο‚· also, total specific energy:
π‘‘π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ 𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 π‘π‘œπ‘€π‘’π‘Ÿ
π‘ƒπ‘œπ‘€π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘
𝑒𝑑 =
=
π‘šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘Žπ‘™ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘šπ‘œπ‘£π‘Žπ‘™ π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’
𝑅𝑀𝑅
o Since turning operation is involved β‡’
𝑅𝑀𝑅 = 𝑓𝑑0 𝑉
π‘š
π‘šπ‘š
π‘šπ‘–π‘›
= (0.25 π‘šπ‘š)(7.5 π‘šπ‘š) [(200
) (1000
)(
)]
π‘šπ‘–π‘›
π‘š
60 𝑠𝑒𝑐
π‘šπ‘š3
= 6250
𝑠
o Thus,
𝐽
π‘šπ‘š3
𝐽
π‘ƒπ‘œπ‘€π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘ = 𝑒𝑑 βˆ— 𝑅𝑀𝑅 = (2.8
=
17500
)
(6250
)
π‘šπ‘š3
𝑠
𝑠
= 17.5 π‘˜π‘Š
ο‚· Substituting into the source power equation:
π‘ƒπ‘œπ‘€π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘ 17.5 π‘˜π‘Š
π‘·π’π’˜π’†π’“π’”π’π’–π’“π’„π’† =
=
= πŸπŸ—. πŸ’πŸ’ π’Œπ‘Ύ
πœ‚π‘šπ‘’π‘β„Ž
0.9
El-Sherbeeny, PhD
Apr 29, 2012
IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012
HW 3 Answers
Page - 5
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
5. With a carbide tool, the temperature in a cutting operation is
measured as 650°C when the speed is 90 m/min and the feed is 0.05
mm/rev. What is the approximate temperature if the speed is
doubled? What speed is required to lower the maximum cutting
temperature to 480°C?
Given:
ο‚· first operation:
o cutting temperature: 𝑇1 = 650 °πΆ
π‘š
o cutting speed: 𝑉1 = 90
o feed: 𝑓 = 0.05
π‘šπ‘–π‘›
π‘šπ‘š
π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘£
Required:
a) second operation:
o 𝑉2 = 2𝑉1
o 𝑇2 =?
b) third operation:
o 𝑇3 = 480 °πΆ
o 𝑉3 =?
Solution:
ο‚· equation for mean temperature in orthogonal cutting (note, it is
mentioned if it is turning on a lathe or not):
0.000665π‘Œπ‘“ 3 𝑉𝑑0
√
πœŒπ‘
𝐾
𝑇=
ο‚· since, π‘Œπ‘“ , πœŒπ‘, 𝐾 are material dependent, and assuming constant
depth of cut (𝑑0 ) and rearranging equation above:
𝑇
3
βˆšπ‘‰
=
0.000665π‘Œπ‘“ 3 𝑑0
√ =𝐢
πœŒπ‘
𝐾
Thus,
𝑇1
3
βˆšπ‘‰1
=
El-Sherbeeny, PhD
𝑇2
3
βˆšπ‘‰2
Apr 29, 2012
IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012
HW 3 Answers
Page - 6
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
a) second operation:
3
𝑇2 =
βˆšπ‘‰2
3 2𝑉
3
1
√
𝑇
=
𝑇
=
√2𝑇1 = (1.26)(650 °πΆ)
1
1
3
𝑉
𝑉
1
√ 1
β‡’π‘»πŸ = πŸ–πŸπŸ— °π‘ͺ
b) third operation:
𝑇3 3
480 °πΆ 3
3
√90 = 3.309
βˆšπ‘‰3 = βˆšπ‘‰1 =
𝑇1
650 °πΆ
β‡’ 𝑉3 = 3.3093
β‡’ π‘½πŸ‘ = πŸ‘πŸ”. 𝟐
π’Ž
π’Žπ’Šπ’
Alternative Solution:
ο‚· assuming this was a turning operation, and using equation for
mean temperature in turning on a lathe
π‘‡π‘šπ‘’π‘Žπ‘›  𝑉 π‘Ž 𝑓 𝑏
or: π‘‡π‘šπ‘’π‘Žπ‘› = 𝐢 𝑉 π‘Ž 𝑓 𝑏
assuming constant feed (𝑓), and using π‘Ž = 0.2, 𝑏 = 0.125 (since
given that this is carbide tool)
β‡’π‘‡π‘šπ‘’π‘Žπ‘› = 𝐢 𝑉 π‘Ž 𝑓 𝑏
π‘‡π‘šπ‘’π‘Žπ‘› 1
𝑉10.2
=
π‘‡π‘šπ‘’π‘Žπ‘› 2
𝑉20.2
a) second operation:
π‘‡π‘šπ‘’π‘Žπ‘› 2
𝑉20.2
2𝑉1 0.2
= 0.2 π‘‡π‘šπ‘’π‘Žπ‘›1 = ( ) π‘‡π‘šπ‘’π‘Žπ‘›1 = (20.2 )(π‘‡π‘šπ‘’π‘Žπ‘› 1 )
𝑉1
𝑉1
= (1.15)(650 °πΆ)
β‡’π‘»πŸ = πŸ•πŸ’πŸ• °π‘ͺ
b) third operation:
𝑇3
480 °πΆ 0.2
𝑉30.2 = 𝑉10.2 =
90 = 1.816
𝑇1
650 °πΆ
El-Sherbeeny, PhD
Apr 29, 2012
IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012
HW 3 Answers
Page - 7
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
1
β‡’ 𝑉3 = 1.8160.2 = 1.8165
β‡’ π‘½πŸ‘ = πŸπŸ—. πŸ–
π’Ž
π’Žπ’Šπ’
Note that the second solution did not produce a significantly large
difference in final temperature, and yet a large difference in cutting
speeds.
El-Sherbeeny, PhD
Apr 29, 2012
IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012
HW 3 Answers
Page - 8