Strategic Plan 2016-2020 - King County Fire Chiefs Assocation

Strategic Plan 2016-2020
Eastside Hazardous Materials Consortium
Pete Brummel
Eastside Hazardous Materials Consortium
Strategic Plan 2016-2020
Final Draft 5/31/16
Pete Brummel
Eastside Hazardous Materials Consortium
Team Coordinator
May 2016
1|Page
Message from the Team Coordinator
On behalf of the member agencies of the Eastside Hazardous Materials
Consortium Group, I am honored to present the Eastside Hazardous Materials
Consortium Strategic Plan for 2016 through 2020. The plan was developed through
various stakeholders of the Consortium Agencies. The Strategic Plan will serve as a
guide for the current and future Consortium Agencies as we collectively strive to
meet the challenges and opportunities the lie ahead.
There are four areas of Strategic Focus that have been identified:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Resource Management
Deployment Modeling & Response Capabilities
Critical Infrastructure and Target Hazard Analysis
Multi-Discipline and Multi-Jurisdictional Interoperability
For the next four years, the Eastside Hazardous Materials Consortium members
will strive to accomplish the goals and critical tasks that support each of the four
areas of Strategic Focus. The organization will move forward and pursue
developmental opportunities to increase the critical role of planning, response,
interdiction and mitigation of hazardous materials events that impact the
communities we serve within Zone 1, WA State Region 6 and FEMA Region X.
Sincerely,
Pete Brummel, Captain
Eastside Fire & Rescue
Eastside Hazardous Materials Team Coordinator
2|Page
Table of Contents
Organizational History…………………………………………………………4
Mission Statement………………………………………………………………6
Governance……………………………………………………………………….7
Operational Mandates & Policy……………………………………………....9
Apparatus & Equipment………………………………………………………11
Future Growth & Development………………………………………………15
Strategic Focus/SWOT Analysis……………………………………………...16
Goals & Strategies




Resource Management…………………………………………...…….18
Deployment Modeling…………………………………………………..19
Critical Infrastructure & Target Hazard/Threat…………………...20
Regional Interoperability……………………………………………….21
3|Page
Organizational History
January 1984:
Creation of an Interlocal Agreement (City of Bellevue Resolution
#4296) to provide quality emergency services through the
operation of a regional cooperative hazardous materials
response unit as a normal function of fire protection services.
Agencies Participating:






Bellevue
Bothell
Kirkland
Redmond
Northshore Fire Department (KCFD #16)
Woodinville Fire & Life Safety (KCFD #36)
Lead Agency: Bothell Fire Department
December 1991:
Bellevue Fire Department designated as Lead Agency (City of
Bellevue Resolution #5455).
July 1994:
Expanded regional services by adding the following agencies:
 Issaquah
 Duvall Fire Department (KCFD #45)
One agency opted to no longer participate and withdrew from
the Consortium:
May 1997:
June 2004:
July 2004:
 Northshore Fire Department (KCFD #16)
Expanded regional services by adding the following agency:
 Eastside Fire & Rescue (KCFD #10)
Increased response capability with the purchase of an additional
Hazardous Materials Response Unit; one located in Bellevue
and the other Woodinville Fire & Life Safety
Expanded the regional services by adding the following agencies:


City of Snoqualmie
King County Fire District #27 (Fall City)
4|Page
June 2012:
Joint Board solicits letters of interest for the position of Team
Coordinator. An interview process is completed. Bellevue
remains as the Lead Agency and Team Coordinator position is
retained by the Captain at Bellevue Station #6.
January 2016:
Following the retirement of the Station Captain from Bellevue
Fire, Captain Pete Brummel from Eastside Fire & Rescue is
appointed to the position of Team Coordinator, Bellevue Fire Lt.
Kevin McKean is appointed to Equipment Coordinator and
Bothell Fire, Lt. Jerry Hughes is appointed to Training Officer
by a unanimous approval of the Joint Board. Eastside Fire &
Rescue becomes the Lead Agency. All finance and
administrative roles and responsibilities remain with the City of
Bellevue Fire Department.
Zone 1 Quarterly Training 2016
Anhydrous Ammonia & Bucket Chemistry
North Bend Fire Training Academy
5|Page
Mission Statement
“The mission of the Eastside Hazardous Materials Response
Team is to identify, interdict and mitigate hazardous materials
releases and weapons of mass destruction events through
integrated training and response capabilities.”
Multi-Jurisdictional Training 2016
6|Page
Governance
The Eastside Hazardous Materials Consortium Group consists of 9 fire
agencies in Zone 1 that support a unified hazardous materials response team that
serves in a multi-jurisdictional prevention and response capability. Consortium
member fire agencies contribute annually to the finance and operations of the
Eastside Hazardous Materials Response Team. The operations section of the team
is directed by the lead agency. Eastside Fire & Rescue has assumed the role of the
“Lead Agency” as of January 1, 2016 after a 30-year tenure of the Bellevue Fire
Department. The auspices of NFPA 472 training curriculum is under the direction
of the Bothell Fire Department and the role of equipment coordination is
maintained by the Bellevue Fire Department, Station 6 personnel.
ACBIRC Training Dugway Proving Grounds
Dugway, UT 2006
7|Page
Consortium Agencies
Eastside Fire & Rescue
Bellevue Fire Department
Redmond Fire Department
Kirkland Fire Department
Woodinville Fire & Rescue
Bothell Fire & EMS
Duvall Fire Department
Snoqualmie Fire Deprtment
Fall City Fire Department
Lead Agency
EASTSIDE FIRE & RESCUE
Capt. Pete Brummel
Finance & Administration
BELLEVUE FIRE
DEPARTMENT
NFPA 472 Training
Equipment Coordinator
BOTHELL FIRE
DEPARTMENT
BELLEVUE FIRE
DEPARTMENT
Lt. Jerry Hughes
Lt. Kevin McKean
8|Page
Operational Mandates and Policy
TRAINING
All ESHMT Technicians are trained to the following competencies:
NFPA 472 Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous
Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents
 29 Code of Federal Regulations -1910
 WAC 296-824 Competencies for Hazardous Materials Technicians and
Hazardous Materials Specialist, Section 30005, Table 4

Initial training opportunities for certification of Hazardous Materials Technicians
are available through several avenues:




Washington State Patrol/WA State Fire Service Training Academy
The Boeing Company
Center for Domestic Preparedness, Anniston, AL
ERTI, Inc. Seattle, WA
This training includes, but it not limited to, PPE, Hazard Recognition and
Chemistry, Decontamination, Instrumentation, WMD Awareness and Operations,
ICS, Offensive and Defensive Strategies. Opportunities are provided for
competency training through FEMA/Department of Homeland Security-funded,
residency and mobile training deliveries. Additional opportunities are provided
through WA State Homeland Security (SHSP) and Seattle/Bellevue Urban Area
Security Initiative (UASI) funded programs. Finally, local and regional training
opportunities are provided through the team training officer and Agency-led
training modules.
DOCUMENTATION AND RECORDING KEEPING


Team Rosters
Training Hours
Documentation and record keeping is recorded at each training event. NFPA 472
Competencies are applied to the subject training matter appropriate hours are
recorded for each technician involved.
MEDICAL SCREENING

OSHA/L&I Mandated Occupational Health
o WAC 296-824-40005, Table 8 Provide Medical Screening for Employees
9|Page

SCBA Mask Fit Testing
o WAC 296-842-15005 Fit Testing

FLEET MAINTENANCE



Bellevue City Shop
Eastside Fire & Rescue Shop
City of Bothell
COMMUNICATIONS

NORCOM
Regional Training Event 2015
Amwater/Tolt Water Treatment Facility
Duvall, WA
10 | P a g e
Standards of Cover & Response History
2013-Present
There is no adopted Standard of Cover by the Consortium agencies that reflects
specific Hazmat-1 response times. Individual agencies have adopted various SOC
protocols that are inclusive of special operations.
Historical data of hazardous materials incidents and response data of HM-1.
ESF-R
2013
Hazardous Condition 1 4.76%
HM1 1 4.76%
0006268 5/18/2013 0 Wb90 To 468th Ave SE 411
Good Intent Call 2 9.52%
HM1 2 9.52%
0003764 3/24/2013 423 213th Pl SE 6111
0005739 4/17/2013 400 NW Gilman Blvd 671
2014
Hazardous Condition 1 4.76%
HM1 1 4.76%
0015658 11/14/2014 611 Front St N 422
2015
Hazardous Condition 2 9.52%
HM1 2 9.52%
0012955 9/17/2015 On NE High St at Highlands Dr NE 422
0015472 11/7/2015 341 NE Eagle Way 424
Good Intent Call 1 4.76%
HM1 1 4.76%
0015220 11/2/2015 5415 220th Ave SE 672
Bellevue
2013
Hazardous Condition 1 4.76%
HM1 1 4.76%
0000259 1/6/2013 1607 145th Pl SE 424
2014
EMS/Rescue 1 4.76%
HM1 1 4.76%
0000090 1/3/2014 NB405 @ Main St. SE 322
2015
EMS/Rescue 2 9.52%
HM1 2 9.52%
0014509 10/18/2015 300 Nb405 SE 322
0001438 1/31/2015 12115 SE 16th Pl 3217
Page 1 of 2
11 | P a g e
J:\FireRMS_Reports\S_Incidents_Unit Responses Generated Bellevue.rpt
4/11/2016
Type of Call
Incident
Count Percent
2015
Hazardous Condition 1 4.76%
HM1 1 4.76%
0009146 7/8/2015 18804 North Creek Pky 422
Kirkland
2013
Hazardous Condition 1 4.76%
HM1 1 4.76%
0012843 10/4/2013 12033 NE 80th St 4212
2014
Hazardous Condition 2 9.52%
HM1 2 9.52%
0003654 3/22/2014 13905 NE 128th St 422
0006819 5/27/2014 12303 NE 130th Ln 451
2015
Rupture/Explosion 1 4.76%
HM1 1 4.76%
0008833 7/2/2015 8629 120th Ave NE 221
Hazardous Condition 1 4.76%
HM1 1 4.76%
0009836 7/21/2015 11724 NE 60th St 4213
Redmond
2013
Hazardous Condition 1 4.76%
HM1 1 4.76%
0012858 10/4/2013 4200 150th Ave NE 4213
2014
Hazardous Condition 2 9.52%
HM1 2 9.52%
0002917 3/5/2014 On 150th Ave NE at NE 36th St 4212
0011014 8/18/2014 15215 NE 90th St 4212
2015
Hazardous Condition 1 4.76%
HM1 1 4.76%
0007582 6/10/2015 14712 NE 91st St 463
21
Page 2 of 2
J:\FireRMS_Reports\S_Incidents_Unit Responses Generated Bellevue.rpt
This does not reflect the responses that were prioritized as AFA’s, BLS or
Investigation that were re-prioritized as Hazmat High Value. This data snapshot
reflects approximately 1.7 Hazmat calls per month over a 36-month period.
12 | P a g e
Apparatus & Equipment
The Consortium operates Hazmat-1, a 2004 H&W medium-duty vehicle
capable of transporting personnel and a variety of technical equipment to the scene
of a hazardous materials incident. Hazmat-1 is located at Bellevue Fire
Department Station 6 and is in a ready state for deployment.
All Consortium hazmat technicians are familiar with the operational capabilities as
well as the current inventory. We have benefitted greatly over the past ten years
from FEMA grant-funding streams through both WA State Homeland Security
Programs (SHSP) and FEMA Region X Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI). The
Consortium also operates (2) mass-decontamination trailers, Decon-49 and Decon77, capable of providing decontamination capabilities for large-scale incidents and
(1) Prime Mover vehicle for towing purposes.
Additional apparatus includes (1) Club Car (ATV-72) capable of providing
deployment to down-range and remote areas at an incident. As the Consortium
moves forward, large-scale equipment sustainment, replacement and/or
decommissioning becomes a priority and we must continue to analyze our current
apparatus and deployment strategies to meet future service level objectives.
13 | P a g e
HAZMAT ONE
14 | P a g e
DECON 49
DECON 77
15 | P a g e
ATV 72
16 | P a g e
Future Growth and Development
When considering the urban growth of Zone 1; Bellevue, Redmond, Kirkland
and the greater Eastside, it is imperative that we must remain vigilant in
promoting the mission statement of the Eastside Hazardous Materials Consortium
into the future. The fire and EMS service demands are continually rising due to
population growth demographics, transportation and utility infrastructures as well
as master-planned residential communities and associated commercial
developments. This increase in demand parallels the unique framework and
specialized needs for resiliency and continuity of operations for hazardous materials
response plans in the region.
Planning for threshold events, credible threat execution as well as accidental
releases and spills in the transportation and fixed facility environments is the most
important aspect of the future growth of the region. Therefore, since service
delivery planning is predictable based on statistical data of population growth and
infrastructure impacts, the Consortium must adapt to these changes for service
delivery of specialized operations. A strategic analysis of the current and previous
delivery models shows that there are options that may prove to be beneficial to a
streamlined service delivery than that of one centrally located regional asset. To be
effective in a service delivery model for the future, we must look at the location of
available personnel in relation to probable target hazards and the delivery of
personnel and response assets to the scene.
17 | P a g e
Areas of Strategic Focus (SWOT) Overview
1.
2.
3.
4.
Resource Management
Deployment and Delivery Modeling
Critical Infrastructure & Target Hazard/Threat Analysis
Multi-Jurisdictional/Discipline Interoperability
Resource Management





Zone 1 Technician Accountability
Develop long-term, multi-year training program
Subject Matter Expertise (SME) per Agency
Standardize documentation and record-keeping
Lead Agency template: SOG’s, mandates & compliance
Deployment & Delivery Modeling





Single resource model
NORCOM Capabilities: response protocols
“HazTac” resource model (strategic locations)
Support resources model (secondary assets)
FEMA resource-typing compliance
Critical Infrastructure & Target Hazard/Threat Analysis





Fixed facility: Agency-level
Critical Infrastructure Hazards
Transportation corridors: Zone-level
TIER II Reporting & LEPC databases
Threshold event coordination and pre-planning
18 | P a g e
Multi-Jurisdictional/Multi-Disciplinary Interoperability




Collaborate with MJ/MD local, State & Federal LE
Develop interoperability with Region 6 Hazmat-discipline assets: Zone 1 &
Region 6
Resource information & sharing: JTTF/FLO Liaison
Incorporate AHLS with Zone 1 ALS providers
o Bellevue Medic One
o Redmond Medic One
Unified Command Post
US Army North, 10th CST, Zone 1 Hazmat, FBI WMD Response Team
Multi-Jurisdictional Training 2016
19 | P a g e
Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threat Analysis
1. Resource Management
Zone 1 Technician Accountability
(Weakness) The ability to quantify, notify and deliver qualified hazardous
materials technicians in a time-sensitive manner.
Currently there is no definitive process to quantify, notify and locate hazmat
technicians within Zone 1 and disseminate the information to Consortium
agencies. Bellevue is the only provider with a minimum staffing level of hazmat
technicians, Woodinville comes close with Station 33 designated as the hazmat
station by internal definition only. The minimum technicians needed for an
offensive mitigation is 10 qualified hazardous materials technicians1,2
Develop Long-Term Multi-Year Training Plan
(Opportunity) Establishing a multi-year training plan will streamline planning
efficiencies and identify training competency requirements.
Annual competency training requirements are based on a minimum of 24
hours.3 Training topics are discussed at quarterly team leader meetings and
training events are planned based on training site availability, requests from
private sector and/or classes and training events that are grant-funded.
Subject Matter Expertise per Agency
(Strengths/Opportunity) Specific subject matter expertise will be tasked to
individual hazmat agencies.
There are many areas of technical and specialist knowledge to be mastered
by technicians. Unfortunately, much of that knowledge is not captured for a
long-term dissemination and information and knowledge becomes lost. Tasking
Zone hazmat agencies with specialized areas of expertise will enable quality
training, investment justification and assurance of updated technologies and
protocols.
1
WAC 296-824-50025 “Use of 2 person teams in IDLH atmospheres” & WAC 296-824-100 Scope
King County Local Emergency Response Plan, 2014 Final Draft
3
WAC 296-824-30005, Minimum Training Competencies for Technicians
2
20 | P a g e
Standardize Record Keeping and Documentation
(Weakness/Opportunity) Training documentation is inconsistent within Zone 1
Hazmat agencies.
There are many opportunities to capture relevant, technician-level training
events both within Agency and Zone. Furthermore, respective Training
Divisions already have established database programs that could be shared
through cloud-based programs.
Lead Agency Template: SOG’s, Mandates and Compliance
(Opportunity) Recognition of roles and responsibilities as Lead Agency
designation.
SOG template shall be designed to reflect future Lead Agency designators to
include operations, planning, logistics and finance.
21 | P a g e
2. Deployment & Delivery Modeling
Single Resource Model
(Strength/Weakness) Hazmat One is centrally located within the Zone.
Having a single resource unit centrally located in Bellevue allows for
deployment to all locations within the Zone. This has been the accepted
response plan since the inception of the Consortium. However, in some cases,
geographical distances make acceptable response times difficult. This could
significantly impact offensive and/or defensive operations.
NORCOM Capabilities
(Weakness/Opportunity) There is an inconsistent deployment plan for
categorizing Hazardous Material responses.
NORCOM dispatches three Hazmat responses; Haz Investigation, Haz Aid
and Haz High Value. Currently, there is not a response protocol to reflect
upgrades, releases or transportation accidents with related TIC’s and TIM’s.
“HazTac” Regional Resource Model
(Opportunity) Placement of two additional tactical response units will enhance
and benefit service delivery to the businesses and citizens served within Zone 1
and neighboring jurisdictions.
Place (2) “HazTac” units in service to serve the I-90 corridor (transportation
high risk) and I-405/North County (fixed facility/transportation high risk). The
units will have Ops/Tech-level capabilities; spill response, instrumentation, wet
chemistry, radiological and Level-B PPE (All equipment is available with Zone 1
equipment cache).


HazTac 73 (Station 73 Eastside Fire & Rescue)
HazTac 33 or 49 (Station 33 Woodinville Fire or Station 45 Bothell Fire)
Support Resources Model (Secondary Assets)
(Strength/Weakness) WA Department of Ecology owns and maintains “Spill
Response” trailers that are located at Eastside Fire & Rescue and Kirkland Fire.
These trailers are regional assets in a response-ready state for spills on area
waterways. It is assumed that the designated agencies are to be responsible for
deployment, with support and sustainment from DOE.
22 | P a g e
FEMA Resource Typing Compliance
(Opportunity) Zone 1 Hazmat has the ability to become typed as a Federal asset.
Zone 1 Hazmat is in a position to become a Type III or Type II resource per
the FEMA Resource Typing credentials. This will enhance overall exposure and
capabilities of the Zone and the team4.
Overpack Training 2016
Regional Training Event
Amwater/Tolt Water Treatment Facility
4
FEMA Typed Resource Definitions: Fire & Hazardous Materials Resources, ESF #10, July 2005
23 | P a g e
3. Critical Infrastructure & Target Hazard/Threat Analysis
Fixed Facility Target Hazards: Agency-Level
(Strength): Zone 1 Hazmat agencies have preplan knowledge of fixed facility
hazards in their respective jurisdictions.
Pre-planning and business inspections bolster the local agency knowledge of
fixed facility target hazards. This is a benefit to the Zone 1 Hazmat team of
potential deployment and mitigation.
Critical Infrastructure Target Hazards
(Weakness/Threats): There are many critical infrastructure assets that cross
jurisdictional and regional boundaries.
Response plans must be congruent with regional planning and protocols.
Zone 1 must work with industry and subject matter experts to understand the
impact of CI in the region. From Bakken Oil trains, high-pressure pipelines to,
power grids and water sources, these assets are vulnerable to man-made and
natural threats.
Transportation Corridors
(Weakness/Threats) Ports of Seattle and Tacoma are the gateway for
transportation of vast quantities of toxic industrial chemicals (TIC’s) and toxic
industrial materials (TIM’s) via Zone 1 Interstate freeways and State Routes.
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration5 lists the top
10 commodities ranked by weighted, high-impact casualties and all 10
commodities travel through Zone 1, daily, on multiple trips. Furthermore, the
Zone has been involved with mitigating numerous rollover tank truck incidents.
MC406 Rollover I-90 @ 47 North Bend
5
PHMSA, Top 10 Commodities with High-Impact Casualties, 2010.
24 | P a g e
Tier II Reporting & LEPC Databases
(Weakness/Opportunity) The ability to utilize central database for Zone 1 and
King County creates a baseline knowledge of TIC’s & TIM’s.
King County & City of Kent LEPC have hundreds of Tier II reports
that give hazard ID, reportable quantities and locations that can used
through software programs that Zone 1 utilizes. Data entry needs to be
performed from all Tier II’s within Zone 1. Each agency will need to
collaborate with their respective fire marshals office to ensure accurate
information. This information will be accessed via HM-1 computer.
Threshold Event Pre-Planning
(Strength/Opportunity) Zone 1 Hazmat is participating in regional planning
committees.
Zone 1 is represented at King County LEPC, MEPG/Ops, King County
Ops Chiefs and participates in FEMA Core Capabilities Ranking and THIRA
meetings. The goal is to collaborate with other regional entities to ensure
that hazards and threats are being acknowledged.
Region 6 Hazmat/MCI Drill
Renton 2007
25 | P a g e
4. Multi-Jurisdictional/Multi-Disciplinary Interoperability
Collaborate with Local, State, Federal Law Enforcement, Military Assets and
Environmental Agencies.
(Strength/Opportunity) The ability to continually collaborate with regional
assets benefits the team, Zone and region for resilience and interoperability.
Zone 1 Hazmat has unprecedented professional relations with local law
enforcement agencies within the Zone, FBI WMD Hazard Response Team as
well as the WA State Army National Guard 10th Civil Support Team, RAP 8
Team from Yakima and as well as Dept. of Ecology, Dept. of Health and private
sector subject matter experts.
Develop Interoperability with Region 6 Hazmat Assets
(Strength/Opportunity) regional training and collaboration strengthens
relations, protocols and equipment sharing.
Zone 1 has established relationships with both Zone 3 (South King County)
and Zone 5 (Seattle Fire Department) and strive to training together whenever
possible.
Resource Information Sharing: Joint Terrorism Task Force/Fusion Center
(Opportunity) FOUO Information sharing benefits resiliency and preparedness
for Zone 1.
Critical information that promotes resiliency, interdiction and planning is
shard with Zone 1 Hazmat. Participation as FLO’s (Fusion Liaison Officers)
with WA State Fusion Center in Seattle is an opportunity to maintain
information sharing with LE assets.
Incorporate Advanced Hazmat Life Support Capabilities
(Weakness) There is no relationship with ALS providers specific to treating
patients and responders who are exposed to TIC’s, TIM’s and WMD agents.
The ALS component to Zone 1 Hazmat is a vital role in ensuring responder
and victim safety in the event of a toxic exposure. Interaction with Bellevue
Medic One and Redmond Medic One needs to include paramedic providers that
have been training in Advanced Hazmat Life Support.
26 | P a g e
Evaluation
Goals & Strategies
Succession Planning
Develop Standards of Cover for Zone 1
Strategy
Actions
POC
TL’s
Year
2016
Completion
2017
Evaluation
Establish minimum accountability with Zone 1 Hazmat Techs
Strategy
Actions
POC
TC
Year
2016
Completion
2017
Evaluation
Completion
2017
Evaluation
Completion
2016
Evaluation
Develop multi-year NFPA 472 training program
Strategy
Actions
POC
TO
Year
2016
Assign Subject Matter Expertise (SME) to Agencies
Strategy
Actions
POC
TC
Year
2016
Standardize documentation and record-keeping database
Strategy
Actions
POC
TO
Year
2016
Completion
2017
Evaluation
Completion
2018
Evaluation
Lead Agency template: SOG’s, mandates & compliance
Strategy
Actions
POC
TC
Year
2017
27 | P a g e
Goals & Strategies
Deployment & Delivery Modeling
Maintain current deployment model within Zone 1
Strategy
Actions
POC
TC
Year
2016
Completion
2016
Evaluation
Year
2016
Completion
2017
Evaluation
Year
2017
Completion
2018
Evaluation
Completion
2018
Evaluation
Completion
2019
Evaluation
Establish collaborative dispatch criteria with NORCOM
Strategy
Actions
POC
TC
Integrate “HazTac” resource deployment
Strategy
Actions
POC
TC
Re-evaluate and update support resources model
Strategy
Actions
POC
EC
Year
2017
Incorporate FEMA resource-typing credentials
Strategy
Actions
POC
TC
Year
2017
28 | P a g e
Goals & Strategies
Critical Infrastructure & Target Hazard/Threat Analysis
Identify NFPA 704 fixed facility hazards
Strategy
Actions
POC
TL’s
Year
2016
Completion
2016
Evaluation
Year
2016
Completion
2016
Evaluation
Identify critical infrastructure hazards
Strategy
Actions
POC
TL’s
Identify transportation corridor constraints and capabilities
Strategy
Actions
POC
TL’s
Year
2016
Completion
2016
Evaluation
Integrate TIER II reporting protocols into LEPC database
Strategy
Actions
POC
TC
Year
2016
Completion
2020
Evaluation
Identify local, regional and national threshold events that will impact Zone 1
Strategy
Actions
POC
TL’s
Year
2016
Completion
Ongoing
Evaluation
29 | P a g e
Goals & Strategies
Regional Interoperability
Collaborate and develop interoperability with MJ/MD local, State & Federal assets
Strategy
Actions
POC
TC
Year
2016
Completion
2016
Evaluation
Strengthen regional interoperability with Region 6 Hazmat assets
Strategy
Actions
POC
TC
Year
2016
Completion
Ongoing
Evaluation
Completion
Ongoing
Evaluation
Resource information & sharing with JTTF/FLO
Strategy
Actions
POC
TC
Year
2016
Collaborate and strategize with Advanced Life-Support SME providers
Strategy
Actions
POC
TC
Year
2016
Completion
2017
Evaluation
Identify local, regional and national threshold events that will impact Zone 1
Strategy
Actions
POC
TL’s
Year
2016
Completion
Ongoing
Evaluation
30 | P a g e
Contact Information
Team Coordinator:
Capt. Pete Brummel
Eastside Fire & Rescue
[email protected]
Training Officer:
Lt. Jerry Hughes
Bothell Fire Department
[email protected]
Equipment Coordinator:
Lt. Kevin McKean
Bellevue Fire Department
[email protected]
31 | P a g e