WP6. QUALITY ASSURANCE (Vitero meeting 15.04.09)
WHO IS GOING TO DO WHAT AND WHEN1
Deliverables and task related with them
PARTNERS
INVOLVED
WORKING DAYS
(0,125=1 hour)
Proposed DEADLINE
Quality Guide
Week 51 (17 Dec 2009)
Literature review (on Higer Education and P3
e-learning standards and quality assurance)
- After consulting expert colleagues we will
decide if it is ok to buy ISO documentation2
- This handbook will be sent to the 5
partners involved and to the externall
evaluator
Ehlers, U. & Pawlowsky, J. M. (2008) (Eds.)
Hand book on Quality & Standardisation in
E-Learning. Berlin: Springer.
- Survey is finished and send to the
partners (24-04-09)
- Survey deadline (07-05-09)
-survey analysis is presented (24-05-09) at
the Madrid meeting
Short survey about Quality standards in
each institution
Survey design and proof reading
(p3, p7 & p1)
Survey deliver (p3)
Survey analysis (p3)
P3
P7
P1
pall
1
0,5
0,250
------
To develop a set of Quality Standards and
Criteria for Vircamp
Quality standards and criteria have to be:
Curriculum plan
Virtual materials
Delivering the course and teaching
P3
P7
P1
P2
P8
2,5
1
0,5
0,5
0,5
P3
P7
P1
P2
P8
2
1
0,5
0,5
0,5
P3
P7
P1
2
1,5
1,5
To develop a systems of quality indicators
for VirCamp
To develop checklist to Implement quality
standards and criteria a different levels of
and with the main actors implied in the
project:
Curriculum plan
Virtual materials
Delivering the course and Teaching
To write the quality guide
- a draft of Quality Standards, criteria and
quality indicators is presented, discussed
and agreed online (vitero) by P3, P7, P1, P2
& P3 (22 June: 12:00-15:00) and sent to all
the partners for feedback
- a final version of Quality Standards,
criteria and quality indicators is finished
(15-07-09)
- a draft of the different checklist is
presented, discussed and agreed online
(vitero) by P3,P7, P1, P2 & P3 (8 September
09, 13:00-15:00) and sent to the partners
for feedback.
-Final versions of the checklist are ready at
the end of September 2009
-a draft of the quality guide is sent to the
partners for feedback at the end of
October.
-The quality guide is finished and send to
the partners (17-12-09)
1
Pink color refers to the period until September 2009. Green color refers to the period until September
2010
2
Red color is used to underline agreements done during the vitero meeting
September 2010
Internal Evaluation Report Series
To develop instruments to collect
evaluation data
-meetings (by participant partners).
Instrument developed by AKL will be sent
to the 5 partners involved and Hellen to be
improved.
-virtual materials (by students, teachers &
technicians) Media Center will help us to
develop this instrument. We have to
decide what are the relevant criteria to be
evaluated (pedagogical, technical,
economical, etc.)
- curriculum plan (by partners, students &
teachers). P2 & P12 will be asked to
collaborate specifically here)
- the running of the pilot course (students
& teachers survey) (we will use as
departure point some of the work done in
Virclass)
to collect evaluation data
3,5
P3
P1
2
P7
2,5
P2
1
1,250
P8
P3
- Meetings (done, it has to be
checked)
- Virtual materials (meeting in
may)
- Curriculum plan (??)
The running of the pilot (middle of
January )
1
A continuous process (mainly from
February to June 2010)
to analyse evaluation data
P3
P1
2
1
A continuous process (mainly July
2010)
To write the nº 1 of the Internal Evaluation P3
Report Series
P7
P1
Program evaluation of the pilot
To invite an external evaluator
To external evaluate the pilot
To write the external evaluation report
2
1,5
1,5
September 2010