Sterile neutrinos at the Neutrino Factory IDS-NF plenary meeting October 19-21, 2011 Arlington, VA, USA Walter Winter Universität Würzburg Contents Motivation Steriles at near detectors Steriles at far detectors Simulation and general constraints Dependence on assumptions Summary (mostly based on: Meloni, Tang, Winter, Phys.Rev. D82 (2010) 093008, arXiv:1007.2419) 2 Motivation: eV2 sterile ns (B. Fleming, TAUP 2011) (arXiv:1007.1150) LSND/MiniBooNE antineutrinos Reactor anomaly Global fits (Kopp, Maltoni, Schwetz, 1103.4570) 3 Arbitrary sterile ns Cosmology: upper bound O(1 eV) However: sterile neutrinos even preferred, if light enough Cannot exclude that light sterile neutrinos “hide“ among the actives m3 m4 ? m2 m1 (Hamann et al, Phys.Rev.Lett. 105 (2010) 181301) 4 Steriles at near detectors … focus on 3+1 framework in the following (for the sake of simplicity) Oscillation physics Can be described independent of parameterization (with mixing matrix only) Probabilities for short baseline limit: Observation: Appearance probabilities depend on two mixing matrix entries, disappearance probabilities on one 6 Choice of parameterization Why do I need a parameterization? Requirements for a parameterization: Our parameterization: (Meloni, Tang, Winter, arXiv:1007.2419) Less parameters (unitarity assumed!) Convenient if long-baseline included (matter effects) 7 Oscillation physics (2) For small mixing angles: qualitatively similar to param.-independent approach (Meloni, Tang, Winter, arXiv:1007.2419) Parameterization dependent probabilities in short baseline limit: 8 Performance indicators Discuss constraints for individual parameters (sensitivity limits for q14, q24, q34) Requires marginalization over unknown other parameters Renders appearance channels useless: always sensitive to a combination of mixing matrix elements/parameters Main sensitivities: q14: Pee (difficult at NuFact) q24: Pmm (leading at NuFact) q34: Ptt (currently impossible) 9 Sterile at far detectors Oscillation physics Peculiarity: NC matter effect (affects only active states) Probabilities to 2nd order: q difficult at long baseline, 14 q24 easiest, q34 by Pmt (discovery channel)? [but: high enough statistics compared to h.o.t. in other channels?] (Meloni, Tang, Winter, arXiv:1007.2419; Discovery channel: Donini et al., arXiv:0812.3703) 11 Hierarchy dependence Characterized rel. to mass eigenstate 1: Case |Dm412| ~ |Dm312|: A+D: m3 and m4 on top of each other B+C: m3 and m4 different (Dm412 = - Dm312) Easier to identify because of matter effects? 12 Simulation and general constraints Assumptions IDS-NF baseline 1.0 (50 kt + 50 kt) Near detectors: At d=2 km with 32 t each (far detector limit) Electron CID with 40% efficiency, 1% mis-ID NB: May in fact need additional near-near detectors to control systematics in disappearance channels See my other talk (+ Giunti, Laveder, Winter, arXiv:0907.5487) Also tested seperately: OPERA-inspired MECC at same distance, hadronic channels, 10 kt 14 Generalized exclusion limits … without any constraints on Dm412 90% CL, 2 d.o.f. From ne disppearance From nm disppearance From LBL-nm disppearance (higher order effect) (Meloni, Tang, Winter, arXiv:1007.2419) 15 Hierarchy dependence A+D: Sensitivity at |Dm412| ~ |Dm312| destroyed (correlations) (Meloni, Tang, Winter, arXiv:1007.2419) 16 Dependence on assumptions What special assumptions often made? LSND-motivated Dm412 Fast oscillation averaged out at long L Special case Dm412 0 (MINOS, Adamson et al, arXiv:1003.0336) Also no additional Dm412 See Meloni, Tang, Winter, arXiv:1007.2419 Two-flavor limits, e.g. (corresponds to same formula in our parameterization with Dm2 = Dm412 , q = q14) 18 q24-q34 for LSND assump. Now if fast oscillations average out, twoparameter combinations can be tested: (otherwise Dm412-marginalization would lead to vanishing sensitivity) nt detection at long baseline (Pmt) adds only little if magic baseline included (higher statistics in Pmm!) (Meloni, Tang, Winter, arXiv:1007.2419; Discovery channel: Donini et al., arXiv:0812.3703) 19 Near detectors added Impact of ND depends on assumptions: Dm412 very large: Oscillations in ND averaged out Dm412 ~ 1 eV2: ND sensitive to spectral signature Curve from last slide (Meloni, Tang, Winter, arXiv:1007.2419) 20 Comparison to MINOS Also experimental collaborations use special assumptions, e.g. additional parameters fixed Comparison to MINOS: Tremendous increase of sensitivity, especially for large q13 Is 3+N a physics case for the Neutrino Factory, even if q13 large? (Meloni, Tang, Winter, arXiv:1007.2419; compared to MINOS, Adamson et al, arXiv:1003.0336) 21 Summary and conclusions Sterile neutrinos may have Dm412 ~ 1 eV2, but could also hide among the actives Technically challenging, therefore hardly tested? Neutrino factory can access some of the sterile parameters very well, even at the longer baselines Dm412 ~ 10-4 – 10-1 eV2 Precision physics case even for large q13? So far, no physics case for nt found; perhaps additional phases for steriles? 22
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz