April 2011
Inside this issue:
Nixon Peabody earns favorable
settlement for immigrants
defrauded by travel agent ........... 2
San Francisco associates get
hands-on trial experience in
prosecutor externship ................ 4
Client rebuilds home after fire
loss thanks to NP’s help on
zoning appeal ............................. 5
Nixon Peabody answers
immigration need with work
on post-deportation human
rights case ................................... 5
Firm helps Jobs for the
Future leverage its unique
school model .............................. 6
Nixon Peabody continues aid
to indigent tenants in housing
disputes ...................................... 7
Congratulations to Scott O’Connell
on receiving the NH Bar’s
Dedicated Pro Bono Service
Award ......................................... 8
Kudos to Neal McNamara on
receiving the Rhode Island Bar’s
Dorothy Lohmann Community
Service Award ............................. 9
Thank you to everyone who
contributed to the firm’s pro bono
efforts in 2010........................... 10
Team gets dependency benefits
for veteran’s widow
Continuing Nixon Peabody’s pro bono support of veterans and their families,
Boston associate Matt McLaughlin was able to help the widow of a World
War II veteran obtain Dependency and Indemnity Compensation from the U.S.
Department of Veterans Affairs after years of delay and denials that threatened
her financial stability after her husband’s death in 2004. The case was brought in
by retired Boston partner Al Jordan—himself a Navy veteran—who has
connected with veterans’ advocates to bring in these kinds of pro bono cases to
Nixon Peabody.
The widow’s husband had sustained a severe grenade wound during World
War II, and suffered related health impairments throughout his life. After her
husband died of renal failure on October 3, 2004, the widow filed a claim with the
Veteran’s Administration, seeking a determination that her husband’s death was
due to a service-connected disability, and that she was entitled to Dependency
and Indemnity Compensation and Accrued Benefits. In October 2005, the VA’s
Boston Regional Office denied her claims, finding an “absence of evidence
relating the cause of the veteran’s death to his service-connected conditions.” In
March 2006, she filed a Notice of Disagreement with the VA’s initial denial of her
claim, but in February 2007, the VA again denied her claims. Later that month,
she filed an appeal to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) in Washington, DC.
Nixon Peabody got involved after she filed her appeal. The BVA judge looked at
the previous denials and remanded her case to the Boston VA to provide specific
medical evidence to support its conclusions. Through a contact of his, Al was able
to procure the opinions, on a pro
bono basis, of two distinguished
pathologists in Boston who were
Harvard professors affiliated with
Beth Israel Deaconess and Brigham
and Women’s medical centers. After
reviewing
medical
records—
including many VA records that
showed references to the husband’s
“chronic renal insufficiency”—the
pathologists concluded that it was
“at least as likely as not” (the applicable standard) that the husband’s death was related to his serviceconnected injuries. Matt then submitted the pathologists’ opinions with a supporting memo of law to
the local VA office.
Due to our client’s advancing age, the case was initially transferred to the Appeals Management
Center in DC, which is supposed to look at cases on an expedited basis. However, after the case
languished for about a year with no action taken by the VA, it was transferred back to the VA’s
Boston office. In May 2010, the VA produced the opinion of a doctor that disagreed with our
client’s expert pathologists, and again denied her claims, finding that there was no service
connection to her husband’s death.
Matt and Al appealed again to the BVA, writing another brief advocating on behalf of their
pathologists’ conclusions. Finally, in January 2011—more than six years after our client’s initial
claim—the BVA ruled in her favor. Due to the lag time between her application and the decision,
she will be entitled to substantial accrued pension benefits as well as an annual pension until she
dies. The ruling could not have come soon enough, as our client had feared being unable to pay the
taxes on her home without this assistance.
Both our client and her adult son (who is on disability and lives with his mother) have been
profuse in their thanks to Matt, the doctors, and Nixon Peabody for their help on the case. Matt, in
particular, went above and beyond in leading the case through the tedious and often frustrating
BVA/VA process, all while keeping up the morale of our client and her son during some very
difficult times.
The client’s son recently reached out to Al with a very complimentary note, thanking Al, Matt, and
others for helping his mother. The son writes, in part: “You guys are the best—I can never thank
you enough. … I have never in my life worked with people as kind and intelligent and caring as
you all. I hope this can help other Veterans in some way as well. … Very much thanks to all those
involved. I could never express this fully as it is an immeasurable amount. We will never forget
your kindness and all the hard work you have done for us.”
Nixon Peabody earns favorable
settlement for immigrants defrauded
by travel agent
After litigating a case for more than two years, two Boston associates—with incredible
collaboration from several others in the firm—were able to secure a favorable settlement for a
class of hard-working immigrants who were defrauded out of airline tickets by a travel agency.
In the fall of 2008, more than 50 people purchased tickets through Oasis Travel in Chelsea,
Massachusetts. Most of the purchasers were low-income immigrants from Central and South
American countries who were flying to visit their relatives for the holidays. Although they
purchased tickets, they were left stranded—many at the airport with their bags—when the airlines
2 of 11
told them that they were never paid for the tickets. Some were forced to book new flights at a
higher price while others had to cancel their trips altogether. A lot of the people who had booked
flights with Oasis paid in cash and had nowhere else to turn.
Associates Scott Sasjack and Sanga Emmanuel, under the supervision of Boston partner Gregg
Rubenstein, got the case from Greater Boston Legal Services, which refers pro bono cases to
Nixon Peabody. The NP team brought a civil action on behalf of the victims against the owners
and operators of Oasis Travel. From the beginning, the defendants were uncooperative, ignoring
the NP team’s discovery requests. The defendants claimed they had no money, and that any money
they did have was used up in the defense of their daughter who was being prosecuted in criminal
court for the fraud. However, Scott and Sanga made several strategic decisions that helped lead to
the favorable outcome.
For instance, they worked together with the prosecutor on the daughter’s
criminal case so that the daughter fully realized the gravity of her situation. She
would ultimately receive probation as part of the settlement deal. Also, when
the defendants made an offer to pay $64,000 into the criminal court for
restitution for the victims, Scott and Sanga realized that the defendants had not
given everything they had promised in terms of the timing of the payments, so
they continued litigating and ultimately forced the owners to the mediation
table in October 2010. The mediation, Scott and Sanga said, was the turning
point where their clients “finally got a fair deal.”
The terms of the settlement—$64,000 to be paid to the 52 known class
members over the next two years—gives them 100% compensation for their
loss. Although $64,000 is not a huge sum of money, it meant a lot to the victims and is more
money than anyone expected they would recover. As part of the settlement, which is awaiting final
approval from the court, the victims will be certified as a class. Scott recalls: “There was a moment
at the beginning of the case where one client asked why it’s so hard to get the money. ‘I thought
America is supposed to be a country of laws and justice.’” “The client was repeating the word
‘justice,’” Sanga says. “We remembered these statements and were motivated.”
Scott and Sanga worked closely with the Chelsea Collaborative, a community organizing group that
helped with the outreach to the victims. Several people across the firm, in addition to those already
mentioned above, also deserve thanks for their contributions to the case. Partner Chris Allen lent
his expertise on class action law; associate Eric Karlberg advised them on probate law as one of
the defendant owners was deceased; associate Juan Concepcion helped translate the legal
documents into Spanish; paralegal Robert Meserve helped conduct an asset search that uncovered
the defendants’ assets in Florida; paralegals Joanne Sylvester and Deb Woodbury, and case
assistant Marilen Hartnett helped research factual issues, and draft and file pleadings; and
members of the Boston library also helped research facts and download pleadings.
3 of 11
San Francisco associates get hands-on
trial experience in prosecutor externship
Nixon Peabody’s San Francisco office has begun participating in a program that allows firm
associates to serve for eight weeks as deputy district attorneys in the Marin County District
Attorney’s Office. DA’s offices throughout California are fiscally strapped, and volunteer
programs, such as the one in Marin County, fill a critical need for prosecutors while also offering
hands-on experience to the associates who volunteer.
San Francisco associate Stephanie Karnavas brought the idea to Nixon Peabody after learning
about the Marin County program through a friend at another firm who was participating in the
program. She also became the first lawyer from Nixon Peabody to participate. From October
through December, Nixon Peabody “seconded” Stephanie to the DA’s office, where she worked
full time for eight weeks and received a tremendous amount of valuable courtroom exposure.
After reviewing some training materials and observing a jury selection in her first week, Stephanie
was in court every week thereafter, handling her own motions and trials. Stephanie brought four
jury cases to trial—all involving defendants accused of driving under the influence (DUI). She
received a conviction in three of them and a hung jury on the fourth.
Her other courtroom experience included arguing several motions in limine and opposing a
defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. Stephanie also prepped approximately six other cases for
trial that either settled or were continued.
Stephanie is now back with her Commercial Litigation group at Nixon Peabody where she, in her
third year with the firm, handles a variety of cases, mostly in the area of financial services. She calls
her time in the fast-paced DA’s office “a confidence boosting experience” that has helped her with
her presentation and public speaking skills while also exposing her to the mechanics of a trial firsthand. “I gained great substantive experience examining witnesses, conducting voir dire, asserting
objections during trial, and arguing jury instructions and a variety of motions that will carry over
into my practice here,” she says.
Nixon Peabody continues to participate with the Marin County program, most recently with
associate Lynn Fiorentino who just finished up an eight-week stint of her own. Lynn tried three
misdemeanor cases: one petty theft, one driving under the influence, and one credit card fraud. She
obtained two guilty verdicts and one hung jury in the same case previously tried by Stephanie.
“This intense, challenging program taught me invaluable trial skills, increased my confidence in the
courtroom, and taught me how to make effective evidentiary arguments with very little preparation
time,” Lynn says.
Associate Matt Richards is currently seconded to the program, and, as of press time, he had
already obtained a guilty verdict on both counts in his first trial. Those associates, counsel, and
partners who wish to be considered for future assignments to this program should contact San
Francisco partner Steve Schrey, who is organizing the firm’s participation.
4 of 11
Client rebuilds home after fire loss thanks
to NP’s help on zoning appeal
Thanks to the work of some of our Rochester lawyers and a summer associate, a pro bono client in
Canandaigua, New York, will be able to replace his home that was lost in a fire in 2010.
The client was a man of modest means who worked for the sewer department of a local
municipality and had a long history of health problems. Sadly, his life was turned upside down
when fire struck his premanufactured home on Mother’s Day 2010, leaving him
with little else than the clothes on his back. He was forced to live for a time in a
less-than adequate motel before his sister was able to take him in. Making
matters worse, the town denied his application for a building permit to construct
his newly purchased premanufactured home in the same spot, explaining that he
was not allowed to locate his home in that zoning district any longer.
Without insurance or anywhere to turn, the client contacted Real Estate partner
Jared Lusk, since he was familiar with Jared’s zoning work. Jared agreed to help
challenge the town’s determination, and he enlisted the help of Real Estate
associate Ashley Baker, summer associate Helen Root, and Real Estate partner
Tom Greiner.
Despite their best efforts to avoid a hearing, the town and the chair of its Zoning Board of
Appeals (ZBA) ordered a hearing for September 2010. Following compelling arguments at the
hearing by Jared, Ashley, and Helen—which were bolstered by Ashley, Helen, and Tom’s
tremendous pre-hearing work—the board issued a favorable ruling, allowing the client to build his
new home on the lot.
Jared credits the great outcome in this case to “a total team effort.” The client, who purchased a
new shirt for the hearing after the loss of his wardrobe in the fire, was thrilled with the result. He
expects to close on his new home this spring.
Nixon Peabody answers immigration
need with work on post-deportation
human rights cases
While looking for new pro bono projects and referral agencies to work with in winter 2009, Boston
partner Matthew Lynch saw an article in BC Law Magazine, his alma mater’s alumni publication,
about BC Law’s Post-Deportation Human Rights Project (PDHRP)—the first and only project
dedicated to representing individuals who have been deported. The program serves an important
need as there are thousands of individuals with U.S. citizen and legal permanent resident spouses,
children, and other relatives who are deported each year and separated from their families. The
5 of 11
article described a clear need for assistance, although it was also clear that there weren’t a lot of law
firms available to help.
With the help of senior associate Juan Concepcion, who is a member of BC’s board, Matthew
contacted Professor Daniel Kanstroom, who founded and directs the PDHRP, about getting
Nixon Peabody involved in the program. That led to another call with Jessica Chicco, the
supervising attorney on the project, who was thrilled at NP’s offer to help. She suggested that NP
attorneys could assist the program in two ways: on cases, serving as counsel or co-counsel, or by
training attorneys and law students.
On November 3, our Boston office hosted the first training session, entitled “After Deportation:
Bringing Family Members Back on an Immigrant Visa,” which featured Professor Kanstroom,
Ms. Chicco, and several NP lawyers. Approximately 20 people attended the session, which covered
the fundamentals of petitioning for a relative who is outside the country, including the most
common grounds of inadmissibility facing those who have previously been deported and the
“waivers” that may be available to overcome those grounds of inadmissibility.
Already the firm has taken on two cases referred by the PDHRP—one being handled by Patents
associate Leena Karttunen Contarino, and another handled by Commercial Litigation associates
Ronaldo Rauseo-Ricupero and Bankruptcy associate Lesley Varghese. More cases are
expected, and participation is open to attorneys around the firm—not just in Boston. Contact
Matthew Lynch or Stacey Slater if you are interested.
While these cases are a little more challenging and require a little more effort than run-of-the-mill
referrals for immigration cases, they are also incredibly interesting and serve a tremendous need.
Firm helps Jobs for the Future leverage
its unique school model
Over the years, many Nixon Peabody lawyers have provided pro bono legal services to
Jobs for the Future (JFF), an organization that seeks, among other things, to place
students who traditionally have low rates of college matriculation onto college campuses
during their senior years of high school. The work we’ve done for JFF ranges from
employment matters to corporate work. More recently, JFF contacted the firm for
counsel on JFF’s rights to sell and license the unique student information system that it
developed under a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
JFF uses a Student Information System to collect and analyze data from schools in the
national early college high school network. Using grant funds from the Gates Foundation,
JFF also developed a unique student information system for one school that had special
data needs because it is designed to advance students based on their achievement of
standards rather than their time spent in courses. This type of school model is likely to
become more prevalent nationally.
6 of 11
Anticipating a growing demand and market for the type of data system it developed under the
Gates grant, JFF contacted Nixon Peabody and was connected with associate Dan Dovi and
partner Peter Durant from our Brands and Creations group for assistance. Dan and Peter put
together a memo to JFF that clearly addressed the organizations’ specific concerns over its rights in
light of intellectual property provisions in contracts with the Gates Foundation and the product’s
developer.
JFF was thrilled with the response. Dan received an e-mail within a few days from JFF’s Associate
Vice President, thanking Dan and his team for their “excellent and useful work.” Lisa Chapnick,
JFF’s Chief Operating Officer, in a subsequent correspondence noted: “This is just one of so many
examples of the amazing work that you and your firm do for us. Once we got our act together to
get you the information we needed, Daniel jumped on it and gave us clear and comprehensive
guidance. This is incredibly helpful as we may want to use this tool to help assess and support
underperforming students. Thank you, thank you.”
Nixon Peabody continues aid to indigent
tenants in housing disputes
Landlord-tenant work is a fertile area for pro bono work, largely because of the importance of
housing and the disadvantaged position in which indigent tenants often find themselves in
comparison to their landlords. Nixon Peabody continues to represent indigent tenants in landlordtenant and related housing disputes in the communities where we live and work. Two recent
examples show just how much our legal work in this area means to tenants in need.
DC lawyers get landlord to make needed repairs
As part of Nixon Peabody’s participation in the DC Bar’s Pro Bono Program Advocacy and Justice
Clinic, DC counsel Christopher Wallace, with the assistance of DC associate Kenneth Nichols,
secured a very favorable settlement for an indigent client who lives in a rent-controlled apartment
in Northeast Washington, DC. The tenant and his daughter were living in an apartment replete
with housing code violations, including vermin infestation, a leaking roof, mold, unsafe electrical
wiring, a broken air conditioner, and other unsafe and unsanitary conditions.
The landlord had instituted an action against the client for failure to pay rent after the client
withheld rent because of all the housing code violations. The client filed counterclaims against the
landlord for the housing code violations, and Chris instituted a Bell hearing, arguing that the tenant
should be allowed to pay less rent pending resolution of the case. While he was successful at the
hearing in winning a temporary reduction in rent for the client, it would prove to be the first of
about a dozen hearings and inspections over the next few months to determine whether the
landlord was indeed fixing the deficiencies in the client’s apartment.
At one of the first hearings, the judge took the unheard of step of contacting the Department of
Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (DCRA) and asked that an inspector speak at the hearings to
7 of 11
give an update on the apartment’s conditions. The inspector’s reports proved very beneficial to the
client’s case since they clearly pointed out all of the code violations in black and white. After
multiple inspections and court hearings, and even a heated but unsuccessful mediation attempt,
Chris and Ken succeeded in requiring the landlord—without a trial—to spend thousands of dollars
on repairs to correct all housing code violations and replace the roof. Chris and Ken were also able
to negotiate a hefty rent abatement of nearly $4,000. Most importantly, after 10 years living in the
run-down apartment, the client now has a safe home that is up to code.
Boston team helps tenant resolve lease issue
Boston Commercial Litigation associate Danielle McLaughlin helped a Boston tenant resolve a
landlord-tenant issue in the client’s favor. While the issue never got near a courtroom or even a
complaint, Danielle’s efforts in counseling her client demonstrate how client “wins” often occur
just by equipping clients with the knowledge they need to accomplish their goals.
Danielle met her client, “Sara,” at the Lawyers Clearinghouse Massachusetts Legal Clinic for the
Homeless at Boston’s Pine Street Inn, where NP lawyers often provide on-site legal services to the
residents of the homeless shelter. Sara relies on Section 8 subsidized housing and was thinking
about changing apartments, in part because of a troubled relationship with her landlord. However,
she did not have a signed lease, and she had received conflicting information as to whether the lack
of a current lease would jeopardize her Section 8 voucher. Sara asked Danielle to clarify whether
the holder of a Section 8 voucher was required by law to have a written lease.
After reviewing her client’s paperwork and consulting with Real Estate partner Matthew Lynch,
Danielle advised Sara that despite the lack of a formal amendment to the lease extending its terms,
there was an equitable argument to be made that signing extensions to her Housing Assistance
Payments (HAP) contract might possibly give rise to an implied-in-fact lease extension. She added
that the landlord would have a difficult time using the lack of a formal extension of the lease as a
basis for eviction, since the landlord had not kept up with her own legal obligations. Just days after
receiving the information, Sara’s landlord agreed to sign a written lease with her for a lease term
through April 2012. Sara duly signed, and reports that the relationship with her landlord has
improved.
Congratulations to Scott O’Connell
on receiving the NH Bar’s Dedicated
Pro Bono Service Award
In February 2011, Manchester partner Scott O’Connell received the Dedicated Pro Bono Service
Award for 2011 from the New Hampshire Bar Association’s Pro Bono Referral Program. Scott
was recognized by the New Hampshire bar for his tremendous pro bono efforts on behalf of
people in need.
8 of 11
Among his many pro bono accomplishments, Scott spearheaded the creation of our Domestic
Protection team that provides victims of domestic violence with emergency legal services. He
personally spent 170 hours on these matters—time that included regular trips to New Hampshire’s
North Country to provide legal services to victims of domestic violence living in Coos County.
A leader within the firm’s Litigation Department, Scott also helped expand our Manchester office’s
pro bono efforts when he and others challenged every lawyer in the firm’s Manchester office to
render 80 pro bono hours in 2010. The office embraced this challenge and exceeded it as the
attorneys in the office rendered nearly 100 hours of pro bono service per attorney for 2010, with a
100 percent pro bono participation rate.
“The program deeply appreciates Scott’s steadfast involvement in and commitment to providing
legal representation to low-income families and individuals who would otherwise be left on their
own to navigate the legal system. His volunteer work through the Pro Bono Program truly makes a
difference for the needy and vulnerable,” said Virginia A. Martin, Associate Executive Director for
Legal Services at the New Hampshire Bar Association.
Kudos to Neal McNamara on receiving
the Rhode Island Bar’s Dorothy
Lohmann Community Service Award
Providence Office Managing Partner Neal McNamara has been named one of the recipients of the
2011 Dorothy Lohmann Community Service Award. Presented by the Rhode Island Bar
Association and in honor of Rhode Island attorney Dorothy Lohmann, this award recognizes
attorneys across the state who generously donate their time and legal expertise for charitable work.
Neal was nominated by the Rhode Island Coalition Against
Domestic Violence (RICADV), a nonprofit that includes six
member agencies and is dedicated to ending domestic violence. The
RICADV provides shelter and supportive services to more than
10,000 victims of domestic violence each year and works to
strengthen laws to protect victims and raise public awareness.
Neal has worked with the RICADV for more than 10 years,
providing an array of pro bono services, from advice on corporate
legal matters and employment issues to litigation. In one particular
case, Neal successfully defended the RICADV in a lawsuit brought
by a man who claimed that the RICADV had damaged his
reputation by allowing his ex-wife to speak out publicly about him.
A loss could have created a chilling effect on the willingness of
abuse victims to speak out in public. Instead, the RICADV was able to launch a nationally
recognized public awareness campaign, featuring three real Rhode Island survivors, called “It
Happens Here.”
9 of 11
Thank you to everyone who contributed
to the firm’s pro bono efforts in 2010
The firm greatly appreciates the hard work and dedication by everyone who contributed to our pro
bono efforts in 2010. As we’ve seen through the stories in this newsletter—and in our day-to-day
practices—the tremendous commitment to pro bono shown by our lawyers and staff firmwide is
making a real, positive difference in the lives of our pro bono clients.
“I’m proud to report that many of our lawyers met the firm’s Pro Bono Challenge by donating
more than 60 hours to pro bono in 2010—and many of them went above and beyond by donating
more than 100 hours!” said Pro Bono Partner Stacey Slater. Over the next few months, each of
our U.S. offices will be organizing events to celebrate our pro bono accomplishments. We will be
distributing Peabody Awards to everyone who performed over 100 hours of pro bono, and
Certificates of Recognition to those who donated over 60 hours.
In honor of the Manchester office, which had the highest number of pro bono hours per lawyer,
the firm has donated $2,500 to the New Hampshire Campaign for Legal Services (“CLS”). CLS
raises funds to help meet the legal aid needs of low-income and elderly New Hampshire residents
through its support of three legal aid organizations: the Legal Advice and Referral Center, the New
Hampshire Pro Bono Referral Program, and New Hampshire Legal Assistance.
Congratulations to the following professionals who generously
donated more than 100 hours to pro bono activities during 2010.
Elizabeth Athenas
Joshua Barlow
Krista Bell
Carolyn Bills
Lois Broussard
Tiana Butcher
Joseph Carello
Lawrence Ceriello
Jennifer Collins
Daniel Deane
Michelle Dhanda
Victoria Donohue
Dennis Drebsky
Brian Duffy
Robert Ebe
Sanga Emmanuel
Lynn Fiorentino
Marjorie Fochtman
10 of 11
Libby Ford
Linn Freedman
Brian French
Margarita Gevondyan
Erik Goergen
John Hayes
Talley M. Henry
Jacob Herstek
Michael Hickey
Dan Hurteau
Rebecca Husman
Oscar Jimenez
Alexander Jordan
Stephanie Karnavas
Randall Kelly
William Kelly
Holly Kilibarda
Daniel Kolodner
Kelly Kramer
Kelly Kress
Barbara Lukeman
Paul Lynd
Richard Marx
Christopher Mason
Matthew McLaughlin
Timothy Mungovan
Andrew Neilson
Lindsey Nelson
Tanya Nesbitt
Lynnette Nogueras-Trummer
Scott O'Connell
Joseph Ortego
Gauri Patil
Anita Pelletier
Frank Penski
Amy Pham
Shirley Phillips
Arthur Pressman
Elizabeth Qually
Ronaldo Rauseo-Ricupero
Susan Reaman
Matthew Richards
Regina Rockefeller
Susan Rodio
Laura Roethel
Shellie Rosan
Barry Rothchild
Jonathan Sablone
Janet Sadoff
Rudy Salo
Kimberly Samuels
Scott Sasjack
Kevin Saunders
Michael Schnipper
Joanne Sylvester
Christopher Thomas
David Vicinanzo
Diana Vilmenay
David West
Elizabeth Wood
Adam Wright
Sherli Yeroushalmi
Thanks to the following professionals who donated between
60 and 99 hours to pro bono activities during 2010.
Sarah Andre
Brian Avello
Ashley Baker
Timothy Baldwin
Anne Belin
Sarah Teachworth Boehs
Deborah Burton
Reginald Champagne
Paul Clifton-Waite
Cameron Cloar
Allan Cohen
Dwight Collin
Carolyn Collins
Juan Concepcion
Michael Cooney
Scott DeMartino
Lawrence DiCara
Paul Dimoh
Benjamin Dwyer
Ross Eichberg
Elaine Enfonde
James Fabian
Sam Feigin
Meghan Fennelly
Gina Fornario
Carolyn Gabbay
Melisa Gerecci
Jeffrey Gilbreth
Matthew Grazier
Kate Hard
11 of 11
Ripley Hastings
Peter Hoefs
Merrill Hoopengardner
Dale Hudson
Renee Jackson
Kristin Jamberdino
John Koeppel
David Kolek
Sunny E. Lee
Jeffrey Lesk
Brent Little
Alexandra Lopez-Casero
Jared Lusk
Matthew Lynch
Gordon MacDonald
Raymond Mariani
Daniel McAvoy
Victor Milione
Darren Miller
Laurie Miller
Joann Moolsintong
Evelyn Moreno
Patrice Morrison
Deirdre Nash
Kenneth Nichols
Christopher Ogden
John Partigan
Vincent Polsinelli
David Portal
Edward Puerta
Amanda Pugh
Abigail Reardon
Michael Reardon
Jena Rotheim
Christine Sackett
Jeffrey Sacks
Jon Schumacher
Talis Seja
Aram Seo
Scott Sergio
Kenneth Silverberg
George Skelly
Stacey Slater
Sheldon Smith
Herbert Stevens
Patrice Harris Talbott
David Tennant
Khara Tusa
Lesley Varghese
Christopher Wallace
Kristen Mollnow Walsh
Robert Weikert
Brian Whittaker
Jodi Rosen Wine
Jeremy Wolk