DGSO-001-15
February 2015
Spectrum Management and Telecommunications
Consultation on Changes to the
Definition of Competitive and UserDefined Service Areas for Spectrum
Licences
Aussi disponible en français – DGSO-001-15
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
Contents
1.
Intent ....................................................................................................................................... 1
2.
Mandate .................................................................................................................................. 1
3.
Background ............................................................................................................................ 1
4.
Transition From Hexagonal to Square Grid Cells ............................................................. 2
5.
Affected Elements and Proposed Mitigation....................................................................... 3
5.1
Population – Coverage and Associated Fees.................................................................... 3
5.2
Location of Deployed Sites .............................................................................................. 5
5.3
Technical Considerations ................................................................................................. 6
6.
Other Consequential Change — Applications for New User-Defined Areas................... 7
7.
Submitting Comments ........................................................................................................... 7
8.
Obtaining Copies ................................................................................................................... 8
Annex A: Sample Diagrams Indicating the Square Grid Cell Concept .................................. 9
Annex B: Tier Area Population Differences ............................................................................. 11
Annex C: Sites No Longer In New Licence Area ..................................................................... 26
i
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
1. Intent
1. As part of the modernization of Industry Canada’s spectrum management system, the Department is
required to change the way in which service areas for competitive and user-defined licensing are
constructed. Specifically, Industry Canada plans to change the definition of the building block of these
geographic areas, called the spectrum “grid cell.” This change will affect all spectrum licences.
2. The Department is informing stakeholders of the impending changes, the impacts and planned mitigation
strategies and is seeking feedback from stakeholders to facilitate a smooth transition. Following the outcome
of this consultation, the Department will make the required changes to the document titled Service Areas for
Competitive Licensing (Issue 3, dated December 2006). Changes would become effective upon
implementation of the new informatics technology application for spectrum licences, expected to occur in
mid-2015.
2. Mandate
3. The Minister of Industry, through the Department of Industry Act, the Radiocommunication Act and the
Radiocommunication Regulations, with due regard to the objectives of the Canadian telecommunications
policy set out in section 7 of the Telecommunications Act, is responsible for spectrum management in
Canada. As such, the Minister is responsible for developing national policies for spectrum utilization and
ensuring effective management of the radio frequency spectrum resource.
3. Background
4. To fulfil its mandate, Industry Canada has operated a spectrum management system using software initially
developed in the mid-1970s. The software allows the Department to manage various radio, spectrum and
broadcasting licences and perform electromagnetic compatibility studies for potential interference prior to
assigning frequencies. It also allows the Department to invoice and accept payments for authorized licences,
among other processes. Industry Canada has recently contracted to replace the software, being
approximately 40 years old, with a new customized off-the-shelf solution currently operated by other
regulators around the world. This is known as the Spectrum Application Modernization Project, details of
which can be found at http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/h_sf10585.html.
5. In August 1997, Industry Canada issued Canada Gazette Notice No. DGRB-003-97 – Consultation on
Issues Related to Spectrum Auctioning, in which the Department discussed several fundamental issues
related to the introduction of spectrum auctions in Canada, including a conceptual approach to defining
service areas.
1
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
6. In August 1998, the Department decided that because different wireless services and applications are best
suited to different sizes of service areas, four tiers of service areas would be established, ranging from a
single national service area (Tier 1) to localized service areas (Tier 4).
7. The building block for all the tiers is called the spectrum grid cell (grid cell), a six-sided polygon (hexagon)
with an area of 25 km2. These grid cells fit together in an interlocking pattern over the geography of Canada.
8. The Department has issued spectrum licences using various defined areas, including a tier-basis, a TELbasis (defined by wireline coverage area), “per grid-cell” basis, as well as on a user-defined basis. The TEL
areas and the user-defined areas, which are specific to a particular licence and which are not based on the
hexagonal grid cell, were created on an ad-hoc basis to meet various licensing needs.
4. Transition From Hexagonal to Square Grid Cells
9. The new software uses square grid cells rather than hexagonal grid cells. This is also the approach used by
other regulators including the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) in Australia and
the Office of Communications (Ofcom) in the United Kingdom. Consequently, the Department will be
aligning with this approach to use square grid cells as the basis for all spectrum licence service areas,
including those licences already issued.
10. An internal study has been undertaken by Industry Canada to determine the impact that this change would
have on existing licences. To minimize the impact on stakeholders, Industry Canada has decided to closely
track the geographic boundaries of the existing service areas by using different sized square grid cells, i.e.
small grid cells along the borders of a service area and larger grid cells near the centre of the service area.
As tier boundaries were initially designed to avoid population centres, the impact is not large.
11. Accordingly, the minimum size of the grid cell will be 1 minute latitude × 1 minute longitude along existing
service area boundaries, which will provide the granularity of the geographic information needed for
accurately converting existing licence service areas to the new licence service areas. The area of these grid
cells will vary depending on the latitude as the distance between longitude minutes decreases from south to
north thereby changing the shape of the grid cell. Larger square grid cells, e.g. 3 minute × 3 minute cells or
15 minute × 15 minute cells, will be implemented for interiors of existing service areas when fine
granularity is not required.
12. For illustrative purposes, Figure A1 in Annex A shows the 5 degree × 5 degree grid cells overlaid on a map
of Canada. Although not shown in the figure, these grid cells are comprised of a progression of layers of
smaller grid cells, the smallest being 1 minute × 1 minute, used to provide more accuracy in defining service
area borders. The multiple layers of square grid cells include 1 degree × 1 degree (Level 4), 15 minute ×
15 minute grid cells (Level 3), 3 minute × 3 minute grid cells (Level 2) and 1 minute × 1 minute (Level 1).
2
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
13. Figures A2 and A3 of Annex A provide an example of an existing service area defined by hexagonal grid
cells and how closely it is mapped when defined by square grid cells. Further granularity is shown in Figure
A4, illustrating how closely Industry Canada can adhere to the existing licence areas, particularly at a
service area border.
14. To ensure consistency with the licence areas based on hexagonal grid cells in the transition to square grid
cells, the centre of the hexagonal grid cells were used to determine the corresponding square grid cells. The
square grid cells were then associated with the licence area identified by the hexagonal grid cell.
Furthermore, by transitioning to the smaller square grid cells, the Department was able to more accurately
map provincial borders and has adjusted several borders accordingly.
15. This transition is expected to be implemented in mid-2015 and would apply to all existing and future
spectrum licences.
5. Affected Elements and Proposed Mitigation
16. Although the new square grid cells will closely track the geographic boundaries of the existing service
areas, the boundaries may not match exactly. As such, there will be minor deviations to the current service
areas, as licensed, resulting in changes to the:
a) population covered by a service area;
b) geographic area where sites can be located; and
c) the applicable boundaries to calculate power flux density (PFD) as noted in the relevant Standard
Radio System Plan (SRSP).
17. The following section discusses these impacts and describes the Department’s planned approach for
mitigation.
5.1
Population – Coverage and Associated Fees
Issue
18. The changes to the service area boundaries may result in small changes to the population covered by a
service area. As such, two elements have to be considered;
a) Coverage area of the licensee: A portion of the population currently covered by a licensee may
no longer fall within that licensee’s service area. Furthermore, the boundary shift may remove a
portion of the population not currently served, but which will be considered in future expansion
plans. Alternatively, the boundary shift could result in an increase in the covered population.
3
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
b) Annual licence fees: As most spectrum licence fees are based on population using a formula of
$/MHz/population, a change to the population of a service area due to the conversion to square
grid cells will have an effect on the annual licence fee.
Proposed approach
19. When the tier areas were developed in the 1990s, the tier boundaries were designed, as much as practically
possible, to pass through less-populated areas in order to mitigate interference and coordination issues
between licensees in different tiers. Another large set of licence areas are the TEL areas, which were defined
in the 1980s as being the geographic area of the wireline carriers. These TEL areas do not adhere to the
hexagonal grid cell concept, but are considered as hand-drawn replicas of the wireline service areas. The
square grid cells allow for fine granularity at the boundaries of a service area. Therefore, when square grid
cells are applied to existing licence areas, the variations in area size and population per licence area will be
very small (less than plus or minus 1.5% per licence area in almost all cases). Similarly, the change in
population per licence area in certain user-defined areas, such as those created for public safety
organizations, will also be small. The variations in population and dwellings and the exceptions are listed in
Annex B. Note: the tables in Annex B only include the census years that are involved in the relevant fee
calculations.
20. In some cases, the slight changes in population would result in a similar percentage change in the annual
licence fee for spectrum licences for which the fee is calculated using population values. Although the
differences are expected to be minimal, the Department plans to freeze the current population values for the
remainder of the existing licence terms in order to mitigate any effect this change would have on these
existing licences.
21. However, during the licence term, should a change be made to a licence area, e.g. subdivision, transfer,
etc., 1 the population would be recalculated, using the square grid cell system, and a small change in the
annual licence fees could result. Similarly, all new spectrum licences whose fee is calculated using
population values would be issued using population values based on the square grid cell system.
1
Note that changes are not allowed for all spectrum licences, e.g. “per grid cell” licences cannot be subdivided.
4
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
22. Finally, should a new fee order be established at any time, Industry Canada’s software would recalculate the
licence fee for all affected licences, using the population values associated with the relevant census in
conjunction with the slight changes to the licence areas due to the transition to square grid cells.
Industry Canada is seeking comments on its proposals:
1. Freeze the existing population values for all existing spectrum licences for the
remainder of the licence term.
2. Apply new population values based on square grid cells when calculating fees for
a new spectrum licence, when changes are made to modify the service area of an
existing spectrum licence (e.g. subdivision) or when a new fee order is established.
5.2
Location of Deployed Sites
Issue
23. Licensees deploy sites within the geographic area defined by their licence. Aligning current service areas
with square grid cells could potentially result in a small number of licensees having existing sites that are
located in an area for which they are no longer licensed.
Proposed approach
24. Based on analysis of information supplied to date by licensees, the change to square grid cells results in only
a small number of sites (7 of more than 24,000 sites) being located outside the licensee’s new service area
and not located within an adjacent area also held by the licensee. 2
25. In order to minimize disruption to existing systems, Industry Canada plans to grandfather sites that fall
outside of the new service area, but that are within the original licence area.
26. In addition, licensees will continue to be able to offer services to customers that are within the original
licence area, but outside of the new area defined by square cells. In this way, there is no impact on a
licensee’s ability to continue to operate and serve its customers within the originally licensed areas.
27. Based on licensees’ data uploads, a listing of existing sites that will fall into a new licence service area can
be found in Annex C. This list will be updated with all stations that are uploaded by March 31, 2015, to
form the final list of grandfathered sites and the list will be published prior to implementation of the grid
cell changes. Licensees must ensure that their sites are updated prior to this date, as sites not included on the
2
Determination of the number of sites is based on data that licensees are required to upload to Industry Canada’s publicly
accessible database.
5
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
list are not subject to the grandfathering provision and would be considered non-compliant if they are
located outside their new service area.
28. Note that licensees are able to enter into contractual arrangements to address existing and future needs. For
further information, see CPC-2-1-23, Licensing Procedure for Spectrum Licences for Terrestrial Services.
Industry Canada is seeking comments on its proposal:
3. Sites that fall outside of the new service area but that are within the original licence area
will be grandfathered. Licensees can continue to offer services to customers that are within
the original licence area, but outside of the new area defined by square grid cells.
Licensees are reminded that it is a condition of licence to update site information and that it
must be updated prior to March 31, 2015, if their applicable sites are to be considered under
this grandfathering provision. A revised list of grandfathered sites will be published prior to
implementation of the grid cell changes. Sites not included on the list are not subject to the
grandfathering provision and would be considered non-compliant if they are located outside
their existing or new service area.
5.3
Technical Considerations
Issue
29. In frequency bands licensed by service area, Industry Canada typically imposes technical requirements to
facilitate the efficient use and sharing of spectrum near service area boundaries. 3 In general, licensees are
required to coordinate any stations that exceed a specified PFD 4 or field strength limit at the border of their
licensed service area. These limits serve two purposes: to mitigate interference between installations that
operate close to the licensed service area boundary and to ensure equal access to the same spectrum by
operators in adjacent areas.
30. With the conversion to square grid cells, the PFD level at the new boundary for some stations may increase
or decrease, depending on the distance from the station to the new boundary. As such, the technical rules
need to be considered.
3
4
These are described in Standard Radio System Plans (SRSPs).
A PFD specifies the power flux density of a radiofrequency wave per unit area and is independent of the receiver and antenna
used to receive a signal. PFD can be measured in linear units (watts per square metre or W/m2) or logarithmic units (dBW/m2).
6
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
Proposed approach
31. Given that the square grid cells will closely track existing boundaries, it is expected that, in most cases, the
change in PFD level at the new boundary will not differ significantly from the PFD level at the current
boundary.
32. However, given the potential for interference and the potential for a licensee to be non-compliant with the
applicable SRSP or a sharing agreement with an adjacent licensee, Industry Canada proposes that the PFD
limits be aligned with the new service boundary.
33. In recognition that system changes can be costly and that the existing systems are currently operating
successfully, Industry Canada proposes that no changes be required to existing systems unless the licensee
modifies a station that is exceeding the PFD or is not coordinated with the adjacent licensee. In those
situations, the licensee would need to either coordinate with the adjacent licensee or make system changes
to meet the specified PFD at the new boundary.
Industry Canada is seeking comments on its proposal to:
4. Require licensees to meet the specified PFD at the new service area boundary or coordinate with the
adjacent licensee if a licensee makes changes to an existing station.
6. Other Consequential Change — Applications for New User-Defined Areas
34. Industry Canada currently accepts applications for user-defined areas in certain frequency bands in which
the requested licence area is drawn free-form and not in conformance with the hexagonal grid cell concept.
With the modernization of the Spectrum Management System and the implementation of the new square
grid cells, the Department will no longer accept applications with free-form user-defined areas. All future
requests for user-defined areas will be required to conform to the square grid cell boundaries.
7. Submitting Comments
35. Respondents are requested to provide their comments in electronic format (Microsoft Word or Adobe PDF)
to the following email address: [email protected].
7
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
36. In addition, respondents are asked to specify question numbers for ease of referencing and provide
supporting rationale for their comments.
37. Written submissions should be addressed to the Senior Director, Spectrum Development and Operations,
Industry Canada, 300 Slater Street (JETN, 15th floor), Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H5. All submissions should
cite the Canada Gazette, Part I, the publication date, the title and the notice reference number
(DGSO-001-15). Parties should submit their comments no later than March 16, 2015, to ensure
consideration. Soon after the close of the comment period, all comments received will be posted on the
Department’s Spectrum Management and Telecommunications website at www.ic.gc.ca/spectrum.
38. All comments will be published, so those making submissions are asked not to provide confidential or
private information in their submissions.
39. After the comment period, Industry Canada may, at its discretion, request additional information if needed
to clarify significant positions or new proposals.
8. Obtaining Copies
40. All spectrum-related documents referred to in this paper are available on Industry Canada’s Spectrum
Management and Telecommunications website at www.ic.gc.ca/spectrum.
8
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
Annex A: Sample Diagrams Indicating the Square Grid Cell Concept
All Figures: © 2014 LS telcom AG
Figure A1: Sample overlay of 5 degree x 5 degree square grid cells on map of Canada
Figure A2: Tier 4-055
(defined by 25 km2 hexagonal cells)
Figure A3: Tier 4-055
(defined by 1 minute × 1 minute square cells)
9
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
Figure A4: Illustration of the adherence of 1 minute × 1 minute square cells to the
existing licence service area borders defined by hexagonal grid cells
10
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
Annex B: Tier Area Population Differences
Table B1 — Tier 4 Areas With Population Difference Less Than Plus or Minus 1.5%
Tier
Area
Tier Name
Population
Difference
1996
Population
Percent
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Percent
Difference
1996
Population
Difference
2001
Population
Percent
Difference
2001
4-001
St. John's
-22
-0.01%
-12
-0.02%
-21
-0.01%
4-002
Placentia
-44
-0.19%
-14
-0.18%
-36
-0.19%
4-003
Gander/Grand Falls/Windsor
6
0.00%
25
0.04%
13
0.01%
4-004
Corner Brook/Stephenville
-7
-0.01%
5
0.02%
3
0.00%
4-005
Labrador
20
0.07%
-44
-0.49%
21
0.08%
4-006
Charlottetown
10
0.01%
5
0.01%
10
0.01%
4-007
Summerside
-28
-0.06%
-13
-0.07%
-29
-0.06%
4-008
Yarmouth
-52
-0.08%
-20
-0.08%
-50
-0.08%
4-009
Bridgewater/Kentville
-92
-0.07%
-29
-0.05%
-92
-0.07%
4-010
Halifax
221
0.06%
85
0.06%
230
0.06%
4-011
Truro
-31
-0.06%
-11
-0.05%
-32
-0.06%
4-012
Amherst
-113
-0.30%
-53
-0.36%
-109
-0.30%
4-013
Antigonish/New Glasgow
87
0.11%
21
0.07%
85
0.11%
4-014
Sydney
-109
-0.07%
-36
-0.06%
-103
-0.07%
4-015
Saint John
-96
-0.07%
-34
-0.06%
-92
-0.07%
4-016
St. Stephen
-44
-0.16%
-15
-0.14%
-42
-0.16%
4-017
Fredericton
105
0.07%
33
0.06%
103
0.07%
4-018
Moncton
49
0.03%
45
0.08%
50
0.03%
4-019
Miramichi/Bathurst
37
0.02%
-4
-0.01%
35
0.02%
4-020
Grand Falls
-31
-0.10%
-9
-0.08%
-27
-0.09%
4-021
Edmundston
-98
-0.34%
-36
-0.33%
-96
-0.34%
4-022
Campbellton
-199
-0.56%
-68
-0.51%
-179
-0.56%
4-023
Matane
215
0.17%
92
0.20%
211
0.18%
4-024
Mont-Joli
-1
0.00%
1
0.00%
0
0.00%
11
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
Tier
Area
DGSO-001-15
Tier Name
Population
Difference
1996
Population
Percent
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Percent
Difference
1996
Population
Difference
2001
Population
Percent
Difference
2001
4-025
Rimouski
-26
-0.05%
-6
-0.03%
-25
-0.05%
4-026
Rivière-du-Loup
-27
-0.03%
-7
-0.02%
-26
-0.03%
4-027
La Malbaie
-15
-0.05%
-7
-0.06%
-14
-0.05%
4-028
Chicoutimi-Jonquière
-20
-0.01%
-2
0.00%
-19
-0.01%
4-029
Montmagny
45
0.07%
20
0.09%
44
0.07%
4-030
Quebec
2
0.00%
-17
-0.01%
4
0.00%
4-031
Sainte-Marie
-50
-0.10%
-15
-0.09%
-51
-0.11%
4-032
Saint-Georges
-72
-0.11%
-25
-0.11%
-75
-0.11%
4-033
Lac Mégantic
125
0.49%
40
0.43%
122
0.49%
4-034
Thetford Mines
19
0.04%
7
0.04%
18
0.04%
4-035
Plessisville
133
0.62%
35
0.45%
136
0.62%
4-036
La Tuque
-10
-0.06%
3
0.04%
-8
-0.05%
4-037
Trois-Rivières
84
0.03%
47
0.04%
81
0.03%
4-038
Louiseville
-34
-0.15%
-9
-0.10%
-33
-0.15%
4-039
Asbestos
95
0.31%
32
0.28%
95
0.31%
4-040
Victoriaville
-213
-0.44%
-69
-0.36%
-218
-0.44%
4-041
Coaticook
-54
-0.41%
-18
-0.37%
-55
-0.41%
4-042
Sherbrooke
-51
-0.02%
-46
-0.05%
-53
-0.02%
4-043
Windsor
-175
-1.07%
-55
-0.88%
-176
-1.07%
4-044
Drummondville
1
0.00%
0
0.00%
1
0.00%
4-045
Cowansville
-227
-0.80%
-86
-0.74%
-217
-0.80%
4-046
Farnham
69
0.23%
-18
-0.17%
65
0.23%
4-047
Granby
496
0.59%
235
0.71%
511
0.59%
4-048
St-Hyacinthe
-266
-0.29%
-107
-0.30%
-241
-0.29%
4-049
Sorel
374
0.57%
323
1.22%
318
0.57%
4-050
Joliette
259
0.21%
-26
-0.05%
-165
-0.12%
4-051
Montreal
-475
-0.01%
-212
-0.01%
-794
-0.02%
4-052
Sainte-Agathe-des-Monts
510
0.87%
149
0.57%
531
0.87%
12
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
Tier
Area
Tier Name
DGSO-001-15
Population
Difference
1996
Population
Percent
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Percent
Difference
1996
Population
Difference
2001
Population
Percent
Difference
2001
4-053
Hawkesbury
-26
-0.04%
-15
-0.06%
-26
-0.04%
4-054
Mont-Laurier/Maniwaki
59
0.12%
47
0.25%
57
0.12%
4-055
Ottawa
1040
0.09%
432
0.10%
1092
0.09%
4-056
Pembroke
-82
-0.10%
-68
-0.23%
-79
-0.10%
4-057
Arnprior/Renfrew
-712
-2.84%
-267
-2.74%
-864
-2.84%
4-058
Rouyn-Noranda
101
0.23%
35
0.20%
93
0.23%
4-059
Notre-Dame-du-Nord
-70
-0.39%
-28
-0.41%
-74
-0.43%
4-060
La Sarre
-261
-1.15%
-82
-0.98%
-232
-1.14%
4-061
Amos
-6
-0.02%
-3
-0.04%
-5
-0.02%
4-062
Val D'Or
-30
-0.07%
19
0.11%
-23
-0.05%
4-063
Roberval/Saint-Félicien
-3
0.00%
-8
-0.03%
-2
0.00%
4-064
Baie-Comeau
-169
-0.32%
-11
-0.06%
-152
-0.31%
4-065
Port-Cartier/Sept-Iles
31
0.06%
24
0.13%
36
0.07%
4-066
Chibougamau
486
1.23%
151
1.29%
357
0.88%
4-067
Cornwall
83
0.12%
40
0.15%
82
0.12%
4-068
Brockville
30
0.04%
21
0.08%
30
0.04%
4-069
Gananoque
-125
-0.96%
-64
-1.25%
-124
-0.96%
4-070
Kingston
86
0.05%
38
0.06%
87
0.05%
4-071
Napanee
12
0.03%
6
0.04%
12
0.03%
4-072
Belleville
-475
-0.33%
-67
-0.12%
-479
-0.33%
4-073
Cobourg
271
0.47%
4
0.02%
282
0.47%
4-074
Peterborough
29
0.02%
68
0.12%
29
0.02%
4-075
Lindsay
-103
-0.25%
-40
-0.25%
-106
-0.25%
4-076
Minden
-65
-0.38%
-28
-0.38%
-67
-0.38%
4-077
Toronto
-526
-0.01%
-277
-0.02%
-875
-0.02%
4-078
Alliston
7
0.01%
-10
-0.03%
7
0.01%
4-079
Guelph/Kitchener
-79
-0.01%
2
0.00%
-84
-0.01%
4-080
Fergus
245
1.07%
96
1.22%
280
1.07%
13
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
Tier
Area
DGSO-001-15
Tier Name
Population
Difference
1996
Population
Percent
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Percent
Difference
1996
Population
Difference
2001
Population
Percent
Difference
2001
4-081
Kincardine
163
0.09%
-384
-0.58%
165
0.10%
4-082
Listowel/Goderich
-813
-0.96%
-343
-1.10%
-797
-0.94%
4-083
Fort Erie
84
0.31%
4
0.04%
62
0.22%
4-084
Niagara-St. Catharines
-451
-0.14%
-116
-0.09%
-451
-0.14%
4-085
Haldimand/Dunnville
112
0.32%
72
0.59%
116
0.32%
4-086
London/Woodstock/St. Thomas
-349
-0.06%
-196
-0.09%
-355
-0.06%
4-087
Brantford
-300
-0.26%
-133
-0.31%
-319
-0.26%
4-088
Stratford
106
0.23%
34
0.19%
113
0.23%
4-089
Chatham
-682
-0.87%
-257
-0.87%
-648
-0.87%
4-090
Windsor/Leamington
324
0.09%
119
0.09%
347
0.09%
4-091
Wallaceburg
215
0.69%
96
0.82%
225
0.69%
4-092
Sarnia
-43
-0.03%
-24
-0.05%
-42
-0.03%
4-093
Strathroy
241
0.60%
142
1.03%
251
0.60%
4-094
Barrie
667
0.28%
733
0.85%
776
0.28%
4-095
Midland
52
0.12%
60
0.37%
54
0.12%
4-096
Gravenhurst/Bracebridge
-9
-0.02%
-26
-0.13%
-9
-0.02%
4-097
North Bay
334
0.32%
129
0.31%
322
0.31%
4-098
Parry Sound
-48
-0.24%
-7
-0.09%
-45
-0.23%
4-099
Elliot Lake
-229
-0.76%
-53
-0.45%
-237
-0.76%
4-100
Sudbury
319
0.17%
122
0.17%
308
0.18%
4-101
Kirkland Lake
-333
-0.88%
-111
-0.74%
-298
-0.86%
4-102
Timmins
-8
-0.02%
-13
-0.07%
-9
-0.02%
4-103
Kapuskasing
-316
-0.69%
-134
-0.79%
-285
-0.68%
4-104
Kenora/Sioux Lookout
-78
-0.12%
-96
-0.44%
-64
-0.10%
4-105
Iron Bridge
-59
-0.26%
12
0.14%
-55
-0.24%
4-106
Sault Ste. Marie
73
0.08%
19
0.06%
68
0.08%
4-107
Marathon
-126
-0.39%
-41
-0.35%
-92
-0.31%
4-108
Thunder Bay
101
0.08%
17
0.03%
97
0.08%
14
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
Tier
Area
Tier Name
DGSO-001-15
Population
Difference
1996
Population
Percent
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Percent
Difference
1996
Population
Difference
2001
Population
Percent
Difference
2001
4-109
Fort Frances
-15
-0.07%
6
0.07%
2
0.01%
4-110
Steinbach
85
0.19%
36
0.24%
90
0.20%
4-111
Winnipeg
-39
-0.01%
206
0.07%
-37
-0.01%
4-112
Lac du Bonnet
138
0.26%
-50
-0.27%
141
0.26%
4-113
Morden/Winkler
-10
-0.03%
-2
-0.01%
-12
-0.03%
4-114
Brandon
-263
-0.28%
-108
-0.30%
-255
-0.27%
4-115
Portage la Prairie
2
0.01%
3
0.04%
1
0.00%
4-116
Dauphin
50
0.06%
25
0.08%
47
0.06%
4-117
Creighton/Flin Flon
-94
-0.40%
-84
-1.03%
0
0.00%
4-118
Thompson
-17
-0.04%
-40
-0.32%
-14
-0.03%
4-119
Estevan
24
0.05%
-19
-0.11%
25
0.06%
4-120
Weyburn
-29
-0.13%
-5
-0.05%
-27
-0.12%
4-121
Moose Jaw
-16
-0.03%
-45
-0.19%
-17
-0.03%
4-122
Swift Current
-13
-0.03%
-1
-0.01%
-17
-0.04%
4-123
Yorkton
21
0.03%
21
0.07%
20
0.03%
4-124
Regina
31
0.01%
55
0.06%
25
0.01%
4-125
Saskatoon
26
0.01%
5
0.01%
24
0.01%
4-126
Watrous
54
0.17%
13
0.11%
52
0.18%
4-127
Battleford
863
0.97%
327
1.03%
866
0.95%
4-128
Prince Albert
-77
-0.06%
-15
-0.03%
-58
-0.04%
4-129
Lloydminster
-929
-2.93%
-416
-3.61%
-900
-2.93%
4-130
Northern Saskatchewan
-10
-0.03%
9
0.12%
-48
-0.14%
4-131
Medicine Hat/Brooks
-5
-0.01%
-1
0.00%
-6
-0.01%
4-132
Lethbridge
-7
0.00%
-2
0.00%
-8
0.00%
4-133
Stettler/Oyen/Wainwright
38
0.07%
-2
-0.01%
35
0.07%
4-134
High River
411
0.93%
71
0.49%
537
0.91%
4-135
Strathmore
-55
-0.16%
-10
-0.09%
-61
-0.16%
4-136
Calgary
-393
-0.05%
-59
-0.02%
-452
-0.05%
15
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
Tier
Area
DGSO-001-15
Tier Name
Population
Difference
1996
Population
Percent
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Percent
Difference
1996
Population
Difference
2001
Population
Percent
Difference
2001
4-137
Red Deer
-31
-0.02%
-39
-0.08%
-15
-0.01%
4-138
Wetaskiwin/Ponoka
20
0.05%
-25
-0.17%
20
0.04%
4-139
Camrose
-82
-0.25%
10
0.08%
-86
-0.25%
4-140
Vegreville
7
0.05%
3
0.04%
1
0.01%
4-141
Edmonton
-507
-0.06%
-151
-0.05%
-550
-0.06%
4-142
Edson/Hinton
-42
-0.09%
20
0.13%
-29
-0.07%
4-143
Bonnyville
452
0.63%
134
0.55%
467
0.63%
4-144
Whitecourt
123
0.48%
25
0.28%
135
0.50%
4-145
Barrhead
4
0.02%
-4
-0.06%
3
0.01%
4-146
Fort McMurray
-33
-0.09%
-37
-0.30%
-56
-0.13%
4-147
Peace River
-33
-0.04%
-32
-0.12%
-52
-0.06%
4-148
Grande Prairie
0
0.00%
13
0.06%
-38
-0.05%
4-149
East Kootenay
-13
-0.02%
0
0.00%
-6
-0.01%
4-150
West Kootenay
-13
-0.02%
6
0.02%
-1
0.00%
4-151
Kelowna
-862
-0.30%
-373
-0.33%
-905
-0.30%
4-152
Vancouver
-490
-0.02%
-146
-0.02%
-531
-0.02%
4-153
Hope
-105
-0.44%
-72
-0.79%
-55
-0.25%
4-154
Victoria
462
0.12%
157
0.10%
475
0.12%
4-155
Nanaimo
-714
-0.44%
-245
-0.37%
-725
-0.44%
4-156
Courtenay
-74
-0.07%
-27
-0.07%
-66
-0.06%
4-157
Powell River
-12
-0.04%
21
0.18%
-3
-0.01%
4-158
Squamish/Whistler
532
0.96%
165
0.74%
573
0.96%
4-159
Merritt
4
0.03%
7
0.12%
5
0.03%
4-160
Kamloops
24
0.03%
-5
-0.01%
21
0.02%
4-161
Ashcroft
42
0.24%
64
1.00%
29
0.18%
4-162
Salmon Arm
897
1.89%
336
1.78%
885
1.92%
4-163
Golden
-15
-0.20%
-6
-0.23%
-15
-0.21%
4-164
Williams Lake
-32
-0.08%
-48
-0.32%
-25
-0.06%
16
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
Tier
Area
Tier Name
DGSO-001-15
Population
Difference
1996
Population
Percent
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Percent
Difference
1996
Population
Difference
2001
Population
Percent
Difference
2001
4-165
Quesnel/Red Bluff
13
0.05%
15
0.16%
25
0.10%
4-166
Skeena
-14
-0.02%
-79
-0.33%
27
0.04%
4-167
Prince George
-29
-0.03%
-12
-0.03%
5
0.01%
4-168
Smithers
-40
-0.10%
18
0.13%
-26
-0.06%
4-169
Dawson Creek
-86
-0.14%
-109
-0.50%
-30
-0.05%
4-170
Yukon
-329
-1.07%
-206
-1.78%
-284
-0.99%
4-171
Nunavut
-3
-0.01%
-1
-0.01%
-5
-0.02%
4-172
Northwest Territories
67
0.17%
25
0.20%
64
0.17%
Table B2 — Exceptions — Tier 4 Areas With Population Difference Greater Than Plus or Minus 1.5%
Tier
Area
Tier Name
Population
Difference
1996
Population
Percent
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Percent
Difference
1996
Population
Difference
2001
Population
Percent
Difference
2001
4-057
Arnprior/Renfrew
-712
-2.84%
-267
-2.74%
-864
-2.84%
4-129
Lloydminster
-929
-2.93%
-416
-3.61%
-900
-2.93%
4-162
Salmon Arm
897
1.89%
336
1.78%
885
1.92%
4-170
Yukon
-329
-1.07%
-206
-1.78%
-284
-0.99%
17
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
Table B3 — Tier 3 Areas With Population Difference Less Than Plus or Minus 1.5%
Tier
Area
Tier Name
Population
Difference
1996
Population
Percent
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Percent
Difference
1996
Population
Difference
2001
Population
Percent
Difference
2001
3-01
Newfoundland & Labrador
-47
-0.01%
-40
-0.02%
-21
0.00%
3-02
Prince Edward Island
-18
-0.01%
-8
-0.02%
-19
-0.01%
3-03
Mainland Nova Scotia
19
0.00%
-6
0.00%
31
0.00%
3-04
Cape Breton
-109
-0.07%
-36
-0.06%
-103
-0.07%
3-05
Southern New Brunswick
-140
-0.08%
-48
-0.08%
-134
-0.08%
3-06
Western New Brunswick
-25
-0.01%
-12
-0.02%
-20
-0.01%
3-07
Eastern New Brunswick
-113
-0.03%
-26
-0.02%
-94
-0.03%
3-08
Bas du fleuve/Gaspésie
161
0.05%
80
0.07%
160
0.05%
3-09
Quebec
-17
0.00%
-18
0.00%
-17
0.00%
3-10
Chicoutimi-Jonquière
-161
-0.04%
3
0.00%
-138
-0.04%
3-11
Eastern Townships
-421
-0.08%
-184
-0.09%
-423
-0.08%
3-12
Trois-Rivières
904
0.12%
465
0.15%
464
0.06%
3-13
Montreal
-406
-0.01%
-230
-0.02%
-729
-0.02%
3-14
Upper Outaouais
569
0.53%
197
0.43%
588
0.55%
3-15
Ottawa
1013
0.08%
417
0.09%
1065
0.08%
3-16
Pembroke
-794
-0.75%
-336
-0.84%
-943
-0.87%
3-17
Abitibi
221
0.11%
92
0.13%
116
0.06%
3-18
Cornwall
83
0.12%
40
0.15%
82
0.12%
3-19
Brockville
-95
-0.11%
-43
-0.13%
-94
-0.11%
3-20
Kingston
86
0.05%
38
0.06%
87
0.05%
3-21
Belleville
-463
-0.25%
-61
-0.09%
-467
-0.25%
3-22
Cobourg
271
0.47%
4
0.02%
282
0.47%
3-23
Peterborough
-74
-0.04%
28
0.04%
-77
-0.04%
3-24
Huntsville
-74
-0.11%
-54
-0.19%
-76
-0.11%
18
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
Tier
Area
Tier Name
3-25
DGSO-001-15
Population
Difference
1996
Population
Percent
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Percent
Difference
1996
Population
Difference
2001
Population
Percent
Difference
2001
Toronto
-526
-0.01%
-277
-0.02%
-875
-0.02%
3-26
Barrie
889
0.16%
400
0.20%
1002
0.17%
3-27
Guelph/Kitchener
166
0.03%
98
0.05%
196
0.03%
3-28
Listowel/Goderich/ Stratford
-707
-0.54%
-309
-0.63%
-684
-0.51%
3-29
Niagara-St. Catharines
-367
-0.10%
-112
-0.08%
-388
-0.11%
3-30
London/Woodstock/
St. Thomas
-537
-0.07%
-257
-0.09%
-558
-0.07%
3-31
Chatham
-467
-0.43%
-161
-0.39%
-423
-0.39%
3-32
Windsor/Leamington
324
0.09%
119
0.09%
347
0.09%
3-33
Strathroy
199
0.12%
118
0.19%
210
0.13%
3-34
North Bay
286
0.23%
122
0.25%
277
0.23%
3-35
Sault Ste. Marie
-216
-0.15%
-23
-0.04%
-223
-0.16%
3-36
Sudbury
319
0.17%
122
0.17%
308
0.18%
3-37
Kirkland Lake
-657
-0.50%
-258
-0.52%
-592
-0.49%
3-38
Thunder Bay
-119
-0.05%
-114
-0.12%
-58
-0.02%
3-39
Winnipeg
65
0.01%
69
0.02%
169
0.02%
3-40
Brandon
-214
-0.12%
-83
-0.12%
-208
-0.12%
3-41
Regina
46
0.01%
51
0.04%
43
0.01%
3-42
Moose Jaw
-29
-0.03%
-47
-0.11%
-34
-0.03%
3-43
Saskatoon
856
0.17%
341
0.18%
837
0.16%
3-44
Edmonton
-926
-0.08%
-427
-0.10%
-930
-0.08%
3-45
Medicine Hat/Brooks
-48
-0.03%
7
0.01%
-58
-0.03%
3-46
Lethbridge
-7
0.00%
-2
0.00%
-8
0.00%
3-47
Calgary
-38
0.00%
1
0.00%
24
0.00%
3-48
Red Deer
-11
-0.01%
-64
-0.10%
5
0.00%
3-49
Grande Prairie
-34
-0.02%
-19
-0.04%
-90
-0.06%
3-50
Kootenays
-27
-0.02%
6
0.01%
-7
-0.01%
3-51
Okanagan/Columbia
24
0.01%
-37
-0.03%
-29
-0.01%
19
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
Tier
Area
Tier Name
Population
Difference
1996
Population
Percent
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Percent
Difference
1996
Population
Difference
2001
Population
Percent
Difference
2001
3-52
Vancouver
-76
0.00%
-33
0.00%
-15
0.00%
3-53
Victoria
462
0.12%
157
0.10%
475
0.12%
3-54
Nanaimo
-714
-0.44%
-245
-0.37%
-725
-0.44%
3-55
Courtenay
-74
-0.07%
-27
-0.07%
-66
-0.06%
3-56
Thompson/Cariboo
46
0.03%
26
0.04%
50
0.03%
3-57
Prince George
-83
-0.04%
-72
-0.10%
6
0.00%
3-58
Dawson Creek
-86
-0.14%
-109
-0.50%
-30
-0.05%
3-59
Yukon, North West
Territories & Nunavut
-264
-0.28%
-181
-0.59%
-225
-0.24%
20
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
Table B4 — Tier 2 Areas With Population Difference Less Than Plus or Minus 1.5%
Tier
Area
Tier Name
Population
Difference
1996
Population
Percent
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Difference
1996
Dwelling
Percent
Difference
1996
Population
Difference
2001
Population
Percent
Difference
2001
2-01
Newfoundland &
Labrador
-47
-0.01%
-21
0.00%
-21
0.00%
Nova Scotia & Prince
Edward Island
-109
-0.01%
-91
-0.01%
-91
-0.01%
2-03
New Brunswick
-278
-0.04%
-249
-0.03%
-249
-0.03%
2-04
Eastern Quebec
-17
0.00%
5
0.00%
5
0.00%
2-05
Southern Quebec
647
0.01%
-99
0.00%
-99
0.00%
2-06
Eastern Ontario &
Outaouais
27
0.00%
-63
0.00%
-63
0.00%
2-07
Northern Quebec
221
0.11%
116
0.06%
116
0.06%
2-08
Southern Ontario
-1099
-0.01%
-1249
-0.01%
-1249
-0.01%
2-09
Northern Ontario
-386
-0.05%
-288
-0.04%
-288
-0.04%
2-10
Manitoba
-148
-0.01%
-39
0.00%
-39
0.00%
2-11
Saskatchewan
873
0.09%
846
0.09%
846
0.09%
2-12
Alberta
-1063
-0.04%
-1056
-0.04%
-1056
-0.04%
2-13
British Columbia
-527
-0.01%
-342
-0.01%
-342
-0.01%
2-14
Yukon, North West
Territories & Nunavut
-264
-0.28%
-225
-0.24%
-225
-0.24%
2-17
Province of Saskatchewan
N/A
N/A
-2450
-0.25%
-3231
-0.22%
2-18
Province of Alberta
N/A
N/A
2239
0.08%
3048
0.07%
2-02
21
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
Table B5 — TEL Areas With Population Difference Less Than Plus or Minus 1.5%
TEL Area
Description
TEL-002
Sept-Îles and Gaspésie, Beauce, SaintGeorges, Sainte-Clotilde-de-Beauce
Population
Difference 2001
Population Percent
Difference 2001
-6225
-1.21%
TEL-004
Valcourt
343
3.16%
TEL-005
La Baie
4
0.39%
TEL-006
Courcelles
8
0.78%
TEL-007
Lambton
-20
-0.90%
TEL-008
Nantes
8
0.53%
TEL-009
St-Victor
8
0.32%
TEL-010
Warwick
-38
-0.35%
TEL-011
Acton
-45
-1.06%
TEL-012
St-Ephrem
2
0.08%
TEL-013
St-Liboire
-53
-1.20%
TEL-014
Etchemin, Nicolet, Saint-Ludger
1
0.00%
TEL-015
Sainte-Rosalie, Notre-Dame-du-BonConseil
195
1.41%
TEL-016
St-Paulin
-73
-0.73%
TEL-017
Québec, Charlevoix, Saguenay, Saint-JeanChrysostome, Bas Saint-Laurent, SaintNicolas, Saint-Étienne, Deschaillons,
Fortierville, Villeroy, Île d'Orléans, TringJonction, Lac-aux-Sables, Sainte-Agathede-Lotbinière, Bellechasse
-4020
-0.37%
Aylmer, Manitoulin Island East, Bruce
Peninsula North, Coldwater, Cambray
-449
-1.21%
17
0.24%
TEL-018
TEL-021
Watford
TEL-022
Port Elgin
-227
-1.17%
TEL-024
Thunder Bay
-33
-0.03%
22
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
TEL Area
Description
TEL-025
DGSO-001-15
Population
Difference 2001
Population Percent
Difference 2001
Dryden
-41
-0.63%
TEL-026
Kenora
9
0.07%
TEL-027
Woodstock, Port Franks
22
0.24%
TEL-028
Cottam
3
0.07%
TEL-029
Grand Bend
-77
-1.13%
TEL-030
Goderich
134
1.45%
TEL-031
Lansdowne
-16
-0.47%
TEL-032
Mornington
62
1.07%
TEL-033
Millbrook
84
1.47%
TEL-034
Keene
0
-0.01%
TEL-035
North Frontenac
27
1.18%
TEL-036
North Renfrew
51
1.27%
TEL-037
Moosonee, Iroquois Falls, Marten River,
Temagami
57
1.37%
TEL-038
Forest
24
0.25%
TEL-039
Kirkton, Uniondale
67
0.70%
TEL-040
Moose Creek
-6
-0.37%
TEL-042
Clinton
-8
-0.12%
TEL-043
Westport
-13
-0.47%
TEL-044
Mildmay
-109
-0.77%
TEL-045
Southern B.C., Dawson Creek Area
6
0.00%
TEL-046
Fort Nelson Area
-103
-1.00%
TEL-047
Prince Rupert
-137
-0.93%
TEL-048
Rainy River District
-155
-0.65%
TEL-055
Sioux Narrows-East Hawk Lake-Minaki
-17
-0.29%
TEL-057
Grand Bend
5
0.12%
23
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
TEL Area
Description
TEL-062
DGSO-001-15
Population
Difference 2001
Population Percent
Difference 2001
Cochrane
-15
-0.23%
TEL-063
North-Eastern Ontario and HWY 144
-138
-0.13%
TEL-064
Algoma, Hornepayne
-109
-1.08%
TEL-066
Oxdrift, East Dryden
47
0.97%
TEL-068
Lake Superior North, Sioux Lookout to
Raith, Highway 105, Greenstone
-42
-0.11%
-161417
-1.48%
TEL-069
South, North, East Ontario
TEL-070
Zurich
-25
-0.97%
TEL-071
North Eastern Ontario
860
0.79%
TEL-072
Yukon Territory less Whitehorse
-97
-1.01%
TEL-073
Whitehorse, NWT & Nunavut
-3
0.00%
TEL-074
South, North, East Ontario, Algoma,
Hornepayne
-161625
-1.48%
TEL-076
Nipigon-Armstrong-Whitefish Lake
-64
-1.05%
TEL-078
Deception Bay
-10
-0.66%
TEL-079
South, North, East Ontario
-162301
-1.49%
TEL-080
Southern Quebec, Québec, Charlevoix,
Saguenay, Bas Saint-Laurent, Thetford
Mines, Plessisville, Saint-Rosaire,
Victoriaville, Saint-Barnabé South, SaintValérien-de-Milton, Saint-Jacques-deHorton, Hudson’s Bay
-39558
-0.63%
Abitibi and James Bay, Mont-Laurier, Les
Bois-Francs, Saint-Ours, Magdalen Islands,
Clarendon, Bedford, Drummondville-Sud,
Château-Richer, Frontenac
-4890
-1.37%
TEL-082
Sept-Îles and Gaspésie, Beauce
-5868
-1.24%
TEL-083
Grassy Narrows, Koko Lake, Folyet
-6
-0.20%
TEL-084
Saint-Georges, Sept-Îles, Gaspésie
-5991
-1.14%
TEL-085
Quebec
1853
0.27%
TEL-081
24
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
TEL Area
Description
TEL-086
TEL-087
DGSO-001-15
Population
Difference 2001
Population Percent
Difference 2001
Montreal
-434
-0.01%
Ottawa-Gatineau
-602
-0.06%
25
Consultation on Changes to the Definition of Competitive and User-Defined
Service Areas for Spectrum Licences
DGSO-001-15
Annex C: Sites No Longer In New Licence Area
Licence
Account
Licensee
Tier
Description
Location
Prov
Latitude
Longitude
(Hexagon cells)
Tier
(Square cells)
5133769
93900105
BELL
MOBILITY INC.
3-011
Eastern
Townships
F0584-320
chemin de
l'Usine
QC
451455.6
725103.24
3-013
5150145
93900105
BELL
MOBILITY INC.
3-011
Eastern
Townships
F0584-320
chemin de
l'Usine
QC
451455.6
725103.24
3-013
5087084
90900344
Xplornet
Broadband Inc.
4-042
Sherbrooke
MELBOURNE,
QC (406
CHEMIN
NORRIS)
QC
453326.59
721150.76
4-043
5120638
93900012
Xplornet
Broadband Inc.
4-074
Peterborough
SCUGOG (4525
RR57) ON
ON
441123.86
784612.61
4-075
5094044
93900012
Xplornet
Broadband Inc.
4-077
Toronto
YELVERTON
(64, HWY 7A)
ON
ON
440921.96
784345.84
4-074
5095002
93900020
Silo Wireless Inc.
4-086
LondonWoodstock-St.
Thomas
Kelvin
ON
425941
802711
4-087
5095001
93900020
Silo Wireless Inc.
4-087
Brantford
Muir Rd, Brant
ON
430640
803527
4-086
26