Headquarters U.S. Air Force Integrity - Service - Excellence Services Acquisition… Going the Last Mile Mr Randall Culpepper Deputy Program Executive Officer for Combat & Mission Support 11 Mar 2011 Overview Debt Clock What’s new PEO/CM Mission, Organization and Processes In Washington – Dr Carter’s Initiatives In Services Tools and Techniques Observations What’s Still Important Lessons Learned/Success Stories Integrity - Service - Excellence 2 What’s New? PEO/CM MISSION, ORGANIZATION AND PROCESSES Integrity - Service - Excellence 3 PEO/CM Mission Manage and oversee the acquisition and delivery of Air Force operational and mission support services for today’s warfighter. •Services $100M to $1B and A-76 actions >300 FTE •SAF/AQ delegations > $1B •Service Requirements Validation •Acquisition: Plan, Select, Execute Pre and Post Award Programs (as of 7 June 10) 187 Acquisitions Valued at $184 BILLION Integrity - Service - Excellence 4 Proposed New PEO/CM Mission Provide executive management and oversight for the acquisition and delivery of Air Force operational and mission support services for today’s warfighter. • Set Air Force Services Acquisition Governance/Policy • Provide AF Services Acquisition Strategic Messaging • Plan for/Select/Execute Service Acq efforts >$100M (or $250M) • Require Service Acquisition Reporting and Conduct Analysis • Facilitate Service Requirements Validation Coordination 183 Acquisitions Valued at $185.8 BILLION As of 5 Jan 11 Integrity - Service - Excellence Service Acquisition Universe Expanded focus FY11 and beyond Service Acq <$100M PEO Sustainment Programs PEO A&AS ALC Sustainment Programs Non-AFMC MAJCOMs and AF-Wide Programs Integrity - Service - Excellence AFPEO/CM focus through FY10 PEO/CM Organization Program Executive Officer Combat and Mission Support Legal Brig Gen Wendy Masiello – PEO Mr Randall Culpepper – Deputy Ms Bachman Ms Mailman Ms Bernstein Adding – Capt Burton – Executive Officer Ms. Ramirez – Exec Admin Assistant Action Group, Operations, Policy & Process Team Market Intelligence Training & Certification Operations Analysis AFMC Weapons Sustainment & Support Acquisition Team Lt Col Lomelin Mr Champlin (inbound) Mr Braden Ms Desaussure Admin TSgt Holland Vacant Lt Col Cameron Mr. Pickham Ms Santens (ktr) Vacant Mr Smith (ktr) Vacant (ktr) AETC, AMC, PACAF, AFGSC Acquisition Team Mr Brittenham Ms Rose Vacant HAF/DRU, AFOTEC, ACC, AFSPC, USAFE Acquisition Team Mr Clarke Ms Tweed Ms Preisinger (inbound) Integrity - Service - Excellence 7 MAJCOM Delegations Delegation Scheme Basic Authority: <= $100M Responsibility: Total – ASP through Admin Qualification: Statutory/Regulatory MAJCOM Desg Rep EMA Silver (P) ACC Silver Authority: <= $500M Responsibility: ASP with status reporting beginning with Requirements Document AETC (OSD-like notification process) Qualification: Immediate probationary based on regular PEO/CM oversight and realtime, joint definition of success AFMC Status Silver Gold Authority: <= $1B Responsibility: SSA, AF Plan and FDO (ASP and Acq Plan at PEO) Qualification: 1-2 years demonstrated success with programs under $500M AFSPC Basic AMC Platinum Authority: Designated Official Qualification: Pro-active full-spectrum Services management and oversight for everything < $1B PACAF Basic USAFE LEGEND: No Contact Integrity - Service - Excellence In Work In Place 8 AF Services Spend by Portfolio Group (FY07, FY09 & * FY10) Total AF Spend FY07 $70.5 Billion Official -AF Spend R&D $12.4B Goods $31B Services $27.1 B FY09 $67.3 Billion Official -AF Spend Goods $25B R&D $13.7B Services $28.6 B * FY10 $64.9 Billion AF Spend FPDS-NG as of 19 January 2011 Goods $24.8B R&D $14.3B Services $25.7B Billions CMEs ~ 69,000 = 12% of Air Force Workforce Integrity - Service - Excellence 9 Assessment Battle Rhythm FY Annual Execution Reviews (Due 31 Dec) SAE PMR (45 days from MAJCOM ASR) MAJCOM AER Briefs and Self Assessments (Dec-Mar) PEO/CM Final Assessment Apr (or 30 days after last Visit) Integrity - Service - Excellence OSD Peer Reviews 10 Management Controls Above $100M So…what are you doing below $100M? Integrity - Service - Excellence 11 EFFECTIVE Competition Integrity - Service - Excellence 12 Training Strategy Different Courses Aligned to Needs Course/ Workshop Mission – Resource Alignment Training (Univ of TN) PBSA Service Acquisition Workshop Purpose Target Audience Develop overall understanding of strategic sourcing and services acquisition life cycle process MAJCOM and Center/Wing Senior Leaders Train established teams in sourcing & LCM of services Crossfunctional teams Duration 2 Hr Training 4 days Focus High level training to provide senior leaders what they need to oversee and manage acquisitions of goods and/or services Smaller acquisitions of services, usually for a single location (DAU) Train established Just in Time teams in strategic Team Training sourcing and life cycle mgmt of (Univ of TN) services and/or commodities Crossfunctional teams for large projects 11 Days (3-5 “JIT” Modules) Large scale acquisitions of services and/or commodities across multiple locations and/or functions Integrity - Service - Excellence 13 What’s New in Washington? DR. CARTER’S INITIATIVES Integrity - Service - Excellence 14 Dr Carter’s Directives 1 - Target Affordability and Control Cost Growth - Mandate affordability as a requirement At Milestone A set affordability target as a Key Performance Parameter At Milestone B establish engineering trades showing how each key design feature affects the target cost - Drive productivity growth through Will Cost/Should Cost management - Eliminate redundancy within warfighter portfolios - Make production rates economical and hold them stable - Set shorter program timelines and manage to them Initiative Not Applicable to Services Acquisition; however, AFPEO/CM can continue to explore strategic sourcing opportunities across communities where synergies exist between the supported entities (i.e. CAAS IV) thereby reducing corporate AF O/H Also, encourage development of program incentives to drive improved efficiencies across entire period of performance Sept 14, 2010 Integrity - Service - Excellence Dr Carter’s Directives 2 - Incentivize Productivity & Innovation in Industry - Reward contractors for successful supply chain and indirect expense management - Increase the use of FPIF contract type where appropriate using a 50/50 share line and 120 percent ceiling as a point of departure - Adjust progress payments to incentivize performance - Extend the Navy’s Preferred Supplier Program to a DoD-wide pilot - Reinvigorate industry’s independent research and development and protect the defense technology base Initiative Not Directly Applicable to Services Acquisition; however, AFPEO/CM can encourage use of FPIF contract types where appropriate and adjust progress/milestone payments to incentivize performance (i.e. structure milestone payment commensurate with completion of successful transition utilizing defined success criteria) Sept 14, 2010 Integrity - Service - Excellence Dr Carter’s Directives 3 - Promote Real Competition - Present a competitive strategy at each program milestone - Remove obstacles to competition - Allow reasonable time to bid Require non-certified cost and pricing data on single offers Require open system architectures and set rules for acquisition of technical data rights Increase dynamic small business role in defense marketplace competition Initiative Directly Applicable to Services Acquisition; build reasonable task order proposal timelines to allow for competition Obtain data necessary to determine price fair and reasonable when a single offer is received - data does not have to be certified under certain circumstances but should be data sufficient to give PCO reasonable assurance that business deal is good Each Competition Advocate must develop plans aimed at improving competition by 2% a year and improving effective competition by 10% a year Emphasize Small Business utilization via past performance assessment criteria and in fee constructs Integrity - Service - Excellence 17 Dr Carter’s Directives 4 - Improve Tradecraft in Services Acquisition - Create a senior manager for acquisition of services in each component, following the Air Force’s example where they serve as Decision Authority for all Acquisitions greater than $250M - - Adopt uniform taxonomy for different types of services - - KBS, Electronics and Comm Services, Equipment Related Services, Medical Services, Facility Related Services, and Transportation Services Address causes of poor tradecraft in services acquisition - Done - AFPEO/CM for USAF ($100M for AF with ability to delegate greater authority) Assist users of services to define requirements and prevent creep via requirements templates Assist users of services to conduct market research to support competition and pricing Enhance competition by requiring more frequent re-compete of knowledge-based services Limit the use of time and materials and award fee contracts for services Require that services contracts exceeding $1B contain cost efficiency objectives Increase small business participation in providing services – Examples - Off-Ramp entities that fail to achieve their SB Utilization Goals - Eliminate contracts with LBs that are essentially pass through instruments to SB Integrity - Service - Excellence 18 Dr Carter’s Directives 5 - Reduce Non-Productive Processes and Bureaucracy - Reduce the number of OSD-level reviews to those necessary to support major investment decisions or to uncover and respond to significant program execution issues - Eliminate low-value-added statutory processes - Reduce by half the volume and cost of internal and congressional reports - Reduce non-value-added overhead imposed on industry - Align DCMA and DCAA processes to ensure work is complementary - Increase use of Forward Pricing Rate Recommendations to reduce administrative costs Initiative Not Specifically Applicable to Services Acquisition; however, AFPEO/CM can explore opportunities to eliminate non-value added activities and explore where we can improve our internal efficiency (i.e. utilize VTC/telecon capabilities more extensively versus travel) Integrity - Service - Excellence 19 What’s New? SERVICES ACQUISITION TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES Integrity - Service - Excellence 20 New Tools and Techniques 21 Small Business Graduate Transition On-Ramps Pricing Models vs Sample Tasks Ordering Periods vs Period of Performances Minimum Solicitation Times for Task Orders CDRL for annual CME reporting Reserve vs Companion Small Business arrangements “Page of Promises” (aka Status of Proposal Commitments) OCI Integrity - Service - Excellence Observations In general Increasing awareness of distinction between Service segments (ie., A&AS vs ADPE/Comm vs Weapon sustainment) PSC Coding accuracy is crucial (OSD’s new taxonomy) Increasing number of $98M efforts Increasing number of $100M efforts sent to outside AF Still doing everyone else’s work – Must Stop Exception: Host-tenant—use AF rules Exception: Command MOUs with Outside Orgs BUT – don’t need AF-coord/approval of requirement Integrity - Service - Excellence 22 More Observations 1 Acquisition planning Still working to get Senior leaders “all in” Take greater advantage of training opportunities Current budget challenges support discrete decision making Requirements approval required…even if NOT in PEO/CM portfolio What does your customer really need….can’t have everything ESIS – NOT an Acquisition Strategy Don’t pitch me what you want to do….it’s your opportunity to ask questions Price matters Transition planning needs work Integrity - Service - Excellence 23 More Observations 2 Contracts T&M—going down Field Still fighting for CPAF Challenged by incentive contracts Contract length 3-5 years - Primarily A&AS 5-8 years Improved performance Large/complex investment/requirement More for same or less price Post-award Technical/functional support needs improving AER – watch task orders! Integrity - Service - Excellence 24 What’s Still Important? Integrity - Service - Excellence 25 In-Sourcing and CMEs Dollars are declining, we must find more efficient approaches Must reduce AO-like KBS efforts by 10%/yr plus In-Sourcing is not dead Review each requirement to find best opportunities Use model appropriately CME counts have heavy Congressional emphasis Accountability: numbers are key to assessing in-sourcing successes and opportunities Integrity - Service - Excellence 26 Communication Quarterly e-mail to MAJCOM Service Advocates 24-month out “Warning Order” on program end dates Acquisition Sustainment Reviews with AQ and AFMC Annual Execution Reviews of Each Program Annual Services Workshop MAJCOM Teams talk regularly Developing stand alone Services Instruction Service Alerts from field to PEO/CM on issues SA PEO quick updates Health of Services Reviews signed out by SAF/AQ Peer Reviews Integrity - Service - Excellence 27 Elements of Success Right Requirements Properly defined up front Focus on needs vs desires Decision Process Seek effective competition Simple, serial source selection decision process Clear evaluation and decision criteria Consider budget realities when determining relative weight of cost/price People Involvement Engaged MAJCOM and/or functional requirements owner Leadership (GO/SES) involvement Integrity - Service - Excellence 28 Elements of Success Contract Type FFP CPFF Labor Hour Army, Navy, etc ESIS Expectations Dr Carter Memo T&M Labor Hour Traditional vs Non-Trad Acq Workforce Future 2011 Focus A&AS On-Ramps & Off-Ramps In-Sourcing & CMEs Congressional Interest Relative Weight of Evaluation Factors Contracts under $100M Long view for PEO/CM & Services Acquisition Host Tenant Integrity - Service - Excellence PEER Reviews Closing Thoughts YOU have led the DoD in improving oversight and quality of Services Acquisition Dr Carter’s Initiatives, coming budgets require more WE must be open to improving what we do and how we do it as TOGETHER WE improve Services Acquisition… Going the Last Mile! Integrity - Service - Excellence
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz