Statisticians Statistically Significant Xavier Núñez, CStat Senior Statistician, CStat Introduction to: • CRO and Clinical Trial: definitions • TFS Company & Organisation • Data Management & Statistics working flow • Regulatory guidelines • Type of clinical trials • 3 Illustrations: statistically significant? • Conclusions What is a CRO? Chief Risk Officer Cathode Ray Oscilloscope Cro-Magnons Clinical Research Organization: a service organization that provides support to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries in the form of outsourced pharmaceutical research services (for both drugs and medical devices) What is a Clinical trial? A clinical trial is a research study to answer specific questions about vaccines or new therapies or new ways of using known treatments. Clinical trials (also called medical research and research studies) are used to determine whether new drugs or treatments are both safe and effective TFS -Introduction Founded in 1996 with headquarters in Sweden Worldwide ranking no 14* ~ 600 employees Operations inspected by US FDA, EMA, MHRA (UK) and MPA (Sweden) Geographical coverage in Europe, USA and Japan Conducting clinical trials in 40 countries worldwide (December 2012) Projected revenue €75 million in 2013 TFS European locations TFS global HQ Sweden TFS regional HQ Sweden Spain The Netherlands Hungary TFS country offices Norway Denmark Finland Russia UK France Germany Portugal Italy The Baltics (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) Poland Czech Republic TFS Solutions for entire clinical development cycle Phase 0/I and PoC trials; Phase II – IV, NIS trials; 26 countries world-wide Clinical research professionals within FSP models; Specialist training for clinical research professionals; www.tfsacademy.com TFS Project delivery functions TFS Barcelona – Biometrics Ricard Quingles Regional Managing Director, South Europe Emma Albacar Associate Unit Manager Biometrics,Spain Eva Lundqvist Director Global Project Delivery Rosa Mª Alonso Unit Manager Biometrics, Spain Biostatistics Data Management Data Assistant Ramón Dosantos Senior Statistician Senior Clinical Data Manager Cristina López Senior Clinical Data Manager Senior Statistician Mireia Cuellar Clinical Data Associate Juani Zamora Senior Statistician Senior Clinical Data Manager Daniel Mosteiro Senior Statistician Senior Clinical Data Manager Elisabet Roqué Clinical Data Associate Eva Usón Senior Statistician Senior Clinical Data Manager Judith Oribe Senior Statistician Senior Clinical Data Manager Marta Gutiérrez Clinical Data Associate Marta Figueras Senior Statistician Rosario Peláez Statistician Clinical Data Manager Verónica Ortega Clinical Data Associate Mercè Viladrich Senior Statistician Emilio Sánchez Statistician Clinical Data Manager Laura García Clinical Data Associate Jordan Bertsch Senior Statistician Laia Pujantell Senior Clinical Data Manager Maite Ruiz Clinical Data Associate Xavier Nuñez Senior Statistician Mario Pircher Senior Clinical Data Manager Data entry people (variable) 14 Statisticians!!!! Data Management working flow Statistics working flow Medical research - Regulations Good Clinical Practice (GCP) An international ethical and scientific quality standard for designing, conducting, recording and reporting trials that involve the participation of human subjects The most important sources for GCP-compliant guidelines referring to the EU are the following: - Declaration of Helsinki (1964) - ICH –E6: GCP (1996) - EU Directives 2001/20/EC, 2005/28/EC Medical research - Regulations Additional guidelines refer to specific statistical or DM regulations or to other recommendations, such as - ICH –E9: Statistical principles for clinical trials - ICH –E3: Structure and contents of clinical study reports - ICH –E10: Choice of Control Group in Clinical Trials - CDISC Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Operational Data model (ODM) Clinical trials vs. non-interventional studies No intervention in the study design Intervention in the study design - Treatment exposition without participation of the investigator → ‘observes’ subjects - No randomisation procedures - Treatment assigned to the subjects by the investigator OBSERVATIONALS CLINICAL TRIALS Disease exposition = treatment? Epidemiological Disease No Yes Post-Authorisation study (EPA) Study medication RANDOMISED Clinical Trials Quasi-experimental Clinical Trials (experimental) (Non-randomised) Type of clinical trials Phase I - Healthy volunteers - Small sample size (6-30 subjects) - Usually FTIH - Objectives: safety (adverse events), dose range, PK/PD Phase II - Healthy volunteers / Patients - Larger sample size (20-300 subjects) - Objectives: efficacy, safety, dose-response Phase III - Patients - Multicentre, Larger sample size, (1000-3000 subjects) - Objectives: confirm efficacy –superiority, non-inferiority?, no safety issues Phase IV (post-authorisation) - Patients - Multicentre, non-interventional studies - Objectives: optimal use of treatment, risk-benefit, marketing, etc. Type of clinical trials By the awareness of treatment administered - Open-label: both investigators and subjects know which treatment is being administered - Single-blinded: investigator is aware of the treatment administered, but the subject is not - Double-blinded: neither investigators nor subjects know which treatment is being administered By time of observation - Retrospective: data from past records is collected in a unique visit, with no follow-up - Cross-sectional: all present data from subjects is collected at a defined time-point - Prospective: subjects are followed over a period of time, collecting data in different visits By sequence of treatments - Parallel : subjects are randomly assigned to a unique treatment throughout the study - Cross-over: subjects are randomly assigned to a sequence of treatments Type of clinical trials By nature of comparator treatment - Placebo-controlled: a group of subjects receives a ‘placebo’ treatment, which is specifically designed to have no real effect → sometimes is not ethical! - Active-control: the experimental treatment is compared to an existing treatment → that is clearly better than doing nothing for the subject By type of comparison - Superiority: the clinical objective of efficacy is to show that the response to the experimental treatment is superior to the comparator treatment → usually superiority to placebo - Equivalence or non-inferiority: the clinical objective of efficacy is to show that the response to the experimental treatment is at least as good, or not clinically inferior, to the comparator treatment → usually non-inferiority to active control Statistically significant? Importance of estimation and its superiority to significance testing - If we do not get a significant difference, what can we then conclude? Only that we have not found evidence to support the existence of a treatment effect - Estimates may often be better than p-values Conclusions Statistically significant Become a statistician: open-minded and objective in the assumptions; precise and analytical in the results. Study Design is crucial !! Become a scientific: interact with your clinical colleagues, do not be only a programmer! Communicate – “Statisticians seem to talk double Dutch”: make yourself and the results understandable to any person with no knowledge of statistics at all Be responsible: our work is key in the outcome of a clinical trial ; the client will listen to you and act from the results you present Work closely with your team – you need the study input from the project leader, the clinical expertise from the medical writer, the knowledge of data from the CRA, and the DB specifications from the DM Conclusions Not Statistically significant Don’t look for p-values, think statistically! “You don’t know the power of the dark side”: if your study is underpowered or you carry out statistical analysis of secondary endpoints, beware of the conclusions: the results do not ‘conclude that’ but ‘suggest that’ We are very lucky!! We are (or will be) statisticians!!!! Some remarks to end... -Many people use statistics as a drunken man uses a lamp post; beware of p-values -Statisticians are more rigorous in interpreting statistics but physicians are more imaginative -Statisticians expect the average but on average people do not expect statisticians -An idiot with a computer is often more powerful than a statistician with a pencil -Even if you have a significant relationship with a statistician you may not find it relevant Guernsey McPearson http://www.senns.demon.co.uk/Confuseus.htm Any Questions? Thank you for your patience! WWW.TFSCRO.COM email: [email protected]
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz