Solutions Manual to Exercises in Mathematical Tools For Economics 1 2 Exercises for Chapter 1 1.1 1. (i) 4 2 6 15 A B , 3A . 4 8 18 3 0 1 4 2 4 8 C A B . 5 8 4 8 52 54 1 6 2 7 4 8 CA , CB , CA CB . 58 17 6 71 52 54 4 2 0 1 10 12 . 4 8 5 8 40 68 A BC (ii) 2 5 2 3 14 29 AB . 1 2 7 10 25 6 2 3 2 5 22 7 BA 1 38 17 2 7 6 14 29 0 1 145 218 ABC 10 25 5 8 125 210 15 26 2 5 186 49 BCA 1 394 121 35 54 6 0 1 14 29 10 25 CAB . 5 8 10 25 150 55 Clearly AB and BA are not the same. (iii) trAB 14 25 39 trBA 22 17 39 trABC 145 210 65 trBCA 186 121 65 trCAB 10 55 65. 2. (i) 1 4 2 1 3 7 16 12 41 AB 2 5 1 . 29 12 58 5 0 8 3 1 6 As B is 3 3 and A is 2 3 , BA does not exist. 16 29 (ii) AB 12 12 . 41 58 1 2 3 1 5 16 29 BA 4 5 1 3 0 12 12 . 2 1 6 7 8 41 58 1 5 1 3 7 59 61 (iii) AA 3 0 , 61 89 5 0 8 7 8 which is clearly symmetric. 3. (i) 2 3 5 1 3 5 0 0 0 AB 1 4 5 1 3 5 0 0 0 . 1 3 4 1 3 5 0 0 0 1 3 5 2 3 5 0 0 0 BA 1 3 5 1 4 5 0 0 0 . 1 3 5 1 3 4 0 0 0 Both AB and BA equal the 3 3 null matrix. 4 (ii) 2 3 5 2 2 4 2 3 5 AC 1 4 5 1 3 4 1 4 5 A. . 1 3 4 1 2 3 1 3 4 2 2 4 2 3 5 2 2 4 CA 1 3 4 1 4 5 1 3 4 C. . 1 2 3 1 3 4 1 2 3 2 3 5 2 3 5 2 3 5 (iii) A AA 1 4 5 1 4 5 1 4 5 A. 1 3 4 1 3 4 1 3 4 2 2 2 4 2 2 4 C CC 1 3 4 1 3 4 C. . 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 (iv) (a) AACB AAB from ii AO from i O. (b) A B 2 A B A B A2 AB BA B 2 A2 B2 4. from i. A square matrix A is symmetric idempotent if A A and A2 A. (i) A (i i) / n (i)i / n A. B (I A) I A B. AA i ii2 i A as ii n. n BB I A I 2 A A2 B. 2 5 trA tr i i tr i i 1. n n trB tr(I A) trI trA n 1. (ii) Ax i ix / n. x1 Now ix (1 . . . 1) x1 . . . + xn . x n x n Hence Ax i x where x xi / n , so Ax is an n1 vector where elements are x. Now i 1 x x1 x so Bx is an Bx I A x x Ax n1 vector where jth element is x j x . , x x n 1.2 1. A 6, B 18 4 22, AB A B 2 4 4 74 1 5 0 6 2 1 4 9 6 18 4 22. 4 1 6 2. 148 16 132. 4 1 6 A7 2 9 1 0 3 . r2 r2 2r1 3 0 8 3 0 8 6 Expanding using the second column we have A 1 1 1 2 1 3 3 8 1(8 9) 1. Similarly, 4 7 3 4 1 3 A 1 2 0 1 6 9 8 1 3. A 0 0 1. 6 3 8 2 3 2.5 0 0 0 r2 r2 r3 1 2 3 3 1 1 7 3 . 2 Expanding using the second row we have A 7(1) 2 4 1 2 3 1 2 3 7 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 0. 3 1 1 2 1 3 0 B 3 2 1 0 0. c4 c4 3c2 1 3 0 0 2 4 1 0 1.3 1. 4 2 4 1 1 1 4 1 . AdjA and A 4 2 6. Hence A 6 2 1 1 1 2 1 8 5 8 0 1 1 8 0 . AdjB and B 16. Hence B 16 5 2 0 2 5 2 1 1 2 0 7 8 AB . 2 4 5 8 16 32 7 8 8 32 16 32 1 1 32 Adj( AB) . and AB 96 so ( AB) 96 16 7 8 7 16 7 2 2. A 1 0 2 1 6, so A is nonsingular. 6 2 6 6(1) 23 13 6 3 r3 r3 r2 13 6 0 2 AdjA 2 6 3 9 1 6 6 4 9 0 2 3 9 0 4 9 1 0 2 6 2 0 6 6 6 2 4 3 36 78 10 2 1 9 18 2 . 4 3 6 12 2 2 1 6 2 Hence 6 36 9 A1 1 78 18 12 . 6 10 2 2 0 1 0 B 1 0 0 1 1 1(1)31 1, so B is nonsingular. 1 1 r1 r1 r3 1 4 3 r2 r2 r3 3 4 3 AdjB 4 3 3 4 3 1 4 1 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 3 4 1 3 1 4 1 3 1 4 1 1 7 3 3 7 1 3 3 0 1 1 0 1 . 1 4 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 3 1 3 7 3 3 Hence B 1 0 1 . 1 1 0 1 8 3. 2 4 5 ( A I) 0 3 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 r1 r3 2 4 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 r3 r3 2r1 0 4 3 1 0 1 0 1 0 r2 1 r2 0 4 3 3 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 r3 r3 4r2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 r1 r1 r3 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 r4 1 r4 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 1 0 r4 1 r4 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 2 0 1 3 1 4 3 0 1 3 4 9 1 3 4 9 0 1 3 0 0 1 3 1 4 9 0 0 0 1 3 1 4 3 9 0 5 3 0 2 3 1 0 2 3 0 2 3 1 9 1 0 0 0 1 0 r1 r1 r3 0 0 1 1 3 4 9 1 3 4 9 0 1 3 5 3 0 2 3 3 4 15 Hence A1 1 0 3 0 . 9 3 4 6 1 2 1 B I 0 1 1 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 c2 c2 2c1 2 3 2 c c c 3 2 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 c2 c2 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 c3 c3 c2 2 3 1 2 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 c1 c1 2c3 0 0 1 c2 c2 3c3 5 7 3 2 2 1 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 c3 c3 0 0 1 1 5 7 2 2 3 2 1 3 1 5 7 3 Hence B 2 2 1 . 2 3 1 1 10 1 1 0 4. A 1 r2 r2 r3 2 A 1 3 3 1 0 . Expanding this determinant using the third column we have 1 1 1 1 1 Adj A = 1 2 1 1 1 2, so A is nonsingular. 3 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 3 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 . 2 1 1 1 5 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 Hence A 1 1 1 1 . 2 1 3 5 1 1.4 1. (i) A set of m n1 vectors a1, . . . ,am are linearly dependent if there exists scalars 1 , . . . ,m not all of which are zero such that 1 a1 . . . mam 0. (ii) Consider 1 x1 2 x2 3 x3 0 which is the following set of equations in 1 , 2 , and 3 : 21 22 143 0 71 42 273 0 1 2 33 0 From the third equation 1 2 33 and substituting back into the other two equations gives 2 23 , so if we take 3 1, 2 2 , and 1 5 we get 5 x1 2 x2 x3 0 . Thus the vectors are linearly dependent. 11 (iii) Consider 1 x1 2 x2 3 x3 0 which gives 91 22 43 0 31 0 1 22 83 0. The second equation gives 1 0 so we are left with 22 43 and 22 83 which are true only if 2 3 0. Hence the vectors are linearly dependent. 2. (i) 11 1 3 2 0 1 11 33 A r2 r2 2r1 0 1 5 15 r3 r3 r1 0 5 1 3 r4 r4 r1 11 1 3 2 0 1 11 33 6 18 r3 r3 r2 0 0 r4 r4 5r2 0 0 54 162 11 1 3 2 0 1 11 33 . r4 r4 9r1 0 0 6 18 0 0 0 0 Hence r ( A) 3. (ii) B 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 0 0 1 r2 r2 r1 0 r3 r3 r1 1 r4 r4 r1 1 0 0 1 1 2 1(1) 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 12 1 2 0 1 1 1. 0 1 1 1(1)11 2 1 r3r3 r1 0 2 1 Hence r ( B) 4. 3. Expanding A by the third column we have A (1)31 2 1 x 1 0 (1 x)(1)3 3 5 x 2 2 1 x (1 x) (1 x) (5 x)(1 x) 4 (1 x) x ( x 6). Therefore A 0 if x 1, or x 0, or x 6 but is nonzero for all other values of x. So if x does not take the value 0, 1, or 6 then r ( A) 3. If x takes any of these values consider the minor 5 x 1 2 0 2 for all values of x. Thus we have r ( A) 3 for all x other than 0, 1, 6, 0, 1, or 6. 4. r ( A) 2 for x taking the value (i) 1 1 1 1 N X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X N . M I N I N M . Hence both N and M are symmetric. Consider NN X ( X X )1 X X ( X X )1 X N 13 and MM ( I N )( I N ) I 2 N N 2 M . So M and N are idempotent. Now NX X ( X X )1 X X X so MX X NX O. (ii) r ( N ) trN tr( X X ) 1 X X trI K K . r (M ) tr( I N ) trI n trN n K . 1.5 1. (i) 0 1 8 A B 0 3 8 7 0 7 0 7 0 2 5 8 5 8 5 16 7 0 7 0 21 0 4 24 15 32 5 8 5 1 0 3 B A 1 8 3 2 1 7 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 0 7 ( A B) 0 14 8 14 10 . 28 20 2 0 0 7 14 4 0 0 21 28 . 2 8 16 5 10 4 24 32 15 20 0 24 5 21 15 . 16 0 32 10 28 20 14 0 1 7 A B 0 2 7 8 0 8 0 3 5 7 5 7 0 8 0 8 4 14 5 7 5 8 0 24 5 21 15 . 16 0 32 10 28 20 tr( A D) 0 5 0 20 15 trA trB ( 1 4)(0 5) 15. (ii) 1 2 0 7 3 4 16 3 3 4 54 61 ABC , 3 4 8 5 2 1 32 41 2 1 178 87 so 54 178 vecABC . 61 87 1 3 3 (C A)vecB 1 4 3 2 1 2 4 3 2 1 1 4 3 2 4 vecB 2 4 3 6 2 4 0 9 12 6 8 8 4 8 1 2 7 12 16 3 4 5 54 178 . 61 87 1 2 0 7 16 3 (iii) AB 3 4 8 5 32 41 15 so trAB 16 41 57. 0 8 (vecA)vecB (1 2 3 4) 57. 7 5 (iv) trABC 54 87 141. C is 2 2 and vecB is 4 1 so the required identity matrix is 2 2 and we have 1 3 0 (vecA)(C I )vecB (vecA) 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 9 22 5 0 0 1 vecB 0 1 2 0 0 2 vecB 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 3 0 4 0 0 3 0 4 0 8 7 5 176 35 141. 2. a1 b1 a1 Let a , b . Then ab b1 a b a n n n a1 b a b1 a n a1 b1 a b a b n 1 a1 bm ab a n bm ab. bm 16 a1b1 bm a b n 1 a1bm . anbm a1b1 anb1 vec ab vec (b a ). a1bm a b n n b1 a1 an ba vec ab. b a m 1 an Exercises for Chapter 2 2.2 1. (i) In matrix notation we have Ax 0 1 A1 0 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 2 1 r2' r2 r1 r3 r3 r1 0 1 1 2 where 2 1 0 0 2 1 . r3' r3 0.5r2 0 0 1.5 2 Thus r ( A) 3 for all values of other than 0.75 , in which case we only have the trivial solution. (ii). If 0.75 , r ( A) 2 3 so we have an infinite number of solutions. If this is the case the original system has the same solutions as x1 2 x3 0 2 x2 x3 0. 17 Let x3 , any real number. Then x2 / 2 and x1 2 , so our general solution is 2 x / 2 . * 2. In matrix notation we have Ax 0 1 2 2 3 where A 1 0 2 13 . 3 5 4 0 As A is 3 4 we must have r ( A) 4, the number of variables. Hence if a nontrivial solution exists, an infinite number of solutions exist. 1 2 2 3 A 0 2 4 16 r2 r2 r1 0 1 2 9 r r 3r 3 3 1 1 2 2 3 0 1 2 8 r2 1 r2 0 1 2 9 2 1 2 2 3 0 1 2 8 . r3 r3 r2 1 0 0 0 Hence r ( A) 3 and the original system has the same solution as x1 2 x2 2 x3 3x4 0 x2 2 x3 8 x4 0 x4 0 x2 2 x3 , x1 2 x3 . Let x3 , where is any real number. Then x2 2 and x1 2 so 2 2 x* 0 is the general solution. 18 3. Rewrite the system as x 3z ky 0 2x 4z 3y 0 3x 22 ky 0 which can be represented in matrix notation as Ax 0 1 3 k where A 2 4 3 3 2 k 3 k 3 k 1 1 0 10 3 2k 0 10 3 2k . 11 r2 r2 2r1 2k r3 r3 10 r2 0 0 3.3 0.2k 0 11 r3 r3 3r1 If k 33/ 2 then r ( A) 3 and the only solution is the trivial solution. Thus for k 33/ 2 we have a nontrivial solution and for this case our system has the same solution as x1 3x2 33 / 2 x3 0 10 x2 30 x3 0. So x2 3x3 and x1 15x3 / 2 , and our general solution is 15 /12 x* 3 for any real number . 2.3 1. In matrix notation our system is Ax b 1 1 1 2 where A 2 1 2 and b 5 . 4 3 4 c 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Then ( A b) 2 1 2 5 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 4 3 4 c r2 r2 2r1 0 1 0 c 8 r2 r2 0 1 0 c 8 r3 r3 4r1 19 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 . r3 r3 r2 0 0 0 c 9 If c 9 then r ( A) 2 but r ( A b) 3 and the equations are inconsistent. For c 9 our system has the same solution as x1 x2 x3 2 x2 1. A particular solution to this system would be x3 0, x2 1, x1 3. The homogeneous equations are x1 x2 x3 0 x2 0 which have a general solution of the form x3 , x2 0, x1 for any real number . Hence the general solution to our nonhomogeneous equation is 3 x 1 . * 2. In matrix notation we have 3 3 x 9 1 3 17 8 y 49 , 3 4 1 z c or Ax b where 3 2 9 3 2 9 3 2 9 1 1 1 ( A b) 3 17 8 49 0 26 14 22 0 13 7 11 r r 3r 1 3 4 1 c r2r 2 3r 1 0 13 7 c 27 r2 2 r2 0 13 7 c 27 3 3 1 9 1 3 2 0 13 7 11 . r3 r3 r2 0 0 0 c 38 Clearly r ( A) 2 3, the number of variables. Hence no unique solution exists as this requires that r ( A b) r ( A) 3. 20 If c 38 then r ( A b) r ( A) and the equations are inconsistent. No solution exists. (a) (b) If c 38 then r ( A b) r ( A) 2 which is less than the number of variables so an infinite number of solutions exist. For this case our equations have the same solution as x 3y 2z 9 13 y 7 z 11. Let y 0, then z 11/ 7 and x 85/ 7 so a particular solution to these nonhomogeneous equations is 85 1 0 . 7 11 The corresponding homogeneous equations have the same solution as x 3y 2z 0 13 y 7 z 0. Let z , where is any real number. Then y 7 /13 and x 5 /13 so the general solution to the homogeneous equations can be written as 5 7 . 13 13 Adding, we have the general solution to the nonhomogeneous equations is 85 / 7 5 /13 7 /13 . 11/ 7 3. (i) In matrix notation our system of equations is x1 1 4 17 4 38 x2 2 12 46 10 x 98 . 3 18 69 17 3 153 x 4 21 Consider 1 4 17 4 38 ( A b) 2 12 46 10 98 . 3 18 69 17 153 If the equations are consistent r ( A b) r ( A). But r ( A) min(3, 4) 4, where 4 is the number of variables, so the equations will then have an infinite number of solutions. (ii) 1 4 17 4 38 1 4 17 4 38 1 4 17 4 38 ( A b) 0 4 12 2 22 0 2 6 1 11 0 2 6 1 11 . r2 r2 2r1 r2 1 r2 0 6 18 5 39 r3 r3 3r2 0 0 0 2 6 0 6 18 5 39 2 r r 3r 3 3 1 Hence r ( A b) r ( A) 3 and the equations are consistent. 2 16 1 0 5 1 0 5 0 10 ( A b) 0 2 6 1 11 0 2 6 0 8 . r1 r1 2r2 0 0 0 1 3 r1 r1 2r3 0 0 0 1 3 1 r 2 r2 r3 r3 r3 2 It follows that the nonhomogeneous equations have the same solution as x1 5 x3 10 2 x2 6 x3 8 x4 3. Let x3 0, then x4 4 and x1 10, so a particular solution to this system is 10 4 . 0 3 22 The corresponding homogeneous system has the same solution as x1 5 x3 0 2 x2 6 x3 0 x4 0. Letting x3 , where is any real number we have x2 3 and x1 5 so the general solution to these homogeneous equations can be written as 5 3 . 0 Adding we see that the general solution to the nonhomogeneous equations can be written as 10 5 4 3 * x . 3 2.4 1. Writing our system as Ax b we have 1 2 2 1 2 2 (i) A 0 2 1 0 2 1 . r r r 1 0 1 3 3 1 0 2 3 Thus A 1 1 11 2 1 2 3 8, and the equations have a unique solution. Now 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 1 A 8 0 1 2 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 2 1 0 8 6 1 2 1 2 0 2 23 so the unique solution is 2 2 6 1 42 x 1 1 3 1 4 1 5 . 8 8 22 2 2 2 8 * (ii) 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 2 3 1 2 3 . 2 2 2 r3 r3 2r1 0 0 0 Thus A 0 and no unique solution exists. Moreover the first and the third equations are inconsistent, so no solution exists. (iii) 1 1 2 1 1 2 A 2 2 4 0 0 0, 3 3 6 r2 r2 2r1 3 2 6 so A 0, and no unique solution exists. Consider 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 A b 2 2 4 6 3 2 6 9 0 1 0 0 , 3 2 6 9 r2 r3 2 2 4 6 r2 r2 3r1 0 0 0 0 r r 2 r 3 3 1 thus r ( Ab) r ( A) 2 and we have an infinite number of solutions. Our system has the same solution as x y 22 3 y 0. Let z , any real number. Then the general solution can be written as 3 2 x 0 . * 2. Consider a system of n linear equations in n variables which we write as Ax b. 24 If A is nonsingular then the solution for xi can be written as a11 b1 a1n x * i / A, an1 bn ann where the numerator is obtained by replacing the ith column A by the vector b and taking the determinant. By Cramer’s rule, 1 2 2 x1 x2 x3 4 2 1 8 0 A 1 3 0 3 4 2 1 8 0 A 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 4 1 0 4 1 1 8 A 1 0 7 A 3 1 2 1 1 2 0 2 4 0 2 4 2 3 3 8 1 42 / 8. A 4 1 7 3 5/8 A 1 2 4 1 0 8 0 2 7 2 7 22 / 8. A A A Exercises for Chapter 3 3.2 1. (i) The endogenous variables are the variables of interest to us in our economic analysis. The whole purpose of building the model in the first place is to get some insight into what determines the values of these variables. The exogenous variables are variables whose values are taken as final for the purposes of our analysis. There are noneconomic variables, economic variables determined by noneconomic forces, or economic variables determined by economic forces other than those at play in the model. Definitional equations represent relationships between the variables of the model which are true by definition. Behavioral equations purport to tell us something of the behavior of some economic entities. The structural form is the original form of the model that comes to us from economists. The reduced form is obtained by solving for the endogenous variables in terms of the exogenous variables. The solutions are called the equilibrium values of the endogenous variables. A model is complete when the number of linear equations in the model equals the number of endogenous variables and the model has a unique solution. 25 (ii) Comparative static analysis concerns itself with how the equilibrium values of the endogenous variables change when we change the given values of the exogenous variables. If we write the structural form as Ax b where x is a vector containing the endogenous variables and b is a vector containing the endogenous variables or linear combinations of the exogenous variables, then the reduced form is given by x A1b and all our comparative static results are summarized by x A1b where b is the vector of changes in the values of the exogenous variables. Often in our economic analysis we are not interested in finding the complete reduced form. Instead, all that we are interested in is the equilibrium value of one of the endogenous variables and our comparative static analysis is concerned with how this equilibrium value changes when there are changes in the values of the exogenous variables. In this case we can use Cramer’s rule to solve for the equilibrium value of the endogenous variable in question. 2. (i) Isolating the endogenous variables on the left hand side of the equations we have Y C I G bY C a dY I c or in matrix notation 1 1 1 Y G b 1 0 C a , d 0 1 I c which we write as Ax b. Now we have three equations in three endogenous variables and 1 1 1 A 1 b d 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 b 1 d 26 1 1 b d, which we assume is nonzero so the model is complete. The reduced form is given by x * A1b 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 b d 0 1 1 1 1 0 b 0 b d 1 d 1 1 d 1 1 d 1 1 b 1 b 0 1 0 G 1 a 0 c 1 1 b d G 1 1 G 1 1 1 1 1 1 d d a b a . b 1 d 1 b d 1 b d d b 1 b c d 1 b 1 c (ii) We go to the first column of A1 and the elements of this column gives us the results. So 1 Y * 1 b d b C * 1 b d d I * . 1 b d (iii) Proceding as before we have Y C I G bY C a bT dY I c G so all that changes is that the vector b is now a bT whereas before it was c In our answer for (i) we replace a by a bT . If both exogenous variables increase by unit amounts then 1 b b 0 27 G a . c and 1 1 1 1 1 x b 1 d b b . 1 b d b 1 b b 0 * That is our results are obtained by adding to the first column of A1 , b times the second column of A1 . For example C* 3. b b(1 d ) bd . 1 b d 1 b d Isolating the endogenous variables on the left hand side we have Q βP βT Q bP a cR which in matrix notation is 1 Q α + βT . 1 b P a +cR Using Cramer’s rule, the equilibrium values of the endogenous variables are given by βT Q* a cR b b βT a cR 1 b 1 b and 1 βT P* (i) 1 a cR a cR βT . b b T 28 We have Q* bT ve ve ve ve ve ve. b ve ve ve Hence the increase in T leads to a decrease in the equilibrium quantity. Similarly P* T ve ve ve ve, b ve so the increase in T leads to a decrease in the equilibrium price. (ii) R Similarly βcR ve ve ve Q* ve, b ve so the decrease in rainfall leads to a decrease in the equilibrium quantity, and P* cR ve ve ve, b ve so the decrease in rainfall leads to an increase in equilibrium price. 4. Substituting the consumption and investments functions into the definitional equation, then isolating the endogenous variables o the left hand side gives Y (1 ) δr G τY + λr M . Using Cramer’s rule, the equilibrium values of our endogenous variables are given by 29 G M G δM Y* 1 (1 ) 1 G r* M 1 (1 ) M ( G ) . (1 ) If G and M change by G and M respectively we have the resultant change in r * is given by 1 M G . r * 1 We want r * to be zero which implies that 1 M G 0. So the required decrease in M is given by G M . 1 Exercises for Chapter 4 4.1 1 0.5 x1 . 0 x2 (i) x1 x2 0.5 (ii) x y 13 16 x . 16 17 y 3 1 1.5 x1 (iii) x1 x2 x3 1 1 2 x2 . 1.5 2 3 x3 30 3 1 0 x1 (iv) x1 x2 x3 1 1 2 x2 . 0 2 8 x 3 42 1.5 4 x1 (v) x1 x2 x3 1.5 2 3 x2 . 4 3 7 x3 4.2 1. (i) Consider A I 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 so the matrix has the eigenvalues 1 0 and 2 2. (ii) Consider 5 A I 2 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 31 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 3 3 5 2 2 1 1 1 5 1 4 1 5 6 2 5 1 6 so the matrix has eigenvalues 1 1, 2 0 and 3 6. (iii) Consider 2 A I 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 1 3 , so the matrix has eigenvalues 1 1, 2 0 and 3 3. (iv) Consider 3 A I 2 2 3 0 0 0 5 1 3 3 3 0 5 2 5 3 4 5 2 6 5 5 5 1 , so the eigenvalues are 1 2 5 and 3 1. 31 1 2 2 3 2. Consider A I a1 b b a2 a1 a2 b2 a1a2 a1 a2 2 b 2 so the equation which defines the eigenvalues is the quadratic equation 2 a1 a2 a1a2 b2 0. This equation has equal roots if and only if 2 a1 a2 4 a1a2 b2 0. That is a1 a2 4b 2 0, but clearly this is impossible, for b 0. 2 4.4 1. (i) The vectors x1 , ... , xm are orthogonal if xi x j 0 for i j. They are orthonormal if they are orthogonal and xi xi 1 for i 1,..., n. (ii) Consider 1 yx y1 y2 y3 1 y1 y2 3 y3 . 3 For y and x to be orthogonal we want this expression to equal zero. Hence three vectors orthogonal to x would be 1 1 3 1 , 1 , 0 . 0 0 1 (iii) Consider 1 y x1 1 y1 y2 y3 1 1 y1 y2 y3 . 3 3 1 For y to be orthogonal to x1 we want this expression to be zero. Hence 1 1 1 and 0 0 1 would be orthogonal to x1 . Normalizing these vectors we have that 32 1 1 1 1 x2 1 and x3 0 2 2 0 1 meet the requirement. 2. (i) Consider A I 2 4 4 2 2 16 4 4 2 16 2 4 12, 2 so the matrix has two eigenvalues 1 6 and 2 2. Eigenvector for 1 6 Consider 4 4 x1 0 . 4 4 x2 0 A 1I x Both the equations give x1 x2 . We want our eigenvector to be normalized, that is x12 x22 1 so 2 x22 1 and we can take x2 1 . 2 Thus an eigenvector corresponding to 1 that meets the requirements is x1 1 1 . 2 1 Eigenvector for 2 2 Consider 4 4 x1 0 . 4 4 x2 0 A 2 I x 33 Both these equations give x1 x2 so a normalized vector corresponding to 2 would be x2 1 1 . 2 1 Clearly x1 and x2 are orthonormal. (ii) Consider A I 4 2 2 1 4 1 4 5 , so the matrix has eigenvalues 1 0 and 2 5. Eigenvector for 1 0 Consider 4 2 x1 0 . 2 1 x2 0 A 1I x Ax Both these equations give x2 2 x1. We want our eigenvector to be normalized, so we require that 5 x12 1 and we can take x1 1/ 5. Our eigenvector associated with 1 would then be x1 1 1 . 5 2 Eigenvector for 2 5 Consider 1 2 x1 0 . 2 4 x2 0 A 2 I x Both equations give x1 2 x2 34 so the required eigenvector is 2 x2 1 . 2 1 (iii) From exercise 1. (iii) of 4.2 we know the eigenvalues for this matrix are 1 1, 2 0, and 3 3. Eigenvector for 1 1 Consider 1 1 1 x1 0 A 1I x 1 0 0 x2 0 1 0 0 x 0 3 which render the equations x1 x2 x3 0 x1 0, so x3 x2 . For the vector to be normalized we want x12 x22 x32 1 which implies that 2 x22 1 so take x2 1/ 2. Our eigenvector associated with 1 would then be 0 1 x1 1 . 2 1 Eigenvector for 2 0 Consider 2 1 1 x1 0 A 2 I x 1 1 0 x2 0 1 0 1 x 0 3 which gives 2 x1 x2 x3 0 x1 x2 0 x1 x3 0. 35 Thus x1 x3 x2 . The normalized requirement implies that 3 x12 1 so we can take x1 1 and the 3 required eigenvector would be 1 x2 1 1 . 3 1 Eigenvector for 3 3 Consider 1 1 1 x1 0 A 3 I x 1 2 0 x2 0 . 0 0 2 x 0 3 That is x1 x2 x3 0 x1 2 x2 0 x1 2 x2 0, so x1 2 x2 2 x3 . For the vector to be normalized we require 6 x22 1 so we take x2 eigenvector associated with 3 would be 2 1 x3 1 . 6 1 4.5 1. (i) Consider 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 ; 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 so the matrix is orthogonal. (ii) Consider 0 2 1 3 2 6 3 2 2 0 3 3 1 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 1 which establishes the result. 36 1 and the 6 (iii) Consider 0 5 5 0 6 2 6 1 0 0 1 6 2 5 2 5 2 5 5 0 1 0 ; 30 2 1 0 0 1 2 6 5 1 5 so the matrix is orthogonal. 2. Now 1 2 1 QQ 1 3 2 1 2 2 1 0 . 1 0 1 1 QAQ 1 3 2 2 1 1 2 and 2 2 1 2 0 1 0 1 3 3 2 3 2 0 0 . 0 3 3. 2 1 2 1 From exercise 1 of 4.2 we have that the eigenvalues of this matrix are 1 2 5 and 3 1. Consider the following set of equations 2 2 0 x1 0 A 1I x 2 2 0 x2 0 0 0 0 x 0 3 which imply that x1 x2 and x3 can take any value. Taking x3 0 the normalization condition requires that x12 x22 1. That is 2 x12 1 so we can take x1 1/ 2. This gives the following eigenvector 1 1 x1 1 . 2 0 Taking x3 1 the normalization condition requires that x12 x22 1 1. So x1 x2 0. A second eigenvector associated with the repeated roots that meet our requirements would be 0 x2 0 . 1 37 Consider now 2 2 0 x1 0 A 3 I x 2 2 0 x2 0 0 0 4 x 0 3 which imply that x1 x2 , x3 0. The normalization condition requires then that 2 x12 1 so we take x1 1 and our eigenvector is 2 1 x3 1 1 . 2 0 A Q that meets our requirement is 1/ 2 0 1/ 2 Q 1/ 2 0 1/ 2 . 0 1 0 The main diagonal elements of QAQ are the eigenvalues 5, 5, and 1. 4. (i) (a) From exercise 1. (i) of 4.2 the eigenvalues of this matrix are 1 0 and 2 2. Consider the equations 1 1 x1 0 ( A 1I ) x Ax , 1 1 x2 0 which renders x1 x2 . The normalized condition requires x12 x22 1 so we take x1 1/ 2 and 1 x1 1 2 1 as our eigenvector. The equations 1 1 x1 0 ( A 2 I ) x 1 1 x2 0 38 give x1 x2 so we take 1 x2 1 2 1 as our eigenvector. Then 1 1 Q 1 . 2 1 1 The main diagonal elements are the eigenvalues 0 and 2. (b) From exercise 1. (ii) of 4.2 the eigenvalues of this matrix are 1 1, 2 0, 3 6 , so first we consider 4 2 1 x1 0 ( A 1I ) x 2 0 0 x2 0 1 0 0 x 0 3 which gives x1 0 and x3 2 x2 . The normalization requirement is then 5 x22 1 so we take x2 1 5 and 0 1 x1 1 5 2 as the eigenvector associated with 1. Next consider 5 2 1 x1 0 ( A 2 I ) x Ax 2 1 0 x2 0 1 0 1 x 0 3 which gives 5 x1 2 x2 x3 0 2 x1 x2 0 x1 x3 0. So we have x1 x3 x2 / 2. The normalization requires then that 3 x22 1 so we take x2 2 and as our eigenvector, 3 2 1 1 x2 2 . 6 1 39 Lastly, 1 x1 0 1 2 ( A 3 I ) x 2 5 0 x2 0 1 0 5 x 0 3 which gives x1 5 x2 0 2 x1 5 x2 0 so x1 5 x3 2.5 x2 . Normalization requires that x12 x22 x32 1 so 30 x32 1 and we take x3 1/ 30 and as our eigenvector 5 x3 1 2 . 30 1 An orthogonal Q that meets our requirements is 0 5 5 Q 1 6 2 5 2 . 30 2 6 5 1 The main diagonal elements of QAQ are the eigenvalues 1, 0, 6. (c) From exercise 2. (iii) of 4.4 we have that a set of orthonormal vectors for this matrix are 0 1 2 x1 1 1 , x2 1 1 , x3 1 1 2 3 6 1 1 1 so 0 2 Q 1 3 2 6 3 2 2 1 . 1 The main diagonal elements are the eigenvalues. (ii) (a) As the eigenvalues are 0 and 2 we know the matrix is positive semidefinite and xAx 0 for all x . (b) As the eigenvalues are 0, 1, and 6 the matrix is positive semidefinite and xAx 0 for all x. (c) Again the eigenvalues are 0, 1, and 3 so the matrix is positive semidefinite and xAx 0 for all x. 40 4.6 1. (i) From exercise 1 of 4.5 a set of orthonormal eigenvectors for this matrix is 1 1 1 2 . and 3 2 2 1 so we consider the transformation y Qx 1 where Q 1 3 2 That is 1 2 . 2 1 2 x2 y1 1 x1 3 3 y2 x1 1 x2 . 2 (ii) From exercise 2 of 4.5 a transformation that meets our requirements is 1 1 0 2 2 y 0 0 1 x. 1 1 0 2 2 That is y1 1 x1 1 x2 2 2 y2 x3 y3 1 x1 1 x2 . 2 2 2. In matrix notation the quadratic form can be written as 1 2 x x y , 2 1 y so we consider A I 1 2 2 1 1 4 2 3 1 and equating this determinant to zero gives eigenvalues 1 3 and 2 1. 41 Consider 2 2 x1 0 2 2 x2 A 1I x which gives x1 x2 so a normalized eigenvector would be x1 1 1 . 2 1 Consider 2 2 x1 0 2 2 x2 0 A 2 I so x1 x2 and a normalized eigenvector would be 1 x2 1 . 2 1 The required transformation is x 1 1 1 v1 . 2 1 1 v2 y The quadratic form is indefinite as one of the eigenvalues is positive whereas the other is negative. 3. If A is an n n positive definite matrix then all the eigenvalues of A are positive so there exists an orthogonal matrix Q such that 0 1 QAQ 0 n where 1 ,..., n are all positive. Let 1 D 0 0 . n Then as Q is orthogonal A Q D D Q so let P D Q . 42 4.7 1. Consider A i i n i in A and AA i ii i / n2 A as i i n, so A is symmetric and idempotent. Now B I A I A B as A is symmetric and BB I A I A) I 2 A A2 B as A is idempotent, so B is also symmetric idempotent. AB A I A A A2 0 as A is idempotent. As A and B are symmetric idempotent their ranks are equal to their traces so r ( A) trA trii / n 1 and r ( B) trB tr I A trI trA n 1. As the eigenvalues of a symmetric idempotent matrix are 1 or 0 and as the rank of a symmetric matrix is equal to the number of nonzero eigenvalues, A has n1 eigenvalues of 0 and 1 eigenvalue of 1 whereas B has n1 eigenvalues of 1 and 1 eigenvalue of 0. It follows that both A and B are positive semi definite matrices (clearly all symmetric idempotent matrices are). Moreover as the determinant of a symmetric matrix is the product of the eigenvalues both matrices have zero determinants. 2. Consider 1 1 N X X X X X X X X N and NN X X X X X X X X N 1 1 so N is symmetric idempotent. Now M I N I N 43 as N is symmetric and MM I N I N I 2 N N 2 M as N is idempotent, so M is also symmetric idempotent. Also MN I N N N N 2 0 as N is idempotent. Finally 1 r ( N ) trN tr X X X X trI K K and r (M ) trM trI n K n K . The matrix N has K eigenvalues of 1 and nK eigenvalues of 0 whereas M has nK eigenvalues of 1 and K eigenvalues of 0. Both matrices have determinants of 0. 3. (i) From exercise 1. (iii) of 4.2 the eigenvalues of this matrix are 1, 0 and 3, so clearly the trace of the matrix is the sum of the eigenvalues. Now 2 1 1 1 1 0 3 3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0, 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 so the determinant is the product of the eigenvalues. The rank is 2. (ii) From exercise 1. (ii) of 4.2 the eigenvalues are 1, 0, and 6 so clearly the trace is equal to the sum of the eigenvalues. Now 5 2 1 4 2 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 3 4 2 2 1 0 so the determinant is the product of the eigenvalues. The rank is 2. (iii) From exercise 4. (i) of 4.5 the eigenvalues are 1, 0, and 3, so clearly the trace is the sum of the eigenvalues. The determinant is clearly zero, the product of the eigenvalues and the rank is 2. 4.8 1. (i) The leading principal minors are 3 2 0 3 2 3 2 3, 5, 2 3 0 5(1)33 25. 2 3 2 3 0 0 5 These alternate in sign, the first being negative. Thus the matrix is negative definite. 44 (ii) The leading principal minors are 3, 3 3 1 1 2, 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 2 8 0 6 2 1(1) 21 2 8 2 6 2 8 4. These alternate in sign, the first being negative. Thus the matrix is negative definite. 2. The principal minors are 2, 1, 1, 1 0 0 1 2 1 1 1, 2 1 1 1 1, 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0. 1 0 1 1 0 1 The principal minors are all nonnegative with one being zero. Thus the matrix is positive semidefinite. 3. The first order principal minors are 1, 3, and 8 but a second order principal minor is 1 2 2 3 1. This is enough to establish that the matrix is indefinite. Exercises for Chapter 5 5.2 1. Let f x1,..., xn f ( x) be a differentiable function of many variables. Then the gradient vector of f(x) is f1 ( x ) . f ( x ) f ( x) n That is it is the vector of first order partial derivatives of the function. The Hessian matrix of the function is f1n ( x ) f11 ( x ) . H x f ( x) f ( x ) nn n1 That is it is the matrix of all second order partial derivatives of f(x). (i) so y1 3x12 x22 , y2 x13 x2 3x12 x22 y ( x ) 3 . 2 x1 x2 y11 6 x1 x22 , y12 6 x12 x2 , y22 2 x13 45 so the Hessian matrix is 6 x1 x22 H ( x) 2 6 x1 x2 (ii) so 6 x12 x2 . 2 x13 y1 5 x14 6 x1 x2 , y2 3x12 2 x2 5x14 6 x1 x2 y ( x ) . 2 3x1 x2 y11 20 x13 6 x2 , y12 6 x1 , y22 2 so 20 x13 6 x2 H ( x) 6 x1 6 x1 . 2 (iii) y1 1/ x2 , y2 x1 / x22 so 1/ x2 y ( x ) . 2 x1 / x2 y11 0, y12 1/ x22 , y22 2 x1 / x23 , 0 1/ x22 H x . 2 3 1/ x 2 x / x 2 1 2 (iv) Write y x1 x2 x1 x2 . Then 1 y1 x1 x2 x1 x2 x1 x2 2 x2 x1 x2 , 1 2 2 y2 x1 x2 x1 x2 x1 x2 2 x1 x1 x2 , 1 2 2 so 2 x2 x1 x2 2 . y x 2 x x x 2 1 1 2 y11 4 x2 x1 x2 , 3 y12 2 x1 x2 4 x2 x1 x2 2 x1 x2 x1 x2 , 2 3 3 y22 4 x1 x1 x2 , 3 so H ( x) 4 x2 2 x1 x2 1 . 3 4 x1 x1 x2 2 x1 x2 46 (v) y1 5 x12 x22 2 x1 10 x1 x12 2 x22 , 4 4 y2 5 x12 2 x22 4 xx 20 x2 x12 2 x22 , 4 4 so 4 10 x1 y x x12 2 x22 . 20 x2 y11 10 x12 2 x22 40 x1 x12 2 x22 2 x1 4 3 x12 2 x22 90 x12 20 x22 3 y12 40 x1 x12 2 x22 8 x2 320 x1 x2 x12 2 x22 3 3 y22 20 x12 2 x22 80 x2 x12 2 x22 4 x2 4 3 x12 2 x22 360 x12 20 x22 , 3 so 2 2 3 90 x 20 x 1 2 H ( x ) x12 2 x22 320 x1 x2 (vi) y1 320 x1 x2 . 360 x22 20 x12 2 x13 3x24 , y , x12 x23 2 x12 x23 so y x 2 x13 1 . x12 x23 3x24 Write y1 2 x13 x12 x23 so 1 y11 6 x14 x12 x23 2 x13 x12 x23 1 2 x14 x12 3x23 x12 x23 y12 2 x13 x12 x23 6 x13 x24 2 2 x 3 1 2 3 x x x . 2 1 2 4 2 3 2 2 Write y2 3x24 x12 x23 so 1 y22 12 x25 x12 x23 3x24 x12 x23 1 3x25 4 x12 x23 x12 x23 2 47 2 3x 4 2 so 2 x14 x12 3x23 6 x13 x24 1 . H x 2 3x25 4 x12 x23 x12 x23 6 x13 xx4 (vii) y1 e 2 x1 3 x2 , y2 3e 2 x1 3 x2 so 2 y x e2 x1 3 x2 . 3 y11 4e2 x1 3 x2 , y12 6e2 x1 3 x2 , y22 9e2 x1 3 x2 , so 4 6 H x e2 x1 3 x2 . 6 9 (viii) y1 6 x1 x2 7 x2 , y2 3x12 7 x1 / 2 x2 so 6 x1 x2 7 x2 y x 2 3x 7 x / 2 x 1 1 2 3 y11 6, y12 6 x1 7 / 2 x2 , y22 7 x1 / 4 x2 2 so 6 H x 6x 7 / 2 x 2 1 2. 6 x1 7 / 2 x2 . 3 2 7 x1 / 4 x2 y x y x 2 1 2, 2 2 2, x1 x1 x2 x2 x1 x2 x22 x12 2y 2 2 1 2 2 2 x x x x x 2 x 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 . x12 x x 2 2 By symmetry x12 x22 2y , x22 x 2 x 2 2 2 2 48 so clearly, 2y 2y 0. x12 x22 5.3 1. (i) (a) AB x2 x1 A B is convex. A B E2 x2 x1 A B E 2 is convex. 49 (b) AB x2 x1 A B is convex AB x2 x1 A B is not convex 50 (c) AB x2 x1 A B is convex. AB x2 x1 A B is convex. (ii) (a) Let u X , v X cu z,and cv z Consider c u 1 v cu 1 cv z 1 z z, so u 1 v X . 51 0 1 (b) Let u, v X Au b and Av b and consider A u 1 v Au 1 Av 0 1 b 1 b b so u 1 v X . (c) Similar to (b) (d) Let u and v X ui 0, vi 0 and consider u 1 v for 0 1. The ith element of this point is ui 1 vi 0 1 0 0, so this point also belongs to the non negative orthant. 2. Suppose S had two points say u and v. Then all points u 1 v S for 0 1. But this contradicts S having a finite number of elements. So S has no or one point only. 3. Suppose s1, t1 S T s1 S and t1 T and s2 , t2 S T s2 S and t2 T. Consider the point s1 , t1 1 s2 , t2 s1 , 1 s2 , t1 1 t2 0 1 As S is convex s1 1 s2 S and as T is convex t1 1 t2 T. Graph of S T t t2 T t1 s1 S 52 s2 s 4. Let u, v X 1 X 2 u, v X 1 and u, v X 2 u 1 v X 1 and u 1 v X 2 u 1 v X1 X 2 so X 1 X 2 is convex. X 1 X 2 need not be convex as the following counter example shows: x1 X1 x2 X2 X 1 x E 2 / x1 0, x1 2, x2 0, x2 2 X 2 x E 2 / x12 x22 1. 5. Let y f x1 ,..., xn f x be a function of many variables. This function is homogeneous of degree r if f x1 ,..., xn r f x1,..., xn . Euler’s theorem If y f x is homogeneous of degree r and differentiable then x1 f f . . . xn rf x . x1 xn 53 (i) Consider 1 1 f x, y x 2 y 2 3 x y f x , y , 1 2 and the function is homogeneous of degree 1. Now 1 12 12 1 12 12 1 f x x y 6 xy , f y x y 3x 2 y 2 2 2 so xf x yf y 1 12 12 1 1 1 x y 6 xy 1 x 2 y 2 3x 2 y 1 f ( x, y ) 2 2 and Euler’s theorem holds. (ii) Consider 3 1 f x, y x 4 y 4 6 x f x, y so the function is homogeneous of degree 1. Now 3 1 1 1 3 3 f x x 4 y 4 6, f y x 4 y 4 4 4 so 3 43 14 1 43 14 xf x yf y x y 6 x x y f x, y , 4 4 and Euler’s theorem holds. x y 3 f x, y f x, y 2 2 x y 2 (iii) 2 so the function is homogeneous of degree 0. f x 2 x x 2 y 2 x 2 x 2 y 2 2 x 2 xy 2 x 2 y 2 1 2 2 f y 2 y x 2 y 2 y 2 x 2 y 2 2 y 2 yx 2 x 2 y 2 . 1 Thus 2 xf x yf y 2 x 2 y 2 2 y 2 x 2 x 2 y 2 0, 2 so Euler’s theorem holds. (iv) f x, y 3 x y 2 x y 3 x y 6 f x, y so the function is homogeneous of degree 6. f x 15x 4 y 4 xy 4 9 x 2 y 3 , f y 3x5 8x 2 y 3 9 x 3 y 2 , 5 2 4 54 3 3 so xf x yf y 15x5 y 4 x 2 y 4 9 x 3 y 3 3 yx5 8x 2 y 4 9 x 3 y 3 6 f x, y and Euler’s theorem holds. 6. (i) For the Cobb-Douglas function Q K , L A K L Q K , L so the function is homogeneous of degree . For the CES production function Q K , L A a1 K a2 L 1 1 Q K , L Q K , L , so the function is homogeneous of degree 1. (ii) For the Cobb-Douglas function QK AK 1L , QL AK L 1 so KQK LQK AK L AK L Q K , L , and Euler’s theorem holds. For the CES production function 1 1 1 1 1 1 QK A a1K a2 L a1 K 1 , QL A a1K a2 L a2 L 1 so 1 KQK LQL A a1K a2 L 1 a K 1 a2 L Q K , L and Euler’s theorem holds. (iii) For the Cobb-Douglas function 1 QK K , L A K L 1QK K , L so the marginal product QK is homogeneous of degree 1 . Similarly QL is homogeneous of degree 1 . For the CES production function QK K , L A a1 K a2 L 1 oQK K , L , 55 a1 K 1 QK K , L 1 1 so the marginal product QK is homogeneous of degree 0. 7. As f1 x1, x2 is homogeneous of degree r1 we have by Euler’s theorem that x1 f11 x2 f12 r 1 f1 so x12 f11 x1x2 f12 r 1 x1 f1. (1) Similarly as f 2 x1, x2 is homogeneous of degree r1 we have x2 x1 f12 x22 f 22 r 1 x2 f 2 (2) Adding (1) and (2) gives x12 f11 2 x1 x2 f12 x22 f 22 r 1 x1 f1 x2 f 2 r r 1 f , by Euler’s theorem. 8. (i) A set X Rn is a convex set if u, v X u 1 v X , 0 1. A function f(x) is convex if f u 1 f v f u 1 v for all points u, v in the domain of the function. f1 x2 , f 2 x1 , f11 0, f12 1, f 22 0 so the Hessian matrix is 0 1 H ( x) . 1 0 Principal minors are 0, 0, 1, so the function is neither convex nor concave. (ii) f x 4 x3 6 xy 2 , f y 4 y 3 6 x 2 y f xx 12 x 2 6 y 2 , f xy 12 xy, f yy 12 y 2 6 x 2 so the Hessian matrix is 12 x 2 6 x 2 12 xy H ( x, y ) . 2 2 12 xy 12 y 6 y The principal minors are 12 x 2 6 y 2 ,12 y 2 6 x 2 and 12 x 2 6 x 2 12 y 2 6 x 2 144 x 2 y 2 72 x 4 72 y 4 36 x 2 y 2 so these principal minors are 0 on R 2 . Thus the Hessian matrix is positive semidefinite and the function is convex. 56 (iii) f x 6 x 2 y 3, so the Hessian matrix is 6 2 H . 2 2 f y 2 x 2 y 4, f xx 6, f xy 2 f yy 2 The principal minors are 6, 2, 8 so the matrix is negative semidefinite and the function is concave. (iv) f x e x y e x y 3 , f y e x y e x y 1 , 2 2 x y x y x y x y f xx e e , f xy e e , f yy e x y e x y so the Hessian matrix is e x y e x y H ( x, y ) x y x y e e e x y e x y . e x y e x y The principal minors of this matrix are e x y e x y and e x y e x y e x y e x y 4e2 x which are all greater than zero on R2 and thus H is 2 2 positive semidefinite. The function is (strictly) convex. (v) f x 2 2 x 2 y , so the Hessian matrix is 2 2 H . 2 2 f y 1 2 x 2 y , f xx 2, f xy 2, f yy 2, The first order principal minors are 2 and 2 and the second order principal minor is 0 so the matrix is negative semidefinite and the function is concave. (vi) f x 1 e x e x y , f y 1 e x y , Thus the Hessian matrix is e x e x y e x y H ( x, y ) . e x y e x y f xx e x e x y , f xy e x y , f yy e x y . The first order principal minors are e x e x y and e x y which are both 0 on R 2 and the second order principal minor is e x y e x e x y e 2( x y ) e x e x y which is 0 on R 2 thus the Hessian matrix is negative definite on R2 and the function is concave. 9. f x 2 x y 3x 2 , f y 2 y x, so the Hessian matrix is 2 6 x 1 H x, y . 1 2 f xx 2 6 x, 57 f xy 1, f yy 2 For the function to be concave we want this matrix to be negative semidefinite. Thus we require all the first order principal minors to be 0, that is, 2 6 x 0 x 1 . 3 We also require that the second-order principal minor be 0, that is, 4 12 x 1 0 x 7 /12. Hence the largest convex domain in E 2 for which the function is concave is x D x 7 /12 . y 10. (i) f x 6 x 2 y 3, so the Hessian matrix is 6 2 H . 2 2 f y 2 x 2 y 4, f xx 6, f xy 2, f yy 2 Leading principal minors are 6 and H 8, so the matrix is negative definite on R2 and the function is strictly concave. (ii) f x 4 x3 2 xy 2 3, f y 2 x 2 y 4 y 3 8, f xx 12 x 2 2 y 2 , f xy 4 xy, so the Hessian matrix is 12 x 2 2 y 2 H x, y 4 xy f yy 2 x 2 2 y 2 . 2 x 12 y 4 xy 2 2 The first order leading principal minor is 12 x 2 2 y 2 which is 0 on the set. The second order leading principal minor is 12 x 2 2 y 2 2 x 2 12 y 2 16 x 2 y 2 24 x 4 132 x 2 y 2 24 y 4 which is also 0 on the set. Hence the Hessian matrix is positive definite on the set and the function is strictly convex on the set. (iii) 3 1 1 3 fx 1 x 4 y 4 , fx 1 x4 y 4 , 4 4 7 1 3 3 f xx 3 x 4 y 4 , f xy 1 x 4 y 4 , 16 16 1 so the Hessian matrix is 3x 74 y 14 H x, y 1 16 43 43 x y 7 f yy 3 x 4 y 4 16 3 3 x 4 y 4 . 1 7 4 4 3x y 58 5 1 The first order leading principal minor is 3 x 4 y 4 which is 0 on the positive orthant whereas the 16 second order principal minor is 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 x2 y2 1 x2 y2 1 x2 y2 256 256 32 which is 0 on the positive orthant so the Hessian matrix is negative definite on the positive orthant and the function is strictly concave on this set. (iv) f x 3e x , f y 20 y 3 , f xx 3e x , f xy 0, so the Hessian matrix is 3e x H x, y , z 0 0 f z 1/ z, f xz 0, 0 60 y 2 0 f yy 60 y 2 , f yz 0, f 22 1/ z 2 , 0 0 . 1/ z 2 The first-order principal minor is 3e x which is positive, on the positive orthant, the second order principal minor is 180e x y 2 which is positive on the positive orthant, and the third order principal minor is 180e x y 2 / z 2 which is also positive on the set. So the Hessian matrix is positive definite on the positive orthant and the function is strictly convex on that set. 11. QK aAK a 1Lb , QL bAK a Lb1 , QKK a a 1 AK a2 Lb , QKL abAK a1Lb1, QLL b b 1 AK a Lb2 so the Hessian matrix is a(a 1) AK a 2 Lb abAK a 1Lb1 H K, L abAK a 1Lb1 b(b 1) AK a Lb2 (i) For the function to be concave we want the first-order principal minors to be 0 and the second order principal minor to be 0. Consider the first order principal minor a(a 1) AK 2 Lb which is 0 on the positive orthant if Aa (a 1) 0. With A 0 this requires that a 0 and a 1. Similarly we require b 0 and b 1. The second-order principal minor is AK a 1 b1 2 L ab(a 1)(b 1) a 2b2 AK a 1Lb1 ab(1 a b). 2 With A 0, a 0, b 0 for this to be 0 on the positive orthant implies that a b 1. Moreover a b 1 with a 0 and b 0 implies that both a and b are 1. Hence the function is concave on the positive orthant if A 0, a 0, b 0 and a b 1. 59 (ii) For the function to be strictly concave, the first order leading principal minor of the Hessian matrix should be 0 which requires that Aa (a 1) 0 so with A 0 we need a 0 and a 1. The second order leading principal minor must also be 0 which requires that ab 1 a b 0. With a 0 this implies that b 0 and a b 1 as required. 12. As f x and g x are convex functions f u 1 v f u 1 f v g u 1 v g u 1 g v , for 0 1. Let h x af x bg x and consider h u 1 v af u 1 v bg u 1 v a f u 1 f v b g u 1 g v h u 1 h v , so h(x) is convex. 13. Let x1 and x2 belong to S so f x1 k and f x2 k. We wish to prove that x1 1 x2 S for 0 1. Now as f(x) is convex for 0 1, f x1 1 x2 f x1 1 f x2 k 1 k k. If f(x) is a concave function then S x / f x k is a convex set. 5.4 1. Consider a nonlinear equation (5.1) F y, x1,..., xn 0. The implicit function theorem addresses the question when it is possible to solve this equation for y as a differentiable function of x1 ,..., xn . In nonlinear economic models equilibrium conditions often give rise to an equation like (5.1). In this equation the y is the endogenous variable and x1 ,..., xn are the exogeneous variables. Before any comparative static analysis can be conducted we need to know the condition required to ensure that we can solve the equilibrium equation for y as a differentiable function of x1 ,..., xn . 60 2. (i) Clearly the point satisfies the equation and the function on the left hand side has continuous partial derivatives. Consider Fy 4 x 2 14 xy 10 at the point in question, so an implicit function exists in the neighbourhood of this point. Differentiating both sides of the equation with respect to x, remembering that y can now be regarded as a function of x gives dy dy 3x2 8xy 4 x 2 7 y 2 14 xy 0 dx dx so dy 4 x2 14 xy 7 y 2 3x 2 8xy dx and dy 7 y 2 3x 2 8 xy . dx 4 x 2 14 xy (ii) The point satisfies the equation and the function on the left hand side has continuous partial derivatives. Moreover Fy 8 x 4 y 3 1 at the point, so an implicit function exists in the neighbourhood of this point. Differentiating both sides of the equation with respect to x, remembering y can be treated now as a function of x gives dy dy 2 x 8 y 8x 4 y3 0 dx dx so dy 4 y3 8x 2 x 8 y dx and 3. dy 2x 8 y 3 . dx 4 y 8x The point satisfies the equation and the function of the equation has continuous partial derivatives. Consider Fy 2 x2 2 y 2 at the point. So such an implicit function exists. Differentiating both sides of the equation with respect to x1 and x2 gives y y 1 3 x2 2 x 2 2y 0 x1 x1 61 so y 2 x2 y 1 3x2 x1 and 1 3 x2 y 2 x1 2 x2 y at the point in question. Similarly 3x1 2 y 2 x2 giving y y 2 x2 2 y 0 x2 x2 3 x 2 y 2 x2 y 1 5 x2 2 2 x2 y at the point. 4. Write the equilibrium condition as Y C Y I Y M Y G X 0. We assume the functions have continuous derivatives. Consider FY 1 C I M . For a solution to exist we require I C I M 0. Differentiating our equilibrium condition with respect to G, regarding Y as a function of G and X gives Y C Y I Y M Y 1 0 G G G G so 5. Y 1 . G 1 C I M The point satisfies the equations and the functions have continuous partial derivatives. The Jacobian determinant is 5 y14 1 J 15 y14 y22 2 y1 2 2 2 y2 3 y2 at the point so the implicit functions exist. 62 Differentiating both sides of the equations with respect to x, treating y1 and y2 as functions of x, we have dy dy 5 y14 1 2 1 dx dx dy 2 y1 1 3 y22 dy2 dx 2 x. dx By Cramer’s rule 1 1 2 y1 3 y22 3 y22 2 x 2 x 3 y22 dy dx1 5 y14 1 15 y14 y22 2 y1 and 5 y14 1 2 y1 3 y22 dy 15 y14 y22 2 y1 15 y14 y22 2 y1 . 4 2 dx2 15 y1 y2 2 y1 At the point in question dy dy 1 and 1. dx1 dx2 6. (i) Write our equilibrium equations as F 1 Y , r , G , M Y C Y I r G 0 F 2 Y , r , G , M L r , Y M 0. If we assume that all functions have continuous derivatives, then it is possible to solve for Y and r as functions of G and M at points where F 1 Fr1 1 C I J Y2 LY Lr FY Fr2 is nonzero, that is, the condition we require is Lr 1 C I LY 0. (ii) Differentiating both sides of equilibrium equations with respect to M, remembering that now we regard Y and r as functions of G and M we have Y C Y I r 0 M M M Lr r LY Y 1 M M 63 which in matrix notation is Y 1 C I M L Lr r Y M 0 . 1 Using Cramer’s rule we have 0 I Y 1 Lr I . M 1 C I Lr L C I LY LY Lr and 1 C 0 LY 1 r 1 C . M Lr I C I LY Lr 1 C I LY Using the apriori information we have on the signs of derivatives we obtain Y ve ve ve. M ve ve ve ve ve So M and equilibrium Y move in the same direction, r ve ve. M ve So M and equilibrium r move in opposite directions. 5.5 1. (i) For a function f(x) of a single variable the Taylor’s approximation of order three is f x0 f x0 2 3 f x f x0 f x0 x x0 x x0 x x0 2! 3! f x0 2 f x0 3 f x0 f x0 dx dx dx 2! 3! where 1 f x0 x02 , 1 f x0 1 x0 2 , 2 3 f x0 1 x0 2 , 4 Evaluating our approximation at x0 4 and dx 0.05 we have 2 3 f (4.05) 4.05 2 1 0.05 1 0.05 1 0.05 4 64 512 2 0.0125 0.000039 0.0000002 2.012461. 64 5 f x0 3 x0 2 . 8 (ii) (a) f x x 1 2 f 0 1 1 1 f x 1 x 1 2 2 3 f x 1 x 1 2 4 5 f x 3 x 1 2 8 f 0 1 2 f 0 1 4 f 0 3 8 so 1 dx 3. x 1 2 1 12 dx 81 dx 2 16 1 For dx 0.2 we have 1.2 2 1 12 0.2 18 0.2 1 (b) 2 3 1 0.2 1 0.1 0.005 0.0005 1.0955 16 f x f x f x f x e x so all these render 1 at x 0, thus e x 1 dx 1 dx 2 1 dx 3 2 3! and 2 3 e0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 0.02 0.00133 1.22133 2 6 (c) f x log x f 1 0 f x 1 x f 1 1 f x 12 x 2 f x 3 x f 1 1 f 1 2 so log x 0 dx 1 dx 2 1 dx 3. 2 3 For dx=0.2 we have 2 3 log1.2 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 0.2 0.02 0.00266 0.18266. 2 3 65 f x f x0 f x0 dx 1 dxH x0 dx, 2 where f x is the gradient vector of f(x), H x is the Hessian matrix of f(x). 2. (i) (ii) For this Cobb-Douglas function 1 1 3 3 f 1,1 1, f1 1 x1 4 x24 , f 2 3 x14 x2 4 , 4 4 so 1 4 f 1,1 . 3 4 Moreover 7 3 f11 3 x1 4 x24 , 16 3 1 f12 3 x1 4 xx 4 , 16 1 5 f 22 3 x14 x2 4 , 16 so 1 1 H 1,1 3 . 16 1 1 Thus f x1, x2 1 1 dx1 3 dx2 3 dx12 3 dx1dx2 3 dx2 2 . 4 4 32 16 32 In moving from the point x1o 1, x2o 1 to the point x1 1.1 and x2 0.9 dx1 0.1 and dx2 0.1. Thus we have 3 1 3 0.12 3 0.1 0.12 3 0.12 1.1 4 0.9 4 1 14 0.1 43 0.1 32 16 32 0.94625. 3 3 1 1 (iii) dy f1dx1 f 2dx2 1 x1 4 x24 dx1 3 x14 x2 4 dx2 4 4 o o At the point x1 1, x2 1 with dx1 0.1 and dx2 0.1 we have dy 1 0.1 3 0.1 0.05. 4 4 3. The total derivative is defined as dy y y dx2 . dx1 x1 x2 dx1 66 The two concepts differ when x2 is itself a function of x1 . If this is the case dy / dx1 is an approximation for the rate of change in y when x1 changes by a small amount, taking into account as it does the direct y dx2 effect of this change given by y / x1 and the indirect effect through x2 given by . x1 dx1 dx2 1 y y 3x12 , 14 x2 , so x1 x2 dx1 x1 dy 3x12 14 x2 / x1. dx1 4. We know that dy f1dx1 f 2dx2 . Taking the differential of both sides remembering that f1 and f 2 are functions of x1 and x2 we have d 2 y d dy f11dx1 f12dx2 dx1 f 21dx1 f 22dx2 dx2 f11 dx1 2 f12dx1dx2 f 22dx22 2 dxH x dx. Exercises for Chapter 6 6.1 1. (i) Critical points where f1 3x12 9 x2 0 f 2 3x22 9 x1 0. From the second equation we have x1 x22 / 3. Substituting in the first equation gives x24 9 x2 0 x2 x23 27 0 3 so x2 0 or x2 3. The equation then has two critical points 0 3 x1* or x2* . 0 3 Now f11 6 x1, f12 0, f 22 6 x2 so the Hessian matrix is 9 6x H x 1 . 9 6 x 2 67 and 0 9 H x1* . 9 0 The first order principal minors of this matrix are 0, 0 and the second order principal minor is -81, so x1* is a saddle point. Also 9 18 H x2* . 9 18 The first order leading principal minors of this matrix is 18 and the second order leading principal minor is 233 so the critical point is strict local minimum. (ii) Critical points where f x 3x 2 y 1 0 fy x 2 y 0 so x 2 y and 12 y 2 y 1 0 3y 1 4 y 1 0 y 1 or y 1 . 3 4 The function then has two critical points 2 1 3 2 * * x1 , x2 1 1 4 3 Now f xx 6 x, f xy 1, f yy 2 so the Hessian matrix is 6 x 1 H x . 1 2 Now 4 1 H x1* 1 2 whose leading principal minors are 4 and 7 so H x1* is positive definite and x1* is a strict local minimum. Also 3 1 H x2* , 1 2 whose first order principal minors are -3 and 2 so H x2* is indefinite and the point is a saddle point. 68 (iii) Critical points where f x 4 x3 2 x 6 y 0 f y 6 x 6 y 0 thus x y and 4 x3 4 x 0 x x 2 1 0 so x 0 or x 1 or x 1. The function then has three critical points 0 1 1 x1* , x2* , x3* . 0 1 1 The Hessian matrix is 12 x 2 2 6 H x 6 6 so 2 6 H x1* . 6 6 First order principal minors are 2, 6, whereas H x1* 24 so this matrix is indefinite and x1* is a saddle point. Also 14 6 H x2* , 6 6 whose leading principal minors are 14 and 48 so this matrix is positive definite and x 2* is a strict local minimum. Similarly x3* is a strict local minimum. (iv) Critical points where f1 2 x1 3x2 0 f 2 6 x2 3x1 4 x3 0 f3 4 x2 12 x3 0, giving x2 3x3 , x1 3 x2 14 x3 which is only true if x1 x2 x3 0. Thus the function has one 2 3 critical point 0 * x 0 . 0 69 The Hessian matrix is 2 3 0 H 3 6 4 . 0 4 12 The leading principal minors of this matrix are 2 3 0 2 3 3 2 2 2 2, 3, H 3 6 4 4 1 4 3 6 9 14 9 14 0 so the matrix is positive definite and the critical point is a strict local minimum. (v) Critical points where f1 x3 2 x1 0 f 2 1 x3 2 x2 0 f3 x1 x2 6 x3 0, so x3 2 x1 , x2 11x1 , and x1 1/ 20. Thus the function has one critical point 1 1 x 11 . 20 2 * The Hessian matrix is 2 0 1 H 0 2 1 1 1 6 which has leading principal minors 0 2 11 2 0 11 3 1 2 2, 4, H 0 2 1 1 1 20. 0 2 2 1 1 1 6 All the leading principal minors are positive so H is positive definite and x * is a strict local minimum. (vi) (d) The first order conditions are fx x 6 y 6 0 f y 6 x 2 y 3z 17 0 f z 3 y 8 x 2 0 70 and the first of these equations gives x 3 3 y so substituting into the other equations gives 16 y 3 z 1 3 y 8 z 2, Using Cramer’s rule to solve these equations gives 1 3 2 8 y 14 /137 16 3 3 8 16 1 3 2 29 /137 137 x 3 42 /137 369 /137, z and this is the one critical point the function has. The Hessian matrix is 2 6 0 H 6 2 3 , 0 3 8 which has leading principal minors of 2 and 2 6 6 2 32, so H is indefinite and the critical point is a saddle point. 2. Critical points where f x y 2 3x 2 y y y y 3x 2 1 0 (1) f y 2 xy x 3 x x 2 y x 2 1 0 . (2) Clearly y 0 and x 0 define critical points. When y 0 we have from (2) that x x 2 1 0 which gives x 0, x 1, or x 1. When x 0 from (1) we get y y 1 0 which gives y 0 or y 1. Alternatively critical points are defined by y 3x 2 1 0 2 y x2 1 0 which yields 5 x 2 1 so x 1 or 1 with y 2 in both cases. 5 5 5 71 All in all we have six critical points 1 5 1 5 0 0 1 1 * x1* , x2* , x3* , x4* , x5* , x6 . 0 1 0 0 25 25 The Hessian matrix is 6 xy 2 y 3 x 2 1 H x . 2 2x 2 y 3x 1 0 1 * H x1* which is indefinite so x1 is a saddle point. 1 0 0 1 * H x2* which is indefinite so x 2 is a saddle point. 1 0 0 2 * H x3* which is indefinite so x 3 is a saddle point. 2 0 0 2 * H x4* which is indefinite so x 4 is a saddle point. 2 2 12 5 5 H x5* 2 5 2 5 . 2 5 The leading principal minors of this matrix are 12 / 5 5 and 4/5 so H x5* is positive definite and x 5* is a strict local minimum. 12 5 5 H x6* 2 5 2 5 . 2 5 The first leading principal minor is 12 / 5 5 and the second leading principal minor is 4/5 so H x6* is negative definite and x 6* is a strict local maximum. 72 6.2 1. (i) Total profit is given by 1 1 p L2 K 2 wL rK . (ii) The critical point is obtained from 1 L 1 pL 2 w 0 2 1 K 1 pK 2 r 0, 2 so we have one critical point L* p 2 / 4w2 , K * p 2 / 4r 2 . (iii) For a global maximum we require that the objective function is concave on the nonnegative orthant. The Hessian matrix of this function is 32 pL 0 1 H L, K . 4 3 2 pK 0 The first order principal minors of this matrix are 3 3 1 pL 2 and 1 pK 2 4 4 which are both 0 on the nonnegative orthant and the second order principal minor is 3 3 H 1 p2 L 2 K 2 16 which is 0 in the nonnegative orthant so H(L,K) is negative semidefinite on the domain of our function, and thus is concave on its domain. Any local maximum will then be a global maximum. (iv) L* p, w p 2 4 w L* p, w , so the demand for labour is homogeneous of 2 degree 0. Similarly for K * . * p2 p2 p2 (v) L 3 L* 3 w. Similarly K * 3 r. w 2w 2w 2r (vi) Substituting L* and K * back into the profit function gives the maximum profit function *1 p2 p2 *1 M p, w, r p L 2 K 2 wL* rL* 4 w 4r 73 M p p M p p p 2 w 2r p 2 w 2r M p M p w w 4 w2 4 w2 2 2 M p M p r . r 4r 2 4r 2 2 2. (i) 2 Total profit is given by 1 1 4 pL4 K 2 wL rK . (ii) 3 1 1 L pL 4 K 2 w 0, K 2 pL4 K K w K 2wL . 2L r r 1 2 r 0, Substituting into the first order conditions gives 1 1 2 pL 4 w 2 L* 4 p4 8 p4 * , K . r 2 w2 r 3w (iii) For a global maximum want to be concave on its domain, the nonnegative orthant. The Hessian matrix is 3 74 12 1 34 12 L K L K H L, K p 4 3 1 2 1 3 . 1 L 4 K 2 L4 K 2 2 The first order principal minors are 1 1 7 3 3 pL 4 K 2 and L4 K 2 4 which are 0 on the domain of . The second order principal minor is 3 H 1 p 2 L 2 K 1 2 which is 0 on the domain. Hence the Hessian matrix is negative definite, is concave on its domain, and any local maximum is a global maximum. 74 4 p (iv) L p, r , w * 4 r w 2 2 L* p, r , w , so L* is homogeneous of degree zero. Similarly for K . * * 8 p4 8 p4 (v) L 3 L* 3 w w rw rw 4 4 * K 24 p K * 24 p r. r r 4w r 4w (vi) The maximum total profit is formed by substituting L* and K * into . Thus the firm’s profit function is *1 M p, r, w 4 pL 4 K *1 2 wL* rK * 4 p 4 / r 2 w M 16 p 3 / r 2 w M 16 p 3p / r 2 w p M 4 p 4 / r 2 w2 M 4 p 4w / r 2 w2 w M 8 p 4 / r 3 w M 8 p 4r / r 3w. r 6.3 1. The Lagrangian function is Z x1 1 x2 2 12 2x1 4x2 . The first order conditions are Z 12 2 x1 4 x2 0 Z1 x2 2 2 0 Z 2 x1 1 4 0 x1 2 x2 3 3 9 11 x2 , x1 , . 4 2 8 The bordered Hessian matrix is 0 2 4 H 2 0 1 . 4 1 0 8 0 4 H 2 0 4 1 1 1 1 0 3 2 8 4 2 1 16, so we have a local maximum. 75 2. (i) The Lagrangian function is Z x1x2 Y p1x1 p2 x2 . (ii) The first order conditions are Z Y p1 x1 p2 x2 0 Z1 x2 p1 0 Z 2 x1 p2 0. (iii) The border Hessian matrix is 0 p1 p2 H p1 0 1 p 2 1 0 H 1 1 2 p1 p1 p2 1 0 1 1 3 p2 p1 p2 0 1 2 p1 p2 0, so the second order condition holds for maximization. (iv) The second two of the first order conditions imply that p x2 1 x1 p2 so substituting into the first of these gives x1* Y / 2 p1 , x2* Y / 2 p2 . Also x1* p1, Y Y / 2p1 x1* p1,Y so x1* is homogeneous of degree 0. Similarly for x2* . Suppose prices and income increase so they are times their original values. All that changes in our problem is the constraint which now becomes p1x1 p2 x 2 Y . But this is the original constraint so nothing changes in the problem. Thus we would expect this result. (v) M p1, p2 ,Y x1* x2* Y 2 / 4 p1 p2 2 2 (a) M Y M Y2 p1 p1 4 p1 p2 4 p1 p2 (b) M Y2 M Y Y . Y 2 p1 p2 2 p1 p2 76 (vi) From the first order conditions we obtain Y M * x1* / p2 . 2 p1 p2 Y 3. (i) The problem is, Minimize wL rK 1 1 subject to 4 K 4 L4 Qo , so the Lagrangian function is 1 1 Z wL rK Qo 4K 4 L4 . (ii) The first order conditions are 1 4 1 4 Z Qo 4 K L 0 1 3 Z L w 4 L 4 0 3 1 Z K r K 4 L4 0. (iii) The deriviatives needed to form the bordered Hessian matrix are 1 3 3 1 gL K 4 L 4 , g K K 4 L4 1 7 3 Z LL K 4 L 4 , 4 7 1 3 4 Z KK K L 4 , 4 3 3 1 Z LK K 4 L 4 4 so the bordered Hessian matrix is H L, K , 7 4 1 L K 4 7 4 0 4 K 2 L 4 KL2 2 2 KL 4 K L 3 K 4 KL2 KL 3 L2 . As our problem is a minimization problem we require H 0 at the critical point obtained from the first order conditions. (iv) From the last two first order conditions we have w K K wL . r L r Substituting into the first of these conditions gives Q 4 w r o 1 4 Q L 0 L o 4 1 2 * 2 r w 1 2 Q K o 4 77 * 2 1 w 2. r (v) The cost function is M w, r , Qo wL* rK * Qo2 rw 2 / 8. 1 1 (vi) M Qo rw 2 / 4. Qo (vii) From the first order completions * 3 1 * 4 4 1 Qo rw 2 / 4 M / Qo rK L * 4. (i) The problem is, Minimize p1 x1 p2 x2 subject to x1a x2b uo , and the Lagrangian function associated with this problem is Z p1 x1 p2 x2 uo x1a x2b The first order conditions are Z uo x1a x2b 0 Z1 p1 a x (1) a 1 b 1 2 x 0 Z 2 p2 b x x a 1 (ii) b 1 2 (2) 0 (3) Z11 a a 1 x1a 2 x2b Z12 ab x1a 1 x2b 1 Z 22 b b 1 x1a x2b 2 so the border Hessian matrix is 0 a2 b2 H x1 x2 ax1 x22 bx12 x2 ax1 x22 a a 1 x 2 2 ab x1 x2 ab x1 x2 . b b 1 x12 bx12 x2 (iii) As this is a minimization problem we require H 0 at the critical point obtained from the first conditions. (iv) From (2) and (3) ax2 p1 bp x x2 1 1 . bx1 p2 ap2 78 Substituting into (1) gives bp uo x1a b 1 0. ap2 Solving for x1 and using the fact that a b 1 gives b ap x1 uo 2 . bp1 By symmetry, a bp x2 uo 1 . ap2 (v) Substituting x1 and x2 into the objective function gives b a ap bp M p1uo 2 p2uo 1 bp1 ap2 p1a p2buo a1 ab b p2b p1auo a ab1 b p1a p2buo a ab b a b a ab b p1a p2buo , as required. (iv) M aa abb p1a 1 p2buo , p1 thus for small changes M a bb p p1b p2buo p1. 6.4 The set of feasible solutions is a hyperplane as it is the set of points which satisfy a linear constraint so this set is a closed convex set. Consider the Hessian matrix of the objective function which is 1 0 x13 H x1 , x2 0 13 x2 The first leading principal minor is 13 0 for all x 0 and the second leading principal minor is x1 1 0 for all x 0 so this matrix is negative definite and the objective function is strictly concave. x13 x23 Thus there will be a unique local maximum which is also a global maximum. 79 1. (i) The Lagrangian function is 1 1 Z Y p1 x1 p2 x2 . x1 x2 (ii) The first order conditions are Z Y p1 x1 p2 x2 0 Z1 1 p1 0 x12 Z2 1 p2 0. x22 (iii) The bordered Hessian matrix of this problem is 0 p1 p2 H x1 , x2 p1 23 0 x1 0 2 3 p2 x2 H p1 1 2 1 p1 p2 0 2 / x 3 2 p2 1 p1 3 1 p2 2 / x 3 1 0 2 p12 2 p22 3 0, x23 x1 for all positive x1 and x2 . Thus the second order condition holds. (iv) From the first order conditions we have x22 p1 p1 x2 x. 2 p2 p2 1 x1 Substituting gives p1 x 0 p2 1 Y p1 x1 p2 x1* p Y Y p1 p2 1 x2* Now p2 p1 p2 . x1* p1 , p2 , Y Y / p1 2 p1 p2 x1* p1 , p2,Y , 80 so x1* is homogeneous of degree zero. Similarly for x2* . M p1 , p2 , Y 1* 1* (v) x1 x2 (a) M p1 2 p1 1 (b) M Y p1 /Y. 2 p2 1 p1 p2 / Y M p1 2 /Y 2 p1 p2 2 M p1 p1 p2 p1 / Y p2 Y / Y . 2 (vi) From the first order conditions 1 * p1 x1*2 p1 p2 Y 2 2 M . Y Exercises for Chapter 7 7.2 1. Total profit is 1 12 p L K 2 wL rK . Let M be the maximum profit function. By the Envelope Theorem (i) ∂ M L* p 2 / 4w2 ∂w ∂wL * (ii) M K * p 2 / 4r 2 r r K * (iii) 1 1 * * M p p 2 L K 2 p p L ,K 2w 2r * * which are the same results we got in exercise 1 of 6.2. 2. Total profit is 1 1 4 pL4 K 2 wL rK . 81 2 Let M be the maximum profit function. By the Envelope Theorem (i) M 4 p4 L* 2 2 w wL r w * (ii) M 8 p4 K * 3 r r K r w * 1 1 * * M 4 (iii) 4 L K 2 16 p3 / r 3 w, p p L ,K * * which are the same results we got in exercise 2 of 6.2. 7.3 1. (i) The Lagrangian function is Z x1 x2 Y p1x1 p2 x2 . Let M be the indirect utility function. Then by the Envelope Theorem M Z p1 p1 M Z p2 p2 M Z Y Y * x1* Y2 , 4 p12 p2 * x2* Y2 , 4 p12 p2 * , x1* * , x2* * * Y , 2 p1 p2 which are the same results we got in exercise 2 of 6.3. (ii) The Lagrangian function is 1 1 Z Y p1 x1 p2 x2 . x1 x2 If M is the indirect utility function, then by the Envelope Theorem p p2 M Z * x1* 1 , p1 p1 * , x* p Y 1 1 82 M Z p2 p2 M Z Y Y p1 p2 * x2* p2 Y * , x2* * * p1 p2 , 2 Y2 , which are the same results as we obtained for exercise 6.4. 2. The Lagrangian function is 1 1 Z wL rK Qo 4K 4 L4 . If M is the cost function then by the Envelope Theorem 1 M Z Q r 2 L* o , w wL 4 w 2 * M Z r r K* M Z Qo Qo 3. 1 2 Q w 2 K o , 4 r * 1 * * Qo rw 2 . 4 The Lagrangian function is Z p1 x1 p2 x2 uo x1a x2b . Let M be the minimum value function. Then by the Envelope Theorem M Z p2 p2 M Z uo uo a bp x uo 1 , ap2 * 2 x2* a a b b p1a p2b . 83 7.4 1. (i) We write the Lagrangian function as Z U x1 , x2 p2 x2 p2 x2 Y . Then the first order conditions are Z1 U1 p1 0 Z 2 U 2 p2 0 Z p1 x1 p2 x2 Y 0. (ii) The bordered Hessian matrix is 0 p1 p2 H x1 , x2 p1 U11 U12 p U U 22 21 2 and the second order condition is H 0 at the critical point obtained from the first order conditions. (iii) We have p1dx1 x1dp1 p2 dx2 x2 dp2 dY 0 U11dx1 U12 dx2 dp1 p1d 0 U 21dx1 U 22 dx2 dp2 p2 d 0. Isolating the differentials of the exogenous variables on the right hand side we have p1dx1 p2 dx2 dY x1dp1 x2 dp2 U11dx1 U12 dx2 p1d dp1 U 21dx1 U 22 dx2 p2 d dp2 or in matrix notation d dY x1dp1 x2 dp2 H dx1 dp1 . dx dp2 2 (1) 84 (iv) In (1) let dp1 dY 0 Then we obtain d x2 dp2 H dx1 0 dx dp 2 2 so using Cramer’s rule to solve for dx1 we get dx1 0 x2 dp2 p2 p1 0 U12 p2 dp2 U 22 H Expanding the determinant in the numerator using the second column gives H dx1 x2 dp2 H12 dp2 32 , H where H12 and H 32 are the cofactors of the (1, 2) and (3, 2) elements of H . Dividing both sides of this equation by dp2 , and remembering that the ratio of differentials is a derivative we have H x1 H x2 12 32 . (2) p2 H H (v) Let dp1 dp2 0 in (1) to obtain d dY H dx1 0 dx 0 2 and using Cramer’s rule to solve for dx1 we have dx1 0 dY p2 p1 0 U12 p2 0 U 22 . dYH12 H H Again dividing through both sides of this equation by dY gives H x1 12 . H Y Prices constant 85 (3) (vi) If utility remains constant then dU U1dx1 U 2 dx2 0 or U1 dx1 dx2 0. U2 But from the first order conditions U1 p1 U 2 p2 so holding utility constant requires p1dx1 p2 dx2 0. But taking the differential of both sides of the budget constraint gives p1dx1 x2 dp1 p2 dx2 x2 dp2 dY or p1dx1 p2 dx2 dY x1dp1 x2 dp2 . Thus holding utility constant requires that dY x1dp1 x2 dp2 0 . (4) (vii) Suppose that Y and p2 change in such a way that utility remains constant and suppose further p1 does not change. Then we must have dY x1dp1 x2 dp2 0 dp1 0. Substitute these conditions in (1) gives d 0 H dx1 0 , dx dp 2 2 and by Cramer’s rule 0 0 p2 p1 0 U12 p dp2 U 22 dx1 2 dp H H 2 32 H 86 so x1 H 32 H p2 Utility constant . (5) Substituting (3) and (5) into (2) gives Slutsky’s equation x1 x1 x x2 1 p1 p1 Utility Y Prices constant constant. (vii) The substitution effect of a change in p 2 on good 1 is x1 H 32 . H p2 Utility constant Clearly the substitution effect of a change in p1 on good 2 is x2 H 23 . H p1 Utility constant But as the bordered Hessian matrix H is symmetric, H 23 H 23 and the substitution effects are the same. 2. (i) Multiply both sides of (7.7) by p2 / xx we have x1 p2 x1 p2 p2 x . x2 1 Y Prices x1 p2 x1 p2 Utility x1 constant constant Now we can write p2 p2 x2 x1 Y x x2 1 21 Y Y Prices x1 Y Prices x1 constant constant where 2 the proportion of income Y spent on good 2 1 income elasticity of demand for good 1. Thus in terms of elasticities we can write Slutsky’s equation (7.7) as e12 12 22 where e12 is the cross elasticity of demand. 87 x p1 x2 p1 (ii) 11 12 1 p1 Utility x1 p1 Utility x2 constant constant p1H 22 pH32 . H x1 But the term in the bracket is obtained by multiplying elements of the first column of H by the corresponding cofactors of the second column of H so by our theorem this term is zero and thus 11 12 0. 7.5 1. (i) The Marshallian demand functions are the optimal point of the following problem: max imize x1 x2 p1 x1 p2 x2 Y subject to The Lagrangian function associated with this problem is Z x1 x2 Y p1x1 p2 x2 and the first order condition are Z1 x1 1 x2 p1 0 Z 2 x2 1 x p2 0 Z Y p1 x1 p2 x2 0. From the first two equations we obtain x2 p1 x p x2 1 1 . x1 p2 p2 Substituting into the third equation gives Y . x1* p1 From symmetry x2* Y . p2 These are the Marshallian demand functions (we assume the second order conditions hold). (ii) The indirect utility function is the maximum value function V p, Y x x * 1 * 2 Y p1 p2 88 . (iii) From the consistency properties V p, e u, so e p1 p2 1 p p u e u 1 2 . (iv) By Shephard’s Lemma the Hicksian demand function x1 is given by x1 p p x1 u 1 2 p p u 1 2 1 1 1 e , so p1 p p u 2 1 p p u 2 1 p1 1 1 p p 1 2 u u p1 p2 . p1 By symmetry x2 u 2. (i) 1 p1 . p2 The Hicksian demand functions are the optimal point of the following problem: min imize p1 x1 p2 x2 x subject to 1 1 x2 u. The Lagrangian function associated with this problem is 1 L p1 x1 p2 x2 u x1 x2 and the first order conditions are L1 p1 x1 x2 1 L2 p2 x1 x2 L u x1 x2 1 x1 1 0 1 x2 1 0 0. 89 From the first two equations we have p1 x1 p2 x2 1 1 p 1 x1 1 x2 . p2 Substituting into the third equation we have 1 x p p 1 2 1 2 p1 u x2 1 p p2 2 1 where / 1 1 x2 p1 p2 1 p2 1 so 1 x2 up21 p 1 p2 1 , and 1 x1 1 up1 p 1 p2 1 . (ii) The expenditure function is the minimum value function of this problem that is 1 u p1 p2 e p, u p1 x1 p2 x2 u p p 1 2 . 1 p1 p2 By the consistency properties e p,V Y so V p1 p2 1 y V y p1 p2 1 90 (iii) By Roy’s Identity the Marshallian demand function is given by V p1 x1* V y 1 p11 1 y p1 p2 1 p1 p2 yp1 1 . p1 p2 x2* yp2 1 . p1 p2 By symmetry 3. (i) The conditional demand functions for inputs are the optimal point of the following problem w1 x1 w2 x2 min imize 1 y x1 x2 . subject to The Lagrangian function is 1 Z w1 x1 w2 x2 y x1 x2 , and the first order conditions are Z1 w1 1 x1 x2 ρx1 1 0 w1 x1 x2 Z 2 w2 x1 x2 1 1 x1 1 0 x2 1 0 1 Z y x1 x2 0. The first two conditions give w1 x1 w2 x2 1 1 x1 w w 1 x2 1 x1 1 x 2 , where . w2 w2 Substituting into the third condition gives w w y 1 2 w2 1 w2 y x x . 2 2 1 w1 w2 91 By symmetry x1 w1 y w 1 w2 1 . (ii) The cost function is the minimum value function of this problem, that is, 1 w1 w2 c w, y w1 x1 w2 x2 y y w w 1 2 . 1 w1 w2 (iii) Consider 1 c y w w w 1 x . 1 2 1 1 w1 Similarly c x2 , so Shephard’s Lemma holds. w2 4. The conditional demand functions are the optimal point of the following problem (i) min imize w1 x1 w2 x subject to 100 x12 x24 y. 1 1 The Lagrangian function associated with this problem is 1 1 Z w1 x1 w2 x2 y 100 x12 x24 , and the first order conditions are 1 1 1 3 1 1 Z1 w1 50 λx1 2 x24 0 Z 2 w2 25 λx12 x2 4 0 Z y 100 λx12 x24 0. From the first two equations w1 2 x2 w2 x1 so x1 2 w2 x2 . w1 92 Substituting into the third equation gives 1 2w 2 3 y 100 2 x24 w1 so 2 4 y 3 w1 3 x2 100 2w2 and 2 4 1 4 2w y 3 w1 3 y 3 2w2 3 x2 2 . w1 100 2w 2 100 w1 (ii) The cost function is the minimum value function for this problem that is c w , y w1 x1 w2 x2 1 4 2 4 y 3 w1 3 y 3 w1 3 w1 w 2 100 2w2 100 2 w2 4 1 y 3 23 3. 3 w 2 w 2 2 100 1 (iii) Marginal cost is 3 c y 3 w 23 2w2 . y 100 1 50 1 1 Now from the first order conditions 1 1 w x2 x 4 1 1 2 50 2 1 1 y 3 w1 6 y 3 w1 w1 100 2w2 100 2w2 c. y 1 6 (iv) The factor demand functions are the optimal point of the following problem 1 max imize 1 py w1 x1 w2 x2 100 px12 x24 w1 x1 w2 x2 . 93 The first order conditions are 1 1 1 3 1 50 px1 2 x24 w1 0 2 25 px12 x2 4 w2 0, 2w x 2 x2 w1 x1 2 x x1 w2 w1 so from the first condition 2w x 50 p 2 2 w1 1 2 1 4 2 x w1 thus 1 x2 1 4 1 w 2w 2 2w1w2 2 1 2 50 p w1 50 p and 50 p 4 * 2 50 p 4 * 1 x x 4 w13 w22 2 w13 w2 . The profit function is the maximum value function of this problem that is 4 4 4 1 1 * * 50 p 50 p 50 p * * * 2 4 w, p 100 px1 x2 w1 x1 w2 x2 2 w1 w2 2w12 w2 4w12 w2 50 p 4 4w12 w2 . (v) By Hotelling’s lemma the firm’s supply function is given by * 50 p 50 504 p3 y w, p 2 . p w12 w2 w1 w2 3 * 94 Exercises for Chapter 8 8.2 1. (i) The ordinates for the subintervals are y1 0 y2 1 n y3 2 n yn 1 1 so SR 1 y2 n yn1 12 1 2 n n 1 1 1 1 as n 2 n 2 (ii) The ordinates for the subintervals are y1 0 2 n y2 1 n y3 2 2 yn 1 1 so S R 1 y2 yn 1 13 1 22 n n 1 as n . 3 n 2 1 2 3 12 6 n n (iii) The ordinates for the subintervals are y1 0 2 n y2 1 n y3 3 3 yn 1 1 so S R 1 y2 n 2 2 yn 1 14 1 2 n 1 4 n 2 n 1 n 4n 1 1 2 12 1 as n . 4 n n 4 95 8.3 1. (i) This function has a maximum at x 0 and cuts the x axis at x 4 and x 4. So we want I 2. 4 4 16 x dx 16 x x / 3 2 4 256 3. 3 4 Required areas are given by the following definite integrals: (i) 9 1 2 2 32 52 x dx x 3 1 3 9 1 1 x5 1 7 x dx 7 x 7 . 5 0 5 0 (ii) (iii) (iv) 2 1 1 4 2 3 0 5 2 x 1 dx x 1 2 5 1 3 x 5x2 2 1 0 2 . 5 1 5x2 2 4 2 5856.4 60.025 5796.375 40 1 (v) x 1 2 dx x 1 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 . x 1 0 3 8.4 1. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) I 1 x dx 2 1 x C. 3 I 3xe dx e C. 2 x 2 I x 2 x dx x C 2 5 2 I x x dx x 2 x C 3 1 I x 2 x 7 x 1 dx x 2 x 7 5 9 7 I 9 x 5 7 x 2 dx x 4 x 3 C. 4 3 1 2 x2 x2 3 1 2 (vii) I (viii) I 2 6 2 1 2 1 2 3 2 3 2 5 1 2 2 5 1 2 2 10 x 6 x C 5 3 2 5 3 1 2 2 2 2 x x dx 4 x x 1 4 x 2 dx 1 x5 2 C 1 5 1 x5 2 96 5 2 C. 2. (i) Let u x 1 so x u 2 1 , dx/du 2u and dx 2udu. Then x x 1dx 2 u 2 1 2u 2 du 2 u 6 2u 4 u 2 du 2 7 3 5 2 2 x 1 x 1 u7 2 5 1 3 C. 2 u u C 2 2 x 1 2 5 7 5 3 7 3 2 2 2udu then 3 3 2 2 2 2 x 2 / 3 x 2 dx u 2 u 1udu u 4 4u 2 4du 27 27 2 1 5 4 3 u u 4u C 27 5 3 (ii) Let u 3x 2 u so x and dx = Substituting u 3x 2 2 into this expression gives the result. 1 u x (iii) Let u 4 x 14 so 2 14 and dx udu . As x ranges from 0 to 2 u ranges from 4 2 22. Moreover dx does not change sign. Thus du 22 2 x 1 22 u 14 udu 1 u 3 dx 14u 8 14 u 8 3 4 x 14 14 3 3 11 1 22 2 14 22 14 2 14 14 83 3 1 23 14 20 22 0.4566 24 14 to 2 0 3. 4. Thus substitution clearly will not work as when x ranges from 1 to 1 u remains at the value 2 and we no longer have a definite integral. In the formula for integrations by parts, (i) Let u cos x and v x. Then x cos xdx uvdx x sin x sin xdx x sin x cos x C (ii) Let u x, v log 3x. Then x2 x2 x2 x2 x log 3xdx log 3x dx C log 3x C 2 3x 2 6 (iii) Let u e x , v x. Then xe dx uvdx xe e dx xe x x x x e x C. 1 (iv) Let u 1 x 2 , v x. Then 1 x 1 x 2 dx 3 2 2 1 x 2 x 3 3 3 1 x 2 dx 97 3 5 2 4 2 1 x x 1 x 2 C 3 15 (v) Let v log x and u 1. Then log xdx x log x ldx x log x x C (vi) Let v x3 , u e3 x . Then 1 x3e3x dx e3 x x 3 x 2 e3 x dx. 3 For the integral on the right hand side let u e3 x and v x 2 . Then 1 2 xe3 x dx e3 x x 2 xe3 x dx. 3 3 Again for the integral on the right hand side let u e3 x , v x. Then 1 1 3x 1 1 xe x dx e3 x x e dx e3 x x e3 x C 3 3 3 9 Substituting (3) into (2) the result thus obtained with (1) gives 1 2 2 x3e3dx e3 x x3 x 2 x C. 3 3 9 (vii) Let u eax and v sin bx. Then eax b ax I eax sin bx sin bx e cos bxdx a a (4) For the integral on the right hand side let u eax and v cos bx. Then eax b ax e cos bxdx cos bx e sin bx a a 1 eax cos bx bI . a ax Substituting back into (4) gives ax I e sin bx b2 eax cos bx bI . a a Solving for I and adding a constant gives ax I 2e 2 a sin bx b cos bx C a b 8.5 1. (i) (ii) e x dx lim b 0 e x dx b e x dx lim eb 1 , so our integral is divergent. b 0 lim b 0 b 0 b e x dx lim e x lim eb 1 1 b 0 b so the integral is convergent. (iii) x 1 0 1 2 dx lim 0 1 1 1 1 x dx lim 2 x 2 lim 2 2 2 2 0 0 1 2 98 (2) (3) so the integral is convergent. (iv) 1 x 2 dx lim 0 0 1 1 x 2 dx lim x 1 lim 1 , 0 0 1 so the integral is divergent. Now x dx lim x (v) 0 2 1 x 2 dx 0 1 2 0 1 x 2 dx 2 1 2 x 2 dx. 0 1 dx lim x 1 lim 1 , 0 1 0 so our integral is divergent. 2. (i) 2 1 (ii) 0 2 x 1 0 0 3 2 0 2 y 3 x2 y x 1 2 3x 2 y dx dy 2 1 1 0 y2 2 1 y 1 1 1 dy y y 2 1 3 2 3 4 1 12 1 7 x3 7 x 8 x 2 dx . 3 3 3 0 3 0 y3 dx x y dydx x y 3 0 0 1 2 1 y2 1 1 x3 x 2 y dy 3 2 0 dx x 2 y 2 dydx 2 0 2 1 1 0 (iv) x xydxdy 2 1 0 (iii) 1 1 1 0 1 4 3 x4 1 x dx . 3 3 0 3 9 x 6 xy 4 y dx dy 2 2 0 3x 3x y 4xy 3 2 0 1 1 3 1 4 121 3y 3 y 4 y dy y 7 y 6 y 5 . 7 2 5 0 70 0 8.6 1. (i) 6 5 4 The Lagrangian function for this problem is Z x1 x2 Y p1x1 p2 x2 . The first order conditions are Z1 x2 p1 0 Z 2 x1 p2 0 Z Y p1 x1 p2 x2 0. The first two conditions imply that px x2 1 1 p2 so substituting into the third equation gives the Marshallian demand functions x1* Y 2 p1 , x2* Y 2 p2 . (ii) The indirect utility function is the maximum value function of this problem so it is V p, Y x1* x2* Y 2 p1 p2 . 99 y2 1 2 dy 0 (iii) CS 1.2 1 1.2 Y Y log p1 Y log1.2 0.09116Y . 2 2 p1dp1 2 1 C is defined by V p1 , Y C V p 0 , Y Y C 4 1.2 p2 2 C Y 2 Y Y C Y 1.2 4 p2 1.2 1 0.09544Y . E is defined by V p1 , Y V p 0 , Y E Y E Y2 4 p2 4 1.2 p2 2 E Y 1 1 1.2 0.08713Y. (iv) As income Y 0 we have E CS C. 2. Now (i) By Roy’s identity the Marshallian demand functions are given by V pj * xj . V Y V 1 Y , n βi pi i=1 and n γ βj V n j y γ i pi βi p j p n p βi pi i=1 j i i 1 i 1 so n x*j j j y i pi j 1 j j y i pi i j i 1 . pj pj 100 (ii) The loss in consumers’ welfare using consumers’ surplus is given by CS where 1.1 p10 p10 x dp1 * 1 1.1 p10 p10 1 1 1 p11dp1 1 y i pi . Thus i 1 CS 1 1 1 p1 log p1 1 1.1 1 1 1 1.1 p10 log 1.1 p10 1 1 1 p10 log p10 0.1 1 p10 1 1 log1.1. (iii) The loss in consumer welfare measured by compensation variation C is defined by V p1 , y C V p 0 , y , where the new prices p1 are the same as the old prices p except p11 1.1 p10 . So y C i pi0 0.1 1 p10 V p1 , y C i 1.1 pi0 βi i and C is given by y C i pi0 0.1 1 p10 i 1.1 p i 1 0 i i 1 y i pi0 i 0 i pi , i that is, y C i pi0 0.1 1 p10 1.1 1 y i pi0 , i that is, C 0.1 1 p10 1.1 1 1 y i pi0 . i The loss in consumer welfare measured by equivalence variation is defined by V p1 , y V p 0 , y E where V p1 , y y i pi0 0.1 1 p10 i 1.1 pi0 i i 1 and V p0 , y E y E i pi0 i 0i i p i . 101 Thus E is given by y i pi0 0.1 1 p10 y E i pi0 i i that is, 1.1 , 1 0.1 1 p10 1.1 1 1 y i pi0 i C . E 1 1.1 1.1 1 Exercises for Chapter 9 9.4 1. All the equations are first order linear differential equations with constant coefficients. (i) The general solution to the homogeneous equation is y Ce4x with C an arbitrary constant. A particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation is x 4 x 4 x x y e 4 x e 4 s e 2 e ds e e6 s 0 e e6 x 1 1 e 2 x e 4 x . 6 6 6 0 The general solution to our equation then is y x ce4 x 1 e2 x e4 x . 6 Using the initial condition we get c 2 and the required particular solution of 2e4 x e2 x e 4 x y x . 6 (ii) The general solution to the homogeneous equation is y ce6c with c an arbitrary constant. A particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation is x e7 x 6 x 1 y e7 x e7 s e s ds e 1 e x e7 x . 6 6 0 The general solution to our equation is then y x ce7 x 1 e x e7 x . 6 Using the initial condition we get c 1 so the required particular solution is 7 x y x 5e 1 e x 6 6 102 (iii) The general solution to the homogenous equation is y ce x , c an arbitrary constant. particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation is y e x x s 2e s ds. 0 Now using integration by parts we have s e 2 s dx s 2e s 2 se s ds and se s ds se s e s ds se s e s so s e 2 s ds s 2e s 2e s s 1 c. It follows that x 0 s 2e s ds s 2e s 2e s s 1 0 x 2e x 2e x x 1 2 x and that a particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation is y x2 2 x 1 2e x . The general solution to our equation then is y x x2 2 x 1 2ex cex x2 2 x 1 cex where c is an arbitrary constant. y 1 1 1 5 ce c 4e1 so required particular solution is y x x2 2 x 1 4e x 1. 2. (i) We have Y Y v dY I dt so v dY Y 1 I dt or dY I 1 . aY where a v dt v 103 A (ii) Potential equilibrium where Y Y and dY 0. dt That is at Y aI I . v 1 This is a particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation. The general solution to the homogeneous equation is Y ce at with c an arbitrary constant. Adding we get the general solution to the nonhomogeneous equation given by Y Y ce at . and Y Y if and only if e at 0. That is, if and only if a 0. (iii) Want a 0 where a 1 . v As is the marginal property to consume, 0 1 and 1 0. The accelerator v is v 0, so this condition will not hold and Y will be subject to explosive growth. This may be a good representation in a growth model. 3. (i) Consumers when faced with rising prices may buy now to avoid higher prices in the future. If this rationale is correct we would expect c 0. Alternatively they may reason that rising prices today must be matched by prices falling in the future so they will hold off buying now, in which case we would expect c 0. (ii) Equating Qs to Qd we have dP a bP c P dt or dP a b dP , with d dt c c which is a first order linear differential equation with constant coefficients. A particular solution to the dP 0 in the equation to give nonhomogeneous equation is found by letting P P and dt a . P b As P is at rest at this value P is a potential equilibrium. The general solution to the homogeneous equation is P t edt P 0 edt , an arbitrary constant. Adding gives the general solution to the nonhomogenous equation P t P P 0 e dt . 104 (iii) Now P P iff d 0, that is, iff b 0. c We are given b 0 and 0 so the condition we require is c 0. ( a ) If this is the case the resultant equilibrium for P is P . (b ) 4. (i) Consider 1 Y K , L K L K L1 so Y K , L is homogeneous of degree one. Y K 1L1 0 2Y 1 K 1L1 0. K K2 2 Similarly Y 0 and Y2 0. K K Now Y 0, L 0 L1 0 Y K ,0 K 0 0, so the function satisfies all the requirements of a neoclassical production function. (ii) Y Y K ,1 K K L L so k k k (iii) The differential equation is k sk n k or k n k sk which is clearly a Bernoulli Equation. Dividing through by k gives k k n k 1 α s and letting z k 1 so z 1 k k we write our equation in terms of z as z n 1 z s 1 . 105 The general solution to this equation is z k 1 c1e 1 n t s , n where c1 is an arbitrary constant. (iv) As 0 1, 1 n is positive so e 1 n t 0 as t . Thus k 1 s n and s k n * 1 1 is the steady state level of k. (v) The steady state level o consumption is c* k * n k * s n 1 n s n 1 1 . The golden rule level of k occurs when k * n . That is when k * 1 n so k n * g 1 1 n 1 . comparing k * with k g* we see that the golden rule level of s is s*g . 9.6 All these equations are second order linear differential equations with constant coefficients. 1. (i) Homogeneous equation with auxiliary equation m2 4m 4 0, which has repeated roots of m1 m2 2, so the general solution is y c1e2 x c2 xe2 x , c1 and c2 arbitrary constants. 106 Now y 0 c1 2 and y 2ce2 x 2c2 xe2 x c2e 2 x 4e 2 x 2c2 xe 2 x c2e 2 x so y 0 4 c2 5 c2 1. The required particular solution is then y 2e2 x xe2 x . (ii) This homogeneous equation has an auxiliary equation given by m2 m 2 0 which has roots m1 2, m2 1 so the general solution to the differential equation is y c1e2 x c2e x , c1 and c2 arbitrary constants. Now y 0 c1 c2 1, y 2c1e2 x c2e x , y 0 2c1 c2 5. Solving the two equations in c1 and c2 gives c1 4 and c2 7 so the required particular solution is 3 3 y 4 e2 x 7 e x . 3 3 (iii) Nonhomogeneous equation with auxiliary equation m 2 2m 3 0 which has roots m1 3, m1 1 so the general solution to the homogeneous equation is y c1e3 x c2e x , with c1 and c2 arbitrary constants. For a particular solution of the nonhomogeneous equation try y a0 a1 x a2 x 2 so y a1 2a2 x and y 2a2 . Substituting into our differential equation gives 2a2 2 a1 2a2 x 3 a0 a1 x a2 x 2 9 x 2 . Equating coefficients gives 2a2 2a1 3a0 0, 4a2 3a1 0, 3a2 9 107 so a2 3, a1 4 and a0 14 . 3 Therefore a particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation is y 14 4 x 3x2 3 and the general solution is y 14 4 x 3x2 c1e3 x c2e x . 3 (iv) The auxiliary equation is m 2 2m 3 0 which has roots m1 3 and m2 1 so the general solution to the homogeneous equation is y c1e3 x c2e x , c1 and c2 arbitrary constants. For a particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation we try y cxe x so y ce x cxe x , y 2ce x cxe x . Substituting into our differential equation gives 2ce x cxe x 2 ce x cxe x 3cxe x 8e x , that is, 4ce x 8e x c 2. Thus a particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation is y 2 xe x and the general solution is y 2 xe x c1e3 x c2e x . (v) This equation has auxiliary equation given by m2 m 2 0 which has roots m1 2, m2 1, so the general solution to the homogeneous equation is y c1e x , c1 and c2 arbitrary constants. For a particular solution of the nonhomogeneous equation by y cxe2 x 108 with y ce2 x 2cxe2 x , y 4ce2 x 4cxe2 x . Substituting in our equation gives e2 x 4c 4cx 2cx 2cx 4e2 x c 4 , 3 so the general solution to our equation is y 4 xe2 x c1e2 x c2e x . 3 Now y 0 c1 c2 5 y 4 e 2 x 8 xe 2xc 2c1e 2 x c2e x 3 3 4 y 0 2c1 c2 1, 3 so c1 14 , c2 31 9 9 and our required particular solution is (12 xe2 x 14e2 x 31e x ) y . 9 (vi) The auxiliary equation is 2m 2 2m 1 0 which has conjugate complex roots m1 1 i , m2 1 i 2 2 2 2 so the general solution to our equation is c cos x c2 sin x y 2 ex 2 1 2 2 with y e Hence c1 cos x c2 sin x x 2 c1 sin x c2 cos x e . 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 x 2 y 0 2c1 4 c1 2 y 0 (c1 c2 ) 2 c2 2 2 so the required particular solution is y e x 2 2cos x 2sin x . 2 2 109 (vii) The auxiliary equation is m2 m 0 which has roots m1 0, m2 1 so the general solution to the homogeneous equation is y c1 c2e x , where c1 and c2 are arbitrary constants. For a particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation try y a0 a1 x. But a constant appears in the general solution of the homogeneous equation so instead try y a0 x a1 x 2 . Now y a0 2a1x, y 2a1 so substituting into our differential equation gives 2a1 a0 2a1x x a1 1 , a0 1 2 and the general solution to the nonhomogeneous equation is 2 y x x c1 c2e x . 2 Differentiating we have y 1 2 x c2e x . Using the initial conditions we have y 0 c1 c2 1 y 0 1 c2 0 c2 1 and c1 2, so our required particular solution is 2 y x x 2 e x . 2 (viii) The auxiliary equation is m 2 2m 1 0 which has repeated roots m1 m2 1, so the general solution to the homogeneous equation is y c1e x c2 xe x , c1 and c2 arbitrary constants. For a particular solution tempted to try y ce x but e x appears in the general solution of the homogeneous equation as does xe x so instead we try y cx 2e x . 110 Now y 2cxe x cx 2e x ce x 2 x x 2 y ce x 2 x x 2 ce x 2 2 x ce x 2 4 x x 2 . so substituting into our differential equation gives ce x 2 4 x x2 4 x 2 x 2 x 2 e x c 1 . 2 The general solution to our equation is then 2 x y x e c1e x c2 xe x . 2 2. Consider y y1 y2 and ay by cy a y1 y2 b y1 y2 c y1 y2 ay1 by1 cy1 ay2 by2 cy2 f1 x f 2 x . (i) which The auxiliary equation is m2 3m 0 has roots m1 0, m2 3 so the solution to the homogeneous y c1 c2e , where c1 , c2 are arbitrary constants. 3x For f1 x 6 try y a0 x. Then y a0 , y 0 and we have 3a0 6 a0 2 . For f 2 x 3e3 x try y cxe3 x . Then y ce3 x 3cxe3 x ce3 x 1 3x y 3ce3 x 1 3x 3ce3 x 3ce3 x 2 3x so 3ce3x 2 3x 3ce3x 1 3x 3e3x c 1. Combining we have that a particular solution to our differential equation is 2 x xe3 x and the general solution is y 2 x xe3 x c1 c2e3 x . 111 equation is (ii) From (vii) of question 1 the general solution to the homogeneous equation is 2 x y c1e x c2 xe x , c1 and c2 arbitrary constants, and a particular solution is y x e . For 2 f2 x 3x we try y a0 a1x as a particular solution so y a1 , y 0 and 2a1 a0 a1x 3x a1 3 and a0 6. Combining we have a particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation as 2 x y 6 3x x e c1e x c2 xe x . 2 (iii) From (v) of question 1 the general solution to the homogeneous equation is y c1e 2 x c2e x , with c1 and c2 as arbitrary constants. For f1 x 6 x, we try y a0 a1x so y a1 , y 0 and then a2 2a0 2a1 x 6 x a 3, a0 3 . 2 For f 2 x 4e x try y cxe x so y ce x 1 x , y ce x x 2 and we have ce x x 2 1 x 2 x e x c 4 . 3 Combining we have the particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation as y 3 3x 4 xe x 2 3 and the general solution is y 3 3x 4 xe x c1e2 x c2e x . 2 3 9.7 Routh’s theorem states real roots and the real parts of imaginary roots of the nth degree polynomial equation a0 mn a1m n 1 an 1m an 0 are negative if and only if the first n of the determinants a1 a3 a5 a7 a1 a3 a5 a a3 a a2 a4 a6 a1 , 1 , a0 a2 a4 , 0 a0 a2 0 a1 a3 a5 0 a1 a3 0 a0 a2 a4 112 are all positive, where it is understood that in these determinants we set ar 0 for all r n needed to obtain these determinants. We know y x will be convergent if and only if the real roots or the real parts of complex roots are all negative. Applying Routh’s theorem to our equation, this will be the case if and only if a 0 a, are 0 a 0, ab 0 a 0 and b 0. 1 b 2. (i) In this equation a1 21 so by Routh’s theorem the time path is not convergent. (ii) From this equation a1 21 0 a1 a3 a0 a2 a1 a3 0 a0 a2 0 1 36 0 a1 a3 21 20 1 36 0 21 20 0 0 0 20 1 3 3 21 20 1 36 21 20 The time path for y is convergent. (iii) From this equation a1 8 a1 a3 a0 a2 8 4 1 7 60, so the time path for y is divergent. 9.8 1. (i) In this example ve ve dy2 f 1 dy1 y 0 f2 ve 1 so y1 0 has a positive slope. 113 0. Similarly y2 0 has a positive slope, so we have two possible phase diagrams: y2 y2 y1 0 (1) y2 0 (4) y1 0 y2 0 (2) (3) (a) y1 (b) y1 Also, y1 f1 0 y 2 so y1 and y1 move in opposite directions so as y1 increases y1 must decrease from positive to zero, to negative which give the directional arrows for y1 in the two diagrams. y2 g2 0 y2 so as y 2 increases, y 2 must decrease from positive, to zero to negative, which gives the directional arrows for y 2 as shown in the diagrams. Phase diagram (a) gives convergent time paths for our variables without cycles. Phase diagram (b) gives the same in sections (1) or (2) but divergent time paths in sections (3) or (4). (ii) In this example ve ve y2 f 1 y2 y 0 f2 ve 1 and y2 y1 y2 0 ve ve g1 g2 ve 114 so the slope of y1 0 is negative and the slope of y2 0 is positive as shown in the diagram: y2 y2 0 y1 0 y1 Also y1 f1 0 y1 so as y1 increases y1 must decrease from positive to zero to negative which gives the directional arrows for y1 as shown in the diagram. Similarly y2 g2 0 y2 so as y2 increases, y2 must also increase from negative to zero to positive which gives the directional arrows for y2 as shown in the diagram. Thus the time paths for our variables is divergent without cycles. (iii) In this example ve ve y2 f 1 y1 y 0 f2 ve 1 115 so the slope of y1 0 is negative, so we have two possible phase diagrams: y2 y2 y1 0 y2 0 (2) (3) y2 0 y1 0 (1) (a) y1 (4) (b) y1 The directional arrows are obtained by considering y1 f1 0; y1 so as y1 increases y1 must increase going from negative to zero to positive. Thus the directional arrows for y1 are as given in the diagrams. By the same reasoning, as y2 increases y2 must increase going from negative to zero to positive thus giving the directional arrows for y2 as shown in the diagrams. Phase diagram (a) gives rise to divergent time paths for our variables without cycles. Phase diagrams (b) gives convergent time paths for our variables, without cycles in sections (3) and (4) but divergent time paths without cycles in sections (1) and (2). (iv) In this example ve ve, y2 f 1 y1 y 0 f2 ve 1 116 so the slope of y1 0 is negative and ve ve, y2 g 1 y1 y 0 g2 ve 2 so the slope of y2 0 is positive. Thus we get the following phase diagram: y2 y2 0 y1 0 y1 As y1 f1 0 , y1 as we increase y1, y1 must also increase going from negative to zero to positive which gives the directional arrows for y1 as shown in the diagram. y2 f2 0 y2 as we increase y2 , y2 must decrease giving the directional arrow as shown in the diagram. Thus the time paths of our variables diverge without cycles. 117 Exercises for Chapter 10 10.2 1. (i) y t 1 f yt Clearly we require f 0 and f 1. (ii) yt 1 f yt We require f 0 but f 1. 118 (iii) f y t 1 yt We require f 1. (iv) y t 1 yt We require f 1. 119 f 10 5 log yt so f 5 1 for 0 yt 1. yt The time path of y is divergent without oscillations. (a) (b) f 3 8 cos yt so f 8 sin yt 0 for 0 yt , so the time path has no oscillations. For 0.122 yt .878, 8 sin yt 1 and the time path is divergent, otherwise convergent. (c) f 10 8 yt5 so f 40 yt4 1 for yt 1 so the time path has no oscillations and is divergent. 10.3 1. All the equations are second order linear difference equations with constant coefficients. (i) We have y x y x 1 y x , 2 y x y x 2 2 y x 1 y x so writing our difference equation in standard format gives y x 2 4 yy x 1 3 y x 0 which is a homogeneous equation whose auxiliary equation is m2 4m 3 0, with roots m1 1 and m2 3. The general solution is y c1 c2 3x , c1 and c2 arbitrary constants. (ii) We have y x 1 y x 1 y x 2 2 y x y x 2 y x 1 y x 2 so our difference equation is y x 4 y x 1 4 y x 2 x2 with auxiliary equation m 2 4m 4 0. This equation has repeated roots m1 m2 2 so the general solution to the homogeneous equation is y c1 c2 x 2x. For a particular solution try y a0 a1 x a2 x 2 . 120 Substituting into our equation gives 2 a0 a1 x a2 x 2 4 a0 a1 x 1 a2 x 1 2 2 4 a0 a1 x 2 a2 x 2 x . Equating coefficients gives a0 4a1 12a2 0 a1 8a2 0 a2 1 a1 8, a0 20, so a particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation is y 20 8 x x 2 and the general solution is y 20 8x x2 c1 c2 x 2x. (iii) Writing our equation in standard format gives y x 2 2 y x 1 2 y x 0 which has an auxiliary equation m 2 2m 2 0. The roots of this equation are conjugate complex numbers m1 1 i and m2 1 i so the general solution to the homogeneous equation is x y 2 2 c1 cos x c2 sin x . 4 4 For a particular solution of the nonhomogeneous equation try y a0 a1 x a2 x 2 . Substituting into our differential equation gives 2 2 a0 a1 x 2 a2 x 2 2 a0 a1 x 1 a2 x 1 2 a0 a1 x a2 x 2 6 x x 2 . Equating coefficients gives a0 2a2 0, a1 6, a2 1 so a particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation is y 2 6 x x 2 121 and the general solution is y 2 6 x x 2 2 2 c1 cos x c2 sin x . 4 4 x (iv) The auxiliary equation is m 2 4m 4 0 which has repeated roots m1 m2 2 so the general solution to the homogeneous equation is y c1 2 x c2 x 2 x , c1 and c2 arbitrary constants. For f1 x 2x try y cx 2 2x which gives cx 2 2 x 4c x 1 2 x 1 4 x 2 2 x 2 2 x. 2 2 Equating the coefficient of 2 x gives 2c 1 c 1 . 2 For f2 x 8x try y a0 a1 x which gives a0 a1 x 4 a0 a1 x 1 4 a0 a1 x 2 8 x. Equating coefficients gives a0 4a1 , a1 8, a0 32 . Combining we have that a particular solution for the nonhomogeneous equation is y cx 2 2 x 1 32 8 x and the general solution is y cx 2 2 x 1 32 8 x c1 2 x c2 x 2 x. (v) The auxiliary equation is m 2 3m 2 0 which has roots m1 2, m2 1 so the general solution to the homogeneous equation is y c1 2 x c2 , c1 and c2 arbitrary constants. For f1 x c2 try y a0 x which gives 2a0 x 2 6a0 x 1 4a0 x 5 a0 5 . 2 For f 2 x 2x try y cx 2 x which gives 2c x 2 2x2 6cx2x1 4cx2x 2x. 122 Equating the coefficients of 2 x gives 16c 11 c 1 . 16 Combining we have that a particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation is y 5 x x2 x 4 2 and the general solution is y c1 2x c2 5 x x2x4. 2 Now y 0 c1 c2 0 y 1 2c1 c2 5 2 1 8 5 8 c2 3, c1 3. Hence the required solution is y 3.2x 3 5 x x2x4. 2 2. In this model we have the following second order linear difference equation with constant coefficients y t 2 y t 1 1 y t 2 v which has an auxiliary equation m2 2 m 1 0. (i) The roots of the auxiliary equation are real and distinct if 4 1 2 as 0. 2 2 4 1 2 2 Now 4 1 2 2 22 as 0 2 2 2 , 2 so our condition on implies that 2 2 . Let m1 m2 be the roots of the auxiliary equation. Then m1 m2 2 2 by our implied condition on and m1m2 1 0 , 123 so both roots are positive and at least one root is 1 . Hence the time path is divergent and nonoscillatory. (ii) The roots of the auxiliary equation are real and equal if 4(1+ α ) , (2 + ) 2 in which case the common root is m 2 2 1 from our implied condition on . Again the time path for output is divergent and nonoscillatory. (iii) We get cycles in this model only if the roots of the auxiliary equation are conjugate complex and the condition that ensures this is 4 1+ α (2 + α)2 . The absolute value of these roots will be 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 4 4 1 For convergent cycles we require then 1 1 1 1 as 1 0. For divergent cycles we require 1 1. (iv.) Explosive Growth without Cycles Explosive Cycles 2 4 1 2 Convergent Cycles 1 1 124 3. When time is treated as a discrete variable we regard our economic variables as changing only after the passage of discrete intervals of time. If y(x) is our economic variables then y(x) is defined for x 0, 1, 2, . . . For continuous time the economic variables are regarded as changing continuously. In a second order linear differential equation with constant coefficients cycles can only occur in the case where the roots of the auxiliary equation are conjugate complex numbers. In a second order linear difference equation with constant coefficients, cycles can occur in all three cases: where the roots of the auxiliary equation are real and distinct, real and equal, and conjugate complex. For example, in the first case if m1 and m2 are the distinct roots and m1 m2 with m1 negative then eventually m1 dominates and we have cycles. This means that for difference equations, unlike differential equations we must look at the conditions on the parameters of our model that ensure (i) m1 and m2 are both positive (ii) m1 and m2 are both negative (iii) m1 negative, m2 positive but m1 m2 . 10.5 (i) Substituting into the definitional equation we have Yt a bYt v Yt 1 Yt 2 , that is, Yt cYt 1 cYt 2 a where c v (1 b) (1 b). The auxiliary equation is m2 cm c 0. The potential equilibrium is found by setting Yt Yt 1 Yt 2 Y in our definitional equation to obtain Y a . 1 b (ii) The auxiliary equation has real and distinct roots if c 2 4c 0 , that is, c c 4 0 . As c is positive, this requires c 4. 125 If m1 and m2 are the roots of the auxiliary equation then m1 m2 c 0 m1m2 c 2 c 2 4c 4c 0. so both roots are positive and the time path for Y is not subject to oscillations. The larger root is c c c 4 1 as c 4, so we have explosive growth for Y. 2 (iii) Real and equal roots of the auxiliary equation if c c 4 0 c 4. The common root then is m c 2 1, 2 so we have explosive growth with no oscillations. (iv) We have cycles if the roots of the auxiliary equation are conjugate complex numbers. The condition needed to ensure this case is c c 4 0 c 4, and the roots will then be given by m1 , m2 c c 4 c i. 2 The absolute value of these roots is c 2 4c c 2 c. 4 4 If c 1 c 1 then we have convergent cycles. If c 1 divergent cycles. v) c v , where v is the accelerator and s 1 b is the marginal propensity to save. Then we s have the following cases: (a) v 4s Explosive growth for Y with no oscillations (b) v 4s Oscillations for Y v s exp losive oscillations v s damped oscillations. 126 10.6 1. (i) Substituting 2 y x y x 2 2 y x 1 y x and y x y x 1 y x into the equation gives the difference equation in standard format: y x 2 3 y x 1 2 y x 6. The auxiliary equation is β 2 3 2 0. Consider 1 2 2 1 3, so by Schur’s theorem the time path for y will be divergent. (ii) Substituting 2 y x y x 2 y x 1 y x 2 and y x y x y x 1 gives the equation in standard format: y x y x 1 y x 2 7. Consider 1 1 1 0, so by Schur’s theorem the time path for y is divergent. (iii) The auxiliary equation is 3m 2 2m 1 0. Consider 3 1 1 3 8 3 0 1 2 2 3 0 1 1 0 3 2 2 1 0 3 0 1 2 3 2 3 0 1 8 0 0 4 2 1 0 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 2 4 0 8 8 0 4 8 0 4 2 1 3 3 2 1 4 8 8 4 48, 127 so by Schur’s theorem the time path for y is convergent. 3. We must first write our difference equation in its alternative form. Now 3 y x y x 3 3 y x 2 3 y x 1 y x 2 y x y x 1 2 y x 1 y x y x y x 1 y x , so substituting back into our difference equation gives y x 3 3 y x 2 3 y x 1 y x a1 y x 2 2 y x 1 y x a2 y x 1 y x a3 y x c. Collecting terms gives y x 3 y x 2 a1 3 y x 1 3 2a1 a2 y x a1 a3 a2 1 c. The auxiliary equation is then m3 a1 3 m 2 3 2a1 a2 m a1 a3 a2 1 0. Schur’s theorem states that the roots of this polynomial will all have absolute values less than 1 if and only if 1 2 3 1 a1 a3 a2 1 a1 a3 a2 1 1 1 0 a1 a3 a2 1 3 2a1 a2 a1 3 1 0 a1 a3 a2 1 a1 a3 a2 1 0 1 a1 3 3 2a1 a2 a1 a3 a2 1 0 1 1 0 0 a1 a3 a2 1 3 2a1 a2 a1 3 a1 3 1 0 0 a1 a3 a2 1 3 2a1 a2 3 2a1 a2 a1 3 1 0 0 a1 a3 a2 1 a1 a3 a2 1 0 0 1 a1 3 3 2a1 a2 3 2a1 a2 a1 a3 a2 1 0 0 1 a1 3 a1 3 3 2a1 a2 a1 a3 a2 1 0 0 1 are all positive. 128 Exercises for Chapter 11 11.3 1. (i) The Hamiltonian is H u u2 u, which is concave in u. Moreover H 1 2u , u 2 H 2, u2 so the value of u that minimizes H is 1 . u 2 Now H 0, x so c, an arbitrary constant, and c 1 . x u 1 2 c2 c1 1 t , where c2 is another arbitrary constant. But 2 x(0) 4 c2 Hence x x(1) 2 4 c1 1 c1 5, 2 so the optimal time paths are x * ( t ) 4 2t u * ( t ) 2 * (t ) 5. (ii) The Hamiltonian is H 4u u2 x 2u which is concave in u and x. Now H 4 2 u 2 , u 2 H 2, u2 so the value of u that maximizes H is u 2 . 129 The costate equation is H , x so c1e t , where c1 is an arbitrary constant. The state equation is x x 2u x 4 2c1e t so we have the first order linear differential equation x x 4 2c1e t . A particular solution to this equation is x et t 0 e s 4 2c1e s et t 0 4e s 2c1e 2 s ds et 4e s c1e 2 s t 0 et 4et c1e2t 4 c1 4 c1et 4 c1 et , so the general solution is x c2et 4 c1et 4 c1 et 4 c1et 4 c1 c2 et , where c2 is an arbitrary constant. Using the end point conditions we have x 0 2 4 c1 4 c1 c2 2 c2 2, and x 1 10 4 c1e 1 6 c1 e 10 c1 e e 1 14 6e c1 0.9827. So our optimal time paths are x* t 4 0.9827e t 5.0173et * t 0.9827e t u* t 2 0.9827e t . (iii) The Hamiltonian is H x u2 u 3x , which is concave in x and u. As H 2u u and 2 H 2, u2 the value of u that maximizes H is u . 2 130 The costate equation is H 1 3 x yielding the differential equation 3 1 whose general solution is 1 c1e3t , 3 with c1 being an arbitrary constant. The state equation can then be written as c x 3x 1 1 eet . 6 2 The general solution to the homogeneous form of this equation is x c2 e 3t with c2 an arbitrary constant. A particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation can be obtained as in 1 (ii). Alternatively we can use the method of undetermined coefficients and use as our trial particular solution x k 0 k1e3t . Then x 3k1e3t and substituting into our equation we get c 6k1e3t 3k 0 1 1 e3t 6 2 c k 0 1 , k1 1 . 18 12 Thus the general solution to the state equation is c1e3t 1 3t x c2e . 12 18 Using the end point conditions we have c x 0 1 c2 1 1 1 12 18 (1) c1e3 1 x 1 4 c2e 4. 12 18 3 (2) c From equation (1) we have c2 17 1 . Substituting into equation (2) we have 18 12 3 17 c1 3 c1e e 71 18 12 12 18 c 1 e3 e 3 1 71 17e 3 12 18 2 71 17e 3 140.3071 c1 2.3343 60.1071 3 e3 e 3 c2 0.9444 0.1945 0.7499. 131 Thus our optimal time paths are x * t 0.7499e 3t 0.1945e3t 0.0556 * t 0.3333 2.3343e3t u* t 0.1667 1.1672e3t . 2. (i) The consumer’s problem is max subject to 40 log C t e 0.02 t dt 0 W t 0.05W t C t W 0 1, W 40 0.5, W and C expressed in millions of dollars. The control variable is consumption C t , the state variable is wealth W t . (ii) The Hamiltonian is H log Ce0.02t 0.05W C . The necessary conditions are H e 0.02 t 0 C C 2 as H2 0, C H 0.05 w W 0.05 W C W 0 1, W 40 0.5. As the Hameltonian is concave in C and W, (the sum of concave functions) these conditions are also sufficient. (iii) The value of C that maximizes the Hameltonian is 0.02 t Ce . From the costate equation we have the first order linear differential equation 0.05 0 which has a general solution given by t c1e0.05t 132 where c1 is an arbitrary constant, so C 1 e0.03t c2e0.03t , c1 say. The state equation gives the differential equation W 0.05W c2e0.03t which has a general solution given by W c3e0.05t 50c2 e0.03t e0.05t . W 0 1 c3 1 W 40 0.5 0.5 e 2 50c2 e1.2 e 2 c2 0.03386. The consumer’s optimal time path for consumption is then C* t 0.03386e0.03t and the accompanying time path for the consumer’s wealth is W * t 1.693e0.03t 0.693e0.05t . 3. (i) Substituting u t for x t in the objective function we have Maximize b a f u t , x t , t dt subject to x t u t x a x a , x b xb . (ii) The Hamiltonian for this problem is H f u t , x t , t u t , and the necessary conditions for an optimal solution are H f u, x , t 0 u u H x f u, x , t x (1) (2) x u (3) x a xa , x b xb . 133 Differentiating both sides of equation (1) with respect to t yields d f u, x, t . dt u Using equations (2) and (3) renders Euler’s equation 11.4 1. (i) The Hamiltonian is 2 H 2x u u x u 2 which is concave in x and u and as H 1 u 0 u 2 H 1, u2 the value of u that maximizes H is u 1 . The costate equation is H 2 x which has a solution given by 2 c1e t with c1 an arbitrary constant. As x 10 is free the transversality condition is 10 0 0 2 c1e10 c1 2e10 , so 2 2e10t . The state equation is x x u x 1 2e10t which is a nonhomogeneous linear differential equation of degree 1 whose general solution is x c2et e10t 1, with c2 an arbitrary constant. But x 0 5 c2 4 e10 . 134 Hence our optimal time paths are x* t 4et et 10 e10t 1 * t 2 2e10t u* t 1 2e10t . (ii) The Hamiltonian is H 4 x 3u 2u2 x u which is concave in x and u and has derivatives H 3 4u , 2 H 4, u u2 so the value of u that maximizes H is x 3 . u 4 The costate equation is H 4 , x which has as its general solution 4 c1e t . As x(1) is free 1 0 c1 4e so we have 4 4e1t . The state equation is x x u x 7 e1t 4 which has as its solution x c2et 7 1 e1t . 4 2 As x 0 2 we have c2 1 1 e so our optimal solutions are 4 2 * t t 1 1 1 x t e e 1 e1t 7 4 2 2 4 * 1 t t 4 4 e u* t 7 e1t . 4 (iii) Proceeding as we did for exercise 1.(iii) of Section 11.3 we have 1 c1e3t 3 135 where c1 is an arbitrary constant. Try 1 0. Then 3 c1 e 3 and using the end point condition x 0 1 as we did in the previous exercise we have 3 c2 17 e . 18 36 These values for the constants in our solutions would yield 3 t 1 3 x* t 17 e e 3t e 1. 18 36 36 18 But then 3 x* 1 17 e e 3 1 18 36 36 which clearly is not greater or equal to 3. Rerunning the problem as we did for exercise 1. (iii) of Section 11.3 with x 0 1 and x 1 3, we get after a little arithmetic that 2 53 17e 3 104.3071 c1 1.7354 60.1071 3 e3 e 3 c2 0.9444 0.1446 0.7999. Thus our optimal time paths are x * t 0.7998e 3t 0.1446e3t 0.0556 * t 0.3333 1.7354e3t u* t 0.1667 0.8677e3t . (iv) The Hamiltonian is H tu x u2 u x which is concave in u and x. Differentiating with respect to u we have H t 2u , 2 H 2, u u2 so the value of u that maximizes H is t . u 2 The costate equation is H 1 x which has as its solution 1 c1e t , 136 where c1 is an arbitrary constant. The state equation is u x t 1 c1e t x , 2 x which has as its general solution c x c2et 1 e-t t 4 2 where c2 is another arbitrary constant. Try 1 0 c1 e which would yield 1t x c2et e t . 4 2 From the end point condition x 0 1 we have that 1 c2 e c2 1 e 1.6796 4 4 rendering 1t x 1.6796et e t . 4 2 Now x 1 1.6796e 3 3.8156 2 4 so our option yields the optimal time paths which are 1 t x * t 1.6796et e t 4 2 * 1t t 1 e t 1 e . t 1 t u * 2 (v) The Hamiltonian is H 10 x 20u x u 10 x u 20 which being linear in x and u is concave in x and u. Moreover it is an increasing function in u for 20 but a decreasing function in u for 20. Thus u* 3 20 u* 0 20. The costate equation is H 10 x which has as its general solution 10 c1e t , 137 where c1 is an arbitrary constant. But as x 1 is free 1 0 so c1 10e 27.1828 and * 10 27.1828e t . This is a monotonically decreasing function in t and its maximum value on our time horizon is * 0 10 27.1828 17.1828. Thus * is always less than 20 and u * 0. The state equation is x x u x so the general solution for x is x c2et where c2 is an arbitrary constant. But x 0 2 so c2 2. The optimal time paths then are u* 0 x * t 2e t * t 10 27.1828e t . (vi) The Hamiltonian is H 10 x 50u x u 10 x u 50 which is concave in x and u and is a monotonically increasing function in u for 50 but a monotonically decreasing function in u for 50. So u* 4 50 u* 2 50. The costate equation is H 10 x which has as its solution 10 c1e t . As x 2 is free 2 0 so c1 10e2 73.8904. It follows that * t 10 73.8904et , 138 a monotonically decreasing function in t starting from the value * 0 63.8904, so * becomes 50 at t t where * t 50 10 73.8904e t rendering t 0.2082. Thus u* 4 0 t 0.2082 u* 2 0.2082 t 2. The state equation is x x u* . For the time interval [0, 0.2082] x 4 c1e t and as x 0 1, c1 3. So for this interval x* 4 3et . For the interval (0.2082, 2] x 2 c2et . But x* 0.2082 4 3e0.2082 0.3056 so 0.3056 2 c2e0.2082 c2 1.3758. For this interval x* 2 1.3758et . 2. (i) The consumer’s problem is logC t e T max imize t dt 0 subject to W rW C W 0 W0 , W T 0. (ii) The Hamiltonian is H log C t e t rW C . The function log C is concave in C, and the linear function rW C is concave in W and C. Hence H is concave in W and C. 139 (iii) The necessary conditions are H e t 0 C C H r W W rW C W 0 W0 , W T 0, T 0 T W T 0. 2 t Now H2 e 2 0 C C and H is concave in W and C so these conditions are also sufficient. (iv) The value of C that maximizes H is t Ce . From the costate equation c1e rt where c1 is an arbitrary constant of integration and c1 0 0 say. It follows that t r C* t 1 e . 0 (v) As T 0e rt and the transversality condition requires T 0 we must have 0 0. Moreover the optimal solution for consumption rules out 0 0. Hence 0 0 and T 0. The transversality condition then requires that W T 0. (vi) Optimal consumption will rise over time if r . That is if the rate of interest is greater than the consumer’s personal rate of time preference. It will fall if r . 3. (i) The problem facing the community is max imize 100 log au dt 0 subject to x u x 0 1000, x 100 0. (ii) The Hamiltonian is H log a log u u 140 which is clearly concave in u. A set of necessary and sufficient conditions for an optimal solution is H 0 u u H 0 x x u x 0 1000, x 100 0, 100 0, x 100 100 0. (iii) The value of u that maximizes H is u . From the costate equation t c1 an arbitrary constant. The transversality condition requires that c1 0 and u prohibits c1 0 so c1 100 c 0. The state equation renders x , c1 which has as its solution x t c2 , c1 where c2 is another arbitrary constant. The end point condition x 0 1000 yields c2 1000 and as 100 0 the transversality condition requires that x 100 100 1000 0 c1 so c1 . 100 The optimal rate of extraction is then u* 100 with the accompanying time path for the resource given by x* t 1000 100t. 11.5 (i) The elasticity of marginal utility is U c c c . U c Now U c 1 and U c 12 so c 1. c c The instantaneous elasticity of substitution is c 1 1. c 141 (ii) We have Y K L L 3 4 L L 1 4 so 3 y k 4. The problem facing the economy is Maximize e 0.05t log c dt 30 subject to k k 4 c 0.11k k 0 k 0 , k 0, 0 c t k . (iii) The Hamiltonian is 3 H e0.05t log c k 4 c 0.11k and the current value Hameltonian is 3 H c He0.05t log c k 4 c 0.11k (iv) The necessary conditions for an optimal solution are HC 1 0 C C 1 1 HC 0.05 3 k 4 0.11 0.05 3 k 4 0.16 k 4 4 3 k k 4 c 0.11k k 0 k 0 , lim T 0, lim k T 0, lim T k T 0. T T T From equation (1) 1 and 12 c c c so equation (2) yields 1 c t 3 k t 4 0.16 c t . 4 This equation with the state equation gives the required system of differential equations. 1 c t 0 3 k t 4 0.16. 4 142 (1) (2) Solving for k gives the steady state level if k k * 482.7976. The steady state level of c is found by substituting this value for k t in the equation k t 0, and solving for c. That is c** 482.7976 4 0.11 482.7976 49.8893. 3 (v) At the steady state 1** 0.02, 0.02e 0.05t c so T 0.02e 0.05T 0 as T k T k * 482.7976 k T T 9.6774e 0.05T 0 as T . It follows that the transversality condition holds at the steady state. 143
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz