PRESS STATEMENT
16 January 2008
Competition Commission outraged to see bread price increases
The Competition Commission today said the rapidity with which all the large
bread producers had moved to increase prices at roughly the same time following
the collusion uncovered in the industry flew in the face of its ongoing
investigation into the bread and milling industries.
The Commission has requested an explanation.
“This blatant profiteering is an insult to the nation, particularly the poor. It
demonstrates that the collusion is continuing or the cartel members are acting to
maintain the artificially-high margins they achieved by acting unlawfully,” said
Shan Ramburuth, Competition Commissioner.
The Commissioner said they would not be stopping with the fine levied against
Tiger Brands.
“Should evidence show that the collusive behaviour is continuing we are able to
withdraw the immunity we’ve granted to other players. We are also prosecuting
the remaining cartel members, Pioneer and Foodcorp. Perhaps most shockingly,
we have received new allegations of other anti-competitive behaviour by these
parties, which we are vigorously pursuing,” he said.
While he said the Commission’s job is to ensure compliance with the law and not
set prices, we expected our actions to prompt the bread producers to see fit to
reduce the prices they had colluded over 12 years to fix rather than increase
them yet again,” said Shan Ramburuth, Competition Commissioner.
He said that while input prices such as wheat and transport costs may have seen
recent spikes, firms colluding to set prices normally do so to extract the highest
price possible. Therefore, the increases are coming on top of what is an artificially
high price in the first instance and could have been seized by the bread producers
as an opportunity to suppress the margin to what would be more market related.
“In that the bread producers have now seen fit make a song and dance about
price increases (though no mention was made of them during our protracted
negotiations with Tiger Brands and Premier Food), we have to wonder if this is a
cynical act to demonstrate a false transparency, or is price signalling to their
competitors, both further evidence of their disingenuousness. It would appear
that old habits die hard.”
Ramburuth also announced that the Commission would be instituting more
rigorous reporting requirements for companies found to have contravened the
Act, particularly when evidence of cartel activity had been found. It anticipates
that market participants, particular shareholders and consumers will increasingly
assist as watchdogs to hold the companies accountable.
ENDS
Prepared by: FD Beachhead
Dani Cohen 082 897 0443
Jennifer Cohen 082 468 6469/ [email protected]
On behalf of: The Competition Commission
Further info:
Shan Ramburuth, Commissioner
012 394 3332 / 083 357 1685 / [email protected]
Thulani Kunene, Head of Enforcements and Exemptions
084 734 4179