Peer-Review Mechanism
for the Improvement of
Water Framework Directive Implementation
Findings at Data Management Workshop – October
2016 at WG DIS 18th October
Niklas Holmgren
1
RBDistricts candidates for
a PR mission
16 Expressions of
Interest from 11 MS
2
Geographic
distribution of
reviewing
experts
• 70 candidate
reviewing
experts from 15
MS
3
Thematic workshops
Ground water, 8-9th September,
Kalmar Sweden
Data Management, 5-6th October, Nice
France
Programme of Measures, 18-19th
October Lourdes
Conclusions
Different structures information
systems
Finland
Sweden
…
Germany
France
…
Reporting
Driving force for database
improvements in many MS
Keep stabile
Vizualising tools for the outcomes –
graphs and statistics as test and
incitement available.
Reference data sets
INSPIRE not enough
National Data Dictionaries are being built and
National Reference data are increasing. Looking for
mutualisation of efforts could help for better
compatability
Proposal – make a lessons learned on the reporting in
2017 to make sure that problems encountered can be
handled early in the coming cycle and be
implemented on national level.
National categories of measures – harmonize KTM
índicators and intercalibrate on EU level.
Open data needed for
Understanding
Decision
Actions
Need to balance against growing insecurity, find and
limit the sensitive areas.
User-friendly on the web, consider Wikipedia
WFD reporting is not for EC, it
is for managing our common
resource - water