Team name
Usability testing plan for BelleViews
School of Business and Information Management
Oulu University of Applied Sciences
Team members

List of team members, with emails
Case description

Describe the case generally


What are you testing?
For whom are you testing?
Focus

If you are concentrating/focusing on
some aspect of the product, describe it
here

E.g. you want to focus on general
playability, first impressions, graphics, bugs
Test persons

Describe how many test person you
want to have, age distribution, sex,
general background
Test protocol

Describe the test protocol


As detailed description as possible
E.g. users have 10 minutes to complete
the test, they will be given written
instructions (include the instructions in
separate slide), they are asked to perform
certain tasks (e.g. play one game, play two
songs),
Test protocol 2

Describe the test protocol




Are you using before testing questionnaire?
Are test users asked to talk out loud, e.g.
describing problems and what they are
thinking
After testing users will be
interviewed/asked to fill in a questionnaire
Make new slides if needed
Team members’ roles

Describe what the team members will
do during the test session



Some will be observing the test
Some will write down all the things that
happen during the test
Some will be the one talking to users,
giving them instructions etc
Time and location


Where will you do the testing?
When will you do the testing?
Demographic





How many testers did you get?
How many male/female
Age distribution
Other background info
(maybe draw a table)
Results 1

Depending on your questionnaire
Calculate mean answers
and discuss written answers

Make as many slides as needed


Test session 1

Who participated in the session
Team roles (if applicable)
Date, time & location
Main findings

Make as many slides as needed



Summary of results

Positive feedback / strong points
Summary of results

Areas of improvement / negative
feedback
Conclusion



What was good in the game
What was not so good
What aspects would need more testing