LTE MIMO System-Level Design

LTE MIMO System-Level Design
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
1
Agenda
MIMO Overview
MIMO Transmitter Case Study
MIMO Receiver Case Study
Early R&D LTE Hardware Testing
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
2
1
Basic channel access modes
Transmit
Antennas
The Radio
Channel
Receive
Antennas
The Radio
Channel
Transmit
Antennas
Receive
Antennas
SIMO
SISO
Single Input Single Output
Single Input Multiple Output
(Receive diversity)
MISO
Multiple Input Single Output
(Transmit diversity)
MIMO
Multiple Input Multiple Output
(Multiple stream)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
Page 3
3
Advantages of multiple antennas
MISO (Tx diversity) increases the robustness of the signal to poor channel
conditions. It does not increase data rates but increases coverage and
therefore cell capacity.
SIMO (Rx diversity) improves the received SNR by combining multiple
copies of the same signal. Like MISO it does not increase data rates but
extends coverage and hence cell capacity.
MIMO uses multiple data streams to increase cell capacity. The data streams
can be allocated to one user to increase single-user data rates.
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
Page 4
4
2
Multiple antenna techniques
Multiple antenna techniques are fundamental to LTE and an appreciation of
the different methods and their relative advantages and disadvantages is
important
There are three main multi-antenna techniques used in LTE
1. Transmit/receive diversity
2. Spatial multiplexing
– Single User MIMO (SU-MIMO)
– Multi-user MIMO (MU-MIMO)
3. Beamforming
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
Page 5
5
Transmit/receive diversity
This is the same as what already exists for UMTS
• Transmit diversity has been specified for W-CDMA since R99. Receive
diversity was introduced in Rel-6 for HSDPA.
Stream 1
eNB
UE
Stream 1
The same data is sent on two antennas which provides better SNR
Improves performance in low SNR conditions and with fading
Simple combining is used in the receiver
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
Page 6
6
3
Single user MIMO
SU-MIMO
= data stream 1
= data stream 2
Σ
Σ
eNB 1
UE 1
This is an example of downlink 2x2 single user MIMO with precoding.
Two data streams are mixed (precoded) to best match the channel
conditions.
The receiver reconstructs the original streams resulting in increased singleuser data rates and corresponding increase in cell capacity.
2x2 SU-MIMO is mandatory for the downlink and optional for the uplink
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
7
Multiple user MIMO
MU-MIMO
= data stream 1
UE 1
= data stream 2
UE 2
Σ
eNB 1
Example of uplink 2x2 MU-MIMO.
In multiple user MIMO the data streams come from different UE.
There is no possibility to do precoding since the UE are not connected but
the wider TX antenna spacing gives better de-correlation in the channel.
Cell capacity increases but not the single user data rate.
The key advantage of MU-MIMO over SU-MIMO is that the cell capacity
increase can be had without the increased cost and battery drain of two
UE transmitters.
MU-MIMO is more complicated to schedule than SU-MIMO
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
8
4
SystemVue MIMO Source
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
9
SystemVue MIMO Channel Model
Simulated Spectrum with MIMO Fading
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
10
5
SystemVue MIMO Receiver
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
11
Agenda
MIMO Overview
MIMO Transmitter Case Study
MIMO Receiver Case Study
Early R&D LTE Hardware Testing
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
12
6
Mixed-Signal Challenges: System Design Tradeoffs
Channel
D/A
Bits In
Coding
Algorithms
A/D
Rx
Tx
Gain
Linearity
Output Power
Decoding
Algorithms
Bits Out
Gain
NF
Phase Noise
Considerations:
• Key Algorithms
• Baseband Implementation/ Fixed-Point Effects
• RF Design Impairments/Non-Linearities
• Phase Noise, ADC Jitter
• Channel Impairments
Fixed Point Baseband Designs
Math Algorithms
FPGA HDL Code
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
13
System-Level Architecture Design
Partition Design Requirements to Meet LTE Specifications
without Over-Designing
Coding/
Decoding
Algorithms
Mixed-Signal
Receiver
ADC and DAC
Impairments
With LTE having such high
performance targets every
part of the transmit and
receive chain becomes
critical to the link budget
Baseband
Fixed-Point
RF Transmitter/
PA Nonlinarities
So how to decide the
optimum balance, without
over-designing?
How are design requirements
impacted going from QPSK
to 16QAM to 64QAM?
RF Channel
D/A
Bits In
Coding
Algorithms
A/D
Tx
Rx
Decoding
Algorithms
Bits Out
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
14
7
Baseband Libraries
Algorithm Test Vectors for FPGA Development
Coding/
Decoding
Algorithms
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
15
Configurable References
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
16
8
FPGA Scrambler Example
Switch between C++
model and math
algorithm model
SystemVue
Scrambler
Output
Diff
HDL (Actual Scrambler Code Not Shown)
FPGA HDL
CoSim Output
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
17
FPGA Scrambler Example
Switch between C++
model and math
algorithm model
SystemVue
Scrambler
Output
Diff
HDL (Actual Scrambler Code Not Shown)
FPGA HDL
CoSim Output
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
18
9
Transmitter Design
Start with SystemVue Pre-Configured Template
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
19
Design Fixed Point IQ Modulator and
Replace Ideal IQ Modulator
Baseband
Fixed-Point
4X
UpSample
I(t)*CosWc(t)
I in
FIR RRC
Fs/4 Carrier
Multiplexing
I(t)*CosWc(t)Q(t)*SinWc(t)
FIR RRC
Q in
4X
UpSample
Q(t)*SinWc(t)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
20
10
64QAM EVM Results with FIR Wordlength =10 for
Fixed Point IQ Modulator Design
EVM = 0.5 %
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
21
64QAM EVM Results with FIR Wordlength =8 for
Fixed Point IQ Modulator Design
EVM = 1.3 %
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
22
11
64QAM EVM Results with FIR Wordlength =6 & 7 for
Fixed Point IQ Modulator Design
FIR Wordlength = 7 bits
EVM = 2.9 %
FIR Wordlength = 6 bits
EVM = 46 % !
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
23
Enable HDL Code Gen to Target an FPGA
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
24
12
Add RF Design: Transmitter and Antenna Cross Talk
Specify LO Phase Noise
dBc/Hz @ Freq. Offset
RF Transmitter/
PA Nonlinarities
Specify 1dB
Comp. Pt.
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
25
-80 dBc/Hz Phase Noise @ 10kHz with -30 dB CrossTalk
Specify Phase
Noise in
dBc/Hz vs.
Frequency
Offset
RS EVM = 1.3 %
QPSK
RS EVM = 1.3 %
64 QAM
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
26
13
-70 dBc/Hz Phase Noise @ 10kHz with -30 dB CrossTalk
Specify Phase
Noise in
dBc/Hz vs.
Frequency
Offset
RS EVM = 3.5 %
QPSK
RS EVM = 3.5 %
64 QAM
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
27
-60 dBc/Hz Phase Noise @ 10kHz with -30 dB CrossTalk
Specify Phase
Noise in
dBc/Hz vs.
Frequency
Offset
RS EVM = 11.2 %
QPSK
Phase noise is introducing significant ICI
, which is impacting OFDMA subcarrier
orthogonality
RS EVM = 11.2 % ,
but composite EVM is 85%
64 QAM
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
28
14
LTE MIMO Downlink BER with ADI A/D Converter
MIMO Source
MIMO
Channel
MIMO Receiver
Sweep SNR
Mixed-Signal
Receiver
ADI A/D
Converter
ADC and DAC
Impairments
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
29
QPSK BER Results with Swept ADI A/D Converter Jitter
6% Jitter
4% Jitter
2% Jitter
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
30
15
QPSK , 16QAM, 64QAM Results vs. Swept ADI ADC Jitter
6% Jitter
6% Jitter
4%
2% Jitter Jitter
QPSK
4% Jitter
6% Jitter
4% Jitter
2% Jitter
16 QAM
2% Jitter
64 QAM
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
31
QPSK , 16QAM, 64QAM Results vs. Swept LO Phase Noise
-60 dBc/Hz
-65 dBc/Hz
-70 dBc/Hz
QPSK
16 QAM
64 QAM
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
32
16
Agenda
MIMO Overview
MIMO Transmitter Case Study
MIMO Receiver Case Study
Early R&D LTE Hardware Testing
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
33
SISO Early R&D SDR Hardware Testing
Simulated
IF
RF
Simulated COTS Receiver
I
Demodulator
A/D
Converter
Q
COTS
Waveform
Baseband
De-Coding
RF/RF BER
SystemVue
+ VSA SW
MXG, ESG
Step 1
Download
Signal
Step 2
Capture
Signal
MXA, PSA
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
34
17
SISO Early R&D SDR Hardware Testing
Simulated
Simulated COTS Receiver
IF
RF
I
Demodulator
COTS
Waveform
Q
A/D
Converter
Baseband
De-Coding
RF/IF BER
SystemVue
+ VSA SW
Step 2
Capture
Signal
Step 1
Download
Signal
MXG, ESG
MXA, PSA
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
35
SISO Early R&D SDR Hardware Testing
Simulated
Simulated COTS Receiver
IF
RF
I
Demodulator
COTS
Waveform
Q
A/D
Converter
Baseband
De-Coding
RF/ Analog IQ BER
SystemVue
+ VSA SW
MXG, ESG
Step 1
Download
Signal
I
Step 2
Capture
Signal
Q
MXA with BB IQ
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
36
18
SISO Early R&D SDR Hardware Testing
Simulated
IF
RF
I
Demodulator
Q
COTS
Waveform
A/D
Converter
Baseband
De-Coding
Simulated COTS
Baseband Receiver
RF/Digital IQ BER
RF/Digital IF BER
SystemVue
+ VSA SW
MXG, ESG
Step 1
Download
Signal
Step 2
Capture
Signal
Logic Analyzers
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
37
Picture of LTE OFDMA Mixed-Signal DUT
SISO BER Test Setup
14 Bit A/D
Board DUT
N6705A
DC Power
Analyzer
MXG
(Download
Signal from
SystemVue)
16822A
Logic
Analyzer
with Agilent
SystemVue*
ESG
(DUT Clock)
* Note: SystemVue does not ship with Logic Analyzer
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
38
19
LTE OFDMA SISO BER Test Setup Diagram
LAN Cable
Download SystemVue LTE TDD/FDD
Signal via LAN
Event 1 Marker Out
Trigger In
SVue LTE TDD/FDD
Signal at 7.68 MHz IF
SystemVue
MXG
Analog
In
30.72 MHz
ESG
Clk
In
14-Bit A/D
Converter
Board (DUT)
+ 3.3V
Dig.
Out
16822 Logic
Analyzer with
SystemVue
installed
+ 5V
LAN Cable
N6705A DC Power Analyzer
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
39
LTE OFDMA SISO BER Results (TDD)
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
40
20
Automate Testing with SystemVue Math Scripting
Power Supply/
Analyzer
MXG
14-Bit
A/D Converter
DUT
Sweep from:
QPSK
to 16 QAM
to 64QAM
Sweep
DC Bias
with Power
Supply/
Analyzer
Sweep
RF Power
on MXG
BER
Logic Analyzer
with SystemVue
Installed
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
41
FDD SISO BER with Swept QPSK, 16QAM,
64QAM, +5V Bias
(Preliminary)
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
42
21
New LTE Reference Vector White Paper
http://www.agilent.com/find/eesof-lte-whitepaper
From an Agilent FPGA Developer
using SystemVue:
“SystemVue helped me discover a
typing error in my 16QAM
scrambler which was failing tests.
It has saved MBD at least 3 months
of development time already, and
is crucial for meeting - and
exceeding - our on-going
development time goals.”
http://cp.literature.agilent.com/lit
web/pdf/5990-3671EN.pdf
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
43
New LTE Book
www.agilent.com/find/ltebook
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
44
22
For More Information:
www.agilent.com/find/systemvue
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
45
For More Information:
www.agilent.com/find/lte
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
46
23
Summary
• Trade-off baseband and RF design impairments for system-level design
requirements
• Evaluate fixed-point design impairments on system-level metrics such
as EVM and BER; Generate HDL from fixed-point design to target FPGAs
• Generate LTE reference vectors to validate hand-written HDL code for
FPGA implementations
• Perform system-level design trade-offs to minimize over-designing to
meet specs (e.g. fixed point vs. LO phase noise vs. RF nonlinearities vs.
ADC jitter)
• Combine simulation with test equipment to perform coded BER on
RF/mixed-signal hardware, using simulation to provide baseband
coding/decoding functionality
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
47
Thank You!
Copyright Agilent Technologies 2009
Agilent Restricted
48
24