Effect of antimicrobial treatment on relapses of acute otitis media Aino Ruohola, Miia K. Laine, Paula A. Tähtinen Dept. of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Turku University Hospital, Finland University of Turku, Finland AIM • To investigate the effect of antimicrobial treatment on relapses of acute otitis media (AOM) Previous results Tähtinen, NEJM, 2011 Previous results Tähtinen, NEJM, 2011 Ruohola, JPIDS, 2017 AIM • To investigate the effect of antimicrobial treatment on relapses of acute otitis media (AOM) METHODS Inclusion • 6 – 35 mo • AOM, stringent dg (> 90% had bulging TM) Exclusion • Ongoing antimicrobial treatment • AOM with spontaneous perforation • Allergy to pen/amox • Down syndrome/cleft palate/immunodeficiency METHODS • • • • • 746 enrollment visits 322 randomized Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Amox-cla 40 mg/kg/day, for 7 days Follow-up days: 1, 3, 8, 15, 30, 60, additionally any day Relapse: appearance or remarkable deterioration of symptoms and signs of AOM between study days 9-18 RESULTS At entry Age, mean (range), mo Male gender Family history of OM Siblings in the household Day care attendance Current use of pacifier Parental smoking Amox-kla, n=159 16 (6-35) 90 (57%) 89 (56%) 89 (56%) 86 (54%) 79 (50%) 56 (35%) Placebo, n=155 16 (6-35) 88 (57%) 95 (61%) 91 (59%) 83 (54%) 83 (54%) 46 (30%) ≥4 previous AOM AOM ≤ previous mo 30 (19%) 36 (23%) 28 (18%) 30 (19%) Unilateral AOM Severe bulging of TM Peaked tympanogram 97/157 (62%) 44 (28%) 32 (20%) 86/153 (56%) 39 (25%) 24 (16%) RESULTS At entry Age, mean (range), mo Male gender Family history of OM Siblings in the household Day care attendance Current use of pacifier Parental smoking Amox-kla, n=159 16 (6-35) 90 (57%) 89 (56%) 89 (56%) 86 (54%) 79 (50%) 56 (35%) Placebo, n=155 16 (6-35) 88 (57%) 95 (61%) 91 (59%) 83 (54%) 83 (54%) 46 (30%) ≥4 previous AOM AOM ≤ previous mo 30 (19%) 36 (23%) 28 (18%) 30 (19%) Unilateral AOM Severe bulging of TM Peaked tympanogram 97/157 (62%) 44 (28%) 32 (20%) 86/153 (56%) 39 (25%) 24 (16%) RESULTS At entry Age, mean (range), mo Male gender Family history of OM Siblings in the household Day care attendance Current use of pacifier Parental smoking Amox-kla, n=159 16 (6-35) 90 (57%) 89 (56%) 89 (56%) 86 (54%) 79 (50%) 56 (35%) Placebo, n=155 16 (6-35) 88 (57%) 95 (61%) 91 (59%) 83 (54%) 83 (54%) 46 (30%) ≥4 previous AOM AOM ≤ previous mo 30 (19%) 36 (23%) 28 (18%) 30 (19%) Unilateral AOM Severe bulging of TM Peaked tympanogram 97/157 (62%) 44 (28%) 32 (20%) 86/153 (56%) 39 (25%) 24 (16%) RESULTS At entry Age, mean (range), mo Male gender Family history of OM Siblings in the household Day care attendance Current use of pacifier Parental smoking Amox-kla, n=159 16 (6-35) 90 (57%) 89 (56%) 89 (56%) 86 (54%) 79 (50%) 56 (35%) Placebo, n=155 16 (6-35) 88 (57%) 95 (61%) 91 (59%) 83 (54%) 83 (54%) 46 (30%) ≥4 previous AOM AOM ≤ previous mo 30 (19%) 36 (23%) 28 (18%) 30 (19%) Unilateral AOM Severe bulging of TM Peaked tympanogram 97/157 (62%) 44 (28%) 32 (20%) 86/153 (56%) 39 (25%) 24 (16%) RESULTS At entry Age, mean (range), mo Male gender Family history of OM Siblings in the household Day care attendance Current use of pacifier Parental smoking Amox-kla, n=159 16 (6-35) 90 (57%) 89 (56%) 89 (56%) 86 (54%) 79 (50%) 56 (35%) Placebo, n=155 16 (6-35) 88 (57%) 95 (61%) 91 (59%) 83 (54%) 83 (54%) 46 (30%) ≥4 previous AOM AOM ≤ previous mo 30 (19%) 36 (23%) 28 (18%) 30 (19%) Unilateral AOM Severe bulging of TM Peaked tympanogram 97/157 (62%) 44 (28%) 32 (20%) 86/153 (56%) 39 (25%) 24 (16%) RESULTS At entry Age, mean (range), mo Male gender Family history of OM Siblings in the household Day care attendance Current use of pacifier Parental smoking Amox-kla, n=159 16 (6-35) 90 (57%) 89 (56%) 89 (56%) 86 (54%) 79 (50%) 56 (35%) Placebo, n=155 16 (6-35) 88 (57%) 95 (61%) 91 (59%) 83 (54%) 83 (54%) 46 (30%) ≥4 previous AOM AOM ≤ previous mo 30 (19%) 36 (23%) 28 (18%) 30 (19%) Unilateral AOM Severe bulging of TM Peaked tympanogram 97/157 (62%) 44 (28%) 32 (20%) 86/153 (56%) 39 (25%) 24 (16%) RESULTS At entry Age, mean (range), mo Male gender Family history of OM Siblings in the household Day care attendance Current use of pacifier Parental smoking Amox-kla, n=159 16 (6-35) 90 (57%) 89 (56%) 89 (56%) 86 (54%) 79 (50%) 56 (35%) Placebo, n=155 16 (6-35) 88 (57%) 95 (61%) 91 (59%) 83 (54%) 83 (54%) 46 (30%) ≥4 previous AOM AOM ≤ previous mo 30 (19%) 36 (23%) 28 (18%) 30 (19%) Unilateral AOM Severe bulging of TM Peaked tympanogram 97/157 (62%) 44 (28%) 32 (20%) 86/153 (56%) 39 (25%) 24 (16%) RESULTS Mo Mo Amox-kla n=159 Placebo n=155 Relapse of AOM 25 (16%) 30 (19%) (P=0.40) RESULTS At entry Age < 24 mo Male gender Family history of OM Siblings in the household Day care attendance Current use of pacifier Parental smoking ≥4 previous AOM AOM ≤ previous mo Unilateral AOM Severe bulging of TM Peaked tympanogram After treatment period during follow-up Persistence of MEE Respiratory viral infection NP bacterial colonization RESULTS At entry Age < 24 mo Male gender Family history of OM Siblings in the household Day care attendance Current use of pacifier Parental smoking OR 2.0 (1.1-3.9) ≥4 previous AOM AOM ≤ previous mo Unilateral AOM Severe bulging of TM Peaked tympanogram After treatment period during follow-up Persistence of MEE OR 4.6 (2.1-9.9) Respiratory viral infection OR 3.1 (1.4-6.9) NP bacterial colonization OR 4.0 (1.5-11.0) CONCLUSION • Treatment of AOM with an antimicrobial with adequate coverage does not affect the development of a relapse after AOM • Persistence of MEE, subsequent respiratory viral infection, nasopharyngeal bacterial colonization, and parental smoking predispose young children to a relapse of AOM ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Paula A. Tähtinen Miia K. Laine
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz