Case Study: Business rescue advisory services Broadcasting & Entertainment Nimble Group advises a Consortium on an offer to Top TV’s Business Rescue Practitioner THE CLIENT A local BEE Consortium INDUSTRY Braodcasting and PayTV BUSINESS NEED To submit an offer to the BRP to acquire the TopTV business. To retain a South African investor and ownership footprint. Background The Board of On Digital Media (Pty) Ltd (trading as “Top TV”) considered that the company was financially distressed and voluntarily began business rescue proceedings in October 2012, as contemplated in chapter 6 of the Companies Act No.71 of 2008 (the “Act”). StarTimes Communications Network Technology Co. Ltd (“StarTimes”), a foreign Pay TV company, made an offer to the Business Rescue Practitioner (“BRP”) to acquire a shareholding and economic interest relating to licenses in the Top TV business. This offer - which was to expire on 30 April 2013 - was accepted by the BRP and included in the business rescue plan that was published on 19 April 2013. This plan was to be considered at a meeting of creditors to be held on 30 April 2013 (Section 151 of the Act: Meeting to determine the future of the company). Following the publication of this plan a local BEE consortium (“The Consortium”) decided it too would submit a formal offer to the BRP for his consideration. Nimble Group was engaged by the Consortium as lead providers to this process. The Challenge Significant challenges for the Consortium in respect of the business rescue proceedings included the following: Meeting of Creditors “Decision Day” The following events occurred on 30 April 2013 at the Section 151 meeting of creditors: The Act does not provide for a process that is to be followed where an unsolicited offer is made to the BRP, after publication of the plan. Because the StarTimes offer had a definitive expiration time ending on this date, it made an adjournment of the meeting problematic. The StarTimes offer had secured an exclusivity period up to the date of this meeting that precluded the BRP from discussing any details of the business with alternative bidders, until after the end of the exclusivity period. The published business rescue plan was considered and voted on. Operational and Other Considerations The ‘Payment Holiday’ agreed to by various Top TV content providers also terminated on the date of the Section 151 meeting date. Top TV was technically insolvent and had no access to additional cash flow required to keep the business operating beyond 1 May 2013. Essential to the success of the Consortium’s offer was the securing of support from the relevant Development Finance Institutions (“DFI’s”), such as the IDC and DBSA, as affected persons, for, either an adjournment of the Section 151 meeting or acceptance of the Consortium’s offer. The eventual deal structure of the Consortium’s offer would be subject to the regulations of the relevant regulatory bodies, including the Independent Communication Authority of South Africa (“ICASA”), and The Competition Commission of South Africa, as well as the provisions of the Electronic Communications Act. www.nimblegroup.co.za Issue date: May 2013 NIMBLE GROUP SOLUTION Prepare an offer that would rally the support of affected persons. Postpone the meeting of creditors to allow the BRP and affected parties to consider the Consortium plan. Nimble Group Solution Nimble Group’s solution included the preparation of the Consortium’s offer to be presented to the DFI’s, material shareholders, creditors and funders. The aim of this offer was to rally the support of those parties in order to postpone the Section 151 meeting, by way of an adjournment or to reject the BRP’s plan incorporating the StarTimes offer. The Consortium’s offer was initially more lucrative to creditors than the StarTimes offer and ultimately more beneficial for all stakeholders, and complied with the relevant legislative and regulatory requirements. The aim of securing the irrevocable support from the DFI’s and material creditors, and the resultant postponement of the section 151 meeting, would allow for: the Consortium to formalize an unconditional offer (pending the termination of the exclusivity period); allow the Top TV business to continue its operations without interruption; and permit the BRP to include the Consortium’s offer in a revised business rescue plan for consideration by the affected persons at a Section 151 meeting to be held at a later date. Nimble Group was instrumental in facilitating numerous interactions between the BRP and the Consortium, as well as Legal Counsel, the current shareholders and funders. BUSINESS IMPACT Consortium offer was announced and considered at the meeting of creditors, but was not accepted. Business Impact The Consortium offer was announced by the BRP at the Section 151 meeting, during which time it was considered by the various affected persons. The Consortium’s offer was, however, not accepted by way of a vote by creditors who, in turn, voted in favour of the StarTimes offer. So what conspired against the Consortium’s plan? The StarTimes offer would expire unless accepted at the Section 151 meeting. The exclusivity in favour of StarTimes restricted access to vital information. The Consortium was unable to secure the support of the DFI’s and creditors. CONTACTS Grant Krog, Executive Director +27 11 253 7249 [email protected] Trevor Murgatroyd, Director +27 82 461 8781 +27 11 253 7225 [email protected] Page 2 28/07/2017
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz