Sharing Content Made Possible Colin Milligan funded by © RELOAD 2004, funded by Aims of project (i) • To facilitate the creation, sharing and reuse of learning objects and services: – tools for the basic specs: MD and CP – generic ‘engine’ architecture, © RELOAD 2004, funded by Interoperability and RELOAD orig. src: Charles Duncan, Intrallect © RELOAD 2004, funded by Why we need standards Standards Promote: • Persistence – Remember laser disc based materials, • Discovery – Beyond your local community • Sharing between different systems – For economy and efficiency. • Flexibility – Internationalization and Accessibility. © RELOAD 2004, funded by Who makes standards. review and feedback User Needs New Technology Research IMS Working Groups ADL SCORM IEEE (conformance) (certification) CEN/ISSS specification implementation standard ISO © RELOAD 2004, funded by What do they cover? • Metadata • Enterprise • Content Packaging • Accessibility • Simple Sequencing • Learning Design • Learner Information Profile • Question and Test Interoperability • Competency (and Portfolios) • Digital Repositories • (Interactive Content) © RELOAD 2004, funded by Example: Content Package imsmanifest.xml Header Metadata Content Organisation Resources © RELOAD 2004, funded by imsmanifest.xml (how to interpret this package) <manifest xmlns="http://www.imsglobal.org/xsd/imscp_v1p1“ xmlns:imsmd="http://www.imsglobal.org/xsd/imsmd_v1p2" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" identifier="MANIFEST-65A1BA8F-3A73-479E-0F63163FFDA5B0E1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.imsglobal.org/xsd/imscp_v1p1 imscp_v1p1.xsd http://www.imsglobal.org/xsd/imsmd_v1p2 imsmd_v1p2p2.xsd"> <metadata /> <organizations default="ORG-9CD8FA62-FF8C-B998-55CA-C1599862AEA6"> <organization identifier="ORG-9CD8FA62-FF8C-B998-55CA-C1599862AEA6" structure="hierarchical"> <title>Organization</title> <item identifier="ITEM-CD55CF07-609F-A592-E0B9-8EC68A32942F" isvisible="true" identifierref="RES5669B8B0-85B5-01D8-0A33-3284AE5A6218"> <title>sundialjelsim</title> </item> </organization> </organizations> <resources> <resource identifier="RES-5669B8B0-85B5-01D8-0A33-3284AE5A6218" type="webcontent" href="sundialjelsim.html"> <file href="images/jspowered.gif" /> <file href="images/solarGeom/sun.gif" /> <file href="jscore.jar" /> <file href="progress.jar" /> <file href="SolarGeom.jar" /> <file href="sundialjelsim.jsm" /> <file href="sundialjelsim.html" /> </resource> © RELOAD 2004, funded by </resources> </manifest> (metadata) (how the content is organised) (what resources are needed) Why do we need tools? • Avoid working directly with XML (files get much more complicated than the one in our example), • speed up xml creation, • reduce errors. • aid uptake and conformance. © RELOAD 2004, funded by In Practice … i R i CREATE CONTENT PACKAGE, TEST & MANIPULATE [EDITOR] i i i i STORE [REPOSITORY] i R CHECK [PLAYER] DELIVER [MLE] © RELOAD 2004, funded by Metadata • Describes resources: – – – – – – – – – General (title and keywords) Lifecycle (versioning) Metametadata (who wrote the record) Technical (assisting implementation) Educational (level) Rights (copyright and other restrictions) Relation (to other content) Annotation (usage metadata) Classification (in a system) © RELOAD 2004, funded by Why metadata is important • Discovering Resources – Description, educational MD • Using Resources – Version control, technical • Enforcing Rights • Attributing Ownership/Authorship © RELOAD 2004, funded by Application Profiles • Metadata must be interoperable – ~80 elements in LOM – Decide on important elements at a local (organisational) level – Use shared vocabulary/taxonomy • Kinetics, motion, physics … – Implement Rules and restrictions © RELOAD 2004, funded by Good Metadata • Added by Information Professionals • Consistent across a repository • Assists Reuse – Usage metadata – recommendation systems like Amazon: © RELOAD 2004, funded by Content Package & Metadata Editor • • • • • V2.0.2 Available now – www.reload.ac.uk Free and Open Source IMS CP 1.1.3 IMS Metadata 1.2 SCORM 1.2 © RELOAD 2004, funded by Reload as Benchmark • Practical interoperability • MLEs compared • Tips and Tricks • Idiosyncrasies • Problems • Contribute? © RELOAD 2004, funded by What Next: Learning Design • Beyond content, • Activities, Services and Roles on top of content, • Complex, • LD Editor: – To create IMS LDs. • LD Player: – To visualise them. © RELOAD 2004, funded by Aims of Reload LD • The first and reference implementation of an editor, • Adheres rigidly to the LD specification, • Use a proven architecture, • Allow us to ask questions of the LD spec. © RELOAD 2004, funded by Learning Design • EML (from OUNL) Abstract Description, • Interactions & Information, • Play as metaphor. • People in specific groups and roles engage in activities using an environment with appropriate resources and services. © RELOAD 2004, funded by LD Workflow (Rob Koper) • Specify course: learning objectives, prerequisites etc., • Specify roles, • Specify activities (learning and support), • Specify resources and environments, • Make dummy files, • Join files and roles together by describing their relationship in XML. © RELOAD 2004, funded by Reload LD Editor • No more writing XML • Instead, a form filling exercise, • A complex one, because LD is complex, © RELOAD 2004, funded by The Player • Like the SCORM Player, • No command Line Interface, • Next version will have tabs for each role. © RELOAD 2004, funded by Problems with Reload • (necessarily) complex UI, • No internal preview of resources, • No internal editing. © RELOAD 2004, funded by Straker: Reload / Eclipse • • • • • • • • Eclipse = speedy: no more Swing clunk. Simpler user interface Embedded browser to view content Project manager view to organise your Learning Designs Resource manager view to organise your favourite files and web links View and Edit files in the Editor Wizards to import and export as IMS UoLs Streamlined Eclipse Help system © RELOAD 2004, funded by General Screenshot © RELOAD 2004, funded by Editing a File © RELOAD 2004, funded by Timetable • Editor: Dec 2004 Player: Mar 2005 • Reload-Eclipse: April 2005 – Level A, – Integration with Player, – Level B and Level C to follow. • End of funding: July 2005 © RELOAD 2004, funded by Where we are? • Proof of Concept • The delivery systems are immature, • These are not tools for teachers, • We can now at least ask questions of the Learning Design specification and improve it or extend it. © RELOAD 2004, funded by Contact Colin Milligan [email protected] http://www.reload.ac.uk/pres/newcastle040305.zip © RELOAD 2004, funded by
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz