Towards the successful deployment of 5G in Europe: What are the necessary policy and regulatory conditions Professor Martin Cave Professor Wolter Lemstra Professor Marc Bourreau Joint Academic Director, CERRE Research Fellow, CERRE Joint Academic Director, CERRE Professor, Imperial College London Associate Professor, Nyenrode Business Universiteit Professor, Telecom ParisTech 1 Agenda I. II. III. IV. Introductions Positioning of the research project Background and precursors Two possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges V. Questions for clarification and discussion 2 Agenda I. II. III. IV. Introductions Positioning of the research project Background and precursors Two possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges V. Questions for clarification and discussion 3 Agenda I. II. III. IV. Introductions Positioning of the research project Background and precursors Two possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges V. Questions for clarification and discussion 4 Positioning • The research question – alternative title of the report: 5G: Just another generation of mobile communications technology? • What about the statements from the policy arena: – European leadership in 5G? – Serving industry verticals? 5 Traditional View Generation Introduction Standard Technology Data rates 1G e1980s NMT/TCAS/… Analogue/Circuit NA 2G e1990s GSM Digital/Circuit->Pct 170 kbit/s 3G e2000s UMTS Digital/Circuit/Packet 7 Mbit/s 4G e2010s LTE All-IP 26 Mbit/s 5G e2020s FPLMTS All-IP 50 Mbit/s 6 5G Design Objectives High-end for Humans: • 20 billion terminals • Guaranteed 50 Mbit/s • Groundspeed 500 km/hr Low-end for Machines: • Over 1 trillion terminals • 100-500 kbit/s • Low power • Aggregate service reliability > 99.999% • Accuracy of outdoor terminal location < 1 m 1000x capacity increase (METIS 2012): – – – – Network densification, 50x More spectrum incl. mmWaves (60-80 GHz), 10x Improving spectral efficiency, 2x Consistent with: Doubling every 3 years - last 30 years 7 5G Introduction 3GPP Rel-14 June 2017 March 2015 5G 3GPP: • Formal start RAN study December 2015 • Functionally frozen specs December 2019 => ITU-R WP5D June 2019 • Final specification February 2020 => ITU-R WP5D Oct 2020 Source: Nokia (2015); 3GPP (2016) March 2016 8 Alternative View Introducing the IT-cloud into the CT-world 9 CT-cloud? Operator back-office IT Computing = ? Routing CT Source: AT&T (2013; 2014; 2016) 10 AT&T: imperative 11 Positioning • The research question – alternative title of the report: 5G: Just another generation of mobile communications technology? The answer: YES and NO • Depending on your perspective and objectives – being an incumbent operator, potential market entrant, vertical industry firm, policy maker, end-user… • Therefore we belief a debate on the most desirable future is required – being informed by two contrasting images of the future 12 Images of the future Evolution Image • Improving the internal business based on virtualization • Benefiting from enhanced capabilities of 5G • Mass consumer market as core business • Pressure on margins remains Revolution Image • Unlocking verticals by opening the market to Virtual Mobile Network Operators (VMNOs) at retail level using open APIs • Improving the internal business based on virtualization • Benefiting from enhanced capabilities of 5G • Differentiated services leads to 13 higher willingness to pay Images of the future Evolution Image • 5G Leadership is about enabling mobile communications growth by: – Timely introduction – Fast roll-out – EU-wide deployment Revolution Image • 5G Leadership is about enabling economic growth by unlocking verticals through: – Leveraging insider knowledge – Across all verticals – Simultaneously • VMNOs: Divisions of MNOs, internal ICT departments; specialized ICT services firms, 14 start-ups, Research Approach Exploring European leadership: • Assessment GSM success factors • Identification regularities 1G-5G • Transposition over time and industry settings Exploring virtualization: • Assessment cloud-based IT services • Assessment transformation of IT data centres • Appreciation SDN and NFV technologies • Assessment regulation of the Cloud Exploring policy and regulatory implications: • Development of two images of the future – at the extremes of the spectrum: “Evolution” and “Revolution” • With the related policies and regulatory actions for each image 15 • To serve as input for discussion on the most desirable future outcome Agenda I. II. III. IV. Introductions Positioning of the research project Background and precursors Two possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges V. Questions for clarification and discussion 16 The success of GSM as precursor The facts: • Commercial launch in 1991 • Peak of deployment in 2015: 3.83 billion subscribers • 700 operators • 219 countries and territories Source: GSMA (2016) The perceived success factors: • Outcome of industrial policy • From national to European standard • European-wide roaming • From analogue to digital technology • Unlocking the consumer market • From ‘brick’ to ‘handy’ • Wide adoption outside Europe 17 Virtualisation as precursor Source: AT&T (2013; 2014; 2016) 18 Agenda I. II. III. IV. Introductions Positioning of the research project Background and precursors Two possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges V. Questions for clarification and discussion 19 Possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges Starting points: • Observed regularities: Europe is ‘on-path’ for 5G • Policy option: Unlock verticals through virtualization as part of Industry 4.0 “Evolution” image: “Revolution” image: • • • • • • • • • EU policy: Elec. Coms. Code Consumer market plus verticals Private use of virtualization EU policy: Unlock verticals (Industry 4.0) Verticals plus consumer market Virtualization to enable horizontal market Unlocking industry willingness-to-pay Enabling service differentiation, incl. QoS To stimulate investments in 5G as result Socio-economic dimension (Porter-Wheelen framework): • As context sketch for the mobile industry scenarios 20 Possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges Enabling “R/Evolution” image: • Availability of new radio spectrum – 11 bands identified: – – – – – – – – – 24.25 GHz – 27.5 GHz 31.8 – 33.4 GHz* 37 – 40.5 GHz 40.5 – 42.5 GHz* 47 – 47.2 GHz* 40 GHz three bands 50.4 – 52.6 GHz 66 – 76 GHz 81 – 86 GHz Radio spectrum management: • New spectrum introduced into the market as and when available: • • • • • – 700 MHz – 3400 - 3800 MHz Existing licenses made technology neutral Band usage for 5G essentially MNO decision Spectrum bands above 6 GHz more fragmented globally License shared access License assisted access 21 Possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges Enabling “R/Evolution” image: • Adapt net neutrality rules to accommodate: – PPDR (from LTE to 5G) – Service differentiation for Verticals Net neutrality: • Protection of the ‘best effort’ lane • All traffic to be treated equally • Economic trade-off: strict vs more open • LTE/5G: Network slicing • Non-homogeneous services – Requiring different ‘lanes’ All 5G services to be Specialized Services? When network capacity is sufficient? The specific level of quality to be specified? 22 Possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges Enabling “R/Evolution” image: • Coverage Indoor access: • Avoid access bottleneck – Compare in fixed ‘mutualization point’ • Potential solutions: – Use of Distributed Antenna Systems – Use of ‘Neutral host’ • Requires collaboration MNOs: – Successful private coordination in UK – Slow progress in NL: SIG as part of BTG 23 Possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges Enabling “Evolution” image: • EU policy: Elec. Coms. Code • Consumer market plus verticals • Private use of virtualization Policy and regulatory implications: • Monitor for negative impact on competition from tying and closed APIs • Stimulate spectrum sharing • Stimulate network sharing • Improve secondary market for spectrum • Re-look at coverage obligations for ubiquitous coverage • Address data protection and privacy in context IoT 24 Possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges Enabling “Revolution” image: • EU policy: Unlock verticals • Verticals plus consumer market • Virtualization to enable horizontal market • Unlocking industry willingnessto-pay • Enabling service differentiation, incl. QoS • To stimulate investments Policy and regulatory implications: • • • • • • • • • • Recognize the innovative nature verticals Apply regulatory constraint Be prepared to facilitate/guide the market Enable VMNOs: use experience MVNOs Assure standard+open APIs across Europe Facilitate implementation of APIs: SDKs, use certification experience Assure seamless operation, re OAM Assure dynamic retail market: stimulate retail-level entry Assure collaboration for national coverage Support multiple VMNOs on single device 25 Possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges Enabling “Revolution” image: • EU policy: Unlock verticals Enable VMNOs across all industries – simultaneously: 1. Implies leveraging industry knowledge – – – – 2. Source: Computaris (2012) Internal ICT departments of vertical firms Specialized ICT service providers to verticals Specialized divisions of MNOs Start-ups Leveraging experience obtained with MVNOs – Europe has largest MVNO market – Norway, Denmark, Germany, Belgium > 15% – Case Hong Kong (40% of capacity) 26 Possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges Enabling “Revolution” image: • EU policy: Unlock verticals • Enable VMNOs across all industries – simultaneously: – Stimulate retail level entry – Create level playing field • Recognize the innovative nature of serving verticals – Apply regulatory restraint • If all else fails use experience fixed BB: – Functional separation as ‘last resort’: – Case BT v. Ofcom; TP v. UKE; Telecom Italia v. AGCOM; TeliaSonera v. PTS; O2 in Czech Republic – Ongoing debates (UK) raise the question whether structural separation is needed 27 Possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges Enabling “Revolution” image: • EU policy: Unlock verticals • Enable VMNOs across all industries – simultaneously: – Application of 5G standard releases – Application open APIs • Standardized radio part: 5G (3GPP ongoing) – EC Mandate not required • Application of 5G standard core – EC Mandate not required (unlike 2G) • Uniform and open APIs (3GPP/ETSI) – Part of 5G standard releases – EC Mandate as ‘last resort’ • Application of uniform APIs – Result of competitive market place – EC Mandate as ‘last resort’ • Certification strongly recommended – Use field experience (e.g. Wi-Fi) 28 Agenda I. II. III. IV. Introductions Review and goals of the report Background and precursors Two possible futures and their policy and regulatory challenges V. Questions for clarification 29
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz