The bound-electron g factor in light ions Vladimir A. Yerokhin Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University Precision Physics and Fundamental Physical Constants FFK-2017, May 19, Warsaw Outline Free-electron g factor. Bound-electron g factor: H-like ions. Bound-electron g factor: Li-like ions. Electron mass and fine-structure constant determinations. g factor of free electron: Classical picture What is g factor ? Classical electrodynamics: g factor = 1 Relativistic quantum mechanics: g factor = 2 g factor of free electron: Quantum electrodynamics g factor of free electron: Quantum electrodynamics g factor of free electron: Quantum electrodynamics What do we learn from free-electron g factor? Best prediction of the (free-field) Quantum Electrodynamics Best determination of the fine-structure constant Bound-electron g factor Experiments: Experimental result for 12C5+: ωL/ωc = 4376.210 500 89 (11)(7) [Sturm et al. Nature 506, 467 (2014)] What can we learn from bound-electron g factor? Tests of bound-state Quantum Electrodynamics Advantages: high experimental accuracy, weak nuclear effects, different Z and charge states Electron mass Fine-structure constant Nuclear magnetic moments, nuclear masses, nuclear radii g factor of H-like ions: theory Relativistic Free QED Effects Bound QED Nuclear Nuclear recoil Nuclear size Nuclear polarization & deformation Leading orders Dirac g factor: n 0 Free QED, α (Zα) : Bound QED, Zα expansion n 2 Bound QED, α (Zα) : [H. Grotch 1970, R.N. Faustov 1970, F.E. Close and H. Osborn 1971,…] 4 Bound QED, 1-loop, α (Zα) : 2 4 Bound QED, 2-loop, α (Zα) : [K. Pachucki, A. Czarnecki, U.D. Jentschura, VAY, 2005] [K. Pachucki, A. Czarnecki, U.D. Jentschura, VAY, 2005] [Czarnecki and Szafron, PRA, 2016] Bound QED, all orders in Zα Electron Self-energy Vacuum-polarization Electric-loop [Beier et al. PRA 2000] Magnetic-loop [Karshenboim & Milstein 2002, Lee et al, 2005] Two-loop QED 2-loop QED corrections, all orders in Zα: only partial results up to now VAY and Z. Harman PRA 2013 work in progress … The main theoretical uncertainty of the g factor ! So far, an “experimental” determination of two-loop QED effects Nuclear effects Nuclear recoil to leading order in Zα [Grotch, PRA 1970, Faustov, PLB 1970] to all orders in Zα [Shabaev, PRA 2001; Shabaev and VAY PRL 2002] [Faustov 1970, Grotch and Hegstrom 1971, Close and Osborn 1971, and others] Finite nuclear size [VAY et al. JPB 2003; PRA 2016] Nuclear polarization and deformation [Nefiodov et al. PLB 2003, Volotka and Plunien PRL 2014, Zatorski et al. PRL 2012] g factor of H-like carbon: present status Theoretical estimate Derived from experiment on Si13+ [J. Zatorsky et al. 2017] Determination of the electron mass Bound-electron g factor: me = 0.000 548 579 909 067 (14)(9)(2) (stat)(sys)(theory) Independent determination (free electron versus C6+): me = 0.000 548 579 911 1 (12) [Farnheim et al. PRL 75, 3598 (1995)] g factor of Li-like ions Parameters: Methods Z α expansion, 1/Z expansion, all orders in 1/Z all orders in Zα g factor of Li-like ions Parameters: Unified theory 1/Z expansion, all orders in Zα [Volotka et al. PRL 2014; Glazov et al. PRA 2010, PRA 2004; Shabaev et al. PRA 2002] g (H-like) 1-photon exchange g (Li-like) Electronelectron interaction 2-photon exchange (>=3)-photon exchange QED + 1-photon exchange QED + Electronelectron interaction QED +(>=2)photon exchange Zα expansion, all orders in 1/Z Nonrelativistic Quantum Electrodynamics (NRQED) expansion: Effective Hamiltonian, describing the interaction of an atom with the external magnetic field to orders α2, α3, and m/M [Hegstrom 73]: Numerical calculations: [Yan PRL 2001; JPB 2002] [VAY, Pachucki, Puchalski et al., arXiv:submit/1889331] Unified theory [VAY, Pachucki, Puchalski et al., arXiv:submit/1889331] Electron correlation: 1/Z expansion Zα expansion NRQED, O(α2) Binding effects in g factor Li-like silicon, current status Binding effects in g factor Li-like silicon, current status g-factor of Li-like calcium. Isotope shift Theory: only one effect (nuclear recoil) contributes ! Nonrelativistic nuclear recoil vanishes (for s states) ! Test of relativistic theory of the nuclear recoil effect. What’s next: Fine-structure constant ? If we get α from the free-electron, why not from the bound-electron? Problems: theory is much more complicated nuclear effects Advantages: we can vary Z and the charge state Fine-structure constant from bound-electron g factor Possible ways to go: H-like ions, Z as small as possible (He+) Li-like + H-like ions, small Z [Yerokhin et al. PRL 116, 100801 (2016)] B-like + H-like ions, large Z [Shabaev et al. PRL 96, 253002 (2006)] Weighted difference of H-like and Li-like ions, Low Z. [Yerokhin et al. PRL 116, 100801 (2016)] Li-like ion Difference Nuclear effects are suppressed by three orders of magnitude. They do not create problems for α determination. Nuclear effects are not a problem ! Outlook: Determination of nuclear magnetic moments g factor of an ion with a spin-nonzero nucleus (I – nuclear spin, J – electron angular momentum, F – electron + nucleus angular momentum): All corrections can be parameterized in terms of the shielding constant σ: Shielding in H-like ions is calculated up to a very high accuracy. [Yerokhin et al. PRL 2011] Conclusion Bound-electron g factor: high-precision measurements and accurate calculations. Tests of bound-state QED Determination of the electron mass In future: access to the fine-structure constant, nuclear magnetic moments, nuclear masses, nuclear charge radii Conclusion Bound-electron g factor: high-precision measurements and accurate calculations. Tests of bound-state QED Determination of the electron mass In future: access to the fine-structure constant, nuclear magnetic moments, nuclear masses, nuclear charge radii THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! Additional Bound-electron g factor: high-precision measurements and accurate calculations. Tests of bound-state QED Determination of the electron mass Access to the fine-structure constant, nuclear magnetic moments, nuclear masses, nuclear charge radii
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz