ICT in the Revised Policies ,
Standards, and Guidelines
for Undergraduate Teacher
Education
Brenda B. Corpuz, Ph.D.
Intended Outcome
1. Determine ICT-related competencies
in the Revised Policies, Standards,
and Guidelines for Undergraduate
Teacher Education
Intended Outcome
2. Consider facts about the existing
PSGs in the formulation of a new set of
PSGs in teacher education that integrate
ICT-Pedagogy
Humor in the Classroom
After a lesson on metaphor , the teacher asked the
class to describe each other including teacher using
metaphor. A student raised his hand and said:
“Ma’am, you are music to me”. The teacher was very
much delighted and asked why. The student said ,
“ because your eyes are sharp and your nose is
flat!”
Humor in the Classroom
Teacher : Ben, your essay on “My
Dog” is exactly the same as your
brother’s . Did you copy it?
Ben: No, Ma’am. It’s the same dog.
Humor at Home
Grandson: Grandpa, am so inspired that up to
now you call Grandma “sweetheart”!
Grandpa: Come here, grandson. Don’t ever tell
this to Grandma. You see I’ve forgotten her
name!
Policies ,Standards and Guidelines
Teacher Education
for
2 Documents
- CHED Memo Order 30, s. 2004, Revised Policies and
Standards for Undergraduate Teacher Education Curriculum
- CHED Memo Order 52, s. 2007, Addendum to
CMO 30 ( NCBTS)
Take note!
 The NCBTS ( CMO 52, s, 2007) came 3 years
after the Revised Policies and Standards for
Teacher Education.
•
The NCBTS is more recent than CMO 30, s.
2004.
 CMO 30, s. 2004 - 11 competency standards of
teacher education graduates - more broad
statements
 The NCBTS - 7 domains , 19 strands , 78
performance indicators - more specific
statements
The NCBTS
- core of the DepEd’s Teacher Education
Development Program since 2007
- adopted by TEIs in the country
- basis for the Licensure Examination for
Teachers by the Board for Professional Teachers
Competency standards for
pre-service / in-service
CMO 30 , 2004
 Competency Standards - Teacher Education graduates
NCBTS ( CMO 52, 2007)
 Competency Standards for Teacher Performance in the light
of TEDP
Where is ICT in these
PSGs ?
CHED Memo 54 , 2007 – NCBTS
Domain Curriculum
-Strand 4.7. Demonstrate the skills in the use
of ICT in teaching and learning
Domain 4 – Curriculum
The 10 competencies that you were given
for Worksheet B- not part of the NCBTS
- were lifted from the Teacher Strengths and
Needs Analysis (TSNA) tool of DepEd
Competencies and NOT from the NCBTS.
Where is ICT in the PSGs contained in
CHED Memo 30, 2004 ?
 There is no explicit mention of
ICT use in teaching nor ICT
integration in teaching .
Where is ICT in PSGs (
CMO 30)
 Implicit in 5 competency
standards
ICT Integration in the
existing PSGs?
ICT use and integration may relate most to
the ff. competency standards :
- Have the basic and higher level literacy ,
communication, numeracy, critical thinking,
learning skills
ICT Integration in the existing
PSGs?
 Can apply a wide range of teaching process
skills ( including curriculum development,
lesson planning, materials development ,
educational assessment , and teaching
approaches )
ICT integration in the
Existing PSGs
 Can demonstrate and practice the
professional and ethical requirements of
the teaching profession - use ICT safely ,
legally and ethically
ICT integration in the
Existing PSGs
 Can facilitate learning of diverse
types of learners , in diverse types
of learning environments , using
a wide range of teaching
knowledge and skills
ICT Integration in Existing
PSGs
 Can be creative and
innovative in thinking of
alternative learning
approaches ….
Our Next Workshop
Formulation of new PSGs that integrate
ICT-pedagogy
New PSGs for Teacher Education ?
 If expected output is New PSGs for Teacher
Education
-Revise the existing Revised PSGs for Teacher
Education?
-Consider making ICT integration more explicit in
the 5 most ICT –related Competency standards
New PSGs for Teacher Education?
 Consider the ICT- strand and the corresponding
ICT performance indicator in the NCBTS.
 Consider ICT competencies in the TSNA.
Something to Think About
In the light of the K to 12, ICT-related research
findings and global demands , the present NCBTS
developed in 2007 and CMO 30, 2004 ( Revised
Teacher Education Curriculum) are being revisited
and will be revised soon.
Which is better?
Formulate PSGs for teacher education as a
whole which include ICT integration?
Or
Formulate an independent set of ICTPedagogy PSGs ?
The decision is ours!
Intended Outcome- Achieved?
1. Determine ICT-related competencies
in the Revised Policies, Standards,
and Guidelines for Undergraduate
Teacher Education
Intended Outcome- Achieved?
 2. Consider facts about the existing PSGs in
the formulation of a new set of PSGs in
teacher education that integrate ICTPedagogy
Thanks for listening!