CLICpix2 & C3PD Alignment Marks I. Kremastiotis, E. Santin, and P. Valerio CLICdp Vertex Meeting CERN, December 3rd 2015 Initial proposal from D. Dannheim overlaid crosses Vernier scale with 1µm fine resolution Motivation: Make possible precise alignments between CLICpix2 and C3PD chips 2 Alignment marks at four “corners” 3175.00µm 3234.75µm 3230.50µm CLICpix2 3261.14µm 3 CLICpix2 bottom marks bottom left bump pad center bottom right bump pad+via center “Bump pad” vs “bump pad + via” center alignments possible (using diagonal crosses) 4 CLICpix2 top marks top left 55.50µm bump pad+via center top right 59.75µm bump pad+via center 5 C3PD marks 2 different alignment marks: “Empty” cross Row of 11 rectangles (20 x 2 µm2) with 9µm pitch (Vernier marks) Use of top metal (AM) Polysilicon, diffusion and M1-MT exclude layers added on the marks to avoid any blurring from the dummy filling pattern DRC clean 4um 10um 20um 90um 20um 2um 9um 6 C3PD top and bottom marks Top side of matrix: 16um Vertical distance from edge of the matrix to the center of the cross: 12.5 µm (center of cross aligned to the center of the top pixel) Vertical distance from the center of the cross to the center of the first (top) bar: 16 µm Center of row aligned to the center of cross C3PD matrix 12.5 top side 43.07 Bottom side of matrix: Horizontal distance from edge of the matrix to the center of the cross: 12.5 µm Horizontal distance from the center of the cross to the center of the first (right-most) bar: 16 µm C3PD matrix 12.5 55.5um bottom side 16 7 C3PD global view Alignment marks matching the CLICpix2 pixel layout for a flip-chip assembly Same cross-to-cross spacing as in CLICpix2 top alignment marks (match the bottom marks on CLICpix2) bottom alignment marks (match the top marks on CLICpix2) 3.2 mm Matrix C3PD CLICpix2 + C3PD bottom marks overlay (“bump pad + via” alignment) bottom right marks aligned marks non-aligned bottom left C3PD bump pad: 20 x 20 µm2 9 CLICpix2 + C3PD top marks overlay (“bump pad + via” alignment) top left top right cross aligned vernier marks aligned cross non-aligned vernier marks aligned 10 CLICpix2 + C3PD bottom marks overlay (“bump pad” alignment) bottom right marks non-aligned marks aligned bottom left For “bump pad” alignment, one of the two chips should be shifted by 4.25 µm 11 CLICpix2 + C3PD top marks overlay (“bump pad” alignment) top left cross non-aligned vernier marks aligned top right cross aligned vernier marks aligned 12 Thank you for your attention! Backup slides Knowledge from CLICpix1 CLICpix1 3µm SiO2 2.125µm SiO2 15 Bump pad + via center (partial coverage) AP width [µm] C3PD bump pad y = 11.5 µm y [µm] Assuming the C3PD bump pad has dimension of 20 x 20 µm2, the CLICpix2 bump pad + via center is at 11.50 µm instead of 11.25 µm (= 22.5 µm/2). This center would maximize the area overlap between the two bump pads, and hence the coupling capacitance (assuming the glue and passivation layer have approximately the same dielectric constant) We are currently using 11.25 µm (i.e. bump pad + via height divided by 2) for simplicity, and also because the alignment machine has a precision of only ~ 1 µm 16 AP width [µm] Bump pad + via center (full coverage) y = 12.167 µm AL = 120 µm2 AR = 120 µm2 y [µm] Bump pad + via center is at ~12.167 µm instead of 11.50 µm, assuming a C3PD bump pad scenario covering the whole CLICpix2 pad 17
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz