Job Design Herzberg’s Factors (again) Job Design is the linking of specific task behaviours to jobs, followed by application of techniques, equipment and job control procedures. Done in order to improve the quality of work life. More meaningful jobs that integrate employee needs with organizational needs enhance job involvement and motivation. Recent movement has placed QWL programs under scrutiny in that they no longer implemented simply to raise levels of employee satisfaction, they must provide payback in organizational terms. 1 Demographic shift Address higher order needs Interventions Hygienes “No dissatisfaction” Self directed teams Job range # of tasks employees perform , perhaps at different times related to a core work activity Increase # of work activities in job Job enlargement Different work expectations Variation of job enlargement – trained in # work activities Cross Training Skill variety: technical, social, etc requirements within job Task Identity: ability to see job through from beginning to end Task significance: does it really matter, is it important Social opportunity: interaction Autonomy: freedom to control work activities Feedback: from work itself on work effectiveness: 2 Job Content Scientific management addressed objective aspects of work only. Job content recognizes the subjective (psychological) aspect of the job, and the setting in which it is performed. Perceptions of job content precede performance in that employees make conclusions about the presence or absence of job content prior to attaining some performance level. Key for managers then is to influence performance by changing job content. Job rotation Task significance Challenge Responsibility Pride in work Recognition Growth opportunities Promotions Managers must maintain an appropriate level of hygienes while improving the motivational aspects of the job (such as through Job design interventions adjacent). Herzberg led the charge against scientific management 3 Job Range (Horizontal) Experienced meaningfulness of work Critical Psychological States Social opportunities Experienced responsibility for work outcomes Personal and work outcomes High Internal work motivation High quality performance High job satisfaction Low absenteeism and turnover Autonomy 3 Job Depth Six Job Content Factors Amount of discretion to select job procedures Skill variety Task Identity Salary Job security Working conditions Status Org procedures Supervision Interpersonal aspect Rotate workers thru specialized jobs over time Note: Job Enlargement makes greater demands on employees than job rotation. Since they must acquire new skills and assume more responsibility Job depth Motivators “intrinsic factors” (Vertical) Feedback Knowledge of results of work activities Growth Need Strength People with a growth need and strength are likely to seek challenging work and prefer to make independent job decisions. People with low growth need strength do not seek jobs with these job content factors Note: Drivers for QWL 5 Task control Accountability Workpace Accomplishment Interest - Herzberg’s Job Design Principles Give employees as much control over ways to complete task as possible Hold employees accountable Let employees set their own workpace Design jobs so employees sense accomplishment Design jobs so employees learn new skills and work procedures Increased differences between workers Better union accceptance Understanding of QWL by managers on bottom line Support by government (tax incentives for retraining) Note: Scientific Management Job Design in an Individual context We know (based on adjacent sheet) that there is: Job Range (Horizontal) Job rotation: not very effective if tasks are similar and boring, i.e. busboy to dishwashing. Job enlargement: changes nature of work eliminating overspecialization created by scientific management Cross Training: earn more for learning new skills, increase skill of work force but also pressures pay system Job depth (Vertical) JD also known as vertical job-loading involving changes which influence the planning and doing components of work Principles: Job design should provide direct employee feedback on jobs. Employees can be their own quality control inspectors. Opportunity to learn new skills. They need to grow. Opportunity to influence scheduling of work. Flextime with core hours for example. Each job should have qualities which distinguish it from other jobs. The job should fit the personality of its holders. Opportunity to control job resources. Ex. Letting them service their own equipment. Personal accountability should be increased. Limited social interaction Low skill requirements, minimal training requirements Machine pacing Repetitive Specialization of tasks Specified methods, no employee variation Above combined to trash craftsmanship and pride, this approach will not sustain growth in face of modern competition Team Based Design 9 Management Design Of Self Directed Teams Social-technical system involving 2 opposing forces Considerations: Creation of high performance norms Channelling group conflict to useful ends Creating satisfying inter-personal relations Aligning technical work with structure of group Technical element. Scientific management and productivity emphasis on specialization through operational, equipment and technical/mechanical processes These two are so interdependent that work designs must be built which account for their interplay Social element. Behavioural sciences dealing with interpersonal aspects of task group behaviour Basic building block of team approach So… . NUMMI plant good example of application (review pg 16/17) Autonomous work group Teams should be relatively small (8-20) Avoid team centered interventions (sensitivity training) as they alter the group climate Pay system structured to ensure individual pay is based on group performance Supervisor in horizontal integrator role with other teams vice vertical liaison Team given authority to plan, organize, and control a defined piece of work wrt quality and quantity (expanded job range and depth) Group assigned a whole task that is understood, significant and meaningful i.e appropriate group mission statement Group individuals possess complimentary skill sets, encourage cross training and skill acquisition Group is given autonomy. Work methods, scheduling, task assignment, sometimes new member selection Reward group performance rather than individual performance Qualities of such work groups include cohesiveness, and effective cross training, due to the fact mbrs ar closer to the tasks being performed. Effective management skill acquisition due to shared leadership, and higher performance goals based on collaboration 1. How employee motivation and performance are related to job design 2. Difference between jobs fulfilling high order needs and those that dont. 3. Approaches for job design at individual employee level 4. Why managers continue to be interested in effect of job design 5. Apply the rules of job design 6. Link job design, employee participation, reduction of job stress 7. How employee personality interacts with job design 8. conditions that might make employee participation effective 9. Describe new developments in team-based employee participation Preconditions For Worker Empowerment Ability to become psychologically involved in participative activities Motivation to act autonomously 8 Considerations for Managers (Empowerment & Participation) 7&8 Paradox as these qualities are reflected in ‘internalizers’, therefore, a dynamic tension between individual needs (internalizer) and those of the team. These people must strike a proper balance in developing the individual identity, yet subordinating that identity to the will of the team. This leads to the third requirement. (What is in it for me??) Ability to see benefit of participation for one’s own well being Participation Has 3 Features Psychological/mental involvement. I must be interested and motivated and wish to take on responsibility. This leads to attainment of higher order needs. It cannot simply be physical involvement. Motivation to Contribute. Intrinsic rewards help employees internalize the motivation to contribute. You cannot instruct people to participate as you cannot legislate motivation. (uninspired compliance) Acceptance of Authority. Responsibility grows on people, they learn to like it. As they acquire more responsibility as a team, they learn to rely on each other more increasing collaboration, and innovation. Training and preparation. Cannot do this under emergency conditions Managers must coach not micromanage Must believe employees have/can develop a high growth need strength Employees must view participation as a central feature, participation otherwise will be a distraction Employees need intellectual and conceptual skills for technical problem solving but also skill set to problem solve with a participative approach Effective communications. Common org terminology to facilitate cooperation within and between teams. Superiors and subordinates must be able to freely discuss problems Adapt or die. It will not always be easy and org cannot afford to take easy way out (competitive advantage) Leadership must instill confidence and trust Presence of motivational systems that tap full spectrum of hierarchy of needs Subordinates must be involved in goal setting Decision making that occurs at all levels Control processes which are dispersed and emphasize self-control High Performance standards and are pursued aggressively Note: some reasons why organizations may choose to avoid these innovations: Lack of competition. High entry barriers, very loyal customer base, government protection, global industries tend to overlook due to small specialist market, patents etc Other less expensive interventions to increase productivity have yet to be pursued Few management layers are already in place. In a way the system is inherent already in the organization Jobs highly specialized governed by strong rules and regulations (aircrew procedures0 Inability of employees, if forced will lead to increased job stress Employees may have sufficient high growth need strength and will avoid new measures Unions Installment of system will likely lead to reduction of middle managers which may change the cost/benefit analysis May not have the will to pursue the vision, change becomes an end unto itself called ‘means-end conversion’ really need a good strategic plan, lack of which would be a de-motivator for change 4 Job design fulfills 2 goals. Improved organizational effectiveness; satisfaction of employee needs. Factors influencing increased interest: More competition increased use of technology improvement in job design methods better understanding of the implementation process greater dependability of results Employers interest in job design Therefore….. Reasons for increased interest: Job design expands the number of intrinsic rewards Job design is behavioural vice attitudinal based (more results) Encourages flexible employee attitudes and innovation Feedback and responsibility fulfills employee higher order needs Alternatives to a totally participative organization: Scanlon Plan – interlocking employee committees for Reviewing work procedures Evaluating suggestions Involving employees Scanlon plans set up group based bonuses to employees who can exceed a historical standard. It is NOT based on profit sharing BUT beware of… Technology Startup and maintenance costs Failure to consider employee preferences Managerial and union resistance Quality circles. Groups of 5-12 employees who meet with their superiors once a week to solve production problems. Not a control system like appraisal or reward systems. (Affects planning of POCL)
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz