OATT Clean-Up Transmission Service Resale Price Caps Members Committee Webinar June 27, 2016 PJM©2016 Background • In Order No. 890, FERC concluded “that it is appropriate to lift the price cap for all transmission customers reassigning transmission capacity.” (¶ 808) • In Order No. 890-A, FERC reaffirmed this decision. (¶ 388) However, because FERC Staff was conducting a two-year study, FERC concluded “it is most appropriate to lift the price cap on reassignments of capacity only to accommodate this study period and amend section 23.1 of the pro forma OATT to reinstate the price cap as of October 1, 2010.” (¶ 390) www.pjm.com 2 PJM©2016 Background • In Order No. 739, FERC permanently removed the price caps based on FERC Staff’s report from the two-year study. (¶ 25) • FERC directed transmission providers to file revisions to their OATT’s indicating: “Because the current OATTs reinstate the price cap as of October 1, 2010, transmission providers will need to revise section 23 of the pro forma OATT, as indicated in Appendix B.” (¶ 37) www.pjm.com 3 PJM©2016 Order No. 739, Appendix B www.pjm.com 4 PJM©2016 Proposed Tariff Revisions • PJM has not applied price caps to the resale rate upstream in OASIS, consistent with the referenced orders. • A clean-up filing is needed to remove the language in Tariff, section 23.1 to avoid any confusion or potential future inconsistencies with Order No. 739. www.pjm.com 5 PJM©2016 Proposed Tariff Revisions • PJM will file revisions with FERC by June 30, 2016. • This presentation is for informational purposes so stakeholders are not surprised. • No detailed stakeholder discussion or vote is required for these revisions because: – PJM incorporated the pro forma OATT section 23.1 language into the PJM Tariff. – Order No. 739 was very clear as to its directive. – FERC, in Order No. 739, specified exactly what language should be deleted from section 23.1. www.pjm.com 6 PJM©2016
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz