WP4
Identification and assessment of methods,
techniques and tools for data collection
May 2011 - February 2012
WP leader FRAUNHOFER
01/19
Work progress and achievements during this period:
1. Survey conducted in form of a new questionnaire
2. Criteria for evaluation of existing MTTs established
•
Information to be obtained by MTTs
•
Identification of key users applying the MTTs
•
Difficulty level of MTTs (time, cost and knowledge)
3. Collected data evaluated by creating a valuation system
02/19
01/19
MTT
Overall level of
difficulty
Photographs
0,14
Inspection in-situ
0,18
Cartographic and topographic plans
0,24
Existing diagnostic survey
0,28
Classification and condition
0,31
Risk maps
0,33
Sample testing
0,36
Management plans
0,37
Documentary archive research
0,39
Visual inspection
0,39
Drawings
0,39
Formal analysis
0,39
Technical analysis
0,39
Historical plans research
0,4
Photo X-Ray
0,53
Destructive testing
0,64
Photogrammetry – terrestrial and aerial
0,67
CAD – Drawings
0,67
Analysis – Maps of specific values
0,67
3D Laser scanner
1
Laser cleaning
1
Energy efficiency analysis
1
Overall level of difficulty value for
all MTTs surveyed
01/19
MTT
Level of
efficiency
Photographs
0,14
Inspection in-situ
0,18
Cartographic and topographic plans
0,24
Existing diagnostic survey
0,28
Classification and condition
0,31
Proper maintenance schedules
0,37
Management plans
0,37
Condition assessment report
0,37
Documentary archive research
0,4
Historical plans research
0,4
Risk assessment
0,47
Visual non-destructive inspection
0,49
Destructive testing
0,64
Dendrochronology
0,64
CAD - Drawings
0,67
Visual destructive inspection
0,68
Climatic data – monitoring of climate change
0,7
Stereoscopies/stereo photography
0,72
Survey and archaeological prospection
0,86
Station of monitoring in situ
0,97
Tachymetry
1
3D Laser scanner
1
GPR – Ground Penetrating Radar
6
Level of efficiency for all MTTs
surveyed
01/19
Results summarised in
1. Deliverable 1.7 (intermediate activity report)
2. Deliverable D4.2 (report on assessment, evaluation and presentation
of MTTs and establishment of criteria for their selection)
02/19
DIFFICULTY OF USE IN TERMS OF TIME FOR ANY SUB-CATEGORY
HISTORIC NAME
DOCUMENTARY ARCHIVIE RESEARCH
AVERAGE
MEDIUM
0,5
GERMANY
LOW
0,0
ITALY
LOW
0,0
GREECE
MEDIUM
0,5
POLAND
MEDIUM
0,5
SLOVENIA
0,3
13/19
Level of efficiency for all MTTs surveyed
02/19