Concept Note development and modular tools TBTEAM Annual Meeting, 18-19 June, 2014 1 Outline Concept note development Elements of the concept note Programmatic gap analysis Modular tool Lessons leaned 2 New funding model cycle Ongoing Country Dialogue 2nd GAC TRP National Strategic Plan/ Investment Case Concept Note Grant Implementation Grant Making GAC Board 3 The concept note • Principal document for TRP and GAC reviews and grant-making purposes • Output from country dialogue, reflective of an inclusive multi-stakeholder process • Encourages robust and ambitious funding request • Funding request based on the national strategic plan • Captures “full expression of demand’’ 4 What is the importance of a concept note? Concept note outlines the reasons for Global Fund investment: • Describes a strategy, supported by technical data that shows why this approach will be effective • Presents a country’s prioritized needs within a broader context, guided by a national health strategy and a NSP • Represents voices of key populations and other stakeholders in the country • Describes how implementation can maximize the impact of the investment 5 Overview of the structure of the standard concept note Section 1 Country Context 2 Funding landscape, Additionality and Sustainability • Core tables + 3 Funding request to the Global Fund 4 Implementation arrangement and risk assessment • CCM Eligibility & endorsement • Supporting documents 6 Section Country context 1.1 Country Disease, Health and Community Systems context 1.2 National Disease Strategic Plans 1.3 Joint programming for TB and HIV 1 Current and evolving epidemiology of the disease, and any significant geographic variations Define constraints and barriers to an appropriate response Community system constraints Health system constraints Human rights barriers Key populations with disproportionately low access to services Provide information based on current NSP(s) Key goals, objectives and priority program areas Implementation to date, main outcomes and impact achieved Linkage to national health strategy Processes for reviewing and revising the response based on outcomes achieved and lessons learned Plan for Joint planning and alignment of TB and HIV Strategies, Policies and Interventions Barriers that need to be addressed in the alignment process 7 Funding landscape, additionality and sustainability Section 2 2.1 Overall Funding Landscape for upcoming implementation period Describe: - availability of funds for and source of such funding (government and/or donor) for the program. - How the proposed Global Fund investment has leveraged other donor resources - For program areas that have significant gaps, planned actions to address these gaps. 2.2 Counterpart Financing Requirement Complete the Financial Gap Analysis and Counterpart Financing Table - Compliance with counterpart financing requirements and planned actions to reach compliance - Government’s willingness-to-pay commitments and how they will be tracked and reported - assessment of the completeness and reliability of financial data reported including assumptions used and caveats with the figures Table 1 Financial gap analysis and counterpart financing 8 Section 3 Funding request to the Global Fund 3.1 Detail the request for funding and how the investment is strategically targeted to achieve impact and strengthen health systems. 3.2 3.3 3.4 Complete a programmatic gap table detailing the quantifiable priority modules within applicant’s funding. Table 2 Programmatic Gap Provide strategic overview of funding request including both the proposed investment of the allocation and above allocation amount. Complete the modular template: link the selected module intervention to goals and objectives, and associated indicators, targets and cost. Explain the rational for prioritization of modules and interventions Describe the expected impact and outcomes. Table 3 Modular Template Focus on key populations and/or highest-impact interventions – LMI and UMIC 9 Concept note will capture the full expression of demand In the concept note: • Full expression of demand captured at a higher level based on a coasted national strategy • Applicant will determine which program elements of their full expression of demand should be in their request above the allocation Applicants encouraged to apply for their full expression of demand 10 Implementation arrangement and risk assessment Information on the implementation capacity of PRs and risk mitigation measures to program delivery Section 1 Overview of implementation arrangements - Include dual-track financing - Describe coordination among implementers - Identify any anticipated challenges 2 Include an implementation arrangement diagram (not required at concept note submission) 3 For each PR, complete the ‘minimum standards for implementers’ assessment 4 Describe current or anticipated risks to program delivery and/or PR performance, including the proposed mitigation measures 4 11 Core tables & templates in a standard concept note Tables 1 Financial Gap Analysis & Counterpart Financing Table* 3 Templates 2 Programmatic Gap Table(s) CCM Eligibility Requirements** List of Abbreviations and Annexes CCM Endorsement of Concept Note** 4 Modular Template * Not applicable to stand-alone HSS or applications from Regional Organizations, Regional Coordinating Mechanisms and Non-CCMs ** Not applicable to applications from Regional Organizations and Non-CCMs 12 Financial Gap Analysis & Counterpart Financing Table 13 Programmatic gap analysis • Programmatic gap table provides a comprehensive picture of the key gaps which form the basis of prioritization of the funding request • Include programmatic gap analysis for three to six priority modules within the applicant’s funding request • Coverage levels for the priority modules selected should be consistent with the coverage targets in section D of the modular template 14 14 Programmatic gap table - example Programmatic Gap Table (Per Priority Intervention) - (create 3-6 programmatic gap tables as needed) Priority Module Selected coverage indicator Current National Coverage 6000 Insert year of latest results 60% Current Estimated Country Need A. Total estimated population in need/ at risk B. Country targets (from National Strategic Plan) TB care and prevention Number of notified cases of all forms of TB Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Comments/ Assumptions 2015 2016 2017 # # % 10000 10000 10000 7000 8000 9000 70 80 90 # 4000 5000 7000 % # % 40 1000 10 50 0 70 0 # % # % # % # % # % 5000 50 2000 20 7000 70 2000 20 9000 90 5000 50 3000 30 8000 80 1000 10 9000 90 3000 30 2000 20 9000 90 1000 10 10000 100 WHO estimate Country need already covered C. Country need planned to be covered by domestic & other sources D. Country need already covered by existing Global Fund grants domestic contribution increases annually Programmatic Gap E. Expected annual gap in meeting the need: A - (C+D) F. Targets to be financed by indicative funding G. Coverage from indicative, existing Global Fund and other resources: F+(C+D) H. Targets to be financed by above indicative funding I. Total coverage (indicative+ above indicative+ existing GF grants+ other resources) 15 The modular approach The modular approach is a framework used to structure the information that defines a grant It runs throughout a grant's lifecycle, providing consistency at each stage • During the concept note stage, a funding request is defined by selecting a set of interventions per module to align with national strategy • During the grant making stage, each approved intervention is further defined by identifying and describing the required sets of activities • During grant implementation, progress of each intervention is monitored as laid out in the prior stages Program level Module Intervention Activity and cost 16 Example: TB modules and interventions Impact/outcome indicators Disease/HSS Modules TB TB Care and Prevention HIV TB/HIV Coverage/output indicators Work-plan tracking measures Interventions Activities (not standardized) Cost Inputs Case detection and diagnosis Smear microcopy Product cost Treatment Training of health workers Transportation Prevention Baseline clinical assessment Storage Engaging all care providers .... Procurement agent fee Procurement of FLD, microscopes Quality assurance MDR-TB TB/HIV Malaria Program Management HSS M&E Community TB care delivery Key Populations 17 17 Measurement framework Modular tool – should be submitted online http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/fundingmodel/single/applicationmaterial/ Lessons and suggestions • Start the NFM process as early as possible • Several of the process that inform CN could be done concurrently and with CN development • Most of the tools are new – but instructions are available and worth reading before completing them • Ensure that figures are consistent – NSP, programmatic gap table, modular tool, narratives • “tell the story” – process and contents, quality • Make a strong and evidence-based case for funding – allocation and above allocation • Experience so far in developing single CN and joint programming for TB and HIV is promising http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/fundingmodel/support/infonotes 21
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz