Briefing and Orientation on New Rules and Procedures of the Pollution Adjudication Board (PAB) 26- 27 April 2011 Pollution Adjudication Board 26 April 2011 Pollution Adjudication Board About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Imposition of Fines 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO The Pollution Adjudication Board (the PAB) is a quasijudicial body created under Section 19 of Executive Order 192 for the adjudication of pollution cases. Where are we now? Page 1 PAB Res 01-2010 Pollution Adjudication Board About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Imposition of Fines 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO Where are we now? The Board assumes the powers and functions of the Commission/Commissioners of the National Pollution Control Commission with respect to the adjudication of pollution cases under Republic Act 3931 and Presidential Decree 984... Pollution Adjudication Board About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Imposition of Fines 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases The PAB is organizationally under the supervision of the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (the DENR), Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO Where are we now? The Environmental Management Bureau (EMB) provides the Secretariat support. Pollution Adjudication Board About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Organizational Placement coequal w/ RTC Imposition of Fines 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO Where are we now? Sec.7 (d) of PD 984 - Execution of decision Any decision or order of the Commission, after the same has become final and executory, shall be enforced and executed in the same manner as decisions of Courts of First Instance, … Pollution Adjudication Board About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Imposition of Fines Composed of the following: Chairman: DENR Secretary 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO Where are we now? Members: 2 DENR Undersecretaries EMB Director 3 others to be designated by the Secretary Pollution Adjudication Board About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Present Composition: Imposition of Fines 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO Where are we now? Chairman:DENR Secretary Presiding Officer: Usec. Demetrio Ignacio Members: Usec. Jeremias Dolino EMB Director Atty. Cuna Dr. Anthony Chiu (Academe) Engr. Jeffrey Mijares (Industry) For. Renato de Rueda (Nat. Resources) Pollution Adjudication Board About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Imposition of Fines 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO Expanded Jurisdiction of the PAB: Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999 (R.A. 8749) Exceedance of air emission; Imposition of Fines; Operating without permit to operate air pollution source installations Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004 (R.A. 9275) Exceedance of the effluent; Imposition of Fines; Committing any of the prohibited acts under Section 27 Where are we now? Page 7 PAB Res 01-2010 Pollution Adjudication Board About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Important Prohibited Acts Under Republic Act 9275 Imposition of Fines 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO Where are we now? Discharging or depositing materials that could pollute any water body Discharging regulated pollutants without valid discharge permit Undertaking activities in violation of P.D. 1586 Transport or discharge of prohibited chemicals under R.A. 6969 Transport or dumping of solid wastes under R.A. 9003 Pollution Adjudication Board About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Imposition of Fines 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO Where are we now? Important Prohibited Acts Under Republic Act 8749 Violation of standards for stationary sources for actual exceedance of air quality standards or limitation Any order, rule or regulation issued by the DENR with respect to such standard or limitation Pollution Adjudication Board About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Imposition of Fines 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO Where are we now? Powers of PAB and Sanctions Under Republic Act 9275 Recommend to the Secretary, the issuance of Cease and Desist Orders Recommend to the Secretary, the imposition of fine for a minimum of PhP10,000 to a maximum of PhP200,000.00 per day of violation Recommend that the proper government agencies file criminal charges against violators Pollution Adjudication Board About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Imposition of Fines 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO Where are we now? Powers of PAB and Sanctions Under Republic Act 8749 Issuance of Cease and Desist Orders Imposition of fine for a minimum of PhP10,000 to a maximum of PhP100,000.00 per day of violation Recommend to proper government agencies file criminal charges against violators Procedures for Handling Cases About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Imposition of Fines 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases PAB RESOLUTION I-C Revised Rules of the Pollution Adjudication Board (PAB) on Pleading Practice and Procedure in Pollution Cases Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO Where are we now? Effectivity: 6 October 1997 Procedures for Handling Cases About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Imposition of Fines 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO Where are we now? PAB Resolution No. 1 – Series of 2010 Revised Rules of the Pollution Adjudication Board (PAB) on Pleading Practice and Procedure in Pollution Cases Signed: 29 June 2010 Published: 02 December 2010 Effectivity: 17 December 2010 Pollution Adjudication Process - Monitoring - Complaint -Inspection Report NOV1 Compliance Period Technical Conference Non Compliant ●Endorse to PAB Compliant ●Resolution Regional Office For inspection/reports Regl Office Resolution/Order Execute Order Fines/Penalties PAB Order Fines/ Penalties Resolution Issued: CDO, TLO, Fines, FLO/Dismissed 1 Regional Offices should submit copies of all NOVs to the PAB Imposition of Fines About PAB Procedures for Handling cases Imposition of Fines 2010 Accomplishment Statistics of PAB Cases Strategies for 2011 Issues and Concerns with the RO Where are we now? 2010 ACCOMPLISHMENT Accomplishments January to December 2010 2% 11% CDO 12% TLO 63% 12% FLO Dismissed others During this period, the PAB made 22 deliberations with 120 resolutions issued, nationwide. – – – – – 3 Cease and Desist Order (CDO) 13 Temporary Lifting Order (TLO) 14 Formal Lifting Order (FLO) 14 Dismissed 76 other resolutions/directives (Show cause, memoranda etc) Of the 491 cases pending in 2009 – 120 cases were deliberated and 28 cases (5.7%) were resolved. 2010 ACCOMPLISHMENT Accomplishments January to December 2010 2% 11% CDO 12% TLO 63% 12% FLO Dismissed others Three (3) firms (2% of the cases acted in 2010) were ordered to cease and desist from undertaking pollutiongenerating activities. Instead of discharging untreated wastewater into the water bodies or aquatic environment, the Board thru the issuance of CDOs was able to control discharging untreated wastewater into the different receiving body of water. This corresponds to 707 kgs of organic pollutants (BOD5) or 12.4% reduction. This was calculated from the difference between the effluent BOD during non-compliance and compliance to the DENR Standards multiplied by the flow rate. 2010 ACCOMPLISHMENT In year 2010, the PAB was able to penalize violating firms with fines amounting to PhP 16,736,149.94. The bases for the fine imposition are P.D. 984 with a total collection of PhP 13,719.066.65, and R.A. 9275 (CWA) amounting to PhP 3,017,083.29 2010 ACCOMPLISHMENT Resolution No. 01 - 2010 POLICY: PAB Resolution No. 1 Series of 2010, “Revised Rules of the Pollution Adjudication Board (PAB) on Pleading, Practice and Procedure in Pollution Cases” was issued Secretary Ramos on 22 June 2010 and was published in Malaya on 02 December 2010, the same became in effect on 17 December 2010. Orientation with the Regional Office will be conducted in 2011. Statistics of PAB Cases Total Number of Cases Docketed (1988 – 2011) 816 Inactive Active (1998-2004) (2005-2010) 723 93 FLO Issued 153 139 14 Dismissed 198 192 6 Remaining Cases as of today 465 392 73 21 4 17 486 396 90 Issue on Fines* TOTAL Data as of 08 March 2011 * Cases endorsed by the RO with remaining issue on fines Programs and Strategies for 2011 In line with the Secretary’s thrust to unclog the cases pending with the DENR including the PAB: 1. The Board will convene the Hearing/COF meeting every Tuesday or Wednesday of the Week; 2. Each Desk Officer of the Secretariat are required to review at least four (4) cases in a month; 3. The Regional Offices will be required/reminded to strictly follow their obligation in handling pollution cases as required in the PAB Resolutions. (i.e. from actions to complaint, issuance of NOV, conduct of Technical Conference, endorsement to PAB and implementation of CDO or Orders of the PAB.) Role of ROs in Adjudication Process - Monitoring - Complaint -Inspection Report 1 2 NOV1 Compliance Period Technical Conference 3 4 Non Compliant ●Endorse to PAB Compliant ●Resolution Regional Office 6 For inspection/reports Regl Office Resolution/Order Execute Order Fines/Penalties PAB 5 Order Fines/ Penalties Resolution Issued: CDO, TLO, Fines, FLO/Dismissed 1 Regional Offices should submit copies of all NOVs to the PAB Roles of RO’s in Adjudication Process 1. Action on Complaints 2. Monitoring 3. Notice of Violation 4. Technical Conference 5. Elevating case to PAB 6. Implementation of CDO 1. Action on Complaints Rule: In all complaints cognizable by the PAB, the Regional Office shall submit a report to the Board containing the following: – Result of investigation – Status of the case – Recommendation Issue No such report is being forwarded to the PAB Secretariat. The objective of having said violations monitored and the same filed before the PAB as undocketed is therefore defeated. Strategy In order to have a proper accounting Regional Office who failed to offer proof be held accountable for cases if the endorsed to the PAB for issuance of CDO of these violations, the of prior submission, shall same will eventually be or imposition of fines. 2. Monitoring Rule: The Regional Office is required to submit monthly reports to the PAB on the status/updates on cases referred, investigated and/or endorsed Issue Cases remained inactive due to absence of updates and inspection/sampling from the Regional Office, thereby limiting the capacity of the PAB in effectively adjudicating pending cases Strategy The Secretariat will endorse to the PAB with appropriate recommendations during its annual inventory of cases, those companies within every Regional Office’s jurisdiction that have not been inspected for at least twice within the preceding year. 3. Notice of Violations Rule: If based on investigation there is a prima facie evidence of violation, a Notice of Violation shall be issued. The PAB shall be furnished copies of all notices of violation issued by the Regional Offices (every 5th day of every month), Notices of violation shall contain the following: – Complaint if any – Date of technical conference – Results of investigation/analyses RO shall furnish respondent a copy of the results of analysis within five (5) days from the release of the results. Issue The Regional Office is not furnishing respondent a copy of results of laboratory analysis of samples taken in order for it to institute the soonest possible time measures to abate pollution. Strategy Require the Regional Office to include in its reporting a statement supported by proof of service that respondent was furnished a copy of the results of laboratory analysis of samples taken. Page 10 PAB Res 01-2010 4. Technical Conference Rule: Within five (5) days from the conduct of compliance testing or validation, the RO shall elevate the case to the Board regardless of its findings, i.e. whether respondent passed or failed to comply with the standards. The records shall include the following: – Copy of the complaint, inspection, or monitoring report; NOV; Position paper, commitment sheet/compliance plan; Minutes of technical conference; Results of laboratory analysis; Resolution of the case. Issue Most of the Regional Offices failed to elevate cases in the event that after the conduct of technical conference, respondent complied with the DENR Standards. This should not be the case; it is only the PAB/DENR Secretary who has the authority to impose fines, which in effect waived if the case is not elevated by the Regional Office. Strategy The Secretariat will conduct semi-annual inventory of notices of violation issued per Regional Office to determine if the same will coincide with the one on file with the PAB. Page 11 PAB Res 01-2010 5. Endorsement to PAB Rule: The Regional Office is bound to make categorical recommendations to the PAB as regards to cases elevated Issue Some of the Regional Office will elevate cases to the PAB with a recommendation “for appropriate action”. In elevating cases to the PAB for adjudication, the Regional Offices are bound to make categorical recommendations whether the same would be for issuance of CDO, TLO, extension of TLO, or imposition of fine. 6. Implementation of CDO Rule: The Regional Office is bound to implement fully a CDO issued by the PAB within a period of 72 hours. If it cannot be implemented, a written report shall be transmitted stating therein the causes of failure to execute. Issue Some Regional Offices are not submitting reports when they failed to execute CDO issued by the PAB; some would mere report that the same was only served upon respondent without offering any explanation why it failed to fully execute the Order. Strategy Verify from the report whether the Regional Office exhausted all measures or remedies afforded by the Rules. Thereafter, report the same to the Board with a recommendation to seek assistance from other appropriate government agencies. Rule X Sec 6 (Page 16) PAB Res 01-2010 Thank you. please visit website at www.emb.gov.ph www.estis.sites.net/cien-ph or you may call our office at 928-1221
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz