Mapping Within The Integrated Resource Framework Alison Taylor Paul Leak Simon Steer What We Will Cover… •Context •The IRF… where it fits and why •The IRF Test Sites •Some Examples of Analysis •(Easy) Questions Context: Recognising The Perfect Storm • Demographic pressures • Economic pressures • Historic patterns of; investment; management and resource use. Context: Scottish Health & Social Care System •Inter-dependency Recognised by Joint Future…. but addressed in more than token ways? •Chasms Health & social care; Community & Institutional care •Previous Joint Resource Models Marginal budgets or real understanding of cost; activity and variation •Mapping and Variation …“Today’s key words” Fit With Current Policy Context: Triple Aim To: •Improve population Health •Improve individual experience •Reduce costs Requires: •Defined Population •Per Capita Resources •Care Integrator Stage 1: Mapping Stage 1: Mapping Stage 2: Test sites What is Mapping? A £500m Cash Limited Budget Corporate/Facilities/Reserves 30% Argyll CHP 4 & Bute CHP Acute SSU North CHPCHP 3 18% CHP SE CHP1 Mid CHP CHP 2 7% 14% 12% Analysis of Spend Other =7% Locality/CHP =17% Practice =27% £1,639 Patient =49% Board Spend Mapped to CHP Populations 30% CHP 4 Argyll & Bute CHP Acute SSU CHP 1 SE CHP CHP CHP Mid 2 CHP 3 North CHP 18% 7% 12% 14% 30% 27% 14% 30% Phase 1. Mapping Test sites should know: •Per Capita Health and Social Care expenditure Practice/Locality/CHP; By care type; Balance of Care. •Patient level hospital activity and costs Per capita hospital expenditure for care groups; Per capita hospital expenditure by age/sex; Site/Specialty analysis Phase 2 “New” Financial Frameworks •Tariffs for hospital care •Total CHP budgets •Programme Budgeting •Pooled Budgets •Lead Commissioner •Transactional agreements •All feasible under current Scottish legislation Test Sites Highland Tayside Lothian Ayrshire & Arran Three Networks •Phase 1 Mapping •Phase 2 Support •Social Care Reference Costs After Mapping: •What does it look like? •Do you like what you see? •Does it fit with stated outcomes (and are the patterns defensible?) •Do you want to do something different? Recent Outputs Early analysis of allocative equity and efficiency based on non coterminous localities and high level LA budget analysis Variation: CHP Expenditure per person (2009/10 weighted) 1,700 1,680 Spend per weighted head (£s) 1,660 1,640 1,620 1,600 1,580 1,560 1,540 1,520 1,500 SE North Mid Community Health Partnership A&B Variation: 2008/09 Older persons SW expenditure per person>75years 3,000 2,500 £/head>75years 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 RSL CSER Council Areas Care Homes Home Care INBS Other Care home/ Home care=2.1(2007/08 National average=1.7 (LGF4a, LFR3)) SW Older Persons Spend Council Social work Spend/head (>75yrs) for Multi-Member Wards 8 7 £000/Person (>75yrs) 6 5 4 Highland Average=£2,075/head 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 MMW Home Care Care Homes 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 # 1 CHP CHP South-East New OPD Appointments 2% A&E 1% Prescribing 12% Community Nursing 6% Fup & Elective 13% Emergency Admissions 25% Corporate/Locality Management 8% GP Direct Access Labs and Radiology 1% Tertiary/Other 9% Total GP Contracted 14% Care Homes 7% Home care 2% # 2 CHP CHP Mid Highland Prescribing 13% Community Nursing 9% A&E 2% Fup & Elective 14% New OPD Appointments 2% Corporate/Locality Management 10% Emergency Admissions 19% Tertiary/Res. Transfer/Other 6% GP Direct Access Labs and Radiology 1% Care Homes 5% Total GP Contracted 18% Home Care 1% A CHP Spend/head>75yrs 2008/09 Prescribing, £525 Other older adult, £144 GMS, £201 Care Homes, £1,436 Community and Other, £446 Home care, £556 OATS & SLA's, £217 Other Clinical Services, £286 A&E, £169 Day Patients, £143 Emergency IP, £2,451 Outpatients, £256 Elective IP & Daycases, £426 600 £/head GP Direct Impact 1,200 1,000 800 400 200 0 55376 55906 55709 55836 55639 55412 55253 55249 55427 56006 55662 55889 55338 55893 55817 55860 55732 56011 55145 55841 55291 55408 55681 55431 55874 55361 55766 55696 55925 55751 55037 55535 55624 55395 55728 55658 55220 55287 55451 55605 55131 55357 55573 55610 55201 55930 55094 55569 55516 55080 55911 55003 56025 55381 GP Practices What Difference? Acute General Hospital City Practice GM OBDs (Average2006/07-2007/08) 500 450 OBD/1000 weighted population 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A 40 Bed Ward Hospital GM Capacity Planning 80 70 60 GM Beds 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 CHP #1 Balance of Care >75yrs 2009/10 Non-Institutional 25% Institutional 75% A SW Area Older Persons Balance of Care 2008/09 Non-Institutional 33% Institutional 67% Variation: Individual Experience Risk of death in hospital in 2007/08 0.8 0.7 Risk of death in hospital (%) 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Starting Point for Integrated Resources… It’s not just about Finance Departments “Clinicians & Care Professionals.. have a crucial role... It is they who commit resources.” “Governance structures need to allow them freedom to act and to ensure there is accountability for their actions.” “Finance needs to be structured in a way that supports this.” Prescription for Partnership Audit Commission Dec 2007 Riding Out The Perfect Storm • Demographic pressures • Economic pressures • Historic patterns of; investment; management and resource use. Starting Point for Pooling….. Is the focus of the exercise the achievement of a a mapped budget, …….or the understanding of the cost and variation the mapping shows? Pooling Resources And The Integrated Resource Framework Alison Taylor Paul Leak Simon Steer
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz