INFORMATIVE TRANSLATION
ANNEX 3: EVALUATION FORM
Evaluator
Date:
Click here to enter text
Click here to enter date
I. General Data
Title of the project
Click here to enter text.
Applicant’s name
Click here to enter text.
Contact person
Click here to enter text.
Phone
Click here to enter text.
E-mail
Click here to enter text.
Amount requested (% of entire budget)
< EUR > Click here to enter text.
Project duration (in months)
Click here to enter text.
Directions
The evaluation form is divided into five sections, which in turn, are divided into
subsections with areas that call for evaluation on a scale from zero to five (the grade
step is 1 point). The points received from each section are added together in the end to
form the overall points for the proposal.
Each project will be evaluated by (at least) two experts, whose points will be added up
and divided by two to form an average score. Projects will be presented to the selection
committee in a ranking based on their point average.
Score
0
1
2
3
4
5
Meaning
Unfulfilled
Defective
Weak
Satisfactory
Good
Very good
Each section has an area for comments where we
request that you elaborate on the points given.
II. Evaluation
1. Background and Expertize
1.1
1.2
The applicant (organization) relevant expertize,
experience and capability for implementation of the
project.
The justification for the project partner’s inclusion,
relevant expertize or justification why project doesn’t
involve partner(s).
Score
Application
form
Choose
score
D.1
Choose
score
D.2; H.2
1.3
The project manager’s and team members’ capability
to implement the project (incl. engagement with
other ongoing projects, tasks).
Choose
score
1.4
The justification and inclusion of the experts to the
planning and execution of the project.
Choose
score
Sub-total (max 20 points):
D.3;
project
manager’s
CV
D.4; H.2;
expert(s)’s
CV
Insert sum
Comments:
Click here to enter text.
2. Purpose and sustainability of the Project
Proposal
2.1
Justification and purpose.
2.2
Innovation and added value.
2.3
Impact of the project/importance after its conclusion
(incl. sustained impact on the target groups); the
institutional and financial sustainability of the
proposed actions.
Score
Choose
score
Choose
score
Choose
score
Sub-total (max 15 points):
Application
form
F.1
F.2
F.3
Insert sum
Comments:
Click here to enter text.
3. Selection of the Target Group(s) and
beneficiaries
3.1
The clear determination of target groups and
beneficiaries; the pertinence of actions to the target
group(s)’s needs.
Score
Application
form
Choose
score
G.1;
Sub-total (max 5 points):
Insert sum
Comments:
Click here to enter text.
4. Quality of Realization
Sotsiaalministeerium
Gonsiori 29
15027 TALLINN
[email protected]
Score
Application
form
2
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
The methodology is clear and detailed (incl. the
visibility of the project is comprehensive, and
realistic);.
The plan of action is comprehensive, appropriate,
and realistic.
Measurability of results, indicators for measuring
results.
Risk analysis and elimination of potential risks.
Sub-total (max 20 points):
Comments:
Click here to enter text.
Choose
score
H.1
Choose
H.2
score
Choose
H.4
score
Choose
I.1
score
Insert sum
5. Economic Efficiency
Score
Application
form
5.1
Justification for the budget (the relationship between
expenditures and expected outcomes).
Choose
score
J.1; Annex
1A
5.2
Justification and clarity of expense categories. How
realistic are the expense categories?
Choose
score
Annex 1A
5.3
Justification/capability for covering co-financing. How
realistic is the plan to covering the co-financing?
Choose
score
J.2
Sub-total (max 15 points):
Insert sum
Comments:
Click here to enter text.
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6. Summary
Background and expertize
Purpose and sustainability of the Project Proposal
Selection of the Target Group(s) and beneficiaries
Quality of Realization
Economic Efficiency
TOTAL (max 75)
TOTAL
/20
/15
/5
/20
/15
Click here to enter score
Comments/suggestions:
Click here to enter text.
(signed digitally)
/NAME/
Sotsiaalministeerium
Gonsiori 29
15027 TALLINN
[email protected]
3