Journal of Biogeography SUPPORTING INFORMATION Mediterranean origin and Miocene–Holocene Old World diversification of meadow fescues and ryegrasses (Festuca subgenus Schedonorus and Lolium) Luis A. Inda, Isabel Sanmartín, Sven Buerki and Pilar Catalán Appendix S1 Supplementary tables. Table S1 lists the taxa and sequences included in this study. Table S2 shows the dispersal connectivity matrices used in the LAGRANGE stratified analysis. Table S3 indicates some numeric results and characteristics from the individual and combined plastid and nuclear analyses. Appendix S2 Expanded Materials and Methods. (a) Detailed description of the phylogenetic inference analyses, with associated references. (b) Description of the methodological settings used in the BEAST dating analysis. Appendix S3 Supplementary figures. Figures S1 and S2 show the phylogenetic trees from the maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian (MRBAYES) analyses of the ITS– cpDNA dataset. Figure S3 shows the BEAST analysis of the more inclusive Loliinae dataset. Figure S4 shows the effect of different sampling strategies on date estimates. Figure S5 shows the results from the LAGRANGE unconstrained M1 analysis. 1 Appendix S1: Supplementary tables Table S1 List of Schedonorus–Lolium complex (Festuca subgenus Schedonorus, Lolium, Micropyropsis) and outgroup taxa used in this study. GenBank accession numbers of newly generated sequences are highlighted in bold. Taxon Origin Distribution Source and voucher GenBank accession numbers ITS trnL–F trnT–L Schedonorus–Lolium group Festuca subgen. Schedonorus(P. Beauv.) Peterm. Festuca apennina de Not. (1) Switzerland: Valais: Gletsch Eurosiberian UZ J. Müller 9683 AF548028 AF533041 EF378991 Festuca apennina de Not. (15) Italy Eurosiberian USDA Pullman PI 577108 EF379048 EF378952 EF378992 Festuca arundinacea Schreber (1) Spain: Lugo: Láncana Eurosiberian UZ J.A. Lopez Rodriguez 1081 AF519976 AY098995 DQ367405 US P. Peterson 14896 EF379049 UZ M. Pimentel s.n. EF379050 EF378954 EF378994 UZ M. Pimentel s.n. - GU573744 GU573745 JACA 9939 P. Auquier EF379058 - EF378999 Mahgrebian ABY-BN 867.1974U EF379051 EF378955 EF378995 Mahgrebian ABY-BN 1304.0000U EF379057 EF378956 EF378996 E Med + SW Asian Festuca arundinacea Schreber (3) Venezuela (introduced) Eurosiberian EF378953 EF378993 E Med + SW Asian Festuca arundinacea Schreber (4) Spain: La Coruña: Torre Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Festuca arundinacea Schreber (5) Spain: La Coruña: Ferrol Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Festuca arundinacea Screber (9) Belgium Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Festuca arundinacea Schreber var. atlantigena Morocco (cultivar, UK) (St.-Yves) Auquier (10) ('F. atlantigena') Festuca arundinacea Schreber var. atlantigena Morocco (cultivar, Belgium) 2 (St.-Yves) Auquier (14) ('F. atlantigena') Festuca arundinacea Screber var. corsica France: Corsica W Mediterranean ABY-BN 1170.0000U EF379052 EF378957 EF378997 Mahgrebian ABY-BN 400.1967U EF379056 EF378960 EF378998 Eurosiberian UZ I.Aizpuru P.Catalán 1331.88 AF303416 AF533043 EF379003 UZ D. Stancik 24.6.01 EF379059 EF378961 EF379004 UZ J. Müller 9947 EF379060 EF378962 EF379005 DNA, Fjellheim et al. 2006 EF379061 - - (Hack.) Richt. (11) ('F. corsica') Festuca arundinacea Screber var. Morocco (cultivar, UK) letourneuxiana (St. Yves) Torrecilla & Catalan ('F. letourneuxiana') Festuca gigantea (L.) Villars (1) Spain: Navarra: Arce E Med + SW Asian Festuca gigantea (L) Villars (3) Czech Republic Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Festuca gigantea (L.) Villars (4) Germany: Thuringen Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Festuca gigantea (L.) Villars (5) Norway Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Festuca fontqueri St. Yves Morocco: Rif mountains W Mediterranean UZ P. Catalan s.n. AF303404 AF533044 DQ631486 Festuca fenas Lag. (1) Spain: Segovia: Castilnovo W Mediterranean UZ J.A. Lopez Rodriguez s.n. AF532951 AF533042 EF379000 Festuca fenas Lag. (3) Spain: Mallorca W Mediterranean UZ L. Saenz s.n. EF379055 - - Festuca fenas Lag. (7) Spain: Huesca: Benabarre W Mediterranean JACA 243698 J.V. Ferrandez EF379053 EF378958 EF379001 Festuca fenas Lag. (12) France W Mediterranean ABY-BN 354.1974U EF379054 EF378959 EF379002 Festuca pratensis Huds. (1) UK: England: Wilshire:Calne Eurosiberian UZ P.Catalan AF303421 AF478503 EF379007 UZ R.Soren 6025 AF532948 EF378949 EF379008 JACA 544795 J.V. Ferrández EF379042 E Med + SW Asian Festuca pratensis Huds. (2) USA: Alaska Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Festuca pratensis Huds. (3) Spain: Huesca: Abizanda Eurosiberian - - E Med + SW Asian 3 Festuca pratensis Huds. (4) Kazakhstan Eurosiberian USDA Pullman W6 13201 930 EF379043 EF378950 EF379009 USDA Pullman PI 289011 85i EF379044 - EF379010 UZ J. Müller 9683 EF379045 EF378951 EF379011 DNA, Fjellheim et al. 2006 EF379046 - - DNA, Fjellheim et al. 2006 EF379047 - EF379012 Mahgrebian UAM 4064 AF303424 AY098996 EF379006 E Med + SW Asian Festuca pratensis Huds. (5) Hungary Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Festuca pratensis Huds. (6) Germany: Thuringen Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Festuca pratensis Huds. (7) Norway Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Festuca pratensis Huds. (8) France Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Festuca mairei St. Yves Morocco: Marrakech: Oukaimeden Festuca simensis Hochst. ex A. Rich. (1) Uganda: Uchuya: Kabale E & W Trop. African MHU 1608 M. Namaganda 204K GU573752 GU573746 GU573777 Festuca simensis Hochst. ex A. Rich. (2) Uganda: Elgon Mnt, bamboo forest E & W Trop. African MHU 1568 M. Namaganda 234K GU573753 GU573748 GU573749 Festuca simensis Hochst. ex A. Rich. (3) Uganda: Elgon Mnt, Mongongo E & W Trop. African MHU 1577 M. Namaganda 282K GU573754 GU573750 GU573751 Lolium canariense Steud. (1) Spain: Tenerife: Teno Macaronesian UZ A. Santos 13.3.02 EF379062 EF378963 EF379014 Lolium canariense Steud. (3) Spain: Canarias: La Palma Macaronesian UZ P. Catalan 2002 EF379063 EF378964 EF379015 Lolium canariense Steud. (4) Portugal: Madeira: Ponte Santo Macaronesian UZ M Sequeira s.n. EF379064 EF378965 EF379016 Lolium canariense Steud. (5) Spain: Canarias Macaronesian USDA Pullman PI 320544 82i EF379065 EF378966 EF379017 Lolium L. Lolium edwardii Scholz, Stierstorfer & Spain: Canarias: El Hierro Macaronesian DNA, Scholz (Berlin 24-3) EF379066 EF378967 EF379018 Scholz, Stierstorfer & Spain: Canarias: El Hierro Macaronesian DNA, M. Gaisberg (Germany) EF379067 EF378968 EF379019 Macaronesian MADS 06842 EF379068 - - Gaisberg (1) Lolium edwardii Gaisberg (2) Lolium lowei Menezes Portugal: Madeira: Porto Santo 4 Lolium multiflorum Lam. (1) Italy Eurosiberian USDA_Pullman PI 239804 86 i EF379069 EF378969 EF379020 USDA_Pullman PI 343155 EF379070 EF378970 EF379021 USDA_Pullman PI 222526 EF379071 EF378971 EF379022 JACA 394790 A. Martinez EF379072 EF378972 EF379023 USDA Pullman PI 619001 EF379073 EF378973 EF379024 USDA Pullman PI 440475 EF379074 EF378974 EF379025 USDA Pullman PI547390 KF454873 KF454874 KF454875 JACA 402293 E. Carreira EF379075 - EF379026 E Med + SW Asian Lolium multiflorum Lam. (2) Egypt (introduced) Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Lolium multiflorum Lam. (3) Iran Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Lolium multiflorum Lam. (4) Spain: Zaragoza: Chodes Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Lolium perenne L. (1) UK: Wales Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Lolium perenne L. (2) Russia Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Lolium perenne L. (3) Iran Eurosiberian E. Med + SW Asian Lolium perenne L. (6) Spain: Lugo: Lugo Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Lolium persicum Boiss. & Hoh. (1) Afghanistan: Tarbulock E Med + SW Asian USDA Pullman PI 3174.50 88i EF379076 EF378975 EF379027 Lolium persicum Boiss. & Hoh. (2) Turkey E Med + SW Asian USDA Pullman PI 545661 EF379077 EF378976 EF379028 Lolium persicum Boiss & Hoh. (3) Georgia E Med + SW Asian USDA Pullman PI 314446 EF379078 EF378977 EF379029 Lolium remotum Schrank (1) France Eurosiberian USDA Pullman PI 283611 82i EF379079 EF378978 EF379030 USDA Pullman PI 233613 EF379080 EF378979 EF379031 USDA Pullman PI 545604 90i EF379081 EF378980 EF379032 E Med + SW Asian Lolium remotum Schrank (2) Sweden Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Lolium rigidum Gaud. (1) Turkey: Saparozu W Mediterranean E Med + SW Asian 5 Lolium rigidum Gaud. (2) Iran W Mediterranean USDA Pullman PI 239794 EF379082 EF378981 EF379033 ABY-BA 9166.1999U EF379083 EF378982 EF379034 ABY-BA 9936.1999U EF379084 EF378983 EF379035 JACA 61195 P. Montserrat EF379085 EF378984 EF379036 USDA Pullman PI 197310 82i EF379086 - - USDA Pullman PI 195000 EF379087 USDA Pullman PI 302664 EF379088 EF378986 EF379038 USDA Pullman PI 477121 EF379089 EF378987 EF379039 USDA Pullman PI 545635 90i EF379090 E Med + SW Asian Lolium rigidum Gaud. (3) France W Mediterranean E Med + SW Asian Lolium rigidum Gaud. (4) France W Mediterranean E Med + SW Asian Lolium rigidum Gaud. (5) Spain W Mediterranean E Med + SW Asian Lolium rigidum Gaud. (6) Argentina (introduced) W Mediterranean E Med + SW Asian Lolium temulentum L. (1) Ethiopia Eurosiberian EF378985 EF379037 E Med + SW Asian Lolium temulentum L. (2) India Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Lolium temulentum L. (3) Germany Eurosiberian E Med + SW Asian Lolium temulentum L. (4) Turkey Eurosiberian EF378988 EF379040 E Med + SW Asian x Festulolium Asch. & Graebn. Festulolium braunii (Richt.) Camus Spain: Lerida Eurosiberian JACA 80158 EF379092 - - Festulolium holmbergii (Dörfl.) Fourn. France Eurosiberian JACA P. Auquier s.n. EF379091 EF378989 EF379041 Spain: Huelva: Almonte W Mediterranean UZ J.A. Lopez Rodriguez s.n. AF532943 AF533037 Micropyropsis Romero-Zarco et Cabezudo Micropyropsis tuberosa Rom.-Zarco &Cabez. EF379013 Other Broad-leaved Festuca 6 Festuca sect. Subbulbosae Nyman ex Hack. Festuca paniculata (L.) Schinz & Thell. France: Mont Aigoual W Mediterranean UZ P. Catalan s.n. AF303407 AF533046 DQ336858 Festuca durandoi Clauson Spain: Segovia: Riaza W Mediterranean UZ J.A. Lopez Rodriguez 6.6.00 AF543514 AF533047 Festuca ovina L. Germany: Thuringen Eurosiberian UZ J. Müller 6879 AF532959 AF533063 DQ367406 Festuca rubra L. (1) Rumania (Cultivar UK) Eurosiberian UZ P. Catalan s. n. AF303422 AY118098 - Festuca rubra L. (2) Switzerland: Valais: Desses Eurosiberian UZ J. Müller 8060 AF118088 AY118099 DQ336857 Spain: Zaragoza: Zaragoza Eurosiberian UZ P. Catalan 14.2000 AF393012 AF488773 DQ367407 USA: Colorado Eurosiberian UZ P. Catalan 730.93 AF532929 AF533026 DQ631507 USA (cultivar) E Med + SW Asian UZ P.Torrecilla P. Catalan s.n. AF303400 AF478501 DQ336856 Slovenia: Ljubljana W Mediterranean UZ P.Torrecilla P. Catalan s.n. AF303399 AF478500 DQ336855 EF378990 Fine-leaved Festuca Festuca subgen. Festuca Less related outgroups Poa L. Poa infirma Kunth Deschampsia Beauv. Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) Beauv. Secale L. Secale cereale L. Brachypodium P. Beauv. Brachypodium distachyon (L) P. Beauv. E Med + SW Asian 7 Table S2 Dispersal rate matrices reflecting the palaeogeographic connectivity among the study areas in each historical scenario (time slices TSI, TSII, TSIII). Areas: (A) Eurosiberia; (B) Eastern Mediterranean and Southwest Asia; (C) Western Mediterranean; (D) Atlas (continental north-western Africa); (E) Eastern and Western Tropical Africa; and (F) Macaronesia. TSI Late Miocene: Tortonian (11–7 Ma) A B C D E F A - 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 B 0.5 - 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 C 0.1 0.5 - 0.1 0.1 0.5 D 0.1 0.1 0.1 - 0.5 0.5 E 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 - 1.0 F 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.5 - TSII Late Miocene: Messinian–early Pliocene (7–3.5 Ma) A B C D E F A - 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 B 0.5 - 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.1 C 0.5 1.0 - 1.0 0.5 1.0 D 0.5 1.0 1.0 - 0.7 1.0 E 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.7 - 0.5 F 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 0.5 - 8 TSIII Mid Pliocene–present (3.5–0 Ma) A B C D E F A - 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.1 0.1 B 1.0 - 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 C 1.0 0.7 - 0.7 0.1 1.0 D 0.5 0.1 0.7 - 0.5 1.0 E 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 - 0.1 F 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 0.1 - 9 Table S3 Numeric results from independent and combined maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses of nuclear ITS, cpDNA and combined ITS+cpDNA data of the Schedonorus–Lolium group (ML analysis was conducted only on the combined dataset). Dataset ITS cpDNA ITS+cpDNA Total characters 654 1907 2561 Informative characters 147 214 361 Number of taxa 72 59 58 Number of MPTs found 31951 2945700 8552 Length (L) 510 789 1292 Consistency index (CI) 0.72 0.73 0.71 Retention index (RI) 0.84 0.69 0.74 Likelihood value (−Ln) - - -10340.033710 MPT = most parsimonious trees. 10 Appendix S2: Expanded Materials and Methods (a) Phylogenetic inference Maximum parsimony (MP) analysis was conducted in PAUP* 4.0 beta10 (Swofford, 2002), using two heuristic strategies: (1) Mulpars on, closest and tree bisection– reconnection (TBR) branch swapping, and (2) 10,000 random-order-entry trees, TBR and saving no more than 10 trees of length equal or shorter than 10 per replicate. A strict and a 50% majority rule consensus tree were computed from the most parsimonious trees obtained in these searches. Branch support was estimated through 1000 bootstrap replicates using the TBR-M (tree bisection–reconstruction swapping, MULPARS OFF) strategy of DeBry & Olmstead (2000). Potentially informative gaps were coded as binary characters and used in the MP analyses. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was conducted in RAxML 7.2.8 (Stamatakis, 2006; http://phylobench.vital-it.ch/raxml-bb/index.php), Stamatakis et al. (2008), using the GTR nucleotide substitution model and leaving the program to estimate the model parameters. Bootstrap support values were based on 100 rapid replicates using a GTRMIX model. Bayesian inference (BI) analyses were performed in MRBAYES v.3.2.1 (Ronquist et al., 2012). First, MRMODELTEST 2.3 (Nylander, 2004) was used to select the optimal nucleotide substitution model for each marker, based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC); a GTR model with a gamma parameter to account for among-site rate variation and a proportion of invariant sites (GTR+G+I) was selected for all markers. Two parallel runs with four coupled chains each were run for 5 million generations, sampling every 1000 generations. Convergence and mixing of the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) was assessed using the effective sampling size (ESS > 200) criterion in TRACER v. 1.6 and by monitoring cumulative split frequencies in MRBAYES. Post-burn-in samples (approximately 7500 trees) were pooled into a 50% majority rule consensus tree to approximate the posterior distribution of the phylogeny. (b) Estimating lineage divergence times Phylogenetic dating was performed using the Bayesian relaxed-clock model implemented in BEAST v.1.5.2 (Drummond and Rambaut 2007) in the reduced combined ITS-cpDNA dataset. Bayes factor comparisons were used to select the best 11 clock model (strict versus uncorrelated lognormal) and tree prior model (Yule versus birth–death). The ucld.mean was assigned a uniform prior distribution of upper = 10E4; lower = 10E-1, initial value = 10E-4). The rest of the parameters were assigned default prior distributions (exponential: ucld.stdev, gamma priors for parameters of the substitution model). Two MCMC chains were run for 10 million generations, sampling parameters every 1000 generations. We used TRACER to verify stationarity and convergence among chains, and the ESS values were > 200 for all parameters. Postburn-in trees were summarized into a maximum clade credibility tree (MCC) with mean values and 95% confidence intervals for nodal ages, using TREEANNOTATOR v. 1.6.1. BEAST found an intermediate level of substitution rate variation across the sampled sequences (e.g. marginal posterior probability of the coefficient of variation of rates: mean = 0.526; 95% highest posterior density (HPD) interval = (0.319, 0.738) and no evidence of rate autocorrelation between neighbouring branches (e.g. marginal posterior probability of rate covariance (mean = 0.009; 95% HPD interval = (−0.195, 0.209), supporting the choice of an uncorrelated clock over the strict molecular clock. All secondary calibration points were assigned a normal prior distribution with mean and 95% confidence intervals obtained from the more inclusive analysis, following Ho & Phillips (2009). REFERENCES DeBry, R.W. & Olmstead, R.G. (2000) A simulation study of reduced tree-search effort in bootstrap resampling analysis. Systematic Biology, 49, 171-179. Drummond, A.J., Ho, S.Y.H., Rawlence, H.N. & Rambaut, A. (2007) A rough guide to BEAST 1.4. Available at: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Main_Page (accessed 15th August 2012). Ho, S.Y. & Phillips, M.J. (2009) Accounting for calibration uncertainty in phylogenetic estimation of evolutionary divergence times. Systematic Biology, 58, 367-80. Nylander, J.A. (2004) MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala. 12 Ree, R.H. & Smith, S.A. (2008) Maximum likelihood inference of geographic range evolution by dispersal, local extinction, and cladogenesis. Systematic Biology, 57, 4–14. Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., van der Mark, P., Ayres, D.L., Darling, A., Höhna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard, M.A., Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology, 61, 539–542. Stamatakis, A. (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics, 22, 2688-90. Stamatakis, A, Hoover, P. & Rougemont, J. (2008) A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Systematic Biology, 57, 758-71. Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and others methods. Version 4.0. beta test. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. 13 Appendix S3: Supplementary figures Figure S1 Maximum parsimony analysis: 50% majority-rule consensus tree of 8552 MP trees found in the heuristic search of the combined ITS+cpDNA dataset (n = 58 sequences) of the Schedonorus–Lolium complex plus outgroup taxa. Brachypodium distachyon was used to root the tree. Numbers above branches correspond to bootstrap support values. 14 Figure S2 (a) Maximum likelihood analysis: optimal ML tree (−ln = −10340.0337) found in the heuristic RAXML search of the combined ITS+cpDNA dataset (n = 58) of the Schedonorus–Lolium complex plus outgroup taxa. Brachypodium distachyon was used to root the tree. Numbers above branches correspond to bootstrap support values. 15 Figure S2 (b) Bayesian inference analysis (MRBAYES): 50% majority-rule consensus tree of 7500 trees from the post-burn-in posterior distribution obtained from the Bayesian analysis of the combined ITS+cpDNA sequences (n = 58) of the Schedonorus–Lolium complex plus outgroup taxa. Brachypodium distachyon was used to root the tree. Numbers correspond to nodal posterior probability support values. 16 Figure S3 Divergence time estimation (BEAST): maximum clade credibility (MCC) chronogram obtained from the analysis of the combined ITS+cpDNA dataset (n = 57, F. arundinacea excluded) of the Schedonorus–Lolium complex plus outgroup taxa (Brachypodium distachyon was pruned from the tree). Numbers correspond to the estimated mean nodal ages. 17 Figure S4 Effect of uneven sampling effort across species on divergence time estimations. Ages of key nodes in the phylogeny estimated with BEAST by randomly removing infraspecific samples from the original dataset to create new reduced datasets with one/two/or three individuals per species, representing 30% (21 taxa), 70% (35 taxa), 90% (44 taxa) of the original number of sequences. The logarithmic lines reflect the expected development with the addition of more infraspecific sampling. Node numbers as in Fig. 5. The table above the figure shows the original data used for the diagram, and compares it with age node statistics calculated from the original dataset (all taxa included). Percentage of taxa included Node 50 Node 51 Node 97 Node 90 Node 52 Node 53 Node 83 Node 54 Node 55 Node 73 Node 56 Node 57 Node 68 Mean 21one1 21one2 35two1 35two2 35two5 44three1 44three2 44three5 Original 10.4931 10.4237 10.3918 10.432 10.5702 10.5504 10.4801 10.5483 10.545 9.3992 9.3057 9.415 9.2869 9.1607 9.2254 9.2989 9.229 9.1844 2.5613 2.4702 2.5091 2.4827 2.5309 2.524 2.516 2.501 2.6427 4.4669 4.7477 4.6446 4.8877 4.9007 4.8754 4.8813 4.9102 4.9341 5.3754 5.3033 5.5363 5.3753 5.6127 5.8244 5.498 5.7495 5.769 4.5367 4.4341 4.7486 4.5245 4.8289 5.0816 4.7593 4.9871 5.1844 3.6361 3.7168 3.6564 3.5572 3.9036 3.9552 3.7592 3.9247 3.982 3.8415 3.7 4.0721 3.8083 4.1272 4.3304 4.0271 4.2614 4.407 3.5145 3.3813 3.7832 3.5357 3.7882 3.995 3.7493 3.9069 4.1067 2.1025 2.3128 2.5227 2.3937 2.5541 2.7372 2.5842 2.619 2.8828 3.2365 3.0279 3.4779 3.1792 3.4313 3.6435 3.3763 3.566 3.729 2.1802 1.3446 2.2858 2.2943 2.4596 2.6764 2.2551 2.5878 2.7785 1.5579 1.7715 2.1229 2.4572 1.8002 2.0284 2.8661 1.9706 3.1317 4.3770615 4.3030462 4.5512615 4.4780538 4.5898692 4.7267154 4.6193 4.6739615 4.8674846 12 Estimated ages based on original dataset Mean 10.545 9.1844 2.6427 4.9341 5.769 5.1844 3.982 4.407 4.1067 2.8828 3.729 2.7785 3.1317 Lowe r bound Uppe r bound 8.2086 13.062 7.0434 11.3932 0.963 5.3575 2.8932 7.091 3.8455 8.1062 3.4326 7.2008 2.8922 2.68 1.6387 2.4279 1.7072 1.916 6.2886 5.8157 4.1563 5.3578 4.0522 4.6416 Ages of key nodes estimated from reduced matrices 18 4.5367 3.6361 3.8415 3.5145 2.1025 3.2365 2.1802 1.5579 4.3770615 4.4341 4.7486 3.7168 3.6564 3.7 4.0721 3.3813 3.7832 2.3128 2.5227 3.0279 3.4779 1.3446 2.2858 1.7715 2.1229 4.3030462 4.5512615 4.5245 3.5572 3.8083 3.5357 2.3937 3.1792 2.2943 2.4572 4.4780538 4.8289 3.9036 4.1272 3.7882 2.5541 3.4313 2.4596 1.8002 4.5898692 5.0816 3.9552 4.3304 3.995 2.7372 3.6435 2.6764 2.0284 4.7267154 4.7593 3.7592 4.0271 3.7493 2.5842 3.3763 2.2551 2.8661 4.6193 4.9871 3.9247 4.2614 3.9069 2.619 3.566 2.5878 1.9706 4.6739615 5.1844 3.982 4.407 4.1067 2.8828 3.729 2.7785 3.1317 4.8674846 5.1844 3.982 4.407 4.1067 2.8828 3.729 2.7785 3.1317 3.4326 7.2008 2.8922 2.68 1.6387 2.4279 1.7072 1.916 6.2886 5.8157 4.1563 5.3578 4.0522 4.6416 Ages of key nodes estimated from reduced matrices 12 Node 50 10 Node 51 Node 97 8 Node 90 Node 52 Age (Ma) Node 53 Node 83 Node 54 Node 55 Node 73 Node 56 Node 57 Node 68 Mean Node 53 6 Node 54 Node 55 Node 73 4 Node 56 Node 57 Node 68 2 All Combined Logarítmica (Node 50) 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Percentage of taxon deletion 14 16 18 Logarítmica (Node 51) Logarítmica (Node 97) Logarítmica (Node 90) 19 Figure S5 Biogeographical scenarios for the Schedonorus–Lolium complex inferred by the LAGRANGE unconstrained M1 model plotted onto the Fig. 4). Pie chart legends correspond to BEAST those MCC chronogram (see indicated in Fig. 5. C F paniculata C F durandoi C F fenas3 7 C F fenas1 C F fenas12 C F corsica11 D F mairei D F atlantigena10 D F atlantigena14 D F letournexiana13 CD F fontqueri C M tuberosa AB F gigantea1 AB F gigantea3 AB F gigantea4 A F apennina A F apennina15 AB F pratensis2 AB F pratensis1 E F simensis3 E F simensis2 E F simensis1 B L persicum3 B L persicum2 B L persicum1 AB L temulentum1 AB L remotum1 AB L remotum2 AB L temulentum2 AB L temulentum4 AB L temulentum3 F L canariense3 F L edwardii1 F L edwardii2 F L canariense1 F L canariense4 F L canariense5 AB L perenne2 AB L perenne3 AB L perenne1 AB L multiflorum2 AB L multiflorum3 AB L multiflorum4 AB L multiflorum1 BC L rigidum1 BC L rigidum2 BC L rigidum4 BC L rigidum3 BC L rigidum5 20
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz