Ossie Jones Allan Macpherson Brahim Herbane Resources and Small Firms Resource-based view (RBV) of the firm Dominant explanation for competitive advantage Valuable, rare, imperfectly inimitable and non- substitutable (VRIN) Salient resources for entrepreneurial ventures Tangible - Financial, Physical, Technology etc Intangible – Knowledge, relationship, Know how/who In SMEs – suffer significant resource constraints. Resources necessary to deal with crisis not readily available Challenge – When faced with Crisis and uncertainty how do SMEs manage the challenges they face? Dynamic Capabilities in SMEs RBV considered to static to account for coping in dynamic situations DC proposes the ability to envisage and enact new configurations of resources – respond to environment. Challenge for SMEs Limited internal resources (tangible and intangible) Informal organizational routines and processes Dynamic capabilities research in small firms Newbert (2005): gestation activities – prepare business plan, develop model, obtain financial support, hire employees etc Wu (2007): resource integration & reconfiguration, learning and response to environmental change McKelvie and Davidsson (2009): idea generation, market disruptiveness, new product development (NPD) & new process development DC and Learning Learning fundamental to reconfiguration Learning processes, integrate and allow creative use of resources (Easterby-Smith and Prieto, 2008) Learning is a DC (Bowman and Ambrosini, 2003) Four key learning modes supporting DC (Zahra et al, 2006) Improvisation Trial and error Experimentation Imitation Improvisation & Bricolage Display creativity in working with limited resources Demonstrate originality – even when working with limited resources Able to combine resources to produce novel outcomes (new products/services) Able to find new ways of using existing methods or equipment Take risks in undertaking new projects ‘Worthless’ discarded resources can become valuable when combined with existing knowledge & skills. Learning in and from Crisis In SMEs Crisis is critical precursor to learning Discontinuous, punctuated experiences are fundamental to learning trajectories (Cope, 2005) Need to understand how crises are translated into action Critical learning events focus entrepreneur on future not past (Herbane, 2010) Entrepreneurial learning largely focused on individual experience Growing recognition of need to focus on entrepreneur in context Learning has to be shared/embedded if it is to be useful long-term (Jones et al, 2010) Entrepreneurial learning environment Task characteristics, internal communication and external interaction Formal internal communication Informal internal communication External communication: buyers, customers, suppliers and other experts Method and Data Data from 23 SMES (part of a larger set of 90 firms) Interviews focused on coping with critical incidents Used AT to focus interview questions. Interrogate how changes enacted and new routines or artefacts seen as evidence of learning Coded using Nvivo – three main activities Combination of template and inductive coding Expanding the solution space Engage in three main practices/sources to expand the solution space: Engaging with actors in close proximity: Learning from others, Staff, friends and family Identifying partner salience: Deploying complimentary skills, developing partnerships, searching for experience Developing downstream relationships Grafting solutions, bonding Solution source Example* Learning from other’s mistakes/failures Failure of neighbouring business provided a new service expansion opportunity rather than into the property (AFCO). Supplier failures forced switching that then allowed firm to “get new ranges in and explore different ideas” (BACO). Staff Observations and photos made by staff allow the company to operate newly purchased equipment that is a gateway technology for new product development to be realised (ANCO). Friend/family skills and guidance Recognition that employees have deep knowledge about production and machinery that owners do not possess (ASCO). Engineering background of owner’s father helped procedural improvement following failed audit for an aerospace contract (BECO). Cousin provides manufactured goods to begin new sales venture (AACO) Friendship and close relationships are considered to be more important than professional links and comprehensive business, market and process knowledge (PMCO). Father plays an “organisational [rather than operational] role” in the business, resulting in better capacity planning and scheduling. The son has improved procurement and costing (something that the father was less willing/able to undertake) (TGCO). Wife ‘keeps the books’ but the technical accounting activities are carried out by a trained accountant that was brought in to replace a lady who was “trusted” and who left on maternity leave, at which point the disorganised financed were discovered (RACO). Partner’s friend writes stock control software (AFCO). Respondent indicates that he wouldn’t recruit someone he knows socially or personally because “you put too much trust in the relationship” (MVCO). Solution source Example Complementary skills Owner finds a new partner to share burden of financial planning and procurement (was planning to sell the business) (AOCO). Respondent refers to a partner’s strength that prevents the firm over-committing working capital to stock (EVCO). Enhanced Respondent refers to his partners in terms of the close support partnership – beyond that they provide, the “very, very close bond” that is essential for co-ownership future development. Associated personal maturity with formalisation of business processes and professionalization (BTCO) Several board members had known each other prior to formation of the business, and “the longer we work together, the more we trust each other” (WLCO). Experience An uninvolved partner had resulted in an expensive buy out (WECO). Sought a partner with experience, a pragmatic view and foresight (AFCO). Solution source Grafting solutions Example Personal relationships considered important in business turnaround plus joint problem solving with client (ATCO). Customer helped in the process of change (talking to staff at a change meeting) (BECO). Following the loss of a major customer at a previous company, the owner showed marketing plans and samples to trusted customers (DPCO). Value of network in problem resolution. A problem with a product led to the invention of a new product via the local Chamber of Commerce, market research company, marketing company and then an engineer at a local university (MVCO). Client recognises that the firm’s problem resides with upstream payments and offers to work together to improve the situation. Respondent adopted this problem solving approach as his modus operandi (FPCO). Bonding Respondent’s honesty in acknowledging an error enhanced the relationship with the client relationships (EOCO). Respondent recounts the development of mutual trust with a supplier in the far east. The relationship means that errors are not perceived to be problematic nor opportunist (FPCO). Financial difficulties “stops you being as trusting” in order to prevent exposure of the firm to creditors (FGCO). Despite having a problem with staff managing a client group, the respondent would be no less trusting, but would supervise the situation more closely (RMCO). Respondent would not have a commercial relationship on the basis of friendship alone, Summary: Learning to Cope Crisis creates a context where entrepreneurs need to manage uncertainty and ambiguity. DC in SMEs: Large firm Dynamic Capability literature presupposes existing resource capacity In SMEs, the capacity building (accretion) necessary to reconfigure the resource base of small firm is fundamental. So accretion enlarging 'the solution space' is a precursor or antecedent to DC in small firms Identified three ‘purposeful activities’ to expand Solution Space Exploratory understanding of DC in SMEs and learning to cope.
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz