Risk Management in a Policing Environment ALARM South East Regional Conference Wednesday, 3 November 2004 Nick Chown Outline of Presentation by Nick Chown, Director of Risk Management, Metropolitan Police Service Some background information Risk management strategy and process Linking with the National Intelligence Model Role of Corporate Risk Management Group Examples of where RM has added value Question and answer session The Met – performance Mission: To make London the safest major city in the world Street Crime 34% over last 2 years Gun Crime 10% in last 12 months Commercial Robbery Burglary 80% on last year Lowest Levels since 1973 Detection Rates 18% in Jan 04 (target 20%) Recruitment 246% over last 4 years Commissioner - “The Met is the agency of first and last resort” The Met - scale Gross annual revenue budget of £2.9bn Approx 25% of total service budget for England and Wales 44,300 Employees • • • • 30,000 police officers 12,000 police staff 1,500 PCSOs 800 Traffic Wardens 650 buildings in 300 locations valued at £1.7bn Over 5,000 vehicles Over 20,000 desktop computers Over 640,000 payslips produced per year 34,000 telephones 30,000 radios MPS – Management Board etc Commissioner Deputy Commissioner [DCC] – Diverse set of teams – Strategic Development [DCC2] – Corporate Risk Management Group [DCC2(7)] Four Assistant Commissioners – Territorial Policing, Specialist Crime, Specialist Operations and Human Resources Director of Resources Director of Public Affairs The Met – governance Authority Full Authority Co-ordination & Policing Committee (COP) Finance Committee Corporate Governance Committee (previously Audit Panel) Service Management Board Corporate Governance Strategic Committee Strategic H&S Committee Other strategic committees Resilience & BC committees Inspection Coordination Group The Metropolitan Police District Risk management – the background Advent of Metropolitan Police Authority Willis review of risk management Central risk management team Director of risk management Securing senior buy-in Integrated risk management strategy Risk management framework & user guide Local sponsors and facilitators Programme of mainstreaming work The Met – integrated risk management strategy Based on ALARM ‘toolkit’ approach To effectively manage potential opportunities and threats to the Authority and the Service achieving their objectives involving: Integration of risk management into the culture Raising awareness of need for risk management Enabling response to changing conditions Introduction of robust framework Minimisation of cost of insurable risk Mainstreaming risk management in planning Strategic RM NIM / PPAF Annual Plan Plan EM SelfAssessment Diversity EM S-A Projects Inspections Audits Reviews Objectives Risk – the chance of something happening that will have an impact on objectives Ad hoc Etc. Monitor and Review Actions Mainstreaming risk management in planning Strategic RM NIM / PPAF Annual Plan Plan EM SelfAssessment Diversity EM S-A Projects Inspections Audits Reviews Objectives Identify Risks (Threats, Hazards) Risk – the chance of something happening that will have an impact on objectives Evaluate Risks Likelihood and impact Ad hoc Etc. Monitor and Review Actions Risk Controls Risk Reporting Risk Register Mainstreaming risk management in planning Strategic RM Corporate Strategic Assessment Corporate Risk Profile Plan Objectives Identify Risks (Threats, Hazards) Risk – the chance of something happening that will have an impact on objectives Monitor and Review Strategic Intelligence Assessment Evaluate Risks Likelihood and impact Actions Risk Controls Business Risk Profile National Intelligence Model Business Government & Local Objectives Performance Management Business Excellence Model Managing Crime Outcomes Outcomes Prioritise Intelligence Work Community Safety TASKING & COORDINATION PROCESS Criminals Disorder Production of Intelligence Products Tasking & Coordination Meetings Controlled Criminality Problems Acknowledgements: National Criminal Intelligence Service Reduced Crime Analytical Products Knowledge Products System Products Controlled Disorder NIM tasking and coordination CONTROL STRATEGY comprises The criminal intelligence paints the picture PRIORITIES FOR • INTELLIGENCE • PREVENTION • ENFORCEMENT Requires Strategic tasking and Tactical tasking and Coordination group coordination group • Resourcing the needs • Setting priorities • Identifying policy needs • Applying the tactical menu • Responding to new needs • Checking still on course Acknowledgements: National Criminal Intelligence Service National Intelligence Model – business risk Business Managing Business Risk Human Rights Life & limb Government & Local Objectives Performance Management Business Excellence Model Outcomes Prioritise Business Intelligence Community Safety TASKING & COORDINATION PROCESS Production of Business Risk Profiles Tasking & Coordination Meetings Reduced Crime Controlled Criminality Reputation Service Delivery Finances Outcomes Analytical Products Knowledge Products System Products Controlled Disorder NIM tasking and coordination The business intelligence paints the picture CONTROL STRATEGY comprises PRIORITIES FOR • INTELLIGENCE • PREVENTION • CONTINUITY Requires Strategic tasking and Tactical tasking and Coordination group coordination group • Resourcing the needs • Setting priorities • Identifying policy needs • Applying the tactical menu • Responding to new needs • Checking still on course The Metropolitan Police risk management spectrum Identify Assess Evaluate Control Controls Measure Measure Report Report All Encompassing NIM ‘Risk’ Coverage … Identify Assess Evaluate Control Control Measure Monitor Report Report Risk management helps achieve the MPS mission Mission Internal Pressures Vision MPS Policing Plan Change Mgmt Local Plans External Pressures Plans can be blown “off course” Plans can be blown “off course” Risk management helps keep plans “on course” Mission Vision MPS Policing Plan Change Mgmt NIM Crime Local Plans NIM Business Risk New NIM business intelligence products Business Intelligence PESTELGO Issue Analyses Accurate picture of the business What is actually happening on the ground Nature and extent of problems The trends Where the main threats lie Strategic Intelligence Assessments Corporate Risk Profile Corporate Strategic Assessment Business Risk Profiles Current approach is often fragmented and inconsistent Reputation Risk Insurance Risk Assessment Legal Issues Health& Safety Compliance BCP / Security Controls Resilience Corporate co-ordination role Early Warning Control Environment Legal Issues Physical Security Embedding in Support Group Process Insurance Health & Safety Inspection & Audit Embedding in Operational Process Risk Profiling Compliance Resilience & Business Continuity Information Security Embedding a ‘Managed Risk’ Culture Risk Assessment SelfInsurance Reputation Risk Some other elements of corporate role • • • • • • • Structure / proactive / focus / solutions Setting standards for risk management Business continuity management lead Insurable risk management / insurance Programme and project input Advice and guidance on risk matters Support to various committees Reputation risk management Metropolitan police ‘brand’ Reputation as impact Business risk management process standard impact assessment MPS (gold/silver/bronze) reputation risk management system Diamond Risk Management Committee Impact assessment Impact Scale Impact categories Human Rights & Diversity Life & Limb Reputation Performance Financial Very Low 1 No differential diversity impacts or HR interference No injuries No discernible damage to MPS reputation No discernible Impact on service delivery On or within 1% of total budget Low 2 Some justifiable impacts / interference Slight injuries only Minimal damage to MPS reputation Impact on service delivery of little/ no concern to stakeholders Between 2% and 5% of total budget Medium 3 Limited unjustifiable impacts / interference Major injuries or single fatality Limited damage to MPS reputation Impact on service delivery relevant and noticeable by stakeholders Between 6% and 10% of total budget High 4 Significant unjustifiable impacts / interference Some fatalities or many major injuries Major damage to MPS reputation Major impact on service delivery Between 11% and 20% of total budget Very High 5 Serious unjustifiable impacts and/or interference Many fatalities Catastrophic damage to MPS reputation Catastrophic impact on service delivery In excess of 20% of total budget Added value from risk management • • • • • • • • • • • Bichard project Business cases Overseas travel policy Insurance invalidation indemnity Diversity Directorate restructuring C3i risk management pilot First steps towards ‘virtual captive’ Human rights & diversity impact assessment SO16 physical security unit CO11 community impact assessments Area homicide review teams Q&A • Any questions?
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz