2 The Research Programme of the „Laura Bassi Centre of

“Laura Bassi Centres of Expertise”
Interim Evaluation
Project Description
Total max.60 pages
Version 1.1 – 22.11.2012
Long Titel:
Name of the Centre (max. 120 characters)
Short Titel:
Short Titel (max. 20 characters)
Head of the Centre
Name
Applicant:
Leader of Consortium
Scientific Project Partner:
Name of the Institution
Company Project Partner:
Name of the Company
Reporting Period:
from: DD.MM.YYYY
to: DD.MM.YYYY
Duration 1st Funding Period:
from: DD.MM.YYYY
to: DD.MM.YYYY
Duration 2nd Funding Period: from: DD.MM.YYYY
to: DD.MM.YYYY
Costs 1st Funding Period
(approved):
Costs 2nd Funding Period
(planned):
Total Costs [€]:
Total Funding [€]:
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
Total Costs [€]:
Total Funding [€]:
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
0.1 Checkliste Formalvoraussetzungen
Vollständigkeit der
einzureichenden Unterlagen für
die Zwischenevaluierung








Sprache
Englisch
Formatierung




Richtige Formulare verwendet
http://www.ffg.at/laura-bassi-01
Seitenanzahl CORE
DOCUMENT „Project Content“

Die Seitenanzahl von maximal 60 Seiten wurde nicht
überschritten.
Laufzeit 2. Förderungsperiode

36 Monate

mindestens 1 wissenschaftliche Partner (-organisation) und
mindestens 1 wirtschaftlicher Partner (Unternehmen)

Es liegen alle LOCs der im Monitoringteil und im Kostenplan
genannten Konsortialpartner vor.
Die in den LOCs angegebenen Beträge pro Partner stimmen
mit den Beträgen im Kostenplan überein.
Project Description (pdf)
Cost Plan (xls)
Monitoring Tables (xls)
Annex 1 References (pdf)
Annex 2 Related Funded Research Projects (pdf)
Annex 3 CVs and List of Publications (pdf)
Annex 4 Letters of Commitment Scientific Partners (pdf)
Annex 5 Letters of Commitment Company Partners (pdf)
Schriftformatierung: Arial, 11 Punkt,
Zeilenabstand: 1,3 Zeilen,
Schriftfarbe: schwarz.
Seiten wurden nummeriert
Konsortien / Partner
Mindestanforderungen an das
Konsortium
Letters of Committment (LOC)

Kosten / Förderung
Kosten


Projektkosten sind förderbar (vgl. www.ffg.at/kostenleitfaden)
Gemeinkostenzuschlag für Universitäten ist mit 20% der
Personalkosten begrenzt.



Förderquote: maximal 60%
Gesamtförderungsbeitrag: maximal 320.000,- EUR pro Jahr
Anteil wirtschaftlicher Partner (Unternehmen): mindestens
35% (kann bis maximal 50% In-kind, d.h. in Form von Sachund Personalleistungen erbracht werden, der restliche
Finanzierungsbeitrag ist in Cash zu leisten);
Anteil wissenschaftliche Partner (-organisation): mindestens
5% (kann bis zu 100% In-kind, d.h. in Form von Sach- und
Personalleistungen erbracht werden)
Förderquoten und Höhe der
Förderung

Anhänge zu den Stammdaten im eCall
Upload als .pdf-Dokument


Kopie des Firmenbuchauszuges liegt vor
Jahresabschlüsse (Bilanz, GuV) der letzten 3 Geschäftsjahre
liegen vor



Project Description (pdf)
Monitoring Tables (xls)
Annex 1 References (pdf)
eCall uploads „Datei Anhänge“
im Subordner
„Projektbeschreibung“
2/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)



Annex 2 Related Funded Research Projects (pdf)
Aufschlüsselung der Gemeinkosten (falls über 20%) mit
einem entsprechenden sachlichen Nachweis liegt vor
Eidesstaatliche Erklärungen zum KMU-Status (falls keine
Daten im Firmenkompass vorliegen, laut Vorlage)
im Subordner „Kostenplan“

Cost Plan (xls) overview and per partner
im Subordner
„CV und Publikationen“

Annex 3 CVs and List of Publications (pdf)
im Subordner
„Absichtserklärungen“


Annex 4 Letters of Commitment Scientific Partners (pdf)
Annex 5 Letters of Commitment Company Partners (pdf)
Bitte beachten Sie folgende Punkte:
o
Halten Sie sich bitte an die vorgegebenen Fragen. Die Erläuterungen zu den Fragen sind
wesentlicher Bestandteil im Begutachtungsverfahren, daher bitten wir Sie diese nicht zu löschen.
o
Die „Checkliste Formalvoraussetzung“ kann gelöscht werden.
o
Bitte beachten Sie die Übereinstimmung zwischen den Angaben in den Formularen und dem
eCall. Wenn Unterschiede auftreten, so sind die Formulare als verbindliches Dokument
anzusehen.
o
Generelle Hinweise: Ein Core Document besteht aus der Projektbeschreibung (Project
Description), dem Kostenplan (Cost Plan), dem Monitoringteil (Monitoring Tables) sowie dem
Anhang (Annex).
o
Im Anhang (Annex) sind die Lebensläufe von jenen Schlüsselpersonen beizulegen, die neu
hinzugekommen sind. Die von Ihnen im CV zur Verfügungen gestellten Informationen werden von
den GutachterInnen sowie dem Bewertungsgremium mit den folgenden Zielsetzungen analysiert
und zur Begutachtung herangezogen:
o
Erfassung unterschiedlicher Beiträge bzw. der gesamten Bandbreite der Beiträge einer
Person zur Entwicklung der Wissenschaft
o
Erfassung und Berücksichtigung der Rahmenbedingungen, unter denen bislang
wissenschaftlich gearbeitet wurde, und der Zeit, die der Person bislang für Forschung
verfügbar war
o
Erfassung der für das „Laura Bassi Centre of Expertise“ relevanten außerfachlichen
Kompetenzen
Bitte prüfen Sie, ob alle relevanten Informationen aus Ihren Darstellungen hervorgehen.
o
Die Angabe der maximalen Seitenzahl ist NICHT als Aufforderung zu verstehen, diesen
Richtwert auch erreichen zu müssen.
o
„Weniger ist mehr“ – bemühen Sie sich, Ihre Darlegungen entlang der Haupt- und Subkriterien
prägnant und präzise auf den Punkt zu bringen. Stellen Sie das Wesentliche in den Vordergrund,
(zu viele) Details könnten überfrachten und den Blick auf das Wesentliche verstellen.
o
Versetzen Sie sich aktiv in die Perspektive der Peers und des Bewertungsgremiums (Jury),
die unterschiedliche Zugänge und Hintergründe mitbringen. Bemühen Sie sich, für alle das
verständlich zu vermitteln, was für die Beurteilung wirklich relevant ist.
o
Bei einzelnen Kriterien wird sich bei der schriftlichen Darstellung eher eine übersichtliche
Aufzählung von Punkten eignen als ein langer Fließtext.
3/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
o
Zeigen Sie die Erfüllung der Kriterien und Ihre Kompetenz auf vielfache Weise – Ihre
Führungskompetenz beispielsweise können Sie durch Ihr Theoriewissen darlegen, was etwa unter
Führung zu verstehen ist, wie auch durch Ihre konkreten Hinweise, welche Prozesse, Methoden
und Führungsinstrumente Sie praktisch einsetzen.
o
Es steht Ihnen frei, Ihre Selbsteinschätzung zu fundieren und zu ergänzen, indem Sie
beispielsweise 360-Grad-Feedbacks zu Ihrer Person bzw. Ihren Leistungen als Zentrumsleiterin
einholen und prägnante Aussagen dazu in Ihrem Bericht oder in Ihrer Präsentation zitieren.
o
Nützen Sie die Zwischenevaluierung als Chance für eine umfassende Bilanzierung und Reflexion
Ihrer Stärken und Entwicklungsfelder als Zentrumsleiterin.
o
Sollten Sie Fragen haben, wenden Sie sich bitte an Ihre Ansprechperson in der FFG
(siehe
Kontaktinformationen
in
den
Allgemeinen
Informationen
oder
unter
http://www.ffg.at/content/die-laura-bassi-zentren).
Ende der Einreichfrist:
Die Dokumente für die Zwischenevaluierung müssen spätestens
am 1. Februar 2013 bis 12:00 Uhr via eCall eingelangt sein.
4/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
Table of Contents
0.1 Checkliste Formalvoraussetzungen .................................................................. 2
Short Summary........................................................................................................... 6
1 Requirements and Recommendations ................................................................ 7
2 The Research Programme of the „Laura Bassi Centre of Expertise“ .................. 7
2.1
Description of the state-of-the-art .................................................................. 7
2.1.1 Orientation to the international state-of-the-art ....................................... 7
2.1.2 Innovative content and methods ............................................................. 7
2.1.3 Inter- and transdisciplinary orientation .................................................... 7
2.2
Objectives of the research programme ......................................................... 8
2.2.1 Definition of clear-cut objectives of the research programme ................. 8
2.2.2 Excellence research results with economic implication ........................... 8
2.2.3 Composition of the consortium and research team ................................. 8
2.2.4 Indicators ................................................................................................ 9
2.3
Exploitation of research results ..................................................................... 9
2.3.1 Relevance and benefits for science ........................................................ 9
2.3.2 Relevance and benefits for industry ........................................................ 9
2.3.3 Sustainability ......................................................................................... 10
2.3.4 Added value .......................................................................................... 10
2.4
Overview and description of the work packages ......................................... 11
2.4.1 First funding period (year 1 to 4) ........................................................... 11
2.4.2 Second funding period (Year 5 to 7) ..................................................... 13
2.4.3 Detailed description of the work packages (year 5 to 7) ....................... 15
3 Future Potential Analysis ................................................................................... 16
3.1
Centre management ................................................................................... 16
3.1.1 Management at the organisational level ............................................... 16
3.1.2 Description and implementation of the costs and funding structure ...... 16
3.1.3 Effective and efficient project management .......................................... 16
3.2
Leadership and career ................................................................................ 17
3.2.1 Management at staff and team level ..................................................... 17
3.2.2 Staff member and team development ................................................... 17
3.2.3 Measures promoting equal opportunities .............................................. 18
3.2.4 Adequate proportion of female researchers in the field of research ...... 18
3.3
Management of project environment ........................................................... 18
3.3.1 Managing the interests of relevant project environments ...................... 18
3.3.2 Management of cooperation ................................................................. 18
3.3.3 Self presentation / marketing ................................................................ 18
3.4
Future orientation ........................................................................................ 19
3.4.1 Strategy development ........................................................................... 19
3.4.2 Knowledge management ...................................................................... 19
4 Explanations of the budget ................................................................................ 19
Annex ................................................................................................................ 20
5/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
Short Summary
The short summary (max. 1 page) should include the following points:
 description of the problematic being dealt with and the initial situation
 description of the objectives envisaged and the methods chosen to attain them
 description of the desired results and findings

> Text <

> Text <

> Text <
6/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
1 Requirements and Recommendations
What requirements and recommendations did the jury give for your "Laura Bassi Centre of
Expertise"? To what extent have these been fulfilled?
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
2 The Research Programme of the „Laura Bassi Centre of
Expertise“
2.1 Description of the state-of-the-art
2.1.1 Orientation to the international state-of-the-art
If you are taking into consideration the international state-of-the-art in research to what extent
have you succeeded to meet this standard?
Current status (1st funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
2.1.2 Innovative content and methods
Where do you see the three or four most important indicators for a modern, new research
culture? To what extent have you managed to pursue and implement the latter?
Current status (1st funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
2.1.3 Inter- and transdisciplinary orientation
How do you ensure an orientation that is both inter and transdisciplinary in your research
programme? What challenges do you seeing facing you in this respect? How are you cope
with the latter?
7/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
Current status (1st funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
2.2 Objectives of the research programme
2.2.1 Definition of clear-cut objectives of the research programme
Assuming that your research programme is concluded successfully what concrete results
exist? What goals have you in fact thereby reached? In what way did you manage to
formulate well / not so well the goals of your research programme according to "SMART"
criteria (Specific, Measurable, Advanced, Realistic, Timely)?
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
2.2.2 Excellence research results with economic implication
How do you assess your research results? Which results are in your opinion excellent?
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
2.2.3 Composition of the consortium and research team
An important success factor for your research programme is the establishment of a
consortium which is competent in both research and management. Which scientific and
industrial partners and partner organisations make up the consortium? Were there any
changes made to the composition of the consortium or are any changes planned? If yes,
why? In your opinion to what extent does this consortium cope with the challenges of the
research programme? How does the consortium contribute and what synergies are created?
Current status (1st funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
8/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
2.2.4 Indicators
How do you assess the development of the indicators you specified? Are there any
deviations? If yes, why? Do you consider the targets you have defined for the second funding
period to be appropriate and realistic given the climate and field of the research? (please
refer to sheet "indicators" in the “Monitoring Tables”)
Current status (1st funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
2.3 Exploitation of research results
2.3.1 Relevance and benefits for science
Where do you see the relevance and use of your research results for science? In what way
does science benefit from your research results? What are the aspects of progress or
showing innovative findings?
Current status (1st funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
2.3.2 Relevance and benefits for industry
Where do you see the relevance and use of your research results for industry? In what way
does industry benefit from your research results? Which industrial sectors or branches could
profit from your research results and how?
Current status (1st funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
9/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
2.3.3 Sustainability
In what way do you follow up on the mid and long-term sustainability of your research work?
Where do you see this sustainability and to what extent do you see it as already attained or
guaranteed?
Current status (1st funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
2.3.4 Added value
Where do you see the added value of your research programme as opposed to a cluster of
individual projects?
Current status (1st funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
10/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
2.4 Overview and description of the work packages
2.4.1 First funding period (year 1 to 4)
WP
No.
Title of work package
Duration
in
months
Start
MM/YY
Planned
end
MM/YY
Results attained / planned
1
2
3
4
n
Milestone
No.
1
2
3
4
n
Title of milestone
Work packages involved
Date
Milestones reached / planned
11/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
2.4.1.1 Work and time plan (Gantt chart) - (Year 1 to 4)
Please add here a detailed graphic illustration of your work and time schedule! Please make sure that your work and time schedule is legible!
Work plan of planned (approved) & actual status of the research packets including milestones. Please highlight the most significant milestones
(M1, M2, etc.) of the research projects
Q1
Year 1
Q2 Q3
Q4
Q1
Year 2
Q2 Q3
Q4
Q1
Year 3
Q2 Q3
Q4
Q1
Year 4
Q2 Q3
Q4
Work Package 1 NN (as approved)
Work Package 1 NN (actual status)
Work Package 2 NN (as approved)
Work Package 2 NN (actual status)
Work Package 3 NN (as approved)
Work Package 3 NN (actual status)
Work Package 4 NN (as approved)
Work Package 4 NN (actual status)
Work Package 5 NN (as approved)
Work Package 5 NN (actual status)
Work Package 6 NN (as approved)
Work Package 6 NN (actual status)
Work Package 7 NN (as approved)
Work Package 7 NN (actual status)
Work Package 8 NN (as approved)
Work Package 8 NN (actual status)
Work Package 9 NN (as approved)
Work Package 9 NN (actual status)
12/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
2.4.2 Second funding period (Year 5 to 7)
WP
No.
Title of work package
Duration
in
months
Start
MM/YY
End
MM/YY
Results planned
1
2
3
4
n
Milestone
No.
1
2
3
4
n
Title of milestone
Workpackages involved
Estimated date
Milestone reached when:
13/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
2.4.2.1 Work and time plan (Gantt chart) - (Year 5 to 7)
Please add here a detailed graphic illustration of your work and time schedule! Please make sure that your work and time schedule is legible!
Work plan of planned (approved) & actual status of the research projects including milestones. Please highlight the most significant milestones
(M1, M2, etc.) of the research projects
Q1
Year 5
Q2 Q3
Q4
Q1
Year 6
Q2 Q3
Q4
Q1
Year 7
Q2 Q3
Q4
Work Package 1 NN (planned)
Work Package 2 NN (planned)
Work Package 3 NN (planned)
Work Package 4 NN (planned)
Work Package 5 NN (planned)
Work Package 6 NN (planned)
Work Package 7 NN (planned)
Work Package n NN (planned)
14/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
2.4.3 Detailed description of the work packages (year 5 to 7)
Give a description of the content of the individual work packages, their expected outcomes
over a specific period of time and the milestones. The tools and individual work steps should
be clearly and consistently defined and described (app. 1 page per work package).
Please duplicate this table for each work package (WP)
Description of work packages
WP No.
Title of WP:
Start:
MM/YYYY
End:
MM/YYYY
Total cost of the WP [EUR]:
Organisations involved and number of person months per organisation:
Goals:
Description of contents:
Methods:
Milestones, results and deliverables:
15/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
3 Future Potential Analysis
3.1 Centre management
3.1.1 Management at the organisational level
Together with the quality of your research programme the quality of your management is of
high importance. Management and leadership activities have an effect on the levels of
organisation, the team and of the individual employees. Where do you see your most
important tasks of the centre management or the leadership of the organisation? Which
structural organisation, which processes and functions form the architecture of your centre?
Which ones have proved themselves in your opinion and which ones need to be adapted or
improved?
Current status (1st funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
3.1.2 Description and implementation of the costs and funding structure
How is your centre financially structured? Which are the main reference figures that you use
to measure the economic success of your centre? To what extent have you achieved these
figures including the budget allotted to you and the costs to be met?
Current status (1st funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
3.1.3 Effective and efficient project management
Effective and efficient project management is without doubt another important pillar of the
centre management. To what extent and how have you managed to define clear SMART
project goals? What approach or methods are you using for project planning including
milestone and resource planning? How do you guarantee the monitoring of the project? To
what extent are your projects running according to plan?
Current status (1st funding period):
16/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
3.2 Leadership and career
3.2.1 Management at staff and team level
What do you understand by leadership, especially of your staff? Where do you see the most
important tasks in the leadership of staff members? Which management tools do you use?
What do you think your staff consider good about your management? With regard to your
management work what do you think your staff members appreciate or appreciate less?
Where do you see your most important role as team leader? How do you manage your
team? What task sharing exists and what rules are there? What meeting and communication
structures have you established and maintained? What conflicts arise within your team and
how do you deal with them?
Current status (1st funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
3.2.2 Staff member and team development
How do you guarantee a targeted career development of your staff? What career goals do
the members of staff in your team follow? In what way do you actively support your members
of staff in achieving their particular career goals?
How do you guarantee the development of your team and its competence? What routines for
learning and reflection exist at team level? How do you ensure knowledge transfer within the
team? Do you employ team coaching?
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
17/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
3.2.3 Measures promoting equal opportunities
What measures have you applied to encourage equal opportunities between men and
women in your team and generally in the field of research?
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
3.2.4 Adequate proportion of female researchers in the field of research
How many female researchers do you employ in your team? Given your field of research to
what extent do you consider this proportion to be adequate or having potential for
development?
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
3.3 Management of project environment
3.3.1 Managing the interests of relevant project environments
What are your four to six most important project stakeholders? Where do you see their
expectations and interests? Which contradictory interests and thereby points of contention do
you have to deal with? How well do you cope with this challenging management of
expectations?
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
3.3.2 Management of cooperation
Who are your most important cooperation partners? Where are the successes in working
together with these (select) cooperation partners? What are you satisfied with? What does
not work so well? What is hard? What approaches do you use to strengthen your cooperative
partnerships?
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
3.3.3 Self presentation / marketing
What do you see as your personal distinguishing features and characteristics in your
appearance and performance as centre manager? What do you consider important to get
across when presenting yourself? What would you like to stand for and what not? In which
situations do you experience yourself as confident and sensitive to context? Which situations
cause you rather to feel uncomfortable or under pressure? In this respect what aspects of
your self presentation and marketing would like to pursue further and what would you like to
improve?
18/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
3.4 Future orientation
3.4.1 Strategy development
Vision and strategy development involves the creation of blue prints for the future which
answer at least three fundamental questions: What is our purpose? (mission, corporate
objective). In which direction do we wish to develop? (vision). How do we want to get there?
(strategy).
What answers have you come up with so far to these fundamental questions with respect to
your centre and research projects? What measures do you use to guarantee continual vision
and strategy work as well as a focus that is forward-looking for your centre?
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
3.4.2 Knowledge management
Knowledge is becoming increasingly important as a resource. Which approaches and
instruments do you adopt in order to ensure purposeful knowledge development and transfer
within your team and between your centre and your scientific and industrial partners?
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
4 Explanations of the budget
Current status (1st funding period):
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
Plan for the years 5 to 7 (2nd funding period):
Comment on the posts included in the budget: personnel costs, R&D infrastructure, user and
material costs, subcontracting costs (costs for third party services) - volume, travel costs amongst others, the purposes of the travel. Explain the relevance of the costs planned for the
project.
> Text <
> Text <
> Text <
19/20
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)
Annex
The following documents should be appended as annexes to this form:


Annex 1 References (pdf)
Annex 2 Related Funded Research Projects (pdf)
All other annexes should be uploaded into the appropriate folder in the eCall (see check list).



Annex 3 CVs and List of Publications (pdf) (for new key scientific persons only)
Annex 4 Letters of Commitment Scientific Partners (pdf)
Annex 5 Letters of Commitment Company Partners (pdf)
Abwicklungsstelle
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG)