ws 2017.s01 public funding for asw elections

Associated Students of Westminster
Bill: WS 2017.S01 PUBLIC FUNDING FOR ASW ELECTIONS
Principal Authors: Carissa Uresk
Sponsors: Gabriella Sanchez
Be It Enacted by the 2016-2017 ASW Senate:
1
Preamble
2
Candidates for ASW elected positions provide personal funding for their campaigns.
3
Candidates for Senate positions are allowed to spend up to $75 on campaigning, while
4
candidates for Student Board positions (President, Vice President, Clubs President, and
5
Chief Justice) are allowed to spend up to $300. While candidates are not required to
6
spend money, it is difficult to run a successful campaign, particularly for Student Board
7
positions, and not spend a substantial amount of the money that candidates are allowed
8
to spend.
9
10
The amount of personal money spent during ASW elections is a deterrent to students
11
who would like to run for an elected position, but do not have the funds to do so.
12
Students who struggle to pay for rent, food, housing, and tuition are excluded from our
13
elections process because there is no way for them to access outside funding for
14
campaigning. Forcing students to use their personal money for campaign funding limits
15
the amount of socioeconomic diversity that we have in student government positions.
16
Limited diversity in student government representatives is contradictory to the ASW
17
mission statement which declares that “the mission of ASW is to promote shared
18
governance on campus.”
19
20
Section I: Funding Amounts for Senate Positions
21
Whereas: The current cap for Senate campaigns is $75, and it is predicted that an
22
average of 20 students will run for Senate positions each academic year. It is
23
reasonable that for each academic year, ASW provide $1,500 for Senate campaigns.
24
25
Whereas: Senate campaigns occur in the fall for First-year Senators, money distributed
26
during the fall election will be limited to $600. This means that a total of 8 people can
27
run for Senate positions and receive the full $75 amount. If more than 8 people run, the
28
money will be distributed among them equally. For example, if 10 people run for a First-
29
year Senate position in the fall, each candidate can receive $60. If less than 8 people
30
run, all left over funds will be rolled over into the account for spring Senate elections.
31
32
Whereas: Senate campaigns occur in the spring for all other Senators, money
33
distributed during the spring election will be at least $900. This means that a total of 12
34
people can run for Senate positions and receive the full $75 amount. If money is left
35
over from spring elections, then more funds will be accessible. However, if only the
36
$900 is available, and more people run, the money will be distributed equally among the
37
candidates.
38
39
Whereas: Candidates may choose not to accept public funding. However, students are
40
still limited to the $75 limit. In situations where public funding only provides a portion of
41
the $75, students may add their own funds. For example, if funds only provide $60 per
42
candidate, a candidate can choose to add $15 to their budget from their own money.
43
44
Whereas: Candidates for ASW Senate positions are required to pay a $25 campaign
45
fee. Students will still be required to pay the fee out of pocket because this money is
46
refundable.
47
48
Section II: Funding Amounts for Student Board Positions
49
Whereas: The current cap for Student Board campaigns is $300. However, students
50
can easily manage such a campaign on only $150.
51
52
Whereas: Student Board campaigns should not cost more than twice the amount of
53
Senate campaigns, the cap on Student Board campaigns should be $150.
54
55
Whereas: A total of $2,250 should be available each fall for Student Board candidates.
56
This means that a total of 15 candidates can access the full $150 from ASW funds.
57
However, if more people are running for Student Board positions, the money will be
58
distributed evenly among the candidates. For example, if there are 20 candidates for
59
Student Board positions, then each candidate can access $112.50.
60
61
Whereas: Candidates may choose not accept public funding. However, students are still
62
limited to the $150 limit. In situations where public funding only provides a portion of the
63
$150, students may add their own funds. For example, if funds can only provide $100
64
per candidate, a candidate can choose to add $50 to their budget from their own
65
money.
66
67
Whereas: Candidates for ASW Student Board positions are required to pay a $25
68
campaign fee. Students will still be required to pay the fee out of pocket because this
69
money is refundable.
70
71
Section III: Source of Funding
72
Whereas: According to the Emergency Fund Cap legislation passed by the 2015-2016
73
ASW Senate, money from the Emergency Fund “should only be used for unforeseen
74
expenditures, investments that highly impact the student body, or occurrences that are
75
time-sensitive.”
76
77
Whereas: Funding for student campaigns is an unforeseen circumstance because this
78
idea was not put forward at earlier budgeting meetings.
79
80
Whereas: Funding for student campaigns is a way to invest in future student leaders.
81
82
Whereas: Funding for student campaigns has a high impact on the student body
83
because students can directly access this money to support their opportunities at
84
Westminster College.
85
86
Whereas: Funding for student campaigns is time-sensitive because elections will occur
87
in February/March and students need to know that they can access public funds before
88
they make the decision of whether or not to run.
89
90
Section IV: Funding in the Future
91
Whereas: This fund will continue permanently, unless overridden by future legislation.
92
93
Whereas: There needs to be a plan each year for how this money will be provided well
94
in advance of First-year Senate elections.
95
96
Whereas: Starting with the 17/18 Student Board, the ASW Director of Budgeting and
97
Accounting will set aside $3,750 in the Training account for campaign funds.
98
99
Be It Resolved
100
That starting with the 2017 spring elections, candidates for Student Board positions may
101
only spend $150 on their campaigns. Additionally, $3,750 will be accessible to
102
candidates for ASW positions. Members of the Elections Committee are responsible for
103
organizing the distribution of these funds. Furthermore, all changes will be reflected in
104
the ASW Elections Handbook.
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114