9:00-10:30
Pilot interventions session plan
• Summary of previous day - 15’
• Group discussions – 45’
• Report back – 30’
Background
•
•
•
•
Good practice report and principles
Sumary on evidence
Pilot intervention themes
Open discussion from yesterday
General ideas
• Feasibility, flexibility and pragmatism. Keep it simple. (Finland
and IE)
• Different interventions but comparable
• Gender perspective (Finland)
• Confidentiality issues (Poland)
• Quality versus Quantity (Scotland)
• Embedded in a health promotion perspective (Poland)
• Public health and best practice perspective (Romania)
• Individual companies choices.
• Minimal impact on day-to-day work (UK).
• Economic difficulties for many enterprises (Greece).
• Share resources (Croatia)
Target
• Engaging intermediaries (Trade Unions) (IE)
• Work with known companies and adapt
implementation to the stage of development (absolute
beginners, champions) (Italy)
• Try to reach different sectors (Italy)
• Smaller companies (Scotland)
• The same multinational in different countries (Ireland)
• Company’s size and the impact in implementation
(Eurocare)
How and What
How
• Guidelines should be developed immediately (all)
• Materials, resources and (assessment) tools (Cr)
• Peer to peer methodology (Italy and Romania) or
cascade (Scotland)
What
• Promote an alcohol policy development within the
company (Scotland)
• Policy templates adaptable to each company (UK)
• Self-help on-line tools (UK)
More…..
Assessment
• Qualitative (soft) or quantitative (hard) indicators
Barriers
• Time constraints: preparation 3-6 months (Be)
• Defining start and end point for pilots (Germany)
Proposal of principles of the pilot
interventions from the lessons learnt
What type of intervention?
Why is this particular company participating? Which are
the aims and objectives of the company?
Who? To whom is the intervention addressed? Who will
actively participate in the implementation?
Where?
When? Schedule the timing.
How? Plan evaluation . Agree intervention content.
Levels of intervention
BASIC
1. Awareness raising
2. Targeted training
MEDIUM
1. Awareness raising - 2. Targeted training
3. Policy development/update & implementation
COMPREHENSIVE
1. Awareness raising 2 - targeted training
3. Policy development/update & implementation
4. Early identification, referral to clinical care and reinsertion.
Working groups
WG1 - Raising awareness and targeted training
Rapporteur/chair – Mary Elmers (AFS)
WG2 - Policy development and implementation
Rapporteur/chair – Bart Garmyn (Securex)
WG3 - Early identification , intervention and referral
Rapporteur/chair – Lidia Segura (GENCAT)
WG4 - Assessment tool
Rapporteur/chair – Theodor Haratau (RF)
Working groups
• Discuss its importance
• Identify and define key elements that should be
included
• Identify existing examples if any
• Rapporteur/Chair:
– Lead the group (4 people minimum)
– Report to the group (oral) – 5 minutes
– Bullet points to be shared with SARD